Just when you thought that the lights had gone out on global warming mythology, Earth Hour will set you straight that the party is not over. On Saturday night between 8:30pm and 9:30pm, we are all asked to turn off our lights in a sort of candlelight vigil for global warming doom.
This is a Right Pundits open talk thread where you are free to discuss this topic or any other. I’m choosing to discuss Earth Hour and the global warming fancy that has been slowly imploding over the past year.
But first just what is this thing called “Earth Hour”?
Four years ago the World Wildlife Fund proposed a turn-off-the-lights day in Australia. The idea went global the next year so since 2008 local governments and citizens who have nothing better to do have participated. You can see the video at the bottom of this news article to learn more.
The official Earth Hour website is gloriously ticking down the hours, minutes, and seconds until the big switch goes off. An interactive map will help your learn what exactly is going dark locally. There you learn precisely what time is Earth Hour, the answer being between 8:30pm and 9:30pm on Saturday, March 27th.
In the United States over 30 states are participating this year meaning many nonessential government buildings will go dark for an hour on Saturday night. In my native California, for example, lights on the Golden Gate bridge will by turned off for an hour thereby disappointing tourists and creating a hazard for resident motorists.
In New York the Empire State Building will go dark with similar consequences for tourists in the Big Apple. Even the famous lights in Las Vegas will go out on the strip. And the list goes on in the United States and throughout the world in England, France, and everywhere else where the global warming movement is still on live support.
The implementation of these measures in states is costing the taxpayers millions of dollars in man-hours. Local governments are paying workers overtime to flip switches on the weekend when they would normally be sitting at home. And they are doing this despite the severe blows cast by legitimate scientists against global warming hype in the last year.
The climate-gate scandal revealed that so-called global warming experts have been methodically exaggerating data and in some cases just making it up. The UN Panel on Climate Change has been using anecdotal evidence from campers to make wild claims about receding glaciers, claims they have improperly attributed to “scientists.” Leaked email messages indicate that a key research organization has been systematically faking data while keeping legitimate data out of peer-reviewed science literature.
Meanwhile global warming realists are armed with data that proves incontrovertibly that temperatures have actually cooled in the past ten years. That might be why you have been feeling a chill the past few winters.
But that won’t stop Earth Hour 2010 from coming and going tomorrow. They are even targeting children. It obviously will not have quite the luster as previous years as many who turn their lights off will entertain new doubts about the mythology as they sit in the dark for 60 minutes.
So dear readers, other than a great opportunity to make conservative babies, what are you doing on Saturday night? Watch the Earth Hour video and comment below.










March 27th, 2010 at 12:31 am
At 7:30 PM CDT here in East Texas I will be turning on 8 floodlights and 42 landscape lights in addition to every light, TV (3), computer (3) and radio (2) in the house. Would it help if I turned the thermostat down to 60 so my 5 ton hvac system could suck up a lot of juice?
March 27th, 2010 at 1:01 am
[...] the original post: Earth Hour: Lights Out on Global Warming (Open Talk) » Right Pundits Tags: earth, earth-hour, Global Warming, lights, night-between, our-lights, party, saturday, [...]
March 27th, 2010 at 1:03 am
It’s not just about global warming. It’s about discouraging over-consumption. It’s about saving energy, which reduces our reliance on the Middle East.
Climate change (global warming is the old term) can refer to cooling or warming of the atmosphere that is caused by human activities. If you really don’t believe in it, you can still observe Earth Hour simply to reduce your consumption of resources.
Or you can sit at home and be an ogre, impressing yourself and no one else.
March 27th, 2010 at 1:57 am
We’re experiencing climate change here.
It’s gotten warmer the last couple of weeks and all the snow has melted.
March 27th, 2010 at 3:12 am
Earth Hour is pretty silly. Clearly, it isn’t going to save the Earth to turn our lights off for an hour.
Nor will it affect the Earth for Mike in Texas to turn ON all his lights (though it sounds like he has enough of them, that he will be wasting a lot of money…)
What’s not silly though is this blog’s apparent belief that ignoring scientific evidence, sticking your head in the sand, and supporting the political agendas of Middle Eastern petro-dictators and the nation’s biggest polluters, at the expense of your own children’s health and prosperity, is “conservative.”
That’s not silly. It’s just dumb.
In 2008 Saudi Aramco made $233 BILLION DOLLARS from your oil addiction. How much did they send to Osama bin Ladin?
