I watched the Mitt Romney interview on Fox News Watch with Chris Wallace this morning. I actually watched twice, I was stunned. What a debacle! Apparently, this was his opening gambit in his 2012 Presidential campaign, since he has written a book. Wallace, by far the most skilled of the talking head interviewers, pressed Romney on his two primary claims: that Obama has spent his first year apologizing for being an American, and that his health care plan is awful.
Romney was unable to delineate any major differences between the plan he developed in Massachusetts and Obama’s, except that the latter is a national policy, whereas Romney’s just applied to one state. He claimed that insurance companies bear no responsibility for rising health care costs, and then said that when insurance companies act ‘badly’, actions should be taken against them, but couldn’t clarify what he meant. When he tried to say a difference was that the Massachusetts plan didn’t have a public option, Wallace nearly laughed out loud. I don’t know if Romney thought that Wallace would give him a free ride, since it was on Fox. If he did think that, he might have wanted to watch the show once in awhile or at least prepare.
I readily admit that he is the presumptive nominee. Wall Street adores him. My guess is that if he gets the nomination, it would be a debacle. Name one Bible Belt state that would support him – perhaps Mississippi. He will bring down a number of Republican House seats in this region. He didn’t say anything that I thought was believable in the last campaign. I had made a bet with a friend that if he and HRC won their respective nominations, we could set up lie detectors on both of them, and make a drinking game out of it. But that’s beside the point. Instead of just foisting another nominee upon the American public, it might be worth the party’s time to actually try to figure out who the voters would support. For his part Romney might try being honest, and see how Americans like actually knowing what he would do. But I sort of think he doesn’t even know what he believes any more.










March 7th, 2010 at 1:19 pm
“I readily admit that he is the presumptive nominee.”
only if palin does not run, and he would have trouble with huckabee too
March 7th, 2010 at 1:21 pm
i doubt palin will run, but i think she would win iowa and do well in nh against romney.
she would sweep the south.
March 7th, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Romney will be great as our next President in 2012! He is the only one with the experience and knowledge that we need. If you read his book (which he actually wrote himself) you will see the research and planning that goes into his decision making and why he has been so successfull in so many of his endeavors.
March 7th, 2010 at 1:27 pm
As usual, lisab, you’re 100% right. If you look back, I think the last presidential campaign where the less likable candidate won may have been in 1976. Both palin and huckabee can compete with bho on the likability terrain, and both would clobber him in the south and mountain states. So, they would just have to win a couple of midwestern states to win.
March 7th, 2010 at 1:38 pm
i am not as optimistic that they could beat obama given a billion dollar war chest, the media and the unscrupulous administration …
however, i think romney, while he may be very nice, cannot win the nomination against palin or huckabee
March 7th, 2010 at 4:17 pm
Ok so I just watched the interview. It was just another interview. Mitt was candid and honest. There was no laugh or any resemblance of one from Chris Wallace at any point. I like Sarah Palin so far on a personal level. I do not like Huckabee because he lied and has shown extrordinarily poor judgment with his clemmencies and what not. I do not think Palin can win the nomination. She excites evangelicals and will do well with that group but Moderates and independants will not vote for her. Palin and Huckubee both runing will bode well for romney.
March 7th, 2010 at 4:20 pm
I don’t know….I think Romney loses his points because people don’t get him! To many are decided against him by sheer gossip driven research. My opinion
March 7th, 2010 at 4:35 pm
The 2008 Presidential election should have been between Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney…however BOTH parties screwed this up.
If you’ll recall, both Dems and Repubs figured Hillary “had it in the bag” and McCain was dead last and had no money…SO, both GOP and Dems crossed party lines. The Dems, confident of Hillary as their candidate crossed party lines and voted for McCain. The Repubs, confident that Hillary was the Dem nominee crossed party lines and voted for Obama, figuring that he’d be the easier for Romney to beat than Hillary.
Since the GOP figured that Romney would win, their crossover votes left Romney out and let the Dems cross over and vote for McCain because he’d be easiest for Hillary to beat.
It backfired on both parties because neither Hillary or Romney won…
However, it worked out best for McCain because face it…McCain? Come on!!
March 7th, 2010 at 4:40 pm
blasphemer!!!!
obama is the only dem candidate ever
he is the alpha and the omega
March 7th, 2010 at 4:40 pm
he is the one
March 7th, 2010 at 6:01 pm
All Palin, Pawlenty, and Huckabee are is a guaranteed second term for Obama.
Romney is the only qualified, experienced, and accomplished individual that can beat Obama. Hopefully stronger candidates with better credentials will materialize.
If not, Romney is the best we have and the religious zealots need to choose between voting for Romney or Obama. Any logical person will chose Romney.
March 7th, 2010 at 6:16 pm
I’d like to see Palin win Idaho just to pi$$ of this one guy over there.
Obama being the idealist he is gives me reason to not get too excited about Romney or Huchabee. Both have strong religious convictions and even as a Christian myself it scares me a little to see two other candidates who have strong theologies behind then which to me can be just as dangerous as the ideology we see ruining this country now.
