Barack Obama’s choice for Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, failed to pay some of his own social security taxes for years 2001-2003. The press is reporting the tax evasion, but it is how they are reporting it, and what they are not reporting, that matters.
Accuracy in Media’s Cliff Kincaid has tracked some glaring omissions. In The Big Money Behind Geithner, he says that in NBC reporter Kelly O’Donnell’s coverage of Geithner’s tax debacle, she failed to mention that Jeffrey Immelt, Chairman and CEO of NBC’s parent company, General Electric (GE), is a board member of the Federal Reserve Bank.
This is pertinent because Timothy Geithner is the chairman of the Federal Reserve.
Also missing from the O’Donnell spot is a reminder that GE is receiving federal bailout funds – funds that Geithner will oversee if appointed Treasury Secretary.
The Washington Post says that Geithner’s “lack of fame” is helping him get beyond his “tax mistake.” After all, WAPO indicates, Wall Street knows him well, but “ordinary Americans on Main Street,” haven’t a clue. They see Geithner’s “hiccup” eventually leading to a “smooth nomination.”
The Washington Post has a reason for not telling the whole story too. Lee C. Bollinger, Columbia University president and board member of the Washington Post Company is also on the board of the Federal Reserve Bank.
As an “ordinary American,” I’m seeing a pattern. View a list of Federal Reserve directors here.
Being well-connected has advantages, not the least of which are influencing the media.
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissenger, speaking from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on January 5th, trumpeted Barack Obama as being the “architect of a New World Order.” Representatives of both sides of the U.S. National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, both American and Chinese, stood beside him as the market bell rang.
Timothy Geithner worked for Henry Kissenger in the late 1980s. You can read more about the present Treasury Secretary-designee’s Kissenger connection at Bob Feldman 68: Part 1 and Part 2.
But wait, still yet another connection: Kincaid’s Why are the Media Protecting Geithner? reports that Timothy Geithner’s father, Peter Geithner, serves on the board of the U.S. National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, and Peter Geithner oversaw the work of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, in developing “microfinance programs in Indonesia.”
The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the Chinese-speaking Geithner is an associate of Henry Kissinger who can be counted on to convince the Chinese Communists to continue to buy U.S. debt and finance Obama’s massive expansion of federal government power.
That is why Obama and his fellow Democrats are putting so much faith in him.
In July 2008, Barack Obama addressed the crowd in Berlin, Germany:
People of Berlin – people of the world – this is our moment. This is our time.
In November 2008, CNN delcared Obama ‘President of the World’ and, indeed, we may be seeing that idea turned into reality for us “ordinary Americans.”
Obama and Timothy Geithner, it seems, have plans to shore up America’s floundering economy with accelerated help from China. Kincaid mentions a book written by Bill Gertz, The Failure Factory: How Unelected Bureaucrats, Liberal Democrats, and Big Government Republicans are Undermining America’s Security and Leading Us to War. Gertz opines:
Beijing’s influence on the U.S. Government is so pervasive that most Americans remain entirely ignorant of the danger.� Gertz, a defense and national security reporter for the Washington Times, describes Kissinger as a lobbyist who exerts “enormous influence on U.S. leaders� and a source of multiple “misguided policies� that benefit China and other U.S. adversaries.
Kincaid characterizes Kissinger as a “lobbyist” exerting “enormous influence on U.S. leaders and a source of “misguided policies that benefit China and other U.S. adversaries.”
Perhaps this is only about Henry Kissenger adding to his government pension in a big way, but when you see the press hushed, perhaps on multiple issues, and possibly because of connections to Geithner, it should do more than raise an eyebrow.
Taking Geithner’s connections to China another step, Geithner, as the head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), as is Zhou Xiaochuan of People’s Bank of China. The G-30 is described as a “group of international financial titans….” with Paul Volcker, a former Federal Reserve chair, at it’s head.
U.S. News & World Report says that “overall, coverage is relatively muted,” especially in light of “renewed questions.”
ABC World News reported President-elect Obama “came to the defense today of his choice for Treasury Secretary, saying that Tim Geithner had made an innocent mistake when he failed to pay $34,000 in income taxes several years ago.”
The CBS Evening News devoted one single sentence to the controversy, noting Geithner’s hearing “was put off until the day after the inauguration.”
Geithner is a big-time, world-class player. What else in Geithner’s tenure over the U.S. Treasury will not be examined or reported? It is a worthy question – and especially just coming off an election where so many lose ends were left lying.
GE also owns MSNBC and CNBC. The Washington Post Company also owns Newsweek and Salon.com. We’re whittling down the sources to tell the public what we have the right to know.
Related: Networks Gloss Over Geithner’s Past, Ignore Criticism










January 16th, 2009 at 7:49 pm
Whoa. What a great piece. Seems to me Obama is incredibly arrogant not to pull this nomination. The media is covering not only for Geithner, but for Obama himself.
