Howard Books has confirmed that former aide Frank Bailey is writing a tell-all book about the marriage and political life of Sarah Palin. Called “Blind Allegiance,” the book is described as a “chilling expose” about the politician’s troubled marriage and unethical behavior.
Supporters of the former Alaska governor are calling Bailey a disgruntled turn-coat who is only looking to harm his former boss. But the former aide insists he has proof in over 60,000 emails to back up the claims in his book!
The accusations in the Sarah Palin tell-all book? First, Bailey says the former VP candidate told him that she and Todd barely speak.
“We’re not like normal couples, Frank. We don’t talk,” she reportedly said.
Big deal right? But more substancial than that, according to Bailey, she forged letters to local newspapers during her governorship praising herself. The letters were supposed to be from avid supporters. In one she said “’It’s clear Sarah is committed to just doing the right thing, even if her Republican Party bosses try to punish her for it.” If that allegation is true, it’s certainly embarrassing, if not damaging. Bailey says he has an email from Palin beginning, amazingly, “I feel like we’re the last of the innocents,” which then goes on to say,
“Good idea about the letters to the editor. Guys—let’s remember to tell people that when they offer to help but don’t know what to do. They can loan us their names for a letter, and they have to be ready to confirm that they authored the letter when all those various newspapers call them for confirmation.”
Not looking very innocent there! “Blind Allegiance” will hit shelves on May 24, just weeks before another much anticipated book on Palin, titled “The Rogue” is released. What do you think of the Sarah Palin tell-all book? Is this just another disgruntled employee getting retribution? Or is this a real insight into the former Governor’s life? We’ll probably never know. Let me know what you think in the comment section!
Photos: www.wenn.com/PNP, Ray Filmano
April 19th, 2011 at 12:06 am
I find these allegations hard to believe. Sarah Palin seems like such a non-opportunist to me.
April 19th, 2011 at 1:57 am
So we are supposed to believe someone who turns on a boss after getting fired. Frank Bailey sounds like kind of a sleazy guy. It’s amazing what happens to a woman or minority when they dare to challenge the left. If the Republican Party is all old white guys its only because the Democrats won’t allow anyone else to step up.
April 19th, 2011 at 2:50 am
Bailey is a curd but he’ll push his book on MessNBC and the rest of the LSM. The AFL-CIO and SEIU will probably demand their memnership all buy a copy to throw at 14-year old girls at Tea Party rallies.
April 19th, 2011 at 4:01 am
I am sorry but what makes anyone think they understand or are privy to the workings of someone else’s marriage. Quite frankly after the Clinton marriage debacle nothing seems like a bad marriage.
Also the letter writing crap, bid deal. So they wrote the letters and people let them sue their names, I have news for everyone do they think that any of the politicians write their speeches or letters? Aides do that and they write letters for people as well. It is the real world. Either this guy has no idea how the world works or he is just looking for something. In all likelihood there is definitely a really good reason he was fired. Obviously stupidity was one cause.
But of course the liberal media will lap it up while still touting Obama’s messiah status. It is old and boring already.
April 19th, 2011 at 4:08 am
I, for one, believe that he probably does have the “real truth” on her, but so what? Why do we all have to know? If I’d done that, no one would care, and perhaps my doing it would land me a great job etc… I am definately not a Palin supporter, I saw her make women in politics look very dumb and ignorant in her inability to even answer simple questions in interviews, however, her personal life is her personal life, she is not leading our country, how she wants to run her family is her business.
April 19th, 2011 at 5:07 am
Just another bottom feeder trying to get his fifteen minutes out of what should have been Palin’s fifteen minutes. Nothing to see here.
April 19th, 2011 at 7:46 am
“Big deal right? But more substancial than that, according to Bailey…” -Stacy
Why don’t you learn how to spell ’substancial’ (lol) if you’re going to get on the anti Palin train.
April 19th, 2011 at 10:58 am
“I saw her make women in politics look very dumb and ignorant in her inability to even answer simple questions in interviews,”
Yeah well, theres something to be said for having to be interviewed by a rabid moonbat like Couric and the rest of liberal media that did their best to make her look stupid all the while ignoring her exemplary resume` and coddling Barry with softballs the whole way.
Seems like you too have bought into all the cartoons depicting her as an idiot while ignoring the fact shes actually a very successful politician and businesswoman.
I myself do not feel shes ready to rule the free world.
But redundant spoon fed talking points crap like yours makes you sound dumber than you portray her to be.
April 19th, 2011 at 10:59 am
Jeff…
why don’t you go n get yourself a “substantial” life ?
April 21st, 2011 at 11:08 am
It kills me that asking someone what they are reading is regarded as being unfair.
If I asked that question of any of you I would get an answer within seconds including a synopsis of the material.
Even when asked by someone that is viewed as sympathetic to her she was bamboozled.
Beck asked her about her favorite founding father.
She could not name one and he did not let her off the hook.
“You know, all of them”, Palin stated.
Beck, “Can you name me one?”
Blank stare.
He was truly disappointed.