President Barack Obama held a budget summit Tuesday morning at the White House, meeting with House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV). The issue at hand is the remainder of the 2011 federal budget, the fiscal year of which ends on September 30, and how much in the way of spending cuts will be agreed upon. The summit ended in failure, leading to a growing possibility of a federal government shutdown this Friday.
The 2011 budget was supposed to have been submitted by the 111th Congress on April 15th, 2010, but Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats punted as to avoid any controversy during an election year. They still lost control of the House of Representatives anyway. In the meanwhile, the government has been funded by a series of continuing resolutions. The last two of which the House GOP members used to cut a measly $12 Billion dollars out of some $3.3 Trillion dollars to be spent this fiscal year.
With the clock ticking, another continuing resolution, this one for only one additional week with another $12 Billion in spending cuts is being considered. But due to a 72-hour rule in the House, such a bill would have to be submitted quickly before noon Wednesday to avert a government shutdown. Even then, if such legislation was to go through, it would not be voted on by the Senate until Saturday at the earliest.
Some 45 days ago, the House GOP passed a budget for the rest of 2011 that would include some $73 Billion dollars in spending cuts, roughly 2.8% of the remaining operating costs through September. But Harry Reid is blocking the bill, calling it too extreme and draconian. Senate Democrats launched a bash-the-Tea-Party campaign last week, in efforts to force John Boehner to compromise. At first, Senate Democrats countered the House Republican budget with one that only had some $8 Billion is spending cuts. Their last offer allegedly has about $33 Billion, but many question the math.
President Barack Obama, who has only become engaged in the budget issue this past weekend, says that he will not go along with any more continuing resolutions. John Boehner and Harry Reid met later Tuesday after the failed White House summit to continue negotiating the size of the spending cuts. But if an actual bill is not submitted to the House floor by tomorrow, then a government shutdown will happen after Friday, unless, of course, the Senate Democrats finally agree to the budget already passed by House Republicans 45 days ago.
Related Articles:
No Agreement in Congress on US Budget, Talks Continue
US budget: federal government faces shutdown over deadlock
Dems Anxious For Government Shutdown










April 5th, 2011 at 2:54 pm
The reps know they will not be re-elected if they don’t stop the madness. The dems are clueless. 2010 is still a mystery to them. This is a product of their arrogance. They all seem to share this defect. It looks like the American taxpayers are going to shine a light up their ass whether they like or not.
April 5th, 2011 at 2:59 pm
Well, Hondo,
According to most of the polling data, the average American is not worried about a government shutdown. In fact, the numbers show about 57% would like to see it shutdown!
The Democrats are going to lose the Senate anyway in 2012. Hopefully the White House, too! The end of an era is rapidly closing in on them. Obama, Pelosi and Reid have set the Progressive agenda back 25 years, if not more!
April 5th, 2011 at 3:27 pm
Whats all this crap about a budget ?
No even knows what that is
April 5th, 2011 at 5:24 pm
Pull the plug or allow obama to collapse the economy, the choice is ours. I say shut’er down!
April 5th, 2011 at 5:28 pm
I luv ya Ron, but, sadly, the choice is not ours
April 5th, 2011 at 5:34 pm
The choice is ours, that’s why we sent 80 freshmen to Congress to stir things up.
April 5th, 2011 at 5:40 pm
Not as long as Reid and Barry are around.
Everyone wants a choice in this matter as long as its not their choice thats eliminated
April 5th, 2011 at 5:50 pm
Sorry Andy, skepticism and cynicism are prevalent to the the point I dont believe anything I hear anymore and only half of what I see.
If “WE” do have a choice at all, its to stop relying, depending and believing even those we voted for.
The choice I’d really like to have is to oust their asses at the first sign of inconsistency or insubordination to their promises.
Someones gonna have to bite the bullet.
But thats hard when our choices are nothing but a bunch of toothless crack wh0res and dealers.
As Beck said today, I’ll paraphrase…
‘Normalcy is going to have to take a hike if were going to make it’
April 5th, 2011 at 6:55 pm
I just heard Michele Bachmann on that boob O’Reilly and the Factor and she sounded good. I don’t know much about her. Anybody care to comment on her? I’m not up to speed on her.
