John Edwards announced his intention on Thursday to become our nation’s 44th President in 2008. The announcement of his candidacy was overlooked by me, and perhaps many others in the wake of Gerald Ford’s death.
And perhaps the announcement was overlooked for another more important reason. John Edwards is a lightweight. He is not prepared to be a president, and should decidedly not become our nation’s president in 2008.
Fitting that the announcement coincided with former President Ford’s passing because it allows us to starkly contrast the two men. When Gerald Ford became president in 1973, he had been Vice President of the United States, served in Congress for 24 years, House Minority Leader for 8 years, immediately enlisted and served in the Navy after Pearl Harbor, and even was an All-American football star. No question he was prepared for the nation’s most important job, a fact confirmed by his good judgment in office.
John Edwards, on the other hand, was barely elected a U.S. Senator for six years and accomplished virtually nothing during that short time in Congress. That’s the entirety of his resume. He was neither admired nor respected by even his Senatorial peers. He now has the curious job title of “Director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity” at the University of North Carolina, and he continues in a lucrative lobbying role for Fortress Investment Group LLC.
And yet, he would be our President. Let’s be honest. The ONLY reason any voter gives John Edwards a second look is that he is a cute man. That will unfortunately carry sway with some voters, as it has since the television political era began with JFK. He knows that, and it is a pathetic indictment of his character that he runs for President on that basis alone. Doesn’t he know why he was selected to be John Kerry’s running mate? Of course he does. People magazine named Edwards the “sexiest politician alive” in 2000. Isn’t that enough? And that is why Edwards announced his candidacy on YouTube where his important future voting block, teenage girls, spend their free time.
Former vice presidential nominee John Edwards declared his candidacy Thursday for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, saying the United States needs to re-establish its leadership role for an unstable, chaotic world, starting by withdrawing troops from
Iraq.Edwards chose work clothes and the backyard of a victim of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans’ devastated Ninth Ward for his announcement. “We want people in this campaign to actually take action now, not later, not after the next election,” the former North Carolina senator said, sounding as much like a recruiter as a presidential campaigner.
Edwards, 53, is calling for an increase in community service and cuts in poverty, global warming and troops in Iraq. He said he made a mistake in voting for a resolution to go to war with Iraq, but also noted that he did not conduct the war. He said the Bush administration’s leadership in Iraq has been a disaster and that it would be a mistake to send in more troops.









December 29th, 2006 at 2:40 pm
and neither is Obama and the Hildebeast is unelectable.
December 29th, 2006 at 2:41 pm
He doesn’t even stand a chance of getting the nomination. His platform consists of the same old big 3 democratic issues- 1) the re-distribution of wealth 2) socialized health care and 3) pulling our troops out of Iraq, after that, he’s got nothing more to contribute.
Hillary Rodham has her womanhood, Hussein Obama has his ethnicity, and Joe Biden has 34 years of screwing the citizenry under his belt.
Edwards has done nothing with his time in office to make a name for himself or do anything for his constituency. His biggest political accomplishment was loosing the election as Kerry’s sidekick in ’04.
December 31st, 2006 at 12:19 am
George Bush’s judgement as President is so horrible that his own father cannot bring himself to publicly support his son’s policies. So I agree with blogger McCain that we do not need another unproven lightweight like Texas governor George Bush.
January 1st, 2007 at 5:16 pm
You are about half-right. Texas is the size of a country and he did run Texas for 6 years, pretty well actually. So although George Bush’s qualifications are light by historical standards, Edwards is a zero in comparison.
January 1st, 2007 at 11:21 pm
I caution Republicans against getting too carried away with this new-found obsession with “qualifications.” You might end up with Giuliani or Romney, who have zero qualifications in foreign policy, against someone with much more.
This is not an academic issue. Al Gore had much better quals in foreign policy than Bush, and in retrospect most Americans recognize how much better off America would be if the Republicans had only permitted a recount of the Florida vote, as provided for by the laws of Florida.
Close your eyes and imagine an America that is powerful and respected in the world, not declining, with leaders who understand that you must maintain alliances and isolate enemies (rather than the opposite). It is a beautiful vision.
February 8th, 2007 at 8:38 pm
[...] I wrote earlier on RightPundits about why former Senator Edwards is unqualified to be President of the United States. He does not have the judgment and wisdom that comes to each of us from experience. His position as a presidential candidate is practically all related to his darn good looks, and my saying that is not intended as a compliment to the candidate. [...]