The same year ExxonMobil made $47 BILLION from your OIL ADDICTION. How much did they spill in the water and spew in the air for the people around their refineries to choke on?
Meanwhile, the average temperature this winter was the warmest ever recorded in 150 years of instrumental measurements. Look it up.
Yeah, no doubt the oil company PR shills have put out, through Inhofe and Rush and this blog, some uber-complicated explanation for why all the thermometers were wrong. Think about it. The simpler explanation might be… pumping out gigatons of CO2 is making it warmer in here.
This spring, Fargo, ND experience its 6th or 7th “100 year flood”… in the last TEN YEARS. Why? Because of heavier snowfalls and more extreme temperature swings… exactly what is predicted by global warming.
Get your heads out of the sand and stop drinking the Saudi Kool-Aid. And have fun with your floodlights Mike. No doubt you will make yourself feel very sure that what you are doing is right.
March 27th, 2010 at 6:13 am
Mike in Texas,
“It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt”
You SIR, are a Class A dweebledick.
March 27th, 2010 at 6:57 am
dweebledick???
You’re not kidding about that newfangled voice. Comes complete with it’s own newfangled dictionary.
March 27th, 2010 at 7:06 am
“In 2008 Saudi Aramco made $233 BILLION DOLLARS from your oil addiction.”
What’s sillier is that we could be drilling our own oil and that $233 Billion could have gone into research to develop cleaner energy.
March 27th, 2010 at 7:11 am
“…at the expense of your own children’s health and prosperity…”
Oh yes, the children!! Never forget to mention the children.
March 27th, 2010 at 10:27 am
Mike,
We wouldn’t expect less. You would just be a typical wasteful Republican. No news there.
BUT, let’s assume global warming is a hoax, is it still such a bad idea to conserve resources? Or do you enjoy the Saudi’s making billions off of us?
March 27th, 2010 at 10:38 am
This sort of thing is nothing new, and goes back to President Ford, who was probably the last sane Republican who ever lived. So what is wrong with this? What is wrong with trying to save energy?
Nothing. Nothing at all.
Unless you’re a dweebledick.
March 27th, 2010 at 11:05 am
In the Darkness Hour
It will concur the largest seven seas
We as a nation shall follow the streams & rivers where there will no longer be light.
For the Darkness hour
Trees and nature will be harmonious with each other, not letting flora and fauna best to only rely on their eyes, by the shadow of the moon.
For the Darkness hour
Children, will learn to share and depend on their own sense of self. To not be angered and confused about what they see on television. Words of book will have a new finish light, during the sweetness hour – from a bright candlelight.
For the Darkness hour
A strong emotive will ensue – for human souls love to procreate.
For the Darkness hour
Today will be earth’s day to uphold, to show their appreciations, for when divinity was created without shadow in a doubt.
Most significantly within this darkness hour, we will remember how sweet it was just to THINK and one can consider the darkness is not just bitter sweet, it is a beginning for mankind to save the WORLD – and what we hold so dearly MANDKINDS LIGHT.
Created by T. R Thomas
March 27th, 2010 at 4:12 pm
Turning off you lights will not make a big difference in the big picture in and of itself just as using a seat belt any one time might save your life. People say that they want 100 % certainty before they make life style changes for mitigating climatic disruption. The chances of you needing your seat belt on any one auto outing are almost vanishing slim. Yet science tells us that the chances of humanity suffering extreme discomfort, (think your children), in the near future are greater than 95+%. Tell me, if science told you with 95% certainty that you would get in a car accident on your next drive would you venture out? With or without a seat belt? Think about that when your lights are out and just perhaps you and all the rest of us can live happily ever after when the lights come on.
March 27th, 2010 at 5:05 pm
[...] source : http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=5933…; Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)OC firms go dark for global warming eventGLOBAL [...]
March 28th, 2010 at 4:32 am
Leif, you can speculate until you’re blue in the face but if it’s a natural cycle then all turning the lights off will do is keep you in the dark.
Most people acknowledge that there are chages in the climate, but the proof that it is man caused is just not there.
Our distant ancestors, the ones without automobiles and coal fired power plants, all experienced climate change. Periods of prolonged cooling and periods of prolonged warming. History shows that civilization thrived during the periods of prolonged warming.
Spreading mass hysteria about something that is not man made and totally out of our control can not be good for the human psyche.
“(think your children)”
March 28th, 2010 at 12:44 pm
flyingmonkey, do you really think the scientists haven’t accounted for natural processes in their calculations? They know that past climate changes have mainly been due to changes in the earth’s orbit, which aren’t happening now, and changes in solar output, which have been at a near-minimum for a decade. Meanwhile, the earth’s temperature is tracking very well with the increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.