April 5th, 2011 at 7:00 pm
Shes kinda like the chick you wouldnt buy a drink but wouldnt kick her outta bed either
April 5th, 2011 at 7:18 pm
Aww sht Mick. I’m serious. You are up to speed on all this. What do you really think?
April 5th, 2011 at 8:06 pm
Well Hondo, as short n sweet as possible.
Shes towin the Tea Party line pretty heavy,wants Obamacare defunded and tossed in the shtter, will make a run for office only if Palin doesn’t, isn’t electable because sadly, not enough people take her seriously because she cant shake the bimbo appearance that’s highlighted by the moonbat MSM.
Shes got the good common sense ideas most of the government needs to follow but would have a hell of a time bustin the good ole boys balls to get what needs to be done.
Its a shame, if she made it past primaries I’d vote for her before Gingrich,Pawlenty, or Romney.
http://www.michelebachmann.com/
April 5th, 2011 at 8:08 pm
A government shutdown would be healthy for this blog as it would be like candy to a baby. Hey, if the R’s and D’s cannot govern anymore, they might as well make a spectcle about it. I think the moral dilemma in this is ryan wants big tax cuts for both the rich and corporations, as tax cuts, not a real restructuring. He is putting forth a shrinking budget that will be destructive to the nation’s business, rather than a coherent game plan on revamping the government. Certainly we could do with a downsized government, but its got to be planned responsibly and we cannot just cut all the pro people programs while allowing the rich unfettered access into our cookie jar. Thats the political part of it. Rather we should focus on eliminating the duplication of government services where both the feds, the state, and the county and even city all duplicate each other. Naturally the whole civil service pay program including pensions needs to be redone. But even so, corporations still need some good faith regulation and certain public services still have value to the nation as well. He made it too political. Like walker.
April 5th, 2011 at 8:33 pm
“I think the moral dilemma in this is ryan wants big tax cuts for both the rich and corporations, ”
Aww, shut up with the ‘evil rich and corporations’ already.
Its fcking tiresome.
Ryan is simply attacking the obvious problem.
Government spending/waste.
If anyone is making it political its you by inferring that his agenda is political.
“pro people programs ”
yeah, you know what the ultimate ‘pro people program’ is ?
Its called a job
April 5th, 2011 at 8:48 pm
once again, you are mindlessly shilling for the big corps and rich. ryan’s budget is a political tool more than a fair restructuring. Its a shame he’s trying to package it like he really fiscally cares. I wonder what he says off the record as I bet its not so different from walker. you think giving elderly fixed dollar health care vouchers to go use on the open unregulated market is a good solution? The insurance companys will once again just take advantage and make a lot of money off it and the elders will get bilked and not get the care they worked a life time to get. Meanwhile insurance execs will get some hundreds of thousands to millions more in bonuses. Simply cutting the deficit is not enough as we also have to deal with some necessary service problems for our people.
April 5th, 2011 at 9:00 pm
I would rather see the government get shut down permanently than the House Republicans get away with what they are trying to do.
April 5th, 2011 at 9:03 pm
“once again, you are mindlessly shilling for the big corps and rich”
No, you just like to attack the persona instead of the facts I’ve bestowed upon your ignorant ass over and over again.
Once again ya fckin retard.
The top 1% pay 60% of these entitlements, the top 5% pay 40% of that 60%.
You’re the mindless sht who insists everyones an idiot if they dont mindlessly take your word for it as opposed to giving facts, stats and links to back up your bullshr, which is growing increasingly predictable and boring.
Govt. spending on unproductive people and programs is the problem.
Not the wealthy of a free capitalist market who feed our tax revenues, innovations and economy.
If Obama made the same proposal you’d suck his dick
April 5th, 2011 at 9:06 pm
Klo, if the government shut down your die
April 5th, 2011 at 9:06 pm
“you’d die”..
sorry
April 5th, 2011 at 9:08 pm
I can see the need for a whole new industry of elder brokers that provide elders with health care, transportation, financial, housekeeping, directed home care and grocery and shopping services. As elders become more infirmed and forgetful and incapable of managing their affairs long before a nursing home is needed, there will be an interim period of several years where they will need responsible guidance and proxies to just live a life. You can’t just give these people health care vouchers for Gods sakes. Have a heart.
