Is there a Carrie Prejean sex tape video? Of course there’s a Carrie Prejean sex tape video; that’s the natural progression in this sordid story of this all American beauty snubbed by the Miss USA pageant for her stance on gay marriage. I mean doesn’t everybody who’s anybody have a sex tape?
The former Miss California and Perez Hilton nemesis Carrie Prejean, admitted to Hannity that there was indeed a sex tape video of her out there. Albeit a “solo” sex tape, but still, a sex tape. I guess it depends on what your definition of is is. Thank you Bill Clinton.
Prejean, 22, says that the solo sex tape she made 5 years ago was a gift for a former boyfriend. How come I never recieved gifts like that? Prejean was pursuing a lawsuit against Miss California USA for libel, but when the subject of the sex tape came up, the lawsuit was dropped. Carrie Prejean got nothing.
But don’t feel bad for her though, the Carrie Prejean sex tape video is popping up at the right time for her. She’s getting ready to release a book and publicity, even though possibly embarrassing, is good for book sales. Carrie said, speaking of her trials and tribulations:
“All I know is there is a campaign against me trying to silence me,” Prejean said. “They tried to embarrass me. They tried to humiliate me. They tried to attack me. And I’m still standing.”
Prejean’s tried to put herself in the same category as Sarah Palin; whooping bag of the left. She said in an interview on the “Today Show” that she was being “Palinized”. She also went on a rant about Keith Olbermann and the liberal media, can’t really argue with her there.
Look, I agree that the libs went after her because of the whole gay marriage answer and her touting her Christian faith. And yes the media has done some damage to Sarah Palin as well. The problem is, the Carrie Prejean sex tape video sort of discontinues her credibility to use media bias as an excuse, as well as her self-comparison to Palin. Don’t you think?
Photos: Photos: www.wenn.com
November 11th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
I think perhaps Carrie may be all about herself. She is using her 15 minutes of fame to milk it for all it’s worth.
I appreciate the fact that she spoke out against gay marriage and expressed her Christian faith.Making a sex tape for a boyfriend is certainly not the type of behavior suggested in the Bible. The marriage bed is undefiled but premarital sex is called fornication and lusts of the flesh are works of the flesh, not works of the spirit.
That being said, I hesitate to judge or condemn her or anyone else too harshly for who among us is without sin.
November 11th, 2009 at 2:04 pm
There is no “liberal media.”
Is FOX liberal? CNN?
The liberal media is yet another manipulative myth put forth by the rabid right.
November 11th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
…that’s the natural progression in this
sortedsordid story of this all American beauty…There, fixed that for ya.
OK, now I’m off to the torrent sites to find this video.
November 11th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
[[the Carrie Prejean sex tape video sort of discontinues her credibility to use media bias as an excuse, as well as her self-comparison to Palin. Don’t you think?]]
Hard to say… I’m going to need to see the tape first- don’t want to rush to judgement!
November 11th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
Since I am at work, I am unable to comment until I get home, and have the ability to make an unbiased judgment. Unfortunately, I anticipate being able to comment on it later this evening, as I’ve heard the tape is very interesting to view.
November 11th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
Hey Gill.
Did you know that 75% of the media are registered democrats ?
All you have to do is look at the way they’re portraying Hasan and you might get a clue.
CBS and NBC Skip Hasan’s Ominous ‘We Love Death More Than You Love Life’
“Tuesday night ABC’s Brian Ross highlighted how in a 2007 presentation mass-murdering Army Major Nidal Hasan exposed his radicalism and adherence to Islam over the U.S. Army as he charged “it’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims,” and declared: “We love death more than you love life.” But neither CBS nor NBC cited those quotes for their viewers.”
. Prejean Slams Olbermann, Calls Out Liberal Media Double Standards on Today
“Invited on Tuesday’s Today show to promote her new book, Carrie Prejean defended the latest scrutiny surrounding her as the latest example of “liberal bias in the media,” of “conservative women” being attacked. When confronted by Today co-anchor Meredith Vieira about her assertion she’s been “Palinized,” Prejean threw back “Do you think Sarah Palin has been attacked,” to which Vieira dodged the liberal bias charge simply stating: “I think Sarah Palin has certainly been criticized, absolutely, by a lot people, as have many politicians.” Prejean also slammed Vieira’s NBC colleague Keith Olbermann.”
I can do this all day buddy.
November 11th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
I beginning to be dissapointed in her.
Enough with the victim sht already and do something with yourself
November 11th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
I have a lot more respect for Carrie than I do for the sleazeball Perez Hilton, but Carrie is NO Sarah Palin.
I think very highly of Sarah Palin and recognize the vicious liberal hit pieces done on her and her family.
The liberal MSM media and blogosphere have shown themselves to be classless, clueless, and totally biased.
Dave Letterman jokes about Palin’s daughter was disgusting. After being exposed as an adulterer, Letterman was shown to be what he is- a hypocritical left wing comic, that is not terribly funny and is sadly lacking in moral character.
November 11th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Easy Greta.
I’m dissapointed in the manner shes bringing attention to herself and theres no doubt shes milking the exposure.
