Here is your thread for exit polls in the 2010 general election on November 2, 2010. Available exit poll data is included in our live blog widget below in real time Preliminary data is summarized in this article and final exit poll data is included in the updated links. Join the Right Pundits election desk team for a long Tuesday election day where we will blog until we drop.
Update 1 (first wave data) 5pm ET:
country is on right track (35%), wrong track (62%)
democrat party favorability (43%), unfavorable (53%)
GOP favorable (41%) unfavorable (53%)Obama approve disapprove (45%), disapprove (54%)
almost entirely useless so far. And note that for whatever it is worth, early exit poll data is notoriously unreliable.
stay tuned in the live blog window for more updates…..
Update 2 (second wave data) 6pm ET:
My vote is a referendum on Obama
38% yes, 24% no, 36% no effect.Health care law:
most voters favor repeal.
More exit poll data can be found here and here.
Full set of final exit polls state by state can be found here.
***
Exit poll data for the 2010 general election will be surveyed in several states and by several organizations, however the main exit polls surveys will definitely not be conducted by the Voter News Service. That organization of several networks and newspapers disbanded because of terrible results in two straight elections, both the 2000 election when their data resulted in networks calling the wrong winner in the national presidential election, and in 2002 when computer glitches rendered the data useless.
(Click arrow to join live blog)
In exit poll history, the VNS gave way to the National Election News Pool in 2004, but their data famously masked the true results which once again led to a wrong call in the early evening.
Current methods employed by the networks use a variety of tactics to gather exit poll data as managed by the National Election Pool under contract with Edison Research. They will conduct surveys in only 26 states in the 2010 general election, all at the state level meaning that no data for local congressional races will be gathered.
In fact some of the data is already known. Telephone surveys of early voters, which make up a significant part of the electorate in 2010, are already included in the data bank. What they will next do is use human surveys of election day voters combined with more telephone polls.
Much more can be learned here.
As usual the preliminary exit polls by state which are released in the late afternoon should always be taken with a grain of salt. Much of that early exit polling data will not be normalized and will not include later voters, typically office workers who work 9-5 jobs and vote on the way home. Because of this phenomenon, early exit polls tend to overestimate Democrat support and underestimate GOP support.
It is also true that Democrat voters are historically more willing to talk with poll takers. Demographic details give the numbers crunchers ways to normalize for this data, but the early data especially is suspect.
Keep all of that in mind when you review the exit poll data included in our live blog session and the final data that will be included later in this post.










November 2nd, 2010 at 8:24 am
The election polls correctly called Al Gore the winner of both Florida and the popular vote, but the Supreme Court took Florida away from him in a 5-4 decision.
How soon we forget, or in your case, twist history to suit our own biases.
November 2nd, 2010 at 8:38 am
Dude, it’s too early in the morning to already be toking.
History lesson: Your man Gore attempted to steal the election by having selected recounts only in the counties that he won by large margins. It was a dishonest attempt to steal an election by accumulating additional votes as he knew that manual recounts always increase the number of votes counted in approxiamate proportion to those cast.
The Supreme Court told Gore to go F himself, you aren’t going to win an election that way, the only fair way that would not have disenfranchised voters elsewhere in the state would have been to do a manual recount of all of the counties, that includes the ones that the Republican was ahead in, too bad you tried to cheat your way to the Presidency, as now the deadline has passed to ask for that.
November 2nd, 2010 at 8:46 am
Thank God Gore didn’t win that election I mean could you imagine how this country would be right now? I mean at least we are in great shape now thanks to Bush, we are the greatest nation on the planet.
November 2nd, 2010 at 8:53 am
Seriously….great shape since bush. bush the one who took clintons multi million dollar surplus and dug it into a multi million dollar deficit. You are an idiot!
November 2nd, 2010 at 8:55 am
The hard work of rolling back 80 years of statism begins after the election. Tonight I will enjoy hearing the voice of the people, awakened from a long slumber.
November 2nd, 2010 at 8:56 am
I’m sorry it was my failed attempt at being facetious.
November 2nd, 2010 at 8:57 am
@Rakb – so true. I think We the People have just begun to realize that our liberties are truly at jeopardy.
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:01 am
Wow. Clinton’s surplus?? Remind me how counting our Social Security System as part of the overall government budget is a surplus. Really? The Democrats and Clinton counted the money for senior citizens in the Social Security program as part of their budget to make it look like a surplus. The Republicans refused to use that sneaky tactic. So no, everything is not as it would seem way back in Clin-Talk land. Lol. Read’em and weep today folks…Real Americans taking the USA back from a socialist agenda.
