The following story is what happens when global warming groups have too much research money. The result? Once again inferior species and plant life are elevated above mankind in stature. Liberals say three children are one child too many.

People are bad for the planet according to a group calling itself the Optimum Population Trust. You see, if we just had less children, all of the people would dry up and blow away. And we would be left with nothing but the critters and innocent plant life.

No more people, get it? Cool, man. That means no more C02 production according to these non-breeders.

Well, not quite. They are forgetting that the vast majority of CO2 is created by plant-life and farting cows. So before we kill off the people, we should be sure and kill all the animals and plants too. Then we would have a perfect Garden of Eden for the liberals — a barren wasteland.

Without irrigation, of course, much of the world I know in California would be a barren wasteland whether or not we kill all of the respirating life on earth. But that doesn’t matter to the people-hating liberals who announced their curious position on population growth.

“The decision to have children should be seen as a very big one and one that should take the environment into account,” quoth the liberal. “As a general guideline, couples should produce no more than two offspring.”

Thank you for the guidelines. The antedote for global warming is just kill everyone, well kill every 3rd child to be fair. Did not China do something like this already? How is their CO2 production these days?