But before any of this started her positions and beliefes were firm and not of any ulterior motives. She was just a contestant in a contest.
Shes always been a conservtive as long as she had a political opinion.
She spoke her feelings on gay marriage because thats the way she felt. Not because she saw a huge controversy like this blooming all over the place and was diabolical enough to put this all together for what it is today.
If you believe that shes conducting with intention everything thats taken place then it would be you whos more like a truther or birther.
I’m willing to bet she could do without that tape popping up or do without half the crap thats been tossed her way as a result of her stance on gay marriage.
By now shes probably got legal bills that need to be paid and is just trying to be resourceful in handling them.
In addition I think we should realize also that its not her whos running around all of creation talking crap about everyone, but instead all of creation is running around talking crap about her.
My beef is that she could accomplish this without playing the victim card as much as she has.
I think we should take into account also that the media is partly to blame not just in the sense that they allow all the negativity concerning her to be spread but that whenever they book her for an interview its always to see what her response to the gossip is.
Maybe if she hooked up with a different agenda she could use those appearnces to promote something positive besides it always being about the most recent attack on her. Open a modeling school, workshops for teen girls, charities for troops or something along that line instead it always being about her having to overcome all the crap weve seen.
Ya know, theres plenty of celebs who are very active in the community, doing a lot of good and at the same time manage to avoid the gossip spotlights and hollywood garbage.
Yeah Tim.
Letterman should just shut up and beat it.
If he were half a man during that wimpy apology to his audience he should of mentioned the incredible hypocrisy he displayed by bashing Palin and then having a bigger glass house than anyone.
I could care less what he did with his private life.
When you slander a woman thru the actions of her kids while all the while have been commiting far greater immoral acts yourself deserves an apology that goes past your audience.
November 11th, 2009 at 11:03 pm
Micky
You can quote the media as much as you want to make your conclusion of it being liberal. The most watch news is FOX news, which we all can agree is not liberal. What Americans need to realize, is that there is a media war or what I call Propaganda Warfare going on in our great nation. You can call it the liberal media or one can slam FOX news. The point is that there is so much mudslinging in our media, who knows the truth. In my opinion if one holds an alliance to either news source (right or left) they are blind. Both the right and left shout propaganda that is far from the truth in hope to capture political gains in return. What we need is more open-minded individuals, ones that exam each side of the news story then formulates their own opinion. Today, people watch commentators such as Keith Olbermann or Sean Hannity and form an opinion from there commentary. A free mind is the most powerful weapon in the universe. So people come up with your own conclusions and beliefs by using the media as a reference for the truth and not an influence on your beliefs.
November 12th, 2009 at 3:25 am
shock?!?!
i am not even mildly surprised.
November 12th, 2009 at 4:41 am
Both the right and left shout propaganda that is far from the truth in hope to capture political gains in return. What we need is more open-minded individuals, ones that exam each side of the news story then formulates their own opinion.- BEN
good point Ben
here is how i see it. msnbc is junk/trash-they simply shill for obama. olberman is a joke.
cnn leans left but has some balance
fox leans right but has balance. beck and hannity are NOT balanced but lean far to the right. shep leans slightly left, greta is balanced as is most of the fox news
the 3 netowrks lean strongly to the left-cbs,nbc,abc.
to get the TRUTH one needs to use multiple sources to get at it.
November 12th, 2009 at 6:12 am
In the end, it’s good this came to light, if she repents and starts living in a new, better way. Having two masters is difficult indeed.
November 12th, 2009 at 7:34 am
Ben.
Any slants in the media come mostly from the left.
FOX is the most watched “CABLE” news.
The rest of the “MEDIA” is compiled of broadcast channels ,newspapers, and magazines so dont even try to convince me that FOX with its incredible cable ratings is still able to even put a dent in the massive liberal media conglomeration thats out there.
I dont know about the rest of you gentlemen out there but anyone with a computer whos dumb enough to take all his references from television cant be all that bright to start with.
And if you’re going to depend on television as your source of info at least have the clarity to realize that each outlet with its own leanings is what you need to take into account.
For example.
FOX interviewed a guy who was present at the Ft. Hood shooting who got shot himself.
In this interview FOX aired the portion where the guy mentions that the Hasan did in fact cry out “Allah Akubar” right before he began shooting.
CNN interviewed the same man later in the day but no where in that interview was the statement the man made earlier to FOX in reference to “Allah Akubar” allowed in the CNN presentation which carried every same detail as FOXs interview exept for the one I mention.
You have to take your info with the awareness of each outlets bias and motive and then go from there.
Sometimes the facts can be presented in way to construe a different message.
I notice that since the majority of these outlets are liberal and attached to Obama at the hip they are trying in ways to portray this as a mental health issue and not one of terrorism.
Which is why I prefer FOX, and not because they are on the right.
They only appear to be on the right because compared to everyone else thats how they look for simply airing a balanced perspective. I can always count on them to give both sides by allowing speakers and guests from both ideologies to place their views. I cant say that about the rest of the media as often as I’d like to.
