Tuesday was Equal Pay Day. According to the National Committee for Pay Equity, it symbolizes how far into 2011 women must work to earn what men earned in 2010. It originated in 1996 as a public awareness event to illustrate the gap between men’s and women’s wages.
The wage gap is a popular theme in the media. The feminist elite love to belabor the fact that women make less money than men throughout their lifetime — “Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns” — but they never provide the details. They’d rather people believe America is ruled by a patriarchy.
What are some of these details? For one, the pay gap in America is not between men and women but between married women and other men and women who spend their lifetimes in the workforce. It is primarily the result of a voluntary domestic division of labor, not discrimination by a conspiracy of male chauvinists. Indeed, women who remain single and childless, stay in the labor force, and work long hours earn, it turns out, more than men! As Carrie Lukas wrote this week in the Wall Street Journal,
“In a 2010 study of single, childless urban workers between the ages of 22 and 30, the research firm, Reach Advisors, found that women earned an average of 8% more than their male counterparts.”
But it’s the types of jobs men and women choose that make a difference. Not only do women not pursue the dangerous and unpleasant jobs men do, most women do not have the desire to live the life required for most high-pay positions. No man or woman rises to high-income ranks on a forty-hour week. Ask any successful doctor, lawyer, or business executive. They have spent years working nights and weekends, bringing home briefcases bulging with work and serving clients or customers in a steady stream outside of office hours. These folks have paid a big price for their career and financial success. For any man or woman who chooses that life, there is plenty of room at the top.
There are fewer female politicians for the same reason. Most women have no desire to do the work necessary to win elections—drive thousands of miles, shake hundreds of strangers’ hands, eat third-rate chicken suppers, and attend political meetings every night and weekend. And most women certainly don’t want to subject themselves to political attacks that impugn their integrity and probe into their personal lives and finances.
Much to feminists’ dismay, most women with children—if they work outside the home at all—work part-time. And they like it that way. That’s why married men with children earn the most, while married women with children earn the least. As the number of children increases, a married man spends more hours in the workforce to support his family, and a married woman spends fewer hours in order to care for the children. As long as women make this choice, there will never be male-female pay parity. That’s not something to gripe about — it’s something to celebrate.
I’m certain the nation’s children would agree.
Suzanne Venker is co-author of the new book The Flipside of Feminism: What Conservative Women Know – and Men Can’t Say.









April 14th, 2011 at 11:09 am
Your argument about lack of pay parity reminds me of a conversation I had with a woman in the Middle East. She was trying to justify the different standards there for men and women. A husband is legally allowed four wives (such a benefit for the children, you know, and he must earn enough to support them all. Such a burden for the man!) The wommens’ section in the local mosque is a quarter the size of the mens. (Women have the luxury of staying home to pray.) Really, you sound just like her!
April 14th, 2011 at 7:41 pm
For one, the pay gap in America is not between men and women but between married women and other men and women who spend their lifetimes in the workforce.
Wait what? Married women on one side and the combination of all men (married and not) and single women combined on the other?
Because if not, you have no point.
April 14th, 2011 at 7:49 pm
There are fewer female politicians for the same reason. Most women have no desire to do the work necessary to win elections—drive thousands of miles, shake hundreds of strangers’ hands, eat third-rate chicken suppers, and attend political meetings every night and weekend. And most women certainly don’t want to subject themselves to political attacks that impugn their integrity and probe into their personal lives and finances.
This is brain-meltingly stupid, and pretty much the same argument you’d hear in the 1950s. Women are gentler, soft creatures and just don’t aspire to “men’s work”. Secretaries, cocktail waitresses, and nurses- thats’ all they really want to be (and are capable of, wink wink)
What a load of cow crap.
That’s why married men with children earn the most, while married women with children earn the least.
Oh, THAT’S why! Awesome!
BTW, shouldn’t you be happier in the kitchen cookin’ up somethin yummy for your man and kids rather than typing this sexist garbage? Or perhaps you could have your husband build you a time machine so you can go back to an era where people won’t think you’re a lunatic.
I don’t want to make any grand, arbitrary assumptions, but I’m sure the nation’s children would agree.
April 14th, 2011 at 10:44 pm
Thank you so much for this application of general and special relativity, quantum mechanics, and advanced calculus to finally prove what I have suspected all along, that women really do get as much money as men, and maybe even more. Here are some other issues you might consider applying your obvious intellectual genius to:
Black people were never slaves.
The Holocaust never happened.
The Earth is flat, and hollow, too.
The universe is only six thousand years old.
Cave men rode on dinosaurs.
And of course:
Global Warming is a hoax.
I will wait with bated breath for your next article. Humanity owes you a lot.
None of it is good, but it’s a lot.
