Last week, President Obama announced a decision to put NASA manned space flights on hiatus. Yesterday, Neil Armstrong, the first man to land on the moon, along with fellow astronauts James Lovell and Eugene Cernan wrote an open letter criticizing this decision as it ‘destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature.’ A concern that Armstrong and his compatriots have is that we have already invested over $10 billion in developing future manned space implements, and this money will have been wasted if the national government does not continue further exploration.
Armstrong typically shuns the spotlight and has been harbored in academia in recent years. But when he made his historic journey in 1969, it was a landmark event in American and world history. The success at the time solidified America’s position as the world’s technological leader, able to do anything the nation set its mind to. For a number of years, NASA captured the public’s imagination, with every trip headlined by the media and watched by hundreds of millions on television. Recently, though, each succeeding NASA manned flight receives less and less publicity, unless something untoward occurs.
For a number of years, NASA was a sacred cow in federal funding decisions. The policy problem is that, because of safety concerns, the cost of manned missions is obviously much higher than similar unmanned flights would be, with advantages that are less quantifiable than symbolic. As fiscal concerns became paramount, and as people became less invested in the future of the space program, the administration saw the opportunity to reduce its budget.
Another problem NASA faces is that both foreign governments and private enterprise have chosen to enter space in recent years. Thus, NASA primarily has been relegated to the position of an adjunct to the Defense Department and the NSA. This pretty much follows established practice, where the government funds something while it is experimental; then, as it becomes more common, and the risks are less punitive, private industry takes over.









April 14th, 2010 at 6:40 am
I have really mixed feelings about this subject. Growing up in the Age of the Space Race, many of my fondest childhood memories are of NASA missions, especially the manned lunar landings. I even collect memorabilia from the Apollo flights, including rare items that actually was on the Moon’s surface.
NASA has become a joke in the last 30 years. A general lack of vision has plagued the agency. A very good friend of mine worked on space shuttle experiment packages in the mid-80s. The stuff he told me was depressing and shocking. Many components required were archaic to say the least. Stuff was transistor-based technology! No cutting-edge!
For the money it would cost to go to Mars, we’d be better off developing a nuclear-powered ‘torch-ship’. A space vessel which would burn fuel continuously at a near-1G rate. Such a space cruiser would be able to make multiple trips and be more cost effective. Plus it would dramatically reduce the time involved for flights. A few weeks for a Mars mission, a few months for round trips to Jupiter or Saturn.
Near-Earth and lunar activity would be better served by private companies at this point. The military could absorb whatever NASA assets it will need for their purposes. Then just sell the rest off to somebody who would actually use it wisely.
April 14th, 2010 at 7:33 am
I want ” moon tours” at an affordable rate.
You’re right Andy.
We need to keep exploring, going as far as we can. Thats what people do and have always done.
I watched the first walk on the moon also.
Its heartbreaking to see this lack of pursuit
April 14th, 2010 at 8:34 am
Another problem NASA faces is that both foreign governments and private enterprise have chosen to enter space in recent years.
In other words, the state of human space exploration is more advanced now than ever before. Who the hell cares whether it comes out of NASA or not? This stuff is much more important than some stupid pis*ing contest with foreign governments.
The private sector is going to be the way forward.
April 14th, 2010 at 8:40 am
A space vessel which would burn fuel continuously at a near-1G rate.
I don’t get it. G is a measure of acceleration, not velocity. Are you saying this would continually accelerate? More than one violation of the basic laws of physics there.
Also, it’s worth pointing out that solid-state electronics do have certain reliability advantages over microprocessor-based computers. The average desktop computer has vastly more computing power than the controllers used in the Apollo missions, but would never be used for space travel due to reliability issues — especially under environmental extremes.
April 14th, 2010 at 8:44 am
“This stuff is much more important than some stupid pis*ing contest with foreign governments.”
Yeah, but whatever stopped that from happening ?
Now we have to pay the Russians cab fare to send our astronauts to a station we paid for.
“The private sector is going to be the way forward.”
I sure hope so. Virgin has done what weve done in the past at a fraction of the cost
April 14th, 2010 at 9:41 am
Buzz Aldrin supports the prez.
April 14th, 2010 at 1:50 pm
[...] Neil Armstrong Blasts Obama NASA Decision - Right Pundits [...]
April 14th, 2010 at 5:00 pm
@ Rhayander
Violating more than one law of physics??? A torch-ship would accelerate continuously at 1-G, 32ft/sec, thereby creating artificial gravity for long-duration flights. Halfway there, you shut down, rotate the vessel, and fire up again to slow down and settle into a gentle orbit. A typical trip to Mars using this method would only take 2-4 weeks one-way, irregardless of planetary alignment. Though, I suppose to make the crew ready for working on Mars, you could tone it down to 2/3G.
It’s an old idea, been around since the 1950s, if not longer. Using conventional chemical rockets, a round trip mission to Mars would take 18-24 months. About 5-6 months to get there, at an optimum planetary alignment, then you’d have to wait till the next alignment before coming back. I think it’s a 21-month cycle, though I may be wrong.
There’s no way you could really use chemical rockets for going beyond that. The fastest spacecraft ever launched I think was Galileo or Cassinni, to Jupiter or Saturn, respectively. They went on a crazy flight path, first to Venus to pick up a gravity-assisted boost, then back to Earth, then on to the outer planets at about 45,000 MPH. Even then it tends to slow down.
When Apollo went to the Moon, the 3rd stage would burn to accelerate the craft to about 25,000 MPH to escape velocity. But due to Earth’s gravity, by the time it got about 2/3rds of the way, it was crawling along at about 1,500 MPH. A torch-ship would make the journey in just a few hours, which would make Micky happy! He has that 9am tee-off at the Sea of Tranquility golf course.
April 14th, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Oh yeah, getting back to Jupiter and Saturn. Even at 45,000 MPH, those probes took YEARS to reach their target planets. Come to think of it, I think Cassini was the fastest, as it got a big gravity boost using Jupiter to slingshot it the rest of the way to Saturn. I think it was about a 6 year, one-way journey.
I don’t care how nice the ship is, you won’t want to spend 10-12 years cooped up inside it. A nuke-powered torch-ship is the ONLY WAY TO FLY!
At least, until you get warp-drive or a TARDIS.
April 14th, 2010 at 6:53 pm
“A torch-ship would make the journey in just a few hours, which would make Micky happy! He has that 9am tee-off at the Sea of Tranquility golf course.”
I hate golf.
I just want to see the earth in its entirety, not that walking on the moon wouldnt be kinda cool.
April 14th, 2010 at 7:27 pm
Obama is a socialist slime worm. He must throw money at the fools who voted for him, and does not see space exploration as anything important to his loathsome constituency. Only when we rid ourselves of the cancer of socialism will be go back to space in a meaninful way. Unfortunately, our once great nation is in irreversable decline, a mere cautionary tale of liberty betrayed by socialist political scum and the fools who vote for them.
April 15th, 2010 at 4:47 am
[...] Neil Armstrong Blasts Obama NASA Decision » Right Pundits [...]