Ron Paul certainly distanced himself from the other GOP candidates at the debate on the issue of foreign policy, didn’t he? He made himself seem like a head-in-the-sand, isolationist and his historical ignorance was amazing. Not only that but his simpleton approach to foreign policy was nothing short of breath taking. Well, Rep. Allen West similarly thought that Paul’s gabled ideas were dangerous and stated directly that Paul is “not the kind of guy you need to be sitting at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.”
Florida Representative Allen West, a former Lt. Colonel in the U.S. Army who served in Iraq, was attending a Tea Party event in Fort Lauderdale, Florida late last week and made a few comments about Paul’s rambling at the Ames debate.
West told attendees that the threats to the USA are far more dangerous than Ron Paul’s simpleminded claims tended to make them seem.
Beside Paul’s absurd stance on Iran, his claim that we never had any kind of war with Russia was just as stupid. Let me just say two words to you Doctor Paul: Cold War. Of course we had a war with the U.S.S.R. Not a hot war, of course, but a Cold War for sure. Are you so ignorant of that history, Doctor Paul?
Now, Paul came is second at the Ames Straw Poll. This is, however, a meaningless fact. Paul has spent the last few years with a singular focus of buying polls all across the country. Whenever there is a straw poll at an event, whenever an Internet poll is begun, his acolytes bomb the results with his purchased supporters efforts. The Ames poll is no different.
Ron Paul will never have more than a small percentage of support in the GOP electorate. He appeals to only one segment of the GOP polity. He appeals to the monetary policy wonks. That is it. He is anathema to the security Republicans and the family values voters. Worse, he’d never get a single independent vote.
Well, he might get the Jew-hater’s vote, too. So, he has that going for him. Which is nice.
Ron Paul’s multiple attempts to pretend to run for president — and he’s never really been serious about it — is a distraction and a shame. I say he’s never been serious because he’s never made much of an attempt to do anything other than buy polls by sending his fans out to them and appear at debates. He’s never really campaigned anywhere for the office. He’s never built a real organization built to influence state party organizations. He’s never really created a Paul organization across the nation that is interested in the electoral process. All he’s ever created is a gaggle of disaffected, libertarians that are desperate to find someone behind which to rally their ideas.
Ron Paul is not now and has never been a serious candidate for the presidency and his ramblings about foreign policy made that more evident than ever.









August 14th, 2011 at 7:25 am
Warner, before exposing Ron Paul for the fraud that he is, please let me first conclude my ongoing negotiations for the exclusive tin foil hat concessions at his rallies.
You’re stepping on my toes Bro!!!
August 14th, 2011 at 7:39 am
I can’t wait for the GOP to fail miserably because of ignorant neoconservative hackery like this. I cannot wait for this party to collapse. The right deserves what is coming because of our refusal to quit indebting our children. — there, there’s my bought and paid for post.
August 14th, 2011 at 7:45 am
Another Palubot heard from.
August 14th, 2011 at 7:48 am
I remember Ron Paul stating that the U.S.S.R. was a far larger threat to us than Iran is today. Did we start a war with the U.S.S.R. because they were developing and then developed nuclear power? No. Pres. Reagan stood his ground and stood ……them down and eventually that “Wall” came down because the U.S.S.R. bankrupted themselves with putting so much of their capital into military machine.
What Pres. Reagan practiced was, “Speak softly, but carry a big stick.”
Because Iran threatens to build their nuclear capability does not mean that we threaten or start a war with them. We and other free world countries hold onto our nuclear capabilities and keep on improving all our military capabilities — and just as what happened with the U.S.S.R. they will fall on their own face when they waste their funds on military spending to the detriment of the lives of their own people who will turn on them because they have been starved out of funds, jobs and food.
Israel is a wealthy nation and has the capability of purchasing as much weaponry as they need from us and other allies. They do not need the U.S.’s or the U.N.’s permission to defend themselves against Iran, Iraq, Libya or any other country – including nuclear defense if they deem it necessary.
