Boy is John Edwards a foolish man, with an emphasis on “boy.�
I wrote earlier on RightPundits about why former Senator Edwards is unqualified to be President of the United States. He does not have the judgment and wisdom that comes to each of us from experience. His position as a presidential candidate is practically all related to his darn good looks, and my saying that is not intended as a compliment to the candidate.
Update: See this hilarious video about Edward’s GQ image, thanks to a commenter. A picture speaks a thousand words.
The latest? The internet has been buzzing all week with the foolish hiring of bloggers Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan who each have a long record of militant feminism, intolerance, and hatred of people that goes well beyond socially accepted norms.
As part of Marcotte and McEwan’s liberal hate doctrine, Christians become their favorite targets of scorn. Here is just one little cheap barb in a litany of religious intolerance, in which Amanda Marcotte chastises Starbucks for marketing coffee to religious people whom this bigot calls “the stupid people.”
It’s really hard for we outsiders to be convinced that someone really has the faith he professes to have when he makes his theological decisions with roughly the same logic that’s used to roll out a new ad campaign for Starbucks. Except Starbucks is more moral, since they slap a disclaimer on the cups, i.e. they’re honest with you that it’s a marketing campaign and not motivated by anything deeper than moving cups of coffee and making money.
Protein Wisdom has this to say in an excellent roundup about Edward’s error:
But lost on these Marcotte supporters—who are cheering on the power of the “netroots� to cow a politician into keeping on an ugly and hateful liability—is that Edwards just showed up Marcotte and McEwan as frauds and posturing blowhards, writers who have been pulling the wool over their audiences’ eyes by posting vicious “arguments� they never truly believed. To use the loaded language of establishment feminism—he publicly castrated them—and in so doing, he made fools out of their audiences, to boot.
John Edwards knew about Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan when he hired them, or he should have known and did not. Either way, it is just another example that Edwards is not ready for prime time.
There were conflicting reports today about whether or not John Edwards had corrected his mistake by firing these two bloggers. Apparently he hasn’t, at least not yet, from a statement issued today by the Boy Edwards:
The tone and the sentiment of some of Amanda Marcotte’s and Melissa McEwan’s posts personally offended me. It’s not how I talk to people, and it’s not how I expect the people who work for me to talk to people. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but that kind of intolerant language will not be permitted from anyone on my campaign, whether it’s intended as satire, humor, or anything else. But I also believe in giving everyone a fair shake. I’ve talked to Amanda and Melissa; they have both assured me that it was never their intention to malign anyone’s faith, and I take them at their word. We’re beginning a great debate about the future of our country, and we can’t let it be hijacked. It will take discipline, focus, and courage to build the America we believe in.
See also Hot Air, Pajamas Media, and Wizbang, Malkin, The Anchoress.
[tags]john+Edwards, blogger, website, Amanda+Marcotte, Melissa+McEwan, christian, religious, intolerance, bigot, feminist[/tags]










February 9th, 2007 at 6:45 am
Edwards is shedding the softie,breck girl image though…here’s video proof:
http://www.minor-ripper.blogspot.com
February 10th, 2007 at 11:43 am
Blogger McCain says: “He does not have the judgment and wisdom that comes to each of us from experience.”
Not each of us… George Bush’s judgment has been so horrible that his own father will not publicly defend his policies. Not just horrible execution, but bad motives: Bush thought he could be the new Napoleon. Instead of building up his empire, Bush can’t even claim Latin America as a sphere of influence anymore, a claim that American presidents have taken for granted since before Teddy Roosevelt.
Declining power, declining influence, horrible leadership, isolation from traditional allies, strategic rivals gaining in power and influence because of our incompetance… you name it. John Edwards could not possibly be worse than George Bush.
February 10th, 2007 at 12:39 pm
George Bush isn’t running. This topic is about John Edwards. You agree with me, right?
February 10th, 2007 at 4:30 pm
Yes, the topic is whether Edwards has enough good judgment to be president. The most recent benchmark is George Bush the Son, whose judgment was considered sound enough by Americans to have been elected once to the presidency (in 2004). And this was AFTER the widely known, hardly hideable, fiasco in Iraq that was entirely due to Bush’s judgments (and was known to have been so by the voters).
Why you and the other voters insist on good judgment only now, after all these years? It is hypocritical. A Democrat must have good judgment, but a Republicans can be a dufuss.
February 10th, 2007 at 4:43 pm
Ok, so your argument is that John Edwards and George Bush both have enough good judgment to be elected President?
February 10th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
What will some people do when George W isn’t in office anymore? What will they have to focus thier anger on as the cause of all the ills of the world? (as if nothing was wrong before that…BUSH). Unlike some places, Bush is not “El Presidente for life” or angling for anything like that.
In my opinion, Edwards will quickly be left in the dust of other Dems. He won’t get the Democratic nomination. Democrats will probably associate him with failure because of ‘04 and Hillary or Obama will probably be the Dem’s nominee. Stranger things have happened, though, I suppose.
February 11th, 2007 at 9:06 am
Blogger McCain, I have not said anything about the good judgment of John Edwards, other than that it could not possibly be worse than George Bush the Son. Since you do not challenge my truths, I can only assume that you agree completely with my analysis of the issues.
February 11th, 2007 at 9:21 am
BH-You are off topic again. This thread is about John Edwards. Continued violation of our comment policy is bad, very bad.
IMI-Oh it will be like Bill Clinton, you know, blame him for a few more years and then start to look ridiculous doing so. At some point, the gift stops giving.
February 11th, 2007 at 9:17 pm
The point is about judgment. Specifically John Edwards judgment. We must remain focused on that. John Edwards judgment is without doubt better than that of George Bush. And he is much better at articulating this judgment.
February 12th, 2007 at 11:10 pm
[...] John Edwards, Poopulist Archives [...]
March 15th, 2007 at 11:59 am
[...] written here and here about why John Edwards has any standing in political circles. The naked truth is that John Edwards [...]
May 17th, 2009 at 1:51 am
This post was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this subject last week.