Gawker Media is probably regretting publication of a Christine O’Donnell sex story by an anonymous source who they paid for the story although publisher Nick Denton is still defending it. Meanwhile new reports suggest that the Christine O’Donnell one night stand kiss and teller may be a 28-year old man named Dustin Dominiak, while earlier reports speculated on his friend, Brad Kurisko, who lived with him at the time. Read more below about this tangled web.
It is beyond the scope of this journalist to muster the English words to capture all the problems with the original Gawker article. The story begins breathlessly by proclaiming a Christine O’Donnell one night stand by an anonymous writer. The writer narrates in excruciating detail what she and her friend were wearing when she showed up “uninvited” at his door, precisely how many drinks they consumed in different locations (yes, the guy seems fixated on booze) including the shocking revelation that beer was consumed on His Couch, an apparently horrifying lack of bikini waxing, one too many remarks about her ladybug Halloween costume, and droning on and on endlessly more.
In the end we arrive at the climax except in this case we finally learn they did not have sex after all. Christine O’Donnell merely slept over in “his bed,” which is apparently a startling revelation for Gawker editors worthy of nationwide interest. It is a yawnful waste of reading time, but the misleading title and lead in are the least of the problem with the Gawker Christine O’Donnell article.
You can read the full article here but once you get past the title “I Had a One-Night Stand With Christine O’Donnell” it is a slow motion train wreck from beginning to end.
Is this news? No, obviously it’s just a bit of yellow journalism which all news sites seeking readers will do from time time. But normally there is some element of truth to online publishing where the writers then have greater liberty to embellish than major newsrooms. But this Christine O’Donnell sex smear stands naked on the face as unprovable, certainly uneventful, and an entirely partisan smear.
And then there is the angry tone. The author sounds vindictive and mean-spirited who the reader feels has lost his way in life. Everyone knows that boys don’t kiss and tell, and here we have this clod barking as if he is a Philadelphia Phillies fan heckling the San Francisco Giant’s right fielder. As readers we become simultaneously angry about his callous disparagement of women and sorry for whatever is torturing his psyche.
You can read an avalanche of reactions to the Christine O’Donnell one night stand claims here and here and satirically here.
So who is this fellow who wrote it? That is a less interesting question than why Gawker published the nonsense, but this site is strongly insinuating that the culprit might be named Dustin Dominiak. He is the friend of Brad Kurisko of Philadelphia, PA, who this writer thought was the evil doer earlier today. His photo is there, and anyone will agree this fat-headed fellow does not rate a Christine O’Donnell one night stand even if she is prone to such sinful pleasures. The two friends shared an apartment in Philadelphia three years ago.
Tell us what you think of the Christine O’Donnell sex smear story below in the comments.










October 28th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
It’s pretty astonishing that Gawker would even publish something like that article. It was like reading the National Enquirer (pre-Edwards story).
Amazing the lengths that liberals will drop to to smear someone’s character.
October 28th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
[...] the original here: Christine O'Donnell Sex Smear: Gawker's One Night Stand Writer … Share and [...]
October 28th, 2010 at 6:51 pm
So can the left clarify their political positions or plans to improve our country in any way?
October 28th, 2010 at 7:24 pm
ummmmmmmm…where are those distasteful pictures from? She looks drunk…just saying
October 28th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
This is sleazy reporting … but don’t delude yourself and think that this type of tactic is limited to “liberal” or “conservative” … it’s kind of an unfortunate trait of poor human behavior …
October 29th, 2010 at 2:17 am
This young lady certainly has some baggage from her past. Who of us do not?
Young people should listen to what she says in this commercial.
Afterall, it is your future that the democrats are spending to pay for votes from parasitical parts of the population.
Maybe it is time for a resurgence of youthful conservatism, one which will mix the acceptable aspects of liberalism to build a society which follows ten commandments but allows some tolerance as long as it is tempered by judgement.
She deserves a chance to serve the people.
October 29th, 2010 at 6:32 am
I’m no O’Donnell fan, but this was a totally tacky and misogynistic move by Gawker. Oooh, an atractive adult went to a party and met a man. Scandalous.
October 29th, 2010 at 7:01 am
Agreed that the story itself is completely irrelevant, but I don’t see how relating a true story can constitute a “smear” — that term implies that something is being made up or distorted. The article was pretty much just a story of what happened. I thought it was stupid and yes, irrelevant, but not a smear.
Oh and by the way — I don’t get why the presence of natural pubic hair is such a turn-off for some guys. I really am not very interested in someone who looks like a 10 year-old. Assuming basic hygiene is intact, I can’t really grasp why it turns guys off when an adult looks like an adult.
October 29th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
In order for this to be a sex smear, doesn’t there have to be some sex involved?