April 5th, 2011 at 9:18 pm
I would refer you to #14 your own blog about the “evil and rich corporations”. I don’t know if they are necessarily all evil, but the profit incentive turns most everybody into something less than nice when it comes to keeping the other persons best interests in mind. Its the nature of the beast. Aggressive profiteering is pretty much what America is all about on the business front. I don’t pray to that unlike so many. Its a factor in the equation that also has to be delt with if you want things to really improve on all fronts. The top 1% will not be paying for my social security, I calculated what I put in and my employer in exchange for lowering my pay and figure I will be lucky if I take more than I put in, in raw cash. Add to that some earnings over time and it would be more. Unless I get platinum hips when I am 77 I doubt I will cost more than the medicare amount I put in. When I see what I pay in taxes for the military, schools, police, and prison industries, I just am aghast. I get less services than what I pay in save the roads and working traffic lights(they do cost something). So no the rich are not paying my way. I pay theirs actually. All the more reason I want an efficent, fair, nonduplitive government structure with a smaller military presence on our streets.
April 5th, 2011 at 9:56 pm
“I pay theirs actually. All the more reason I want an efficent, fair, nonduplitive government structure with a smaller military presence on our streets.”
You’re fuckin high and an idiot with nothing to back that up.
Talk to Obama and his buddy Immelt/GE before you go bashing those evil corporations.
theres more.
Here, read and learn something besides the garbage you drum up in your head
“According to the Office of Tax Analysis, the U.S. individual income tax is “highly progressive,” with a small group of higher-income taxpayers paying most of the individual income taxes each year.
•In 2002 the latest year of available data, the top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than one-half (53.8 percent) of all individual income taxes, but reported roughly one-third (30.6 percent) of income.
•The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.7 percent of all individual income taxes in 2002. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group’s tax share has grown faster than their income share.
===============================================
•Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes.
============================================== In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 94 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000, 2001, and 2002, this group paid over 96 percent of the total.
Treasury Department analysts credit President Bush’s tax cuts with shifting a larger share of the individual income taxes paid to higher income taxpayers. In 2005, says the Treasury, when most of the tax cut provisions are fully in effect (e.g., lower tax rates, the $1,000 child credit, marriage penalty relief), the projected tax share for lower-income taxpayers will fall, while the tax share for higher-income taxpayers will rise.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/incometaxandtheirs/a/whopaysmost.htm
Shut up and go to bed…fool
April 5th, 2011 at 9:57 pm
“I pay theirs actually. All the more reason I want an efficent, fair, nonduplitive government structure with a smaller military presence on our streets.”
You’re fckin high and an idiot with nothing to back that up.
Talk to Obama and his buddy Immelt/GE before you go bashing those evil corporations.
theres more.
Here, read and learn something besides the garbage you drum up in your head
“According to the Office of Tax Analysis, the U.S. individual income tax is “highly progressive,” with a small group of higher-income taxpayers paying most of the individual income taxes each year.
•In 2002 the latest year of available data, the top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than one-half (53.8 percent) of all individual income taxes, but reported roughly one-third (30.6 percent) of income.
•The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.7 percent of all individual income taxes in 2002. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group’s tax share has grown faster than their income share.
===============================================
•Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes.
============================================== In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 94 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000, 2001, and 2002, this group paid over 96 percent of the total.
Treasury Department analysts credit President Bush’s tax cuts with shifting a larger share of the individual income taxes paid to higher income taxpayers. In 2005, says the Treasury, when most of the tax cut provisions are fully in effect (e.g., lower tax rates, the $1,000 child credit, marriage penalty relief), the projected tax share for lower-income taxpayers will fall, while the tax share for higher-income taxpayers will rise.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/incometaxandtheirs/a/whopaysmost.htm
Shut up and go to bed…fool
April 5th, 2011 at 10:02 pm
“You can’t just give these people health care vouchers for Gods sakes. Have a heart.”
Would you rather take care of illegals at a trillion every three years or give it to American seniors ?
Seems to me the illegals/Hispanics are a more important voting block.
A heart is useless without a brain
April 5th, 2011 at 10:04 pm
“smaller military presence on our streets.”
HUH ????
Seeing black choppers again Brian ?
fckin loonatic