April 15th, 2011 at 2:07 am
Re “This is brain-meltingly stupid, and pretty much the same argument you’d hear in the 1950s. Women are gentler, soft creatures and just don’t aspire to “men’s work”. Secretaries, cocktail waitresses, and nurses- thats’ all they really want to be (and are capable of, wink wink)”:
Hm…Don’t believe I wrote anything that said women aren’t capable of doing these jobs. I said most women have no desire to do them. They have what they believe to be a far more important and satisfying job to do: raise their children. That’s why more women don’t pursue these opportunities. Discrimination is not the issue; lifestyle choice is. This is true across the board, even in Scandinavian countries where feminists think women have it so much better. These women choose part-time work just as women here in America do, and their willingness to depend on a husband to lead a balanced life demonstrates this.
April 15th, 2011 at 9:48 am
in Scandinavian countries where feminists think women have it so much better. These women choose part-time work just as women here in America do, and their willingness to depend on a husband to lead a balanced life demonstrates this.
I was just in Scandenavia and happened to have a conversation with a woman who’s sister is having a kid. She and her boyfriend (they aren’t married– it’s not a big deal there) just received their “package” from the government.
What package? Well, since they’re going to be parents, the government gave them a huge box of supplies– baby wipes, diapers, all kinds of stuff to help them out. Of course, BOTH the mother AND the father will recieve a 480 day allowance of paid parental leave so they can give their full attention to the kid. 60 for the men, 60, for the women, and the rest to be assigned as the parents see fit. They are paid about $110 a day’s allowance during this period. Parents who adopt get 1.5 years.
The hospital stay and medical care will, like all medical care for any Sweden, be 100% paid for as well. Pediatrician… free. OB/GYN, free. All paid for by taxes. Their standard of health care is excellent, and they spend far less on medical care as a percentage of their GDP as we do. Of course they get a top-notch education for their kid as well at no personal cost.
They do pay higher taxes than we do, although the cost of a restaurant meal there is roughly equivalent to what we pay– for one thing the tax is already in the price– what you see is what you pay. And even with our low dollar-to-Swedish Kronar exchange, a hamburger costs about what it would in any big US city. Only it’s healthier.
The number of women in politics, both in absolute terms and percentage is very high, about 50% in their parliament. I can’t understand why in Sweden women have such an interest in politics, there and not here. (Unless you’re totally wrong about the “gentler” sex. Go figure.)
Finland, Iceland, and Norway all had or have women prime ministers and other heads of state. (Sweden hasn’t… yet) It almost blows through your theory that it has to be one or the other, doesn’t it?
Overall, I’d say women (and men) have it MUCH better in Sweden than here in terms of equality, pay, and the average person, male or female, has a much more stress-free, healthy, and better-educated life.
I suggest before bashing Scandinavia that you actually visit there. I think your head just may explode. “Their willingness to depend on a husband to lead a balanced life” couldn’t describe their attitude more backwards.
April 15th, 2011 at 10:06 am
“I suggest before bashing Scandinavia that you actually visit there. I think your head just may explode. “Their willingness to depend on a husband to lead a balanced life” couldn’t describe their attitude more backwards.”
Too bad the article was relevant to American women and not idiot Scandinavians who are indoctrinated at birth to fork over a much larger portion of their private (not) property.
My family is Danish, almost all of them moved here so they could make more individual decisions and keep more of their own money.
They say Danes are the happiest people on Earth.
Well, thats all relevant to elemental exposure, isnt it ?
“I suggest before bashing Scandinavia that you actually visit there. I think your head just may explode. “Their willingness to depend on a husband to lead a balanced life” couldn’t describe their attitude more backwards.”
Why need a partner when the government will even help you get knocked up and pay for the little fcker cradle to grave ?
April 15th, 2011 at 10:23 am
Me;
“Of course they get a top-notch education for their kid as well at no personal cost.
They do pay higher taxes than we do, ”
HUH ?
April 16th, 2011 at 12:44 am
The most maddening thing about leftists is that no matter how much docmented fact you show them they’ll still push the same bogus meme.
I read an article similar to this several years ago that compared the disparity in annual income between male and female physicians. What they found was that the male doctor’s work day was likely to be a couple hours longer, they were more likely to work weekends, and took less time off for vacations or sickness.
When they broke their salaries down by actual work performed, the difference in pay was a little more than a penny.
Why don’t they call it Equal Pay for Equal Work Day?
Because they know!!!
April 16th, 2011 at 10:03 am
Actually physicians are one area where I’d expect there to be a much tighter correlation.
I know this isn’t true (guy CEOs no doubt make a shtton more than women CEOs, what there are of them. Meg Whitman notwithstanding
), but say that upper income professions were closer to parity… which I would be suprised if it were not true.
It would kind of blow your “doctors are the same” argument out of the water with a loud boom and white plume going fifty feet in the air.
Well I guess there are apologists for all manner of social crimes, aren’t there?