I, of course, will vote for Sarah Palin as the winner, but I’m sure all the talking heads will be sure to give us their opinions over the next few days.
Hello to all of you after an extended absence! Other activities in my life has been keeping me form all of you, but rest assured during the McCain-Obama election season, you have been in my thoughts!
However, after watching the arse-kicking contest, um vice presidential debate last night, I had to make a few comments. First of all, Justin did a great job below of summarizing the inaccuracies in Biden’s comments. I loved it when Gov. Palin hung in there and wouldn’t back down to him. I think I heard Reagan come through there a few times, “there you go again!�
He made, I feel, an almost unforgivable gaffe – one that would have had Sarah Palin pilloried right out of the Naval Observatory – his invocation of Article 1 of the Constitution to describe the powers of the Vice President. As a lawyer and a Senator, he should know much better. You see, Article 1 provides the powers of Congress, not Executive powers. While Article 1 sets up the Vice President as the President of the Senate with no voting powers except for tie breakers, Article 2 describes the powers of the Executive Branch and the role of the Vice President to be a heart-beat away from the Presidency. I wouldn’t mind, except he said it in such a condescending way: admonishing the poor outwitted woman to his left that couldn’t possibly understand such things of high importance. In addition to all the mistakes outlined by Justin, Biden’s performance was pathetic. (We won’t even discuss Biden’s smirking and sidewards glances to the Governor. He couldn’t even look at her most of the night.)
As a former female candidate, I have been most interested in Gov. Palin’s candidacy and how the press would react to her. I have always felt that as a professional “GASP� conservative woman, that we are all treated as some form of traitor, similar to how African-American Republicans are treated. We should march to the liberal drum beat, or keep our mouths shut. I have been, regrettably appalled.
My first interview as a candidate with a Baltimore Sun reporter started with, “So how do you plan to balance your legislative duties with your duties as a mother?� OK, perhaps the hapless reporter thought this would be news worthy (he’s a registered Democrat), but my response was, “How many male candidates have you asked that to?� I sat there with sad recognition as the same comments were being made of Gov. Palin and worse: “she should stay home and take care of her kids.�
I thought the liberal women were fighting for the right to have a life that Sarah has had: successful, a mother and to top it off, a Governor! As Sarah’s life gets laid bare, and the vultures circle faster when they realize there is nothing juicy to report – she played flute in the talent portion of the Miss Alaska contest, her “first dude� husband is cute and her main and only squeeze – it is apparent that Sarah has “left the plantation,� or more accurately, left the kitchen and done the unforgivable – injected western/Midwestern conservative female ideals into the fray. Heavens forbid that a conservative woman has accomplished what only liberal women are supposed to do: have a family and a professional life AND not march in lock-step with the Roe v. Wade folks. Come to think of it, how many liberal female politicians have kids? (Remember the Republican Governor of Massachusetts had twins while in office!)
Way to go Sarah! I DO hope someday to be able to meet you. I feel like we are somewhat kindred spirits. Regardless of the ourcome of this election, Sarah Palin is a name we will be hearing more of in the future!
***Update***
For those of you so inclined, I have listed the Constitutional gaffes by Joe Biden last night. They were significant, numerous and troubling. For more details, please see my “other” post at RightJuris.









October 3rd, 2008 at 3:31 am
[banned]
October 3rd, 2008 at 3:39 am
DON”T CLICK that link from “eric”! It will force a trojan (MSCodecLt.v.1.0.exe) onto your computer. Fortunately I’m on a Mac.
As for the debate. Palin was clearly outclassed on the issues. Her reliance on canned talking points and cute mannerisms is transparent.
McCain’s media strategy as it relates to Palin has been one long mistake.
October 3rd, 2008 at 5:11 am
Stagolee, you couldn’t be more wrong. She connected with the people and Biden rambled on and on. If you are a Beltway wonk you problem think Joe won, if your a regular Joe no way.
Welcome back MBT!
October 3rd, 2008 at 5:47 am
Bryan – Thanks! It is good to be back!
Stagolee – I don’t see how someone can be outclassed by Biden who could get his facts staright. But I guess that is the Democrat MO – all talk and no substance.
October 3rd, 2008 at 5:54 am
Article 1 section 3 clause 4.
Biden was correct.
October 3rd, 2008 at 5:55 am
“She connected with the people”
Are you saying this because she winked, said “darn right” a couple times and tried to channel W via mispronouncing the word “nuclear” again?
Maybe I’m grossly misunderstanding Palin, but, to me – there was not an ounce of authenticity in her performance yesterday. You could literally see the horde of advisers carefully scripting her each word, gesture and “shiny happy people” demeanor.
She would be a great press secretary, though – talking doll with immense discipline to never stray from pre-arranged material.