The other stations by their means of allowing a more liberal bias to show thru more often or omission of fcats favorable to the right only make FOX appear to the right.
I watch a lot of news from PBS to C Span to everything else and do a lot of research on my computer.
Toss it all in a blender and whatever floats to the top is what I go with.
The liberal media in all its facets has been beating the crap out of conservative women.
Period.
November 12th, 2009 at 7:42 am
Ben.
In addition.
FOXs ratings dont come to what they are because they attract the right that the other outlets cant.
Their ratings are what they are because of the diverse viewership they have.
Theres so many more liberal TV news outlets out there that whatever viewership tunes in to them is being dispersed among a much larger field so consequently the numbers per each individual outlet will be smaller because they are attracting much of the same demographic.
According to Nielsen a more balanced percentage of independents, liberals and conservatives tune into FOX than any other outlet.
November 12th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
I need to see this video. Tim you got the link?
November 13th, 2009 at 2:17 am
so she made a solo sex tape for her boyfriend
so what
you would think she was married and cheating on her husband with a young intern in the oval office or something.
November 13th, 2009 at 11:18 am
Well Stormy Daniels will probably running for congress now that she has no shot at beating Vitter. So what’s wrong with what she’s doing?
November 13th, 2009 at 11:27 am
It is hard to defend her on this tape. I was disappointed. When she applied for Miss California she stated she did not pose nude. First came the photos - I gave her the pass, because those were taken by the photographer without permission - in between poses. On the sex-tape I am not willing to give her a pass. She should have disclosed that before running for Miss California. I admire her stand on gay marriage, but it is hard to put my faith in the traditional values in a bimbo with fake books - entertaining her boyfriend with sex-videos. Not that there is something bad in it - just it is fair to be held against her when she runs in public standing for sertain set of values.
November 13th, 2009 at 11:45 am
I meant fake boobs
November 13th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
@Ellie: Sex is a natural part of life, and people should feel free to enjoy it and have fun with it however they see fit. There’s nothing wrong with making a videotape, so long as nobody is coerced or deceived.
The real problem with Prejean isn’t that she’s a normal, liberated young woman who made a sex tape. The problem is that she supports a policy that denies others the right to their own private lifestyle choices. She has a hypocrisy issue, not a “values” issue.
November 13th, 2009 at 12:17 pm
Rhyader, that is exactly what I mean - there is nothing bad in silicone breasts and sex-taping your boyfriend - but she is running around talking about her religion all the time. I have no clue what is Jesus’s opinion on fake boobs - he may have approved those if they existed back then in time. Her religion though is insisting on getting married and just after that having sex-tapes with a husband? It is kind of hypocritical - I know there is a double standard for the conservative women - but she doesn’t live up to it.
My point is that she lied when applying for the job at the pageant.
November 13th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
Yeah fair enough. Of course, if you ask me, almost all of those “family values” public figures — both in politics and out — are lying to a certain extent. People aren’t naturally inclined to live like monks — sex, drugs, and other so-called “vices” have strong roots in basic human nature, even for those people who publicly claim to detest those realities.
November 13th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
I’m more of a Kantian about this kind of stuff. There is nothing wrong with arguing for a moral society per se. While there are a lot of hypocritical scumbags there are also a lot of people who champion causes like the ones Prejean did who are sincere and not hypocritical. Just because one person does something hypocritical doesn’t mean that what they are arguing for is not valuable. I wouldn’t say it is fair that all “family values” people are lying, but their actions may not align perfectly well with their philosophy, but is there anything more human then that?
Also, I don’t think family value folks are arguing we should live like monks, but we should be reasonable in our actions, especially actions that cause societal harms. Casual use of marijuana I have no problem with, but I have a brother who is a heroin addict and he has caused great harm not only to himself, but to our family and his community. The same could be said, to some extent, of the young teenager who gets pregnant. Who do you think ends up supporting that young mother and child usually? Society does. I have no problem with healthy expressions of sexuality, I think we are probably a bit too prudish in this country when it comes to that. However, teaching teenagers about sex and the consequences of sex or drugs or any of the vices is a duty which a good and just society should undertake, even if some of the spokepersons are douches.
November 13th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Yeah that makes sense Bryan. I hear that line of reasoning quite often, and it’s valid — people who act irresponsibly often impose a cost on society.
Of course, my primary response is this: let’s close the public feeding trough. Let’s stop funding — and, by extension, enabling — all of these irresponsible life decisions. If you want to waste away to nothing and smoke crack in your basement all day, go for it; just don’t expect us to haul you into the hospital, detox you, feed you, give you a place to stay, etc etc. We gave you the freedom to make your own bed, now you have to lie in it.
I realize that this is never going to happen. Hell, we’re moving in the exact opposite direction with health care and whatnot. I also realize that it’s a little naive to think no safety net should exist. When you have children who are victimized by their parent’s carelessness, or adults who are truly unable to take basic care of themselves, they shouldn’t be left on the street to die.
So I’m not a radical about this, but I do think we could address this problem — irresponsible personal behavior imposing a cost on society — at least as effectively through insulating ourselves from those liabilities as we could through legislating away said irresponsible behavior.