An organization calling themselves “Breasts not Bombs” crashed Hillary Clinton’s campaign headquarters in San Francisco on July 23rd. See the video and photos of these women protesters.
There is no nudity in this video, but I promise this kind of nudity you will not want to see.
In a quest for better nudity, I visited the “breasts not bombs website” and was appalled by a lack of photographic judgement on the homepage.
Meanwhile, Ms. Magazine sent a letter denouncing the Washinton Post for discussing Hillary Clinton’s feminine gambit, namely her intentional display of breasts in the Senate last week.
Senator Clinton is a distinguished member of the Senate and quite possibly the next president of the United States. Instead of writing about her strategy to end the war in Iraq or her plans to reform the health care system in this country, the Post devoted a feature story to analyzing her breasts.
… it drones on …
The letter was audaciously signed “For Equality” where you normally write “Sincerely” by Katherine Spillar of Ms. Magazine. I do not think there is anything on that side of the magazine rack for me.
Hat tip: Politico.









July 24th, 2007 at 3:38 pm
Boobs…
Buy, you know, not in a good way.
…
November 20th, 2007 at 6:31 am
As much as I’d like to see a woman president, I don’t trust Hillary as far as I can throw her.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
Hillary should get her boobs out if she becomes president.
Maybe the other world leaders wont notice if she suddenly bursts into tears …
October 19th, 2009 at 9:12 pm
Violating anyones rights, you are immortal?License from ICSTIS, my skin feel.If you think, special attraction is.When you say home office strategies, per set information only had.They comes in, various circumstances you.,