October 3rd, 2008 at 6:33 am
Mandy – Article I is the powers of Congress. It does cover the fact that the VP has a tie breaking vote in the Senate. The Role of the VP, which he seemed to be lecturing Palin on, is found in Article II. Biden even got the role of the VP wrong. He said that the VP could only preside over the Senate when there was a tie-breaking vote – WRONG! he can preside any time he wants (except when he is acting as the President of the United States) – he can only VOTE when there is a tie.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says that the VP can’t go over to Capitol Hill and twist arms, call them on the phone or discuss issues with them. He can even attend funerals of heads of state…. What was it that Vice President Dick Cheney has done that was so dangerous? Inquiring minds want to know….
Sorry, Biden’s sloppy use of the Constitution doesn’t cut it – he’s a lawyer and should know better.
October 3rd, 2008 at 6:39 am
Demitri –
“She would be a great press secretary, though – talking doll with immense discipline to never stray from pre-arranged material.”
what a sexist remark! Hillary’s performances where she spit back all the Democrat talking points wasn’t scripted? Bull hockey! Biden was trying so hard to stick to his script that he couldn’t get most of his facts staright – why? because his voting record and past statemnet have clashed with Obama’s and McCain was on the right side of many of the issues which Obama now wants to claim.
Oh yes, that’s right – I keep forgetting – conservative women need to be working in the kitchen taking care of the kids (barefoot and preganant?), not in the liberal world of faminist politics…..
I’ll go back to the kitchen now, I think I hear my kids calling me.
But before I change some diapers, I don’t understand why Jimmy Carter can say “nucular” but W can’t; why is it OK for those in Boston to say “Cah” for “car,” but somehow “nucular” is uneducated.
It is an ACCENT! Geez.
October 3rd, 2008 at 6:48 am
MBT,
Any chance you can reply without bringing up Hillary, Obama, McCain, Biden, or Jimmy Carter?
“I don’t understand”
Tried books?
October 3rd, 2008 at 7:04 am
mbt welcome back!! we’ve missed you.
October 3rd, 2008 at 7:07 am
Dimitri – silly me, bringing up politicians on a political site.
So you want to forget about history, or the other debater in this campaign, or the two guys actually running for president – OK – I guess that leaves us with Sarah Palin.
What shall we discuss? The Palin derangement syndrome that seems to be plaguing the poor folks already afflicted with Bush derangement syndrome?
How about the fact that Katie Curic refused to call her “Governor?”
How about the fact that the MSM was making a big deal about how much she was “cramming” for the debates. Why was there no comments made about Biden cramming for the debates? OOPS there I go again, mentioning Biden.
It is hard to function in a vacuum…
“Tried books?” Puhleeze. I read books with titles you can’t even pronounce. Give me a break. You have no arguments so you go to the tired old lines….
Oh by the way, there was a lot made of the fact that Sarah Palin didn’t answer Katie Curic’s book question. I have the answer – between kids and husband and all the reading associated with her job as governor, her free-time books consists of “The Very Hungry Caterpillar” and “Dr. Suess.” Just like any working mother – liberal or conservative.
October 3rd, 2008 at 7:09 am
Kate – thank you – I don’t know how long this “lull” will be – but it is good to be back! I’ve forgotten how fun it is!
October 3rd, 2008 at 7:14 am
Demitri,
Any chance you can reply without being condescending?
“Tried books?”
Case in point.
October 3rd, 2008 at 7:24 am
MBT,
“What shall we discuss?”
Don’t know about you, but I made my point in #6.
“I read books with titles you can’t even pronounce.”
I seriously doubt that.
“Any chance you can reply without being condescending? ”
Yes.
October 3rd, 2008 at 7:37 am
Dimitri,
““I read books with titles you can’t even pronounce.â€?
I seriously doubt that.”
Perhaps you should check out my bio at this link:
http://www.rightpundits.com/?page_id=2
October 3rd, 2008 at 8:18 am
“Perhaps you should check out my bio at this link:”
I did. And?
October 3rd, 2008 at 10:17 am
“Heavens forbid that a conservative woman has accomplished what only liberal women are supposed to do: have a family and a professional life AND not march in lock-step with the Roe v. Wade folks.”
As a liberal woman, I don’t begrudge Sarah Palin her accomplishments or her pro-life views. I think it’s wonderful she has a family and a career. But I don’t think she’s qualified to be Vice President of the United States. She can barely string a rehearsed sentence together, much less an unrehearsed one. Liberal women are angry about Palin not because she is a conservative, but because she is unqualified, and choosing an unqalified but cutesy woman for VP sets women back. Why didn’t they choose one of the many more qualified female Republican candidates? I believe it was a conservative who called the choice “cynical.”
October 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am
By “they” I meant whoever made the choice- presumably McCain?
October 3rd, 2008 at 10:38 am
The weird thing to me is that the only reason Palin was preferred to McCain’s friend and fellow Vietnam War vet Tom Ridge was Ridge’s insufficient opposition to pro-choice concept and Palin’s overwhelming support for pro-life concept. Or am I missing anything? Was there anything else that made McCain abandon Ridge in favor of