This week several of my posts prompted discussion among readers about parenting – or more specifically, the decline of good parenting. This is an extremely difficult subject to tackle if for no other reason than most people have a stake in the discussion, and naturally we all want to think of ourselves as good parents. Whether we are or not is another matter, but criticizing other people’s parenting never goes over well. Everyone knows parenting in America has changed immeasurably (and not for the better) and that admitting this is half the battle. Unfortunately, solving it — if that’s even possible –means stepping on some toes.
In the interest in taking myself out of the discussion (I’ve covered this topic enough in the past 10 years), I’ll point to the best book I’ve ever read about this subject: Born Liberal, Raised Right. Many parenting books are political in nature, but this is the only one that explains in detail exactly when, how, and why parenting in America took a turn for the worse. The author’s argument is that liberalism is to blame.
Stay with me.
It’s a theory, really – but a good one. The author’s premise is that all human beings are born liberal, and by that he means this: “Children start off life with a will-to-be-gratified, and if it is not brought in check when they are young, they will arrive at adulthood with the same self-focused, passion-driven worldview they had as toddlers.”
Bradley explains that it takes a conservative upbringing to quell a child’s natural desire for self-interest — and adds that most parents today, most of whom are children of baby boomers, were not raised in socially conservative households (though some of their parents may vote Republican for financial reasons). Thus, they were not taught self-control as a virtue — and few have trained their own children to have it. “Fifty years ago, America was a more moral place – not because of government programs or tighter gun controls, and not because schools were better funded. Our communities and schools were safer because parents raised their children to not act on their every whim.”
In other words, before the baby boomers came along with their trendy worldview of Self first, Others last, life in America was a far better place from a moral standpoint. People in the past were no different than they are today — but they had greater self-control. They did not allow themselves to be ruled by their passions. Modern Americans, on the other hand, have been encouraged to focus on the Individual above all else. Thus, they grow up “with an exalted view of their own importance and are merely exercising what they think is their right to express their feelings in protest of an unreasonable request by an authority figure.”
Such is the mentality of modern liberalism.
In a nutshell, the kids of baby boomers – and now their kids – have rarely been told “No.” Instead, they’ve been encouraged to express their creativity and ignore societal constraints. The result is a nation of people who believe they’re entitled. They’re “rights” are far more important than anything else, and personal responsibility has fallen by the wayside. This is a horrendous environment in which to raise children, and we have the modern liberal mind (which is not to be confused with the authentic liberal mind) — to thank for it.
(Incidentally, before I get walloped by a bunch of well-meaning liberal parents, let me add this: That modern liberalism has wreaked havoc on parenting doesn’t mean that all conservatives or libertarians make great parents or that parenting prior to the 1960s was perfect. I didn’t say either one of these things — so please do not make that leap.)









February 5th, 2010 at 7:49 am
Vencker,
What a bunch of malarky. But wait, I think I see what you’re not saying: Conservatives worship Jesus better, their meatloaf is more tasty, their poop doesn’t stink, their cars are better, faster, and more efficient, their degrees are worth more, their kids are smarter, and only they can love God right.
Suzanne, you are full of ready to be expelled meatloaf. Shut up.
February 5th, 2010 at 8:01 am
Brilliant post, Miss Suzanne!
I didn’t learn how to be what I am today until I joined the military, because my folks let me pretty much do whatever I wished growing up.
Mistake.
It wasn’t until a Drill Sgt. got into my face and announced to me that he was my Mommy and Daddy now, that I started to “get it” and realize that it wasn’t all about me.
Liberals decry a good butt-whipping for their children, but I have yet to see a person whose will was crossed, (getting told No, and spanked), by their parents at an early age, ever grow up to tell those same parents that they hate them.
As adults who become parents on their own, it is the children of parents who provided boundaries that know how to raise their children.
I will never be friends with my children. I am their Father, and my role is unique. They will have tons of friends growing up, but only one of me.
Just an observation, not a sermon.
February 5th, 2010 at 8:25 am
My parents were hard-as*es, and now I’m an atheist who loves to smoke pot.
