Marxist-Socialist Fears in Obama Presidency.
Georgia Representative Paul Broun tapped into an undercurrent of public fear when he questioned what Barack Obama’s socialist-leanings may mean in the next administration. He warned of an “Obama dictatorship” and fears of a coming Marxists-socialist agenda based on Obama’s own recent statements, and compared his rapid ascension in troubled times to the circumstances which promoted Adolph Hitler from obscurity to elective office in Germany.
The rhetoric is obviously harsh but unfortunately taps into sentiment that is widely whispered in the public. It is obviously too early to know if the fears are founded, but it is a sentiment felt by a large segment of a wary public as Obama transitions from president-elect to the White House. Obama needs to act swiftly to counter these fears by directly confronting them in his next press conference.
Paul Broun most fears Obama’s proposal of a national civilian security force that would trump local law enforcement and local laws. Obama’s idea conjures up images of strong-arm tactics used in other socialist countries like Venezuela. Socialist governments in Central and South America have long used quasi-government militias to strong-arm political opponents. That happens to be a favored tactic of the liberation theology movement south of our border, of which Obama’s former church in Chicago is connected.
The idea is similar to that of his new Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, who has advocated for “universal citizen service.” The idea of forced servitude by young people hearkens back to the colonial days when the British government conscripted men to serve on Royal Navy ships. The idea so enraged the founding fathers that it became one of the contributing factors in the Revolutionary War against the British monarchy.
Although it is easy for our American sensibilities to dismiss Paul Broun as a fringe publicity monger, lingering questions about Obama remain. These questions caused a mainstream media reporter, Barbara West of station WFTV, to openly question Joe Biden about Barack Obama’s Marxist tendencies in an on-air interview. See that video below. The interview so annoyed the Obama campaign that they cut off access for that station, demonstrating a heavy hand against dissenting voices in the media. Subsequently, they abruptly kicked all media organizations who endorsed his opponent off of Obama’s airplane.
Paul Broun is a no crackpot. As a biography, he is a 2nd term United States congressman who was re-elected in a landslide this past election to serve Georgia’s 10th congressional district. He served in U.S. Marines and became a U.S. Navy Medical Officer. After leaving the armed forces, Broun became a physician in Georgia for over 20 years. He is married with two children. Read more about him here.
There is so little we know about Obama’s policies that people like Paul Broun are asking nagging questions. An Obama dictatorship seems impossible to those who cherish democratic-capitalism, and probably serves no constructive purpose except to sound early warning bells for any socialist-style proposals coming from the president’s desk.
But the questions remain on the public’s mind. What does Obama want to do with a civilian security force? How much income confiscation and redistribution does he intend? And what steps will he take to silence opponents in the media beyond trying to revive the “fairness doctrine”?
Paul Brown Video Biography
Obama Marxist Accusations










November 11th, 2008 at 12:20 am
As I mention in the Gordon Brown post, Obama has a tremendous opportunity to cease an enormous amount of power amidst a global economic meltdown. No one can predict what he’ll do with it, but at a minimum, sweeping reforms to the liking we haven’t seen in 70 years. I don’t know about dictatorship, rather he is likely to have “the will” of the American sheeple.
November 11th, 2008 at 1:00 am
H1tler had the will of the people so we know that dynamic doesn’t define dictatorships. The extent to which a leader stifles opposition and tramples on constitutional protections would be the telltale sign.
November 11th, 2008 at 2:53 am
The Center for American Progress has already announced Obama will immediately use executive orders to get some of his agenda in place before he has to deal with Congress for approval.
Just saying …
November 11th, 2008 at 3:48 am
Let’s see, replace racial tension with class warfare (a mutual rallying point), nationalize financial markets & industry and control the media. The massive financial collapse & bailout just sort of dropped into Obama’s lap; the mainstream media needed no control for they were willing participants, yielding watchdog status to something greater.
Obama probably didn’t plan it this way, but the ducks lined up and presented him the power to rule rather than govern. Look at the people he’s surrounding himself with. These “brownshirt-types” are not prone to much discussion. If you don’t think their way you can pretty much hit the road. And there’s even a space cadet with Podesta poking around looking for aliens & advanced technology from the stars. Hitler had that!
The next and most obvious step will be to meet with foreign leaders and form a variety of alliances, compacts, etc.. Of course, all of it will be meaningless, just some words on a piece of paper and your basic oral agreements & promises. Step out-of-line and military force will be used. Look for Obama to begin sending out envoys before he’s sworn into office.
