If your reaction to this story isn’t to nearly give yourself whiplash with your double take, then nothing can faze you. A man named Glen Busch started the Chicago chapter of Coats for Kids back in 2005 and since that time he’s delivered winter coats to more than 2,000 needy children. Shockingly, Mr. Busch has been fired from the charity organization for posting on his personal Facebook page a plea to folks not to jump to partisan conclusions about the motives of the Arizona shooter and wishing for one and all to remember the victims first.
Really, you ask? Why was he fired again? Because the charity decided that Mr. Busch broke his non-partisan status as a charity worker by somehow joining the political fray because Busch was telling people not to make it all political!
Yes, my neck is hurting from the double take, too.
According to Fox News, here are two of the posts that Mr. Busch made:
” This was not a political thing, it was a psychotic thing. This kid was nuts! Now lets drop the ink wars and pray for the families. Maybe apologize in public just like your accusations as well? I’m just saying.”
When the shooter, Jared Loughner, was identified Busch posted “Now that we know that this kid was an extreme socialist and democrat, does that change some of the opinions? Guys look, this is not political, he’s just crazy. I do not hold liberals responsible for this now that the facts are known.”
We know now, of course, that Loughner was a registered independent (not a Democrat) and that he hasn’t voted in years, but Busch can be excused for not knowing that because many folks thought he was a Democrat in the early stages of the news. But Busch is right that this really isn’t “political” but is instead “a psychotic thing.”
I know. I am still a bit hazy on this, too. So why the heck did the charity fire Mr. Busch over this rather innocuous Facebook posting? Paul Darby, the president of the national chapter of Coats for Kids, released a statement on why they fired Busch to help us understand.
“As a public non-profit foundation, it is essential that we not become involved in public controversy, either in support or in opposition of an issue or cause. You have every right to make whatever comments that you wish as a citizen. We support that right as Americans. Unfortunately, you name is clearly associated with the Coats for Kids Foundation and the activities by the Foundation in Chicago.”
Yes, they fired the guy for being political when he wasn’t really being political.
It makes no sense at all. As Ed Morrissey said, “apparently a couple of Facebook postings asking people to stop leaping to conclusions over the Tucson shootings outweigh the years of good work.” It is a sad over reaction that I hope Coats for Kids revisits.
After all, this was Mr. Busch’s own Facebook page and no one was assuming he was speaking for the charity. But even if he was, is what he wrote so outrageous?
And does this mean that anyone can be fired for anything they have on their personal Internet pages? Seems a bit draconian.
Update









January 13th, 2011 at 3:04 pm
The operative words here are :
Non-Profit/Public
Chicago
Smells alittle? Smells Alot.
Seems Coats4Kids is nudging…
So….More kids get sick and healthcare goes up…
DeepDishMoonbatThinking!
January 13th, 2011 at 3:19 pm
So, whoever fired him is not making a statement of their own ?
Pathetic
January 13th, 2011 at 3:50 pm
Read the actual article. NEVER just take Warner Huston’s word for something. The man who was fired called the shooter “an extreme Socialist and Democrat.” All while saying hey guys, nothing political here, don’t jump to conclusions!
January 13th, 2011 at 3:55 pm
He wasn’t calling for less vitriolic rhetoric, he was doing exactly what he was accusing others of doing.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:07 pm
Yeah Ginnie, read the article.
He also said that the guy was a nut and that his politics, if he had any, were not the reason he shot.
And that hes not holding the lefr responsible.
You need a better cherry picker
January 13th, 2011 at 4:09 pm
Saying someone is a democrat(democratic?) as a point of reference is “vitriolic”?
Give it a rest already.
Jeez fcking crust , no one can anything anymore.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:10 pm
“no one can “SAY” anything anymore.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:15 pm
If you’re lecturing people on not to be political about what happened in Tucson, then don’t turn around and be political by lying about the shooter’s voter affiliation and political ideology.
I don’t care what people say, but if I think they’re lying, I’LL say something. I really hate it when people don’t have enough courage of their convictions to just come right out and say what they mean. It’s annoyingly passive-aggressive.
January 13th, 2011 at 4:26 pm
“If you’re lecturing people on not to be political about what happened in Tucson, then don’t turn around and be political by lying about the shooter’s voter affiliation and political ideology. ”
So what ?
Take the comment in its full context and not just pick the most benefial context to your agenda.
I am soooooooooooo past this bullsht already.
I thought he was a democrat at first cuz it was reported he frequented dem events but also made it clear that in no way did I think he was an actuall democrat and that only sick motherfcker outside of any ideology could do this.
maybe you’re just pi$$ed cuz he used the term “democrat”?
January 13th, 2011 at 4:37 pm
he was a left wing shooter
but not a democrat
January 13th, 2011 at 4:58 pm
Sorry but I’m not following this
The suspect was an Independent right?
(and BTW Who the F cares?)
He murdered 6 Americans
But who cares? DOA is easy for hospitals
The Left has many labels: Democrat/Liberal/Progressive
and the Independents?
They sit passively on the fence
It’s poker Put your cards on the table
The name of this site is RIGHT PUNDITS
Do the Math…
January 13th, 2011 at 8:10 pm
Well said, Faye!
January 13th, 2011 at 8:38 pm
micky: “Take the comment in its full context and not just pick the most benefial context to your agenda.”
My “agenda” is to call out this fake BS that this man was just innocently calling for people to tone it down. Which is about as fake as Warner’s claim that “Busch can be excused for not knowing that because many folks thought he was a Democrat in the early stages of the news.”
“Many” people did not assume he was a Democrat. Many rightwingers tried to pass him off as one. Because of something one girl he went to high school with said on Twitter and because of one book he listed on his Facebook page (and they conveniently ignored the Ayn Rand book and Mein Kampf).
January 14th, 2011 at 3:24 pm
Given how Loughner thought and acted, he was probably more influenced by another of his favorite books, “Through the Looking Glass”.
January 14th, 2011 at 4:43 pm
“fake BS that this man was just innocently calling for people to tone it down. ”
Got anything to back that up ?
““Many” people did not assume he was a Democrat.”
yeah they did. The concensus at first was that it a disgruntled constituent