The United States should not be the policeman of the world – nor should we be stationed in Germany, Italy, France, Japan, S. Korea and all the other nations throughout the world. Let all of those nations expend their capital and their military to defend their own countries and quit using our troops as free fodder for all the other nation states.
We are the largest Debtor Nation in the world. We should be expending our capital to have our troops defending our borders – and bring our troops home to do just that.
August 14th, 2011 at 8:00 am
“Because Iran threatens to build their nuclear capability does not mean that we threaten or start a war with them. We and other free world countries hold onto our nuclear capabilities and keep on improving all our military capabilities — and just as what happened with the U.S.S.R. they will fall on their own face when they waste their funds on military spending to the detriment of the lives of their own people who will turn on them because they have been starved out of funds, jobs and food.”
SovereignMary, hypothetically speaking, if your husband smoked would it be okay for him to possess a lighter? How about your hypothetical two-year-old?
Think about it!!!
August 14th, 2011 at 8:09 am
I respect Allen West a great deal and have been proud to post many of his comments. However, it has become obvious that he is unable to loose himself of the bonds of the military-industrial complex. Dr. Paul’s views on Iran are sound. Allen states that Dr. Paul doesn’t see any problem with Iran getting a nuclear weapon. That is untrue. Dr. Paul does see a problem with the U.S. continuing its threats to begin war with Iran.
As to Iran promoting terrorism throughout the world, Dr. Paul has not denied that. And though Dr. Paul has not said it, I will–The CIA is and has been for decades the greatest promoter of terrorism throughout the world.
Dr. Paul promotes legitimate defense of the U.S. Dr. Paul does not promote the use of our military to further aggression and meddling in the internal affairs of other nations.
Representative West still maintains positions on other issues which I will continue to support. In fact, if he could only understand Dr. Paul’s position on warmongering better, I could see him as an excellent choice for high military positions within the Ron Paul presidency as a DEFENDER of our freedoms.
August 14th, 2011 at 8:15 am
To imagine that Iran is somehow just like the U.S.S.R. is idiotic and simpleminded.
August 14th, 2011 at 8:42 am
“To imagine that Iran is somehow just like the U.S.S.R. is idiotic and simpleminded.”
The USSR wouldn’t fly an airplane into the side of a building. Iran would!!
August 14th, 2011 at 8:49 am
Allen West is right. Soon we will see more attacks in American soil. When we turn a blind eye to what’s happening in the world, it finds a way to our own shores.
August 14th, 2011 at 9:33 am
You neoconservatives as hilarious. Whenever anyone suggests that the US shouldn’t roam the globe looking for people to murder, you “good christian” types get rabid!
I can’t wait to see the GOP and Democrats unite; ya’ll are the same party anyway. Big Government, lots of war. The Libertarian Party is where real Constitutionalists go nowadays.
August 14th, 2011 at 9:35 am
You probably don’t even know what a “neoconservative” is. But for sure to you it is just another way to say eeevil Jooooos. Get lost racist.
August 14th, 2011 at 9:38 am
Dear flyingmonkey, get your history right:
“The USSR wouldn’t fly an airplane into the side of a building. Iran would!!”
Iran didn’t. A coupla Saudis did.
August 14th, 2011 at 9:41 am
The difference between Iran and the old USSR is that the old USSR was not willing to die just to defeat capitalism (any more than we were willing to all die just to defeat communism.)
The lunatics in Iran would be more than happy to die even to just wound “The Great Satan”.
August 14th, 2011 at 9:42 am
“neoconservatives, military industrial complex…”
Freekin Paulbots sound like wound up college lemmings.
Bottom line is this asshats.
Pauls foreign policies will get us all killed.
Hes gone as far as to blame us for 911, hes a racist little prick,and has no concept of how our military keeps a global economy and community from blowing up.
Half the sht thats moved around this planet would never get there if we brought home the amount of troops you suggest. You’re all highly ignorant, childish and naive.