Lastly, Pelosi will have to be stripped of her power, investigations/witch-hunts into the Bush administration must begin; complete control of the media is an absolute must.
Nah, none of that could ever possibly happen…………
November 11th, 2008 at 6:22 am
How quickly we forgot the fears of the Bush administration from the left. And how ridiculous the right thought it sounded.
November 11th, 2008 at 6:41 am
MEF.
Those fears were not of a lock step society.
If I’m correct most fears were of his percieved lack of intellect.
Obama has an undeniable record of promoting initiatives and movements that are almost always are based on large collectives.
It seems like everything he wants to do always has a large communal aspect to it.
Anyone who wants to create a civilian security force and has 2nd amendment issues such as Obama should send up red flags in any true patriots head.
November 11th, 2008 at 7:14 am
With the economy getting sicker every month, and everyone so frightened by the thoughts of a 30’s style recession or depression, I think Obama will have a tremendous opportunity to impose his radical marxist ideas. With the large banks, insurance, auto manufactureres, and all building related companies suffering he will have a perfect opportunity to justify nationalizing these companies. Then smaller companies. Then use his national civilian security force to take the guns and oppress those that disagree with his marxist ideas. Bidden has already shown a will to muzzle the press. I’m afraid that the 700 billion dollar bail out was just the beginning of the end.
November 11th, 2008 at 7:24 am
Barack Obama is a Communitarian, although you will not have heard him use the term during his election campaign. Americans will get a shock when the truth of his hidden agenda becomes known and they find out his real intentions. Bear in mind that Obama is simply a front-man for the New World Order Communitarians.
Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.
More about this evil and dictatorial philosophy here: Common Purpose and Communitarian philosophy
November 11th, 2008 at 8:11 am
The comments of Congressman Broun suggest an active campaign of support erosion based on fear and gossip. As evidenced by the election, there is a growing wisdom in the electorate that will render that campaign ineffective.
November 11th, 2008 at 8:42 am
Yea right Mac.
Unfortunaltly theres more facts than gossip to give us concern.
What comes out of Obamas mouth often has to be deciphered, his past actions speak clearly to the ideals he likes to surround himself with.
Exit polls determined that Obama was elected by the majority in hopes he would fix the economy.
You all took your eye off the ball(s) as the economy overshadowed other very important issues in the campaign that could of exposed his willingness to impose socialism.
The only time we saw his revelations on how he intends to use the economy to socialize us was when Joe the plumber ask him that question.
He never really could squeeze out of that one, never regreted or tried to change that position and instead reinterated that position in an interview a few days later.
The next thing was to go out and tear down Joe and present him to the public in a bad light in attempts to silence/discredit the message.
While all this was going on we heard Biden saying paying taxes was patriotic and those who rejected this were being selfish, his income levels determining middle class go from 250,000 to 200 to 150, then Richardson threw 120 out there and you heard nothing from Obama to oppose Richardson.
Theres more, much more, but if you cant even pick up on one instance that clearly shows Obamas intentions it may be fruitless to even explain or show them to you since it sounds like you already drank that koolaid
November 11th, 2008 at 8:42 am
I have to admit that this “Civilian National Security Force” idea does bother me a lot - and I don’t consider myself to be part of the tinfoil hat crowd.
However, I do have an intense interest in history, and this DOES follow along the same paths other nations have taken before that resulted in horrific consequences.
Aside from that initial concern - my next thought is: Where the hell does Obama get the authority under our US Constitution to create such a force?
The Founding Fathers would have been flabbergasted at the thought!
November 11th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Broun’s comments and your take on them are hilarious. Broun compared Obama to Hilter and claimed that he wants a Nazi like Gestapo. But you and Broun then claim that Obama is a socialist/Markist. Apparently you have forgetten that Hitler was NOT a socialist/Markist. Just the opposite in fact, he was an ultra right-wing facist. READ A TEXT BOOK once in a while instead of spouting off stupid comments that make absolutely no sense. If you have a bone to pick with Obama’s political philosophy, fine. But get your facts straight. Comparing him to Hilter and them claiming that he’s a socialist/Markist just makes you look dumb.
November 11th, 2008 at 9:02 am
Thank goodness the extremist views this site and its supporters represent are becoming a smaller minority in this country by the minute.
President Bush backed the EXACT same concept before Obama or Biden ever brought up a national security force. That can be researched by anybody.
