On March 3rd, Joseph Crowley, a Democrat Congressman from New York, queried Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner about the $162 million in bonuses scheduled to be paid to AIG employees. Timothy Geithner, a week or more later, said his staff first alerted him of the bonuses on March 10th. Geithner lied and C-SPAN caught it on video. See photos and the C-SPAN video below.
Timothy Geithner (Photo)
The New York Times quotes Treasury spokesman Isaac Baker as follows:
Although Congressman Crowley raised the issue of the bonuses two weeks ago, Secretary Geithner was not aware of the timing or full extent of the contractual retention payments or the other bonus programs until his staff brought them to his attention on March 10.
Listening to the video clearly shows this statement as a lie also. Baker said that Geithner “takes full responsibility for not being aware of these programs before last week.” He also took full responsibility for not paying his income taxes until he was caught doing so, but then did not offer to pay other back taxes that had passed the statute of limitations for IRS audit. Geithner taking responsibility for anything does nothing for this Country. The man is an inept liar and a tax evader.
The NYT points out:
Mr. Geithner is not the only one who appears not to have understood the populist fury the bonuses would set off.
In other words, if the public isn’t upset, a politician needn’t strive to do the right thing. Timothy Geithner and Congress rolled the dice and lost. The question is, what did they really lose? Political capital? Maybe, but it’s doubtful. Nothing seems to stick to these “representatives of the people” and “public servants.”
In November, when the bailout of A.I.G. was restructured, Treasury and Fed officials negotiated the terms under which A.I.G. could make the retention payments. And in December, Democratic lawmakers sought a hearing about the payments.
Treasury officials have suggested that the New York Fed and the Federal Reserve Board in Washington failed to alert the Treasury staff until March 5. And Fed officials said that they not only alerted the Treasury staff weeks earlier, but discussed the issue with them via e-mail.
This article also claims that two Democratic lawmakers “had vociferously and repeatedly complained about the bonuses….” The two “lawmakers” are unnamed.
According to President Obama, he told Geithner to pursue every legal avenue to retrieve the bonuses. In early February, according to the NYT, “…Geithner opposed a provision in the economic stimulus bill that would have slapped a steep tax on the kind of bonuses that AIG was about to pay.”
Despite the Treasury’s objection to taxing bonuses, and Geithner’s refusal to create legislation to do so, the House voted yesterday, unconstitutionally in my opinion, to create such legislation and now the AIG bonuses will be almost entirely taxed.
While controversy rages about whether or not the bonuses are important in light of the fact that Geithner and Congress lied to the country about the bonuses - we can quibble over both, or we can condemn Congress for both. For those saying that the bonuses were contractual, that’s well-and-good, but it seems those contracts would have been broken without the intervention of Congress - or maybe the bonus approval via the House legislation was intended to keep AIG out-of-trouble once the contracts were honored. In fact, that is exactly what Geithner told CNN - finally - on Thursday, March 19th.
We have liars and cheats running this country in great abundance.
In the video below, courtesy of Hot Air, you’ll hear Timothy Geithner made aware of the AIG bonuses on March 3rd.
Timothy Geithner, Congress (Photos)
Timothy Geithner (Video)










March 20th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Somebody tell this clown that there’s an elf out there that wants his ears back.
March 20th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Hondo, do you think he and Obama are related?
Great story, Maggie.
March 20th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
I do believe that Mr. Geithner’s pants are on fire.
March 21st, 2009 at 2:45 pm
It appears Mr. G doesn’t present himself that well, or is not that charismatic, or good at spin miesting, but all the same the multitude of programs coming out of treasury and the fed seem to be helping now, and rather quickly so I wouldn’t write him off. I think the bush picks for tresury were better public speakers, more charismatic, and better at spin than he is, but maybe that is his weakness. Obama knows how critical it is to solve the economic problems and must see something in the guy. Still his inexplicable tax problems are troubling and his inability to hire on a staff are frustrating. He seems to recognize what China is doing to its currency which displeased them hearing it so its probably right. Geitner is still the great unknown, but he did come up with talf I think, which actually is the first attempt to help the small guy. Maybe he’s moving from the big to the small guy now. It seems that we need to bring in the small guys money needs, which will be a big thing. Aig, love them or not, does need a talented pool of brokers to unwind all the debt against the pirhana on wall street. so the retention bonus’s that failed to retain, were meant to keep on competitive talent because they had us by the hair if we wanted to get value back for our tarp once the selling to other banks etc begins. A strategic foul up, it failed, but the intent had some thought to it. The contracts originally written by that division of aig just so gave away the store it was unrecoverable. A better argument to be made would have been to let aig fail completely if we had the politicial will and national resiliance to stomache the fall out. Its a fast moving game but I think really hard to blame on any one person. I would still say Paulson rammed through a big payout to the banks, aig, and wallstreet that saved the shadow banking system while enriching its captains. Now geitner and company need to save the little guy through a hodge podge of programs and they are enacting them as we speak with what appears favorable results. What more do you want?
March 22nd, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Something makes no sense here. I thought that Rush and the RNC and all the rest of you were in favor of high-paid execs getting their money. Rush even said it last week. So…this is nothing but a straw man being thrown up to attack the Obama admin. politically, that’s all.
March 23rd, 2009 at 4:00 pm
@ arch: No arch, it was the administration throwing up the straw. Of course we are in favor of high-paid execs. What we are not in favor of is the government getting in the middle of it. We don’t even want the government bailing anyone out.
But the issue in the article is that Geither lied, Obama probably lied and Congress certainly lied.