So Jaime, not that we winners call names…butin this case since you called someone else the name first…apparently you’re the idiot.
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:04 am
NoeValleyJim: Gore never won Florida. Despite several re-counts Gore never one a single recount, Period! If you want a president elected by popular vote than work hard to change the rules but get over your loss! As for the popular vote, using the Gore (and yours apparently) standards of unfairness, you would have to re-count the entire country to accurately make that determination. Win or loose they both had a greater percentage of the popular vote than Bill Clinton ever did so what does it really mean?
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:14 am
Bearing in mind who took control of Congress in budget year 2007 this graph tells the whole story. http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/obama_budget_deficit.jpg
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:16 am
I don’t know what is the problem with recounts. The secret is to keep recounting until you’re ahead. Hey, it worked for me!
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:30 am
you mean the same social security that doesnt even exist anymore and bush had a huge hand in that…
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:38 am
Gee, if Al Gore could have won his home state of Tennessee or Clinton’s state of Arkansas, Florida would have been a moot point.
In 1984 Mondale only won one state but at least it was his own!!!
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:53 am
Jaime, “you mean the same social security that doesnt even exist anymore and bush had a huge hand in that…” thank the Dems for fillibustering Bush’s restructure. How people like you can blast Bush’s fiscal policy during war time and then praise your messiah for creating the worst debt in history with no payoff is frightening to me.
November 2nd, 2010 at 9:58 am
Besides Jaime it wasn’t Clinton’s multimillion dollar surplus. Clinton had nothing to do with it. He had help from the Tech boom and other factors. Additionaly, in 1999 Clinton is the one who demanded the de-regulation of the housing market. Look how that worked out. And he let Osama off the hook the first time so he could come back and strike again. But yeah keep throwing Clinton out there as an example it helps us Republicans.
November 2nd, 2010 at 10:30 am
You guys sure are fighting awfully hard over republican vs. democrat when they’re just different sides of the same coin. Kind of reminds me of watching football fans argue over why “my team can kick your team’s ass”.
November 2nd, 2010 at 10:36 am
That “Clinton Surplus” was actually a Republican Congress surplus. Clinton, in true Clinton sytle took credit for something he fought against during his entire administration.
November 2nd, 2010 at 10:43 am
The GOP Congress, as well as Clinton, deserves credit for the annual budget surpluses in the 1990s. But the important fact is this: the national debt – the sum of annual deficits or surpluses – DECREASED during Clinton’s 8 years, but DOUBLED during Bush’s 8 years. And Bush had a GOP Congress for 6 of those years. The national debt TRIPLED during Reagan’s 8 years.
If you expect the GOP to get the debt under control, you do not understand the history of U.S. federal debt.
November 2nd, 2010 at 10:50 am
Doug, Thanks for attempting to put NoeValleyJim straight. Experience tells me you were probably wasting your breath though.
November 2nd, 2010 at 10:56 am
Clinton didn’t have a surplus, he spent Social Security excess receipts to make it look like a surplus on paper, which is partly why we have such a high debt now.
Kind of like that trick to take 500 billion from medicare and say it would help lower costs while spending it on the health care reform bill instead of seniors. It doesn’t help medicare stay solvent if you spend it on something else.
November 2nd, 2010 at 11:01 am
Seriously people? This is exactly what is wrong with this country today. Politicians used to be people of character and tact. They were once the best and brightest amongst us. Today politics is a three ring circus where the person who can fling the most mud is the brightest star! We have to stop this bickering because it is getting us nowhere!! If you want to sit on the blogosphere and rant about an election that happened 10 years then fine, but realize that you are wasting valuable time that could be focused on improving the future! We are never going to solve any of the millions of problems this country has if all it’s brightest people are willing to do is get on line and anonymously call each other names and relish in their knowledge of history! It is time for us to come together and solve these problems as a united country with a clear goal; a better America and world for our children!!
November 2nd, 2010 at 11:02 am
“Doug, Thanks for attempting to put NoeValleyJim straight. Experience tells me you were probably wasting your breath though.”
You’re right about that Kevin. Representatives of nine major liberal newspapers went to Florida and counted the votes afterwards. They declared unanimously that Bush won the election.
Lefties like NoeValleyJim just can’t let it go.
November 2nd, 2010 at 11:03 am
You people just don’t get it, do you? Pascal said, “The more it changes, the more it’s the same thing. Are you even able to consider those less fortunate than Americans?
November 2nd, 2010 at 11:05 am
Correction-the more it’s the same thing.”
November 2nd, 2010 at 11:07 am
“It is time for us to come together and solve these problems as a united country with a clear goal; a better America and world for our children!!”
But Dug, the moonbats won’t cooperate!!