January 16th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
I just heard a report on Fox that Congress received many phone calls today from constitutents not at all happy about Geithner. As Herman Cain said: where are our defending Fathers?
Interesting that Obama’s mother, you know that poor single mom, arranged for “microfinancing” for Indonesia and Geithner’s father oversaw the project.
January 16th, 2009 at 8:52 pm
The rooster’s in charge of the hen house.
This is yet another example of Obama paying back his political debts through appointments.
January 16th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Fantastic article Maggie !
January 16th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
Yeah, I always thought it was interesting that he was raised by a poor single mother who had to be on food stamps while he was going to the most exclusive and expensive private school in the United States.
But then, a Marxist wouldn’t have a problem taking money from the taxpayers for their own elitist benefit.
January 17th, 2009 at 6:25 am
Beth.
I attended summer school at Punohou in the 70s and remember my parents talking about the cost back then. Hell, at some point I might of even crossed paths with Obama.
Anyway, you’re thoughts were the same thoughts I had a few months back in being that his mother couldnt be hurting that bad.
Which raises another question for another post maybe.
Isnt Barry all about public schools ?
Even with all the other ulterior motives behind Geithners appointment theres still the ethics question.
Overlooking tax commitments is almost always willful, give me a break.
Especially when your salary includes the half that you are to pay towards FICA.
So, hes smart enough for the job but at the same time its OK to be dumb ib this area ?
Maggie pretty much explained why.
For 7 years now weve been listening to moonbats cry about how our kids are going to have to pay off the debt that Bush ran up with China.
I guess its OK that Barry commit our great grandkids to the same thing ?
January 17th, 2009 at 7:12 am
GE is not receiving federal bailout money. They are paying the FDIC a fee to provide FDIC insurance to its unsecured bonds so that they can sell debt at lower spreads. Just like you would pay GEICO for your auto insurance,
FDIC is making money from the deal, taxpayers are not paying for this. Unlike the scam banks who have to get taxpayer dollars to fund their acquisitions such as Citi Morg (Citigroup + Morgan Stanley) and BAC + Merrill Lynch. The rest of your article is compelling but you should do more due diligence on some of your facts.
And we have had added GE to our distressed equity hedged portfolio, They are one of a few financial institution that we feel will survive this aftermath.
January 17th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Gordon Gekko: Much of the financial reporting I see on this, views this as a scam also – as well as viewing it as a bailout. This article is about pay-to-play actually. It’s about Team Obama buying the media through long-establish contacts, and Democrats being willing to help in the effort.
Here are just a few links I read through doing my research for the piece:
MSNBC Rewarded for Obama Support with GE Bailout Money
General Electric Gets a $140B Bailout – What’s the Point of AAA
GE Needs Fed Bailout to Finance Operations; Dividend at Risk
January 17th, 2009 at 7:47 am
Mickey, your comment about Geithner being
I believe Washington and the New York media admire people like Geithner who beat the system. It’s like a badge of honor for those of high-profile. For the rest of us, we’re just poor schmucks.
I thought Obama grew up in a household of poor schmucks too, but clearly that’s not the case.
January 17th, 2009 at 8:01 am
JoAnn, thanks so much!
January 17th, 2009 at 8:08 am
This article doesn’t make any sense. I’ve read it three times now, and I am still at sea.
If Obama wants to run up more debit with China, and if this is a bad thing, then why are we not mentioning the Bush administration, and if it is not a bad thing, then why are we mentioning it at all? It’s like, hey presto! The past eight years didn’t even happen.
And what in the world does Obama’s mama have to do with it? Oh, I get it. Behind the scenes, Obama’s evil mother is pulling the strings that move the financial machinations of the world.
I don’t know. I think that Maggie is a raving Magpie. They are beautiful birds, though.
January 17th, 2009 at 8:17 am
Isn’t Obama’s mother dead? She’s microfinancing things from Heaven. No wait! She was an athiest! Or an agnostic! Show’s what I know.
January 17th, 2009 at 9:01 am
Ed.
I did mention Bush.
Its very simple, its called a “double standard”
I’m OK with it because Obamas intentions are far more worthy than Bushs, so its OK for him to hock the whole damn country and put a guy in charge of the entire account who is either a liar, a thief, or an idiot.
Your comment on Barrys mom was so bad that you ask to have it taken down .
I dont even think you’re that stupid, but rather just got bored and wanted to say something.