February 5th, 2010 at 8:25 am
Suzanne, if you concede that bad parenting is a problem among Conservatives and Independents, too, then why call your post “Liberals Need Parenting Lessons”?
I tell you, I have never read more whiny crap in all my life. “I can’t get published because of the liberal bias in the publishing industry. I can’t be a teacher because of the insidious liberal influence in public schools. I can’t call out anybody or anything without a liberal pointing out that I call out everyone for everything.”
Can’t wait for your next post: The Fine Art of Rationalization.
February 5th, 2010 at 8:59 am
@Rhay,
And why, oh why, am I not surprised you would chime in with this information?
Of course your parents were hard-as*es and of course you turned out to be an atheist who smokes weed. Of course.
Yet for every one of you, there are more people like me.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/120857/conservatives-single-largest-ideological-group.aspx
Always seeking to be the exception, are you Rhay?
Cheers.
February 5th, 2010 at 9:10 am
LA: I did not concede that bad parenting is a problem among conservatives and independents at all. I said, “That modern liberalism has wreaked havoc on parenting doesn’t mean all conservatives or libertarians make great parents.” In other words, just because a person is conservative doesn’t automatically mean he’ll make a great parent. But that doesn’t change what modern liberalism has done to parenting as a whole.
I also did not say I can’t get published; I have been published. I said it’s much harder for conservatives to get published because the industry is run by liberals. This is a fact, not an opinion.
To Mizdaice: You keep mentioning God when you write your rants. I haven’t mentioned God once.
February 5th, 2010 at 9:15 am
Haha, I have no idea how that poll you sent me relates to what I said at all. I was obviously speaking anecdotally.
Always seeking to be the exception, are you Rhay?
Uhhh, I guess, whatever.
February 5th, 2010 at 1:07 pm
@Rhay,
ooops…that link was for something else!
Disregard and pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…
February 6th, 2010 at 3:45 am
I also did not say I can’t get published; I have been published. I said it’s much harder for conservatives to get published because the industry is run by liberals. This is a fact, not an opinion.
Source?
February 6th, 2010 at 11:26 am
If you can stomach Ann Coulter’s book Slander, she documents my argument well. If not, here’s another:
Unmentionable: Best-Selling Conservative Books and the Networks that Ignore Them
Research reveals a glaring imbalance in network coverage of liberal best-sellers and comparable conservative titles.
By Matt Philbin and Zoe Ortiz
Culture and Media Institute
September 8, 2009
Executive Summary
Since the 1940s, an appearance on The New York Times Best-Seller List has been the mark of commercial success for any book. Authors with titles on the list can count on media attention to help sell even more copies. Unless they are conservatives.
As the Culture and Media Institute discovered, viewers of ABC, CBS and NBC might never know of the popularity and commercial success of conservative books.
CMI studied the coverage network news organizations gave to 25 books that appeared on the New York Times Hardcover Nonfiction Best-Seller List during the first half of 2009. Of those, 14 were liberal (either in subject or author) and 11 were conservative. The books in question covered current events and politics, political biography and economics. CMI analysis discovered a dramatic difference between the amount and quality of coverage.
Major Findings
CMI discovered a glaring imbalance in network coverage of liberal best sellers vs. comparable conservative titles.
* Liberal Books Favored: The networks covered liberal books three times as often (36 to 12) as conservatives.
* Liberal Authors Favored: 79 percent of the liberal authors on the list received at least a mention on the networks, compared to just 36 percent of conservatives.
* Levin Snubbed: The book that was by far the most successful in both longevity and position on the Best-Seller List, Mark Levin’s “Liberty and Tyranny” did not garner a single network mention.
* Interviewers Hostile to Conservative Authors: When conservative authors did appear on the networks, they were greeted with skepticism and adversarial questions. Conversely, liberal books were complimented.
* ABC the Worst: ABC was the least balanced of the three networks, favoring liberals eight mentions to two (four to one). NBC was a close second at 20 mentions to six.
* CBS the Best: CBS did the best job ensuring ideological balance in its book coverage, mentioning liberal books eight times and conservative books five times.
February 8th, 2010 at 9:13 am
[...] And if you really want to read the rest, check it out at Right Pundits. [...]