The media, in its seemingly endless ability to miss the real story, is awash in celebration today. Fifteen British sailors taken hostage by Iran were released from captivity.
I share no sense of joy except in the relief that their families must feel at this hour. But there are far greater stakes than the relatively unimportant feelings of a few family members.
Great Britain, our closest ally in the War on Terror, has been utterly humiliated by the events of the past two weeks. And the extent of their ineptitude has corresponded with a rise in Iranian stature. Oh joy, Ahmadinejad “defused a growing crisis” by pardoning the sailors. God help us all. It is clear now that the world community has neither the willingness nor the ability to check Iran, an Axis of Evil nation with a stated objective of destroying the United States as they work furiously on developing the weapons necessary to try it. The Anchoress has an interesting perspective on why that might be so.
The public statements by British authorities as this sorry saga unfolded got progressively weaker. The extent of their willingness to accommodate Iran on the public airwaves, about what precisely they might be willing to say about broaching Iranian territorial waters (you know, in the “future”), about the diplomacy going on behind the scenes, and about how they didn’t want to upset Iran left me wrenching and speechless. At the end, we hear from Tony Blair, “throughout we have taken a measured approach — firm but calm, not negotiating, but not confronting either,” adding for good measure that “we bear [Iran] no ill will.”
The behavior of the sailors themselves are a black mark on England’s history. True, one can never be sure of our behavior in similar circumstances. However, we do know how American GIs behaved during Vietnam, an ordeal in which they actually were tortured to join the North Vietnamese propaganda operation. Yes, many did allow themselves to be paraded before cameras but the soldiers we remember are the heroic ones who did not. The photos we remember are American captives giving the middle finger to their smiling captors, a gesture that wasn’t understood by the North Vietnamese enemy. The stories we remember are of John McCain, who endured torture rather than play the propaganda game, and who refused to leave his captivity early.
“Your people have been really kind to us, and we appreciate it very much,” one of the British sailors said to Ahmadinejad in parting. Another sailor added: “We are grateful for your forgiveness.”
So I ask where is the hero among the fifteen British sailors? And I ask where are the leaders in Britain who would honor the spirit of a once proud nation?
Read also British Sailors Refuse to Leave Iran over at the Satirical Political Report. That sums it up.
And over at The Spine, they (hopefully) facetiously report that the British government is considering medals for the sailors.
[tags]great+britain, iran, sailors[/tags]










April 5th, 2007 at 4:25 am
Wow. I am not sure how I would react if I had a gun to my head.
Then, again Iran may have been very smart and really treated them well while presenting their case at the same time.
That can be a very effective technique with captives especially with those who are not trained to resist. It is another form of Stockholm Syndrome. I agree, Blair looks bad in this. Iran out played him in every way possible and looks like the good guys in this. Blair is morphing into Jimmy Carter.
April 5th, 2007 at 11:03 am
Barfola.
Iran played this whole thing real smart and has come out looking good. Will anyone look at the big picture? Iran was just plain wrong. What defense Lawyer would try some hooey like “your honor, my client is charged with 15 counts of kidnapping, but he let them loose after awhile, so that shows what a great guy he is”. Yet, that’s exactly what Iran has done.
Barforama.
http://www.redstate.com/stories/war/the_sun_finally_sets
April 8th, 2007 at 8:46 am
What a bunch of bullshit. You rightwing nutjobs don’t have the faintest idea what’s going on. You are up to your ears in war propaganda and you don’t even realize it. Iran is not working on nuclear weapons. The CIA, the IAEA, the UN and anyone with some actual knowledge of the matter have confirmed this. Thew only people who claim Iran is actively working on nuclear weapons are propaganda outlets who are owned by the same corporations who profit from eternal war. Oh, and uninformed “pundits” like you.
April 8th, 2007 at 10:33 pm
“rightwing nutjobs” Golly. Never been called anything like that before. I hardly know what to do. I’m just all in a dither. Does that mean you don’t like me? Kos I don’t know if I can live knowing someone in this world doesn’t like me.
This is the headline from a Canadian article which is linked to below [Then again, maybe a Canadian article wasn't the best choice. We all know how much those bloodthirsty Canadians spew out all that hateful war propagana.]
“UN security council toughens sanctions on Iran”
“Saturday’s motion, which was adopted unanimously”…[Unanimously. Hmm. So I guess all the members of the UN Security Council evidently are concerned enough about Iran's nuke stuff to all agree on this. Do you maybe wonder why? Then again, maybe they're all just "misinformed", huh?]
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070324/iran_sanctions_070324/20070324?hub=TopStories
Iran’s nuclear stance criticised
The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says he is “seriously concerned” about omissions in Iran’s declaration on its nuclear programme submitted last year.
Mohammed ElBaradei was speaking as the International Atomic Energy Agency met to consider how to proceed with Iran.
But Iran’s ambassador said Tehran had never said the dossier was complete.
His US counterpart said Iran had changed its “stories to fit the facts” - and suggested the IAEA would be dealing with Iran for many years.
‘Misquoted’
The 35-nation board of governors is discussing a critical report on Iran, which notes that Tehran failed to reveal sensitive research in a declaration submitted last October.
Iran had violated the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) for many years, Mr ElBaradei said at the Vienna talks.
Mr ElBaradei singled out for particular concern Iran’s failure to declare that it was researching advanced centrifuge designs, known as P2, capable of producing highly enriched uranium.
This, he said, had been “a setback to Iran’s stated policy of transparency”.
Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the Vienna meeting, Iran’s ambassador said their declaration was never intended to be a full picture of their atomic past.
They had been the victim of a “war of propaganda” and “misquoted” as saying the declaration was complete, Pirooz Hossein said.
Last October, Iran said the declaration “fully disclosed” its “past peaceful activities in the nuclear field”.
But the US ambassador to the IAEA said the Iranians changed their stories each time IAEA inspectors found something that had not been declared to them.
“This [IAEA] board has a lot more work to do and I expect we’ll be dealing with the Iran issue for many years to come,” Kenneth Brill said.
‘Clandestine weapons’
Mr ElBaradei rejected Iran’s demands that the IAEA close its files on the country’s nuclear programme and accept that it is a peaceful project.
The matter would be closed, he said, once the IAEA had completed its work on verifying Iran’s past activities.
Iran halted its enrichment programme last year under international pressure but has indicated the move is only temporary.
European states led by Germany, France and the UK have favoured a more conciliatory approach to Iran, pointing to the complicated political situation within the Islamic republic.
Tough checks
The IAEA board meeting is also hearing a report on the dismantling of Libya’s nuclear weapons programme.
Mr ElBaradei also criticised Tripoli for past violations of the NPT and urged similar transparency and openness from them. But the IAEA is expected to praise the country for its current co-operation.
Libya made a surprise announcement in December that it was scrapping its weapons programmes in a bid to end its international isolation.
At the weekend, the country sent all its known remaining nuclear weapons-related equipment to the US as part of a disarmament deal.
An IAEA spokeswoman said Libya, as well as Niger, would sign up on Wednesday to the agency’s additional protocol, which allows tougher inspections of their atomic sites.
Another issue being raised at the Vienna talks is growing concern over the black market in nuclear material and equipment.
This follows recent revelations that a top Pakistani scientist sold nuclear secrets to Iran, North Korea and Libya.
Mr ElBaradei said he would be putting forward steps to tighten control over nuclear activities.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/3541881.stm
Published: 2004/03/08 19:24:52 GMT
© BBC MMVII
———————————————–
So why all the games if Iran is on the up-and-up? Are the North Koreans invololved with Iran’s nuke stuff? Why? What’s North Korea’s recent history as far as nuke things go?
April 8th, 2007 at 11:28 pm
Article from a link in an earlier post on this site.
North Korea Assisting Iran with Development of Nukes
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=VHOZSF2QLAXUBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/01/24/wiran24.xml
A lot of hay has been made over the fact that the United States is the only one to have ever used an atomic weapon.
Two things to think about
1) The United States, while being the only country to use an atomic weapon, hasn’t used one since. Iy
April 8th, 2007 at 11:49 pm
2) The US used atomic weapons as soon as we
made them.
So, like Gramma used to say “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. .
April 9th, 2007 at 12:02 pm
The US is blackmailing UN member states once again based on false claims about fictitious WMD. And “conservative” Americans are so braindead, they fall for the same trick once again.
Here, read this in regards to the non-existance of Iran’s nuclear weapons:
http://www.newsnation.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3031
In particular, read the segments in red.
As for Canadian sources claiming that Iran is working on nukes, there are fascist nuts in Canada, too. And Rupert Murdoch does not only own media outlets in the US.
April 9th, 2007 at 12:09 pm
In regards to your idiotic “an ounce of preventetion” statement…
As difficult to grap as it may be for fascists like you, foreigners are humans, too.
These are the “evil Iranians” you so callously want to kill:
http://www.coolvideoclips.com/2007/02/05/iran-people-like-us/
April 10th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Rob, Rob…
Another thing good ol’ Gramma used to say was that “You catch more flies with Honey than Vinegar”.
As for my “idiotic” statement [What's that buzzing noise?], what I was getting at was that maybe it would be better for all if the nuclear activities of Iran were under heavy scrutiny now [the "ounce of prevention"] rather than them getting to a point where folks think action is necessary [the "pound of cure"]. Which would you think is preferable?
Yeah, there are all kinds of people in Canada, I was referring to the overall tone of the country.
You couldn’t be more mistaken in your assumption of my view of foreigners, but I realize that the “fascist” costume many like to shove people like me into is one size fits all.
I’m not exactly sure how it is that you assume I want to kill Iranians on a scale that would make Dachau look like cookie-and-nap time, but maybe that’s also a result of the party-line brush being wide and so everything gets painted the same color when it’s used. Just because I might not want to make a giant drum circle with Ahmadinejad and his boys doesn’t mean I want to dance in the blood of Iranian babies and eat thier dead, burnt bodies. Puh-leeez.
June 22nd, 2007 at 5:48 pm
Aussies prevent thier capture by Iranians in Dec., 2004 in situation very similar to one discussed here.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/aussies-repel-iranian-gunboat/2007/06/22/1182019309654.html
March 29th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
I thought Mccain DID “play the propaganda game” but was beat up first.
August 16th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Thanks so much for taking the time to write this post. I was able to implement it with no problems whatsoever. Big up!

Very nice blog design and layout!
Nice, comments are soo underappreciated
Awesome article, with code examples, can?t thank you enough
Wow, so informative. I didn?t know SPAM had so many flavors! :o)
Thank you for this article and all your work, Jean-Baptiste
well, some tricks can be simpler. like the author?s comment style customizing.
October 20th, 2009 at 10:18 am
ak?am lisesi t?rkiyedeki ak?am liselerinin bir araya geldi?i bir sitedir bilginize