Colin Powell’s reply to what he called a “cheap shot” in former Vice President Dick Cheney’s new book, “In My Time,” is little but an example of “dishonesty” that is “quite stunning,” as far as Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post is concerned.
Powell was upset over the way Cheney described the supposed leak of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative. The former Sec. of State said that the former VP delivered a “cheap shot” to say that the outing of Plame was Powell’s fault and the fault of his underling at the State Dept., Richard Armitage.
Then Powell goes on to offer his own version of the incident. Sadly, what he proffered is filled with inaccuracies. Truthfully, there is no other way to characterize Colin Powell’s version of the Valerie Plame affair but as an outright lie.
Jennifer Rubin does a good job of laying out the actual facts of the case, not the cockeyed version that Powell is trying to sell at this late date.
Powell says that he and Armitage told the Dept. of Justice right away that it was he, Armitage, that was the source for the damaging Bob Novak column that revealed that Valerie Plame was once a CIA operative.
The facts, however, prove Powell to be lying. Rubin notes that Michael Isikoff had a good account of what really happened.
The next day, a team of FBI agents and Justice prosecutors investigating the leak questioned the deputy secretary. Armitage acknowledged that he had passed along to Novak information contained in a classified State Department memo: that [ Joe] Wilson’s wife worked on weapons-of-mass-destruction issues at the CIA… [William Howard Taft IV, the State Department’s legal adviser] felt obligated to inform White House counsel Alberto Gonzales. But Powell and his aides feared the White House would then leak that Armitage had been Novak’s source — possibly to embarrass State Department officials who had been unenthusiastic about Bush’s Iraq policy. So Taft told Gonzales the bare minimum: that the State Department had passed some information about the case to Justice. He didn’t mention Armitage. Taft asked if Gonzales wanted to know the details. The president’s lawyer, playing the case by the book, said no, and Taft told him nothing more. Armitage’s role thus remained that rarest of Washington phenomena: a hot secret that never leaked.
Rubin points out the real facts of Powell and Armitage’s complicity…
Recall how all of this played out. Armitage and Powell allowed the entire country and troops in the field to believe a lie, namely that the White House had “outed” Plame. This, aside from the galling display of moral cowardice, also put the president’s reelection in jeopardy since Democrats were all too intent on making this into a huge scandal.
Yet here we now have Colin Powell, at this late date, lying about the part he and his underling at the State Dept. played in this idiotic incident.
It is pretty disgusting, really. What we have here is Colin Powell continuing to cover for Armitiage, a man who SHOULD have been in Scooter Libby’s shoes during that mess. Libby was 100% innocent and Powell and Armitage sat silent as he was prosecuted for Powell and Armitage’s crimes.
Colin Powell lost every ounce of my respect with this, I have to say.









August 29th, 2011 at 1:55 pm
Once again more evidence as to what a pinhead Colin Powell is. I always get a chuckle watching “Mars Attacks” when the Powell-like character gets vaporized.
Had Powell given Schwarzkopf the addition day or two he needed to finish off Iraq’s Republican Guard, history would be totally different. Saddam would have been toppled from power in 1991 and the world might be a more peaceful place.
August 29th, 2011 at 3:28 pm
yup
August 29th, 2011 at 3:29 pm
Powell is as full of sht as the sound of his name suggests.
August 29th, 2011 at 4:06 pm
So after all that has transpired, Cheney is the “beacon of light” and everyone else is misguided?
Now that I have seen the support of Cheney, Rupert Murdoch (a foreigner who is only in it for the money, but elicited unbelievable support) and the unfathomable backing of a Michelle Bachmann, I can only say I am consumed with fear.
This is more like people that follow a religion, no matter what, and bears no resemblance to actual analytical reasoning.
Are people here on “blind faith” and conforming to a narrow dogma or is each situation judged independently?
Just curious. The Murdoch thing is what seemed so illuminating. His company did some things that were very wrong, but everyone supported him like an “American” hero, which he is not.
August 29th, 2011 at 4:18 pm
Who said anything about Cheney being a “beacon of light”? In fact, in what I wrote I don’t refer to ANYTHING that Cheney said of the Plame affair. I used proof from others to show that Powell is a liar.
You are just so filled with hate for Cheney that you can’t even comprehend English or follow a story.
Please come bak when you can understand logic.
August 29th, 2011 at 4:34 pm
By the way, Colin Powell was a “military man,” unlike both Bush and Cheney who somehow avoided “actual” confrontations.
The fact they he has been thrown under the bus because he saw through some of the rhetoric shows an incredible lack of objectivity and loyalty.
I guess the application was for “Yes Men”/
August 29th, 2011 at 4:42 pm
… in other words, you are sticking with your uninformed talking points. Figures.
August 29th, 2011 at 5:18 pm
Talking points? I don’t even know what that means. I read the article and gave my opinion.
August 29th, 2011 at 5:25 pm
You skimmed the article, did not comprehend it, and then regurgitated what you were told by others, more like it.
August 29th, 2011 at 7:27 pm
“By the way, Colin Powell was a “military man,” unlike both Bush and Cheney who somehow avoided “actual” confrontations.”
SO Buzzy?
How do ya feel about SlickBill and Al-PoorLoser-Gore “who somehow avoided “”actual”" confrontations.”???
Gore’s father voted against segregation Fine Example for Junior.
SlickBill had no Daddy.
Powell is from Harlem. He needs to contact Charles Payne (also from Harlem)
Maybe they can collectively HELP poor poor Charlie Rangull. (insert sarcasm here)
MY vote is for Charles Payne.
Yeah NON military but a good guy!!
Do your research. Maybe you will see.
August 29th, 2011 at 9:08 pm
Where’d Barry serve ?
August 30th, 2011 at 2:51 am
…and Benedict Arnold was a “military man” too. Jess sayin.
August 30th, 2011 at 3:19 am
The article was in reference to Colin Powell and Cheney.
What does that have to do with where Gore, Obama and Bill served?
Powell was an intricate component when selling this war to the American public. His opinion changed and he has earned the right to voice that opinion.
It does not change the character of the man.
August 30th, 2011 at 4:34 am
Yeah, looking back now its all too evident, he was always a sht if hes going to be a fair weather friend.
And you’re the one who obfuscated by bringing up “military men”
So its only fair to mention a few.
Warners right.
You’re loosing simple concepts, or being intellectually dishonest.
If not intellectually dishonest then I hate to use the other word that fits or you’re arguing for excercise
August 30th, 2011 at 6:24 am
I like the attempts to minimize it: “…Democrats were intent on making this into a huge scandal.” Also characterizing it as an “idiotic incident.”
Blowing the cover of a CIA agent is treason.
If the purpose of this is to lay the blame at the feet of someone other than Cheney and Bush, then why minimize it? Because we have a pretty good idea who was really behind it, and you do too, and you are too stupid to inject some consistency into your distortions and your lies.
August 30th, 2011 at 7:48 am
“Blowing the cover of a CIA agent is treason.”
Then stop acting as if you care and stop prosecuting them for doing their job.
She was not covert. There was no “outing”.
Everyone knew where she worked and what she did.
She was a freeking analyst.
Not 007
August 30th, 2011 at 2:43 pm
You need to learn the definition of treason, Flo.