The brain trust over at CNBC strikes again. This time CNBC’s Erin Burnett revealed that neither she nor anyone else at CNBC have any idea what they are talking about where it concerns Catholicism or its history. On a Feb 8 report on an iPhone App to help Catholics with confessions Burnett wondered if this was a return “back to the age of condolences”? Uh, “condolences”? Yes, that is what she said.
The iPhone app in question is called “Confession: A Roman Catholic App.” The description says that the App is meant to, “be used in the confessional, this app is the perfect aid for every penitent. With a personalized examination of conscience for each user, password protected profiles, and a step-by-step guide to the sacrament, this app invites Catholics to prayerfully prepare for and participate in the Rite of Penance. Individuals who have been away from the sacrament for some time will find Confession: A Roman Catholic App to be a useful and inviting tool.”
In her report on the app, Burnett imagined that having to purchase the item was somehow untoward. Here is what she said, “The app supposedly is not designed to replace going to confession but to- quote, ‘help Catholics through the act.’ The app costs $1.99. Now, wait, we wonder, is this back to the age of ‘condolences,’ those things that Martin Luther so abhorred?”
We call this both history AND religion fail, Erin Burnett. You see, the practice that Martin Luther “so abhorred” was called “indulgences,” not “condolences.” That was the practice where the Church and it representatives took money from members to excuse their sins. Luther wondered why God would need the money, as it were. But obviously this practice was just a way for the Church to get cash and had precisely zip to do with anyone’s sins.
Sadly not a single person at CNBC, not the producers, not the cameramen, not the script writers and most specially not on-air “talent’ Erin Burnett, know that the word was not “condolences.” Proving, once again, that the Old Media leftists are so out of touch with both history and religion that no one there caught it.
But there was an even deeper misunderstanding of this whole issue for Burnett and the gang at CNBC. You see, indulgences were sold by the Church and the Church got the money. For Burnett’s idiotic point to be a proper analogy this iPhone App would have to be sold by the Catholic Church. But it isn’t. The thing is being sold by a private citizen, not the Catholic Church.
Yep, Burnett and CNBC has “fail” written all over them.
(H/T Newsbusters)









February 10th, 2011 at 7:55 am
“It’s because people are attracted to extreme drama and fake reality TV.”
People get their news from mostly FOX and CNN so knock off the bullsht already.
FOX has one of the most stellar line ups having nothing to do with this superficial sht you speak of. All stations have their little bias and leanings but any “ADULT” knows where to get their info outside of a computer.
Its time you all knock off this childish bullsht before we get to the point that weve poisoned the entire well and everything is dismissed.
I dont watch “ANY” reality TV and have noticed that most who do dont have a fcking clue whats goin on in this world.
Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer,Bret Baer, Megyn Kelly,etc, etc, etc,…
They have pretty diverse viewership of independents, 40% liberals and the rest conservative…
So please, everyone grow the fck up and knock off the bullsht !
February 10th, 2011 at 7:59 am
“Why would you call the cameraman an idiot because a talking-head said something wrong?”
And would say everyone at FOX is not one of the brighter ones because of Carlsons error ?
THATS WHAT YOU DID YOU FCKING LOSER !!!!
You blame one person for a generalization and then turn around and do the EXACT SAME FCKING THING !!!
GOT IT ASS HOLE ??
February 10th, 2011 at 8:03 am
because of Carlsons error ?
THATS WHAT YOU DID YOU FCKING LOSER !!!!
You’re a hopeless ret@rd. Again, WHERE did I say it was because of Carlson’s error? I DID NOT blame her error on the whole cast. Spin away Mick, spin away.
February 10th, 2011 at 8:07 am
A majority of the clowns at Faux are idiots. Like I said before I respect O’Reilly, so it’s not EVERY single person, but MOST. This isn’t because of Carlson’s error and I never said that, it’s my own opinion – NOT a generalization. Todd is blaming Cameramen for a pundits error.
You really should pull your head out of your a$$ sometime, that must be uncomfortable.
February 10th, 2011 at 8:15 am
“DID NOT blame her error on the whole cast.”
Show me where I said you did.
If Carlson an idiot but one of the brighter ones what does that make everyone else at FOX?
Dumber than her ?
Ergo, everyone at FOX is dumber than dumbo Carlson.
you said it yourself. “She must be one of the brighter ones”
You did exactly what you ragged on Warner for doing.
He labled everyone incompetent.
You labeled everyone stupid.
Spin nothing b*tch, just pointing out the obvious
February 10th, 2011 at 8:20 am
Warner doesnt really know that the crew is responsible for ‘whats her names’ error anymore than you know that Carlsons one of the brighter ones rendering eveyone dumber than her.
Now sit down and shut up ass hole
February 10th, 2011 at 8:22 am
If Carlson an idiot but one of the brighter ones what does that make everyone else at FOX?
Dumber than her ?
Ergo, everyone at FOX is dumber than dumbo Carlson.
Right, so how is I’m blaming everybody’s idiocy on HER error? I’m not, which is what you keep saying. I’m simply saying “She’s an idiot, most others are idiots as well.” I’m NOT saying “Because she doesn’t know what ignoramus means, that means everybody else is an idiot.” Regardless of Carlson’s error, my opinion is that the pundits and reporters on Faux are idiots. I’m just using her as an example, I’m not blaming everybody else for her error, which is what you keep trying to tie to me, though you can’t because I never said that.
You did exactly what you ragged on Warner for doing.
I’m saying the reporters and pundits on Faux are idiots. Todd is saying the cameramen are idiots because a pundit made a mistake. If you can’t see the difference then I can’t help you. You’re just going down spin-alley now, so ta-ta on this subject.
February 10th, 2011 at 8:24 am
Warner doesnt really know that the crew is responsible for ‘whats her names’ error anymore than you know that Carlsons one of the brighter ones rendering eveyone dumber than her.
Sadly not a single person at CNBC, not the producers, not the cameramen, not the script writers and most specially not on-air “talent’ Erin Burnett, know that the word was not “condolences.” Proving, once again, that the Old Media leftists are so out of touch with both history and religion that no one there caught it.
He doesn’t report as such.
February 10th, 2011 at 9:12 am
“so how is I’m blaming everybody’s idiocy on HER error?”
Once again buttmunch, never said you did.
Quit returning to the same argument.
I like Warner, we all make mistakes or fail to discern opinion from fact.
All you did was commit the same offense you cry about.
Carlson is not one of the brighter ones. By asserting she is by calling her not bright but brighter than most you’re calling everyone at fox dumber than her.
Any fcking idiot knows thats no more true than Warners submission.
Its not the first time you’ve walked right into yourself…”Denver Dan”
February 10th, 2011 at 9:20 am
“so how is I’m blaming everybody’s idiocy on HER error?”
Once again buttmunch, never said you did.
And would say everyone at FOX is not one of the brighter ones because of Carlsons error ? (Post 26)
That’s just one example. So, yes, in fact you did.
February 10th, 2011 at 11:42 am
Everyone at fox is not dumber than Gretchin.
Everyone at CNBC is not incompetent because of whats her name.
You’re both wrong.
And I love you both
I like a good joust as much as the next guy. But on this one, I’m bangin both your heads together.
Right now weve got some serious issues facing us besides tearing down two very different but credible outlets.
FOX news, even though a tributary is pretty much an entity in itself.
CNBC, also a tributary, is just that, with much less appeal to the general audience.