March 28th, 2010 at 1:55 pm
flyingmonkey,
“Spreading mass hysteria about something that is not man made and totally out of our control can not be good for the human psyche.”
Your words reverberate the shrill and incoherent voice of the right side of the political spectrum.
Do you live in a cave?
BTW your confession (above) is imbued with irony.
March 28th, 2010 at 8:25 pm
Give me proof newfangled voice, not rebuttal.
March 28th, 2010 at 8:28 pm
@Bill W.
The scientists calculations are based on models.
Garbage in, garbage out!!!
March 28th, 2010 at 8:46 pm
@flyingmonkey
No, the determination that CO2 is rising and that it’s caused by humans, and that that is causing warming, is not based on models. It’s based on measurements and experiments. Future predictions of climate behavior are, of course, based on computer models, which are first tested against known past data. What would you have them use, Tarot cards?
See http://www.skepticalscience.com/human-fingerprint-in-global-warming.html for a nice description of this issue.
BTW, the crash structure of your car was designed using computer models. Your house, if it’s not too old, was likely engineered using computer models. If you work in an office building, its structure was likely engineered with computer models.
March 28th, 2010 at 9:00 pm
if you know anything about chemistry and biomes you know there is global warming due to the geometric ever-increasing human population and its use of the earth to survive and grow. Its not just the carbon economy but also in deforestation and raising of cattle and farm animals. That is if you know anything about chemistry and biomes. The flat earth society is still so out of touch as in Columbus’s time. Bill W, great post, you added some real information. And separate from this are long term earth cycle trends that just by themselves can warm the planet to an uninhabitable state. The human overgrowth has added a second derivative secular accelerant to the problem. I don’t see the point to leaving your oven on if your not cooking anything.
March 28th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
“Meanwhile, the earth’s temperature is tracking very well with the increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.” Bill W
you are assuming that C02 causes temperatures to rise.
higher temperatures cause by the sun could cause higher Co2 in the atmosphere.
Co2 is less soluble in warm water than cold. that is why soda cans explode when you open them if they are warm.
thus a better explanation for the increase in co2 is that the earth naturally experienced warming (as did mars btw … where only brian lives) … and the co2 went out of solution into the atmosphere from the ocean.
btw, the hockey stick model that was the basis for global warming has been completely discredited. even the author admits it is TOTALLY flawed.
March 28th, 2010 at 11:09 pm
Lisab, did you follow the link I gave in #20? It addresses most of your points about CO2 causing warming, I believe. The CO2 solubility effect you describe did occur in the past, when CO2 levels rose in response to increases in the earth’s temperature due to orbital changes. But the CO2 rise lagged behind the temperature rise by about 1000 years. This time around, we have no orbital effects, and CO2 rose _ahead_ of the temperature change. See http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm (Skeptical Science is a great site for this stuff. They’ve done a good job of summarizing and linking to all the real science on the issue).
As to the “hockey stick”, while McIntyre did find a statistical error, “Since the hockey stick paper in 1998, there have been a number of proxy studies analysing a variety of different sources including corals, stalagmites, tree rings, boreholes and ice cores. They all confirm the original hockey stick conclusion: the 20th century is the warmest in the last 1000 years and that warming was most dramatic after 1920.” (http://www.skepticalscience.com/broken-hockey-stick.htm).
March 28th, 2010 at 11:11 pm
The chemical bonds in CO2 vibrate faster as they absorb heat, so the more CO2 the more radiant kinetic energy in the atmosphere which by itself traps in more heat as the warming molecules attracted by gravity create a net heat shroud around the planet. Other even more complex interactions are going on to as the biped biomass increases geometrically and alters its biome with various technologies. You just don’t know physical chemistry.
March 28th, 2010 at 11:25 pm
Bill, she is a professional apparachuk for the right whose expertise is in spinning illogical arguments full of flaws, faux science, complete denials of what we all know, etc etc. to simply win the rights’ ideological point of view no matter how outrageous it sounds and if that doesnt work she will then character assassinate you, call you names, make claims to all sorts of professional degrees and aschools and jobs from being an emergency room doctor to a teacher to a lawyer. You will see it all. She is working for this blog to do just that, so you’r arguing with a chimera that has no good intentions if what you want is an honest logical discussion. Its truly a waste of time and she will only get nastier. You’ll see.