We already have an armed force outside of full time active duty military personal to go into action within our borders when our active military is stretched thin. It’s called the National Guard. This nation is under siege by illegal immigration, massive drug smuggling and the constant threat of terrorism. Obama wants us to serve and protect as citizens while the brave men and women of our armed forces are fighting overseas and you have a problem with that? Sounds like you are the one who has the dangerous motives here!
President Bush under the name of homeland security eliminated many basic civil liberties in order to chase bad guys. Where was this site and its crazy bloggers to say this was the first step to a Gestapo or Marxist police State? Gee, wonder why you say such things now? Reasons to numerous and to obvious to waste space on!
Hitler and Stalin were both diagnosed mentally ill mass murders. Without equal in history for the horrors they committed. You then come out and say our new president has the same ideas of leadership as Hitler and Stalin? When somebody has ideas different than the conservative extremists that fooled the people for so many years they use fear tactics or worse to try and discredit legitimate opposition. Especially any left leaning opposition. Sounds like you are the dangerous one capable of any crime when your power is threatened.
[ed- threatening comments removed.]
November 11th, 2008 at 9:14 am
This is ridiculous. Read the speech! Volunteer teachers and Peace Corps members are NOT a secret Nazi paramilitary force.
The point of the entire speech is simply that a strong infrastructure, strong schools, and a strong healthcare system are important to our national security.
Who are the scary members of this “civilian national security force”? Just read the speech:
“… the teacher in East LA, or the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans, the Peace Corps volunteer in Africa, the Foreign Service officer in Indonesia.”
Do you really, honestly think that a militia of Appalachian nurses is going to break down our doors and take our guns?
Do you think that when Obama promises to “double the size of Peace Corps by 2011,” that he will turn them into an armed gestapo? For crying out loud, most of those Peace Corps hippies can’t even fire a gun!
The people in the “civilian national security force” are people who contribute to the infrastructure and help improve national security by volunteering, and NOT by using weapons.
November 11th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Eugene, the irony of your comment isn’t lost on our readers. A sign of a dictatorial-syle government is confusing the message with the messenger, and then acting to silence the media who reports the message.
Jon, just reporting news. Go talk with Eugene about what steps you are willing to take to prevent news. But on the merits of your argument, you are confusing theoretical constructs with practical ones. You would be hard-pressed to define any discernible difference between Stalin’s government and H1tler’s government. After all the Nax1s provided a socialist health care system. The commonality is that dictators consolidate power to rule without checks and balances regardles of any underlying theoretical differences.
Jamie, you are confusing two speeches.
November 11th, 2008 at 10:35 am
I see the folks on here have skipped their paranoid scizo drugs again
Ms. Shaw, He plans to reverse a lot of Bush’s record amount of executive orders, that is what I heard reported..
November 11th, 2008 at 10:47 am
Eugene, Jon an Jamie.
You are overlooking the fact that some 64 million people did not vote for Obama. And I think he is out for revenge against how he thinks America has treated blacks.
Time will tell. What will his first executive order be. All presidents have used it but usaully to get around congress. But Obama has a democrat congress.
I hope we are all wrong about him. Just like you all were wrong about Bush. He to was compared to Hitler. Unless you are conversing with terrorist or are one yourself, your rights have not been violated. So saying that Bush eliminated many basic civil liberties is a BIG FAT LIE.
What would you have us do. Put these people up in our homes. Maybe that could be a part of the Security Force duties. Civilians guarding people caught trying to kill Americans in their basement.
Today is Veterans Day. Have you Thanked a Veteran Today? If not you should because they have given us the right to debate here.
November 11th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Germany has had socialized heath care from the end of the bismark years.. Germany is where socialism started, way before Nazis.. besides Obama has not advocated for socialized health care..
The brown guy is a politician trying to make a name for himself.. House of reps is full of nut jobs (left and right)
JFK in his short tenor as President pushed for Civilian service as well..
And calling Obama a socialist because of some exerts of speeches and interviews is nothing compared to what you guys claim is one of the best presidents in history is allowing right now..
Bush is nationalizing Banks and now Insurance Giant AIG..
2 trillion dollars lended with no paper trail as well.. where is the transparency you guys always say Obama needs to have?
Bush has done more for socialism in this country than any president since FDR.. but you guys are worried about Obama?
November 11th, 2008 at 10:56 am
Jamie,
If he meant the types of people you are referring to, why didn’t he just say so?
“Civilian National Security Force” equal to the military.
Think about that for a moment. “Security Force” is specifically related to military or police action - not social work. Why reference such a specific phrase?
Also, when referring to funding, why not compare it to NASA, or any of the numerous federal social programs instead of the US military?