If any constituency next to Naders Raiders needs sit down and shut the fck up its you guys.
Not that I would demand it, but in the bif pic you guys are pretty irrelevant
August 14th, 2011 at 9:44 am
Sally, get your own sht straight.
Iranians do go on suicide missions and the are Muslims
August 14th, 2011 at 9:47 am
Ferrand;
“Paul has not said it, I will–The CIA is and has been for decades the greatest promoter of terrorism throughout the world.”
Good grief this thread got stupid
August 14th, 2011 at 10:02 am
Please read Antony Sutton’s books which explain where communism came from. It was completely funded by Wall Street and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This is fully documented in the State Department’s records. The ignorance here is stunning.
If I am “stupid” or a “nut” for reading the actual government documents on the formation of the Soviet Union or the CIA’s history of arming militant Muslims for the purpose of regime change, and telling people what I have discovered, then I will wear the label with pride.
August 14th, 2011 at 10:22 am
Republicanmother…
I dont think any half decently informed person would deny that we have put money and arms in the hands of genocidal and terrorist regimes at one time or another before or after their terror based ideology was evident.
Mubarack, Taliban, Saddam, etc…
no doubt.
But to say that the CIA is the “greatest promoter of terrorism throughout the world” is patently false and stupid.
If anything promotes these ideologies its not our money or assitance but rather a belief system being sold in the name of a diety for centuries now
Theres a machine out there now consisting of Communist, Socialists and radical theologians thats working together to bring down free capitalist and semi capitalist nations such as Australia, Canada, US,EU, etc.
While these nations have their differences between each other they have one thing in common that bonds them in a general agreement and cooperation such as N Korea dealing arms to Syria, Russia selling weaponry to Iran, Iran selling weaponry to Hugo Chavez, China to N Korea, etc, etc, etc.
These collaborations are a far greater promotion of the evil forces in this world than our CIA will ever be.
August 14th, 2011 at 10:59 am
Those who support the Military Industrial complex come out in full force to attack Ron Paul. Keep in mind that Ron Paul served in the military so he does know what he is talking about. Wanting to create a strong army to protect us on our land is not an isolationist. Relationships with all, entanglements with none. He is the only consistent voice. Get us out of forced nation building and forced democracy aboard. We stop that and terrorism ends. Neo-cons need common sense. But since they want ot destroy Jesus’s competitive religion war is all they want.
August 14th, 2011 at 11:01 am
Yes, Ron Paul is a nut. But michelle bachmann.. now THERE’s a stable, rational republican.
ahahah. This is very enjoyable.
August 14th, 2011 at 11:02 am
I love the absurd assumption that just because someone “served in the military” that they, therefore must know EVERYTHING about the military! It is just a stupid thing to say.
August 14th, 2011 at 12:00 pm
“Yes, Ron Paul is a nut. But michelle bachmann.. now THERE’s a stable, rational republican.”
These Paulbots almost make you Billy Ray backers look rational Me.
NOT!!!
August 14th, 2011 at 12:12 pm
““Yes, Ron Paul is a nut. But michelle bachmann.. now THERE’s a stable, rational republican”
This coming from one who thinks Obama is a far right nut.
This is far more enjoyable for me.
Hey Paulbots !
Can you construct an argument or even a sentence without including “the military industrial complex”?
You guys sound like frickin retards in your stupid narrow minded generalization of our military and its puroposes.
Liberty woes;
“He is the only consistent voice.”
Only because he never will change his voice regardless of the facts.
Consistency doesnt make one right…duh
Many idiots can be consistently stupid and ignorant. Its not a rare quality and sure as hell no doubt reflected in his constituency.
August 14th, 2011 at 1:09 pm
To those who ignorantly bash Ron Paul on foreign policy: how many military bases does Iran have overseas? If you can’t answer this then you truly don’t understand foreign policy.
August 14th, 2011 at 1:14 pm
How many bases did Nazi Germany have overseas? Gosh, not many. Again, another Paulbot fails.