Romneys Mormanism will be as much a problem as it was before, Huckabee is just too much of an alter boy for me. His show is just too “cute” and kinda makes me uncomfortable because I feel its just a huge precurser to campaign
March 7th, 2010 at 6:23 pm
If the left can pull out someone as oblivious as Obama with his lack of experience in governmentand have him win, with all his fck ups in the last year we should have no problem coming up with a candidate offering just as much hope and change but who can actually tell us how where why and when hes going to do what things.
Donald Duck could beat Obama in an election today but is that what we want? As much as even that would be an improvement
March 7th, 2010 at 7:56 pm
I agree. That interview was devastating. Romney is Obama-lite.
You can’t defeat a liberal democrat with a liberal Republican.
March 7th, 2010 at 8:29 pm
If we were looking for a hedge fund operator and planning to sell off groups of states to foreign countries to pay off the national debt, Romney would be the man.
Given the mess Obama is creating, the next president is going to need to be a man/woman of courage, who is willing to stand up to congress and the bloated federal employee groups and say we are turning back the clock. In his entire life, when has Mitt Romney ever done anything courageous?
Of the potential candidates, there are three that possess this type of courage: Jim DeMint, Mike Pence and Sarah Palin.
March 7th, 2010 at 8:32 pm
I thought Romney did well in defending his positions. Chris pushed hard but didn’t phase him. Sure, there are some problems with the Massachusetts plan but he and he only should not accept responsibility for it. I for one applaud him for making the efforts to reform a system that didn’t work. Romney himself openly admits that the Mass health plan has flaws. People need to wake up on this issue. I don’t support Obama’s plan either though. Rising health care problems in this nation will remain problems until we address them (or attempt to do so). I like Romney. I think he is terribly misunderstood as an individual personally and for his political views.
March 7th, 2010 at 8:36 pm
Take a look at Mitch Daniels, Governor of Indiana. He may be the Republican strong card for 2012. He had done a marvelous job in his state.
March 7th, 2010 at 8:40 pm
romney is a nice guy but cannot win the nomination
palin has the support of the tea party and evangelicals. huckabee is a distant second. either could win the nomination at this point.
the rinos and the 3% libertarians will have the choice … social con or obama.
March 7th, 2010 at 8:41 pm
After i dozed off several times during the Romney interview with Mike Wallace i thanked my lucky stars that there is a Sarah Palin. Not only is she smart she has that ” IT ” about her that no other candidate has..and oh by the way I am an Independent and there are alot of us supporting Sarah!
March 7th, 2010 at 8:43 pm
after mccain a rino will be about as welcome as a cat in a stocking factory in gop primaries
March 7th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
The posted comments are what they are but
the ARTICLE is typical, BIASED but as luck would have it, probably won’t accidentally run into this site again so will never know the next negative slam. For one, I’m not a Rom support but realistically he’s a better businessman than the ‘legal nuts” in Washington that can’t make a living in the real world so they just spend their time and hope for a lifetime pension and free “everything” else that comes with the office.
Oh well….I should have been a Politician…
March 7th, 2010 at 9:24 pm
If Mitt wins the nomination, the day after the MSM will start tying him to Wall Street, the MSM will make Mitt into a fatcat CEO and run story after story how Bain capital ripped off the little guy, they will then tie him to the DC elite thru his father and his many connections. By Nov roles around the MSM will have made Mitt into bosom buddies of the two most hated froups in the USA Wall Street and DC. While this is going on the MSM will make Obama/DNC nominee into the man/woman of the little guy, fighting the good fight for avg Joe.
Nominating Mitt is a death sentence for the GOP for the next 20 years.
March 7th, 2010 at 9:56 pm
“I should have been a Politician…”
Anyone can be a politician.
unseen.
If Omama can get elected with all his “legitimate” garbage” Mitt shouldnt have much to worry about.
But weve still got a little longer to pull a better rabbit out of the hat. I was gonna say we have a couple years but campaigns now start running days after inaugurations
March 7th, 2010 at 10:04 pm
[...] Mitt Romney Interviewed by Chris Wallace - Right Pundits [...]
March 7th, 2010 at 11:38 pm
Romney did very well defending what he did as Governor regarding healthcare. Mitt was fantastic on NPR as well.
I think Mitt Romney will make one of the most effective POTUS the country has ever seen, if given the chance.
After fours years of Obama this country is going to be begging for a person like Mitt who is not a rock star, celebrity type, cult of personality person.
Unfortunately, Sarah Palin (love her) is too much of a rock star and kind of a lightweight, reality show type of person.
Plus Sarah (and Huckabee) both try to blame a certain sector of people (businessmen, insurance, bankers, etc) for all the troubles. Obama incessantley does this as well.
Mitt Romney is the only public figure out there telling the folks not to demonize one another. He says it’s unproductive and rarley true that one class of people can blame another for all their problems.