There was a specific martial inference to what was being spoken of, and that is what should have any skeptic a bit concerned.
As for hippies and guns, I believe the Manson Family were hippies - yet they were quite capable of multiple murders. Being a “hippie” does not mean one is incapable of brutality.
November 11th, 2008 at 11:03 am
KV.
After your first statement on this post is to question peoples sanity with nothing of any substance to back it up is why I treat you like the jerk you are.
You may think were nuts, if thats the case there are meds to help these symptoms.
Last I checked there are no pills to help with idiocy.
Eugene;
“We already have an armed force outside of full time active duty military personal to go into action within our borders when our active military is stretched thin. It’s called the National Guard. This nation is under siege by illegal immigration, massive drug smuggling and the constant threat of terrorism. Obama wants us to serve and protect as citizens”
If thats the case then all Obama needs to do is ask us to be vigilante, pay attention and go to law enforcement if something is troubling, much like the request Bush placed upon Americans after 911.
It is “NOT” the exact same concept.
When good honest citizens have pointed out questionable activities the left wasted no time in calling those citizens racial profilers, bigots etc…
Are we ready to institute something like a civilain force left to its own discretion if this is the type of thing we will run into ?
Or will the left act as the hypocrites they are and use this authoritarian measure to root out resistance on the right ? Enforcing ideological bigotry ?
November 11th, 2008 at 11:14 am
Micky
You underestimate the intelligence of the American people as does the Congressman. We have paid our dues politcally and socially over the past 8 years and earned our BS detection chops. Not only do I not accept the Marxist/socialist premise I don’t believe the Congressman does either. The point of statements like his are simply part of the political artillery that is launched blindly into the crowd and until this election was effective. Im sorry you were hit. Trying wearing a common sense helmet next time.
November 11th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Proof once again that some people on this site can not take a joke
You know humor..
but it is sort of paranoid to believe that Obama is going to turn the USA into Naz*s like state.. just my opinion (or am I allowed to have one?)
I called the rep from GA (not the people reacting to Brown’s comments), either a nut job or trying to make a name for himself..
no need for name calling AGAIN..
But if Obama does turn this into a Naz*s state, at least you guys can not call Obama weak on military anymore
November 11th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
First of all KV, I never said Obama would do any such thing.
However, all the tell tale signs of someone wishing to impose a totalitarian/collective/socialist regime on us.
Banks are being owned by the fed, as usleless as it is the dems want to bail out the biggest union employer on the planet, we will have a one party state,definition of middle class changes weekly,my money is being diverted to those undeserving,environmental standards are going to be imposed on private property,desires for a national civilian force along with overwhelming amounts of Americans going out and buying guns for fear of 2nd amendment infringments, the fairness doctrine being instituted and on and on and on and on….
“But if Obama does turn this into a Naz*s state, at least you guys can not call Obama weak on military anymore”
That was stupid.
American spirit will never let Obama get away with it as we also kicked the crap out of Naz1 doctrine.
However, the Naz1 doctrine has been taught by radical islam and is the foundation of their doctrine.
Put that together in your head.
Mac.
Pay attention.
Exit polls confirm that the main reason Obama was elected was to fix out economy.
The popular vote 46%/54% shows that not all of us are as smart as you would like to believe.
I doubt Obama would get away with half of whats suspected.
But you have to admit, all the parts and plans seem to be able to oblige such an incentive if he were to pursue it.
Wearing a helmet is entirely different from having a skull as thick as a wall.
You are the guys who basically elected a guy who in two years, said nothing. Anything of substance cosistantly had to re answered in two or three different fashions for expedience purposes.
From Wright , to Ayers, withdrawl timelines, positions in foreign affairs etc…
So please, dont talk to me about BS when you guys gargle with it.
November 11th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Mickey
How could the statements of the Congressman affect anything except to light up like-minded folks like your self. You seem to be more interested in proving a point that could only be seen by those who already agree with the Obama is a Marxist point of view. You miss the point of my statement that the Congressman is using statements of sensationalized drama to erode public opinion. Its deliberate it isn’t opinion. If in 2 years if there is proof of what you say, the American people will provide an accounting.
November 11th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
I see the Obamanites have found this site, and started screaming about how all of this is rediculous. Nothing new here, I was amazed at how these brainwashed people were attacking conservatives during the campaign. Then when you visited a liberal site, the liberals were at ease to comment on their true socialist agendas.
By the way JON, H1tler did speak against socialism/”marxism” in rhetoric, but implemented a socialist economic system. Hmmm! Whatever gets Obama to world domination, right?