January 17th, 2009 at 9:03 am
“Your comment on Barrys mom was so bad that you ask to have it taken down”
should of said;
Your comment on Barrys mom was so bad that you “SHOULD” ask to have it taken down
January 17th, 2009 at 11:21 am
I am disturbed he so messed up his taxes frankly as he should have known better, or put it in the hands of a tax accountant given the peculiarities of the IMF’s witholding taxes. Certainly this is something the IMF employees must talk about and have ways of dealing with it through experience. I wouldn’t fault him for an occasional use of part time domestic help, but apparently he did it regularly and should have known then to do it officially and proper. Sounds like his domestic finances and household management is sloppy at best and is that who we want as Treasury Secratary. I think he has a valuable role in a consultant capacity but as cabinet secratary I don’t know. He has been part and parcel of this Paulson Bailout program which is highly flawed, though in the end libor has dropped remarkedly to non-crisis levels. And I suppose you can’t blame him for not really seeing the scope and depth of the bank problems regarding insufficent capital exactly since now they need a second thristing at the public trough. Seems to me any good University graduate business or economic schools department could have better calculated the total capital losses more carefully. They seem at least double what we thought, and probably more. The first thing I would have done as Treasury secratary would have been to get a competent group to calculate the actual and predicted losses accurately and modeled a tiered group of scenarios including the present near collapse? of our biggest banks.It may well take closer to 7-10 trillion to stabalize this mess then two. And again, we have offloaded much of our cash earning manufacturing base to countries all over the world that would by definition enable us to predictably, logically, work our way out of this with more solid plannning. I wonder if Geitner is too narrow for such a broad problem. Isn’t it amazing how our entire finanical fabric is being nationalized due to the failures of our corporate titan’s leadership? The unfolding B of A story is just stunning. Maybe the message of capitalism is their is a band of profitability and efficiency that works well, but too much concentration into corporate state like enterprises causes it to collapse. The greedy hyper type A ambitious people at the top of the heep drove the nascar into the retaining wall, but parachuted out the last moment and are now recooping in their beach houses. That is parallel to what happened in our government too.
January 17th, 2009 at 11:46 am
Brian, Geithner was audited in 2006 and paid evaded taxes for 2003 and 2004. He knew he had not paid the taxes for 2001 and 2002 but he was not audited, so he didn’t pay.
I agree with your comment about Geithner’s connection to Paulson. Geithner has been involved from the beginning and we still didn’t see the first half of TARP sent well, not to mention how we were told it would be spent.
Thanks for your ideas on how it might have been handled differently. That $7Trillion number is frightful.
January 17th, 2009 at 11:51 am
Edward: Sorry you are having trouble understanding this article. Bush was not mentioned because he is out of the picture now, and dang! I know you hate it, but this is on Obama’s watch.
The fact is, media and financial powerhouses are cozy. It was relevant that Obama’s mother worked with Geithner’s father within the U.S.-China Relations national committee. Who knew that Obama’s mamma was so well connected?
January 17th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
BTW all wealthy people and politicians cheat on thier taxes and also take money under the table. I know because I worked at a few firms and this happens.
I do agree that GE is in bed with Obama, but they did not recieve 139 billion. GE is paying insurance premiums to the FDIC anytime the sell debt with a max ceiling of coverage of 139 billion.
If you want to make a case, try to be honest, and did GE get special access to FDIC due to Obama/MSNBC etc.. maybe.
Now I see GE as a good distressed stock to buy at these prices because I always say follow the company that greases the politician and you will cash in.
Just like when I invested in war/oil stocks when dumbya was elected. I sold them all in 2006 for a fat profit but now I am skating to where the puck will be not where it has been.
January 17th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
I guess Geithner thought he could squeek by on a “Dont ask dont tell” policy ?
January 18th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Gekko: I acknowledge that GE did not have $139B deposited into their checking account. They did receive FDIC loan guarantees, and they are paying premiums. If GE defaults, the FDIC pays. Without the FDIC guarantee, GE has said they are not competitive. The talk of a GE dividend cut was rampant, but at the time, no one knew the truth. We probably don’t know the truth today.
The guarantee is being characterized as a “bailout,” and in essence, the U.S. is bailing out GE and allowing them, in their words, to be competitive.
The connection of fraternization still lives.
January 18th, 2009 at 10:13 am
Mickey, these people know the MSM always comes to their rescue. I don’t think they give their mishaps much thought.
January 18th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
True Maggie, as these people, even if they got fired would get out with enough money to retire on anyways, and many just reform investment groups among friends the whole scam was so on going. They generally come from competitive backgrounds where all their life they were told they were darn smart and would always make the big grade, and wallstreet quickly proved them right. call them overconfident aggressive financial narcissists if you want. too bright to fail. too big to fail. failure not an option. and a sense of entitlement.
January 18th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Brian, that’s why so much success keeps happening for these people. They established their power, and we go along like sheeples – following the crowd while they lead.
Americans best keep their thumbs on their money. Congress is on the warpath and plans to fund their mission with our money.
Thanks much for commenting.
January 19th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
[...] about Timothy Geithner’s tax evasion – the man nominated for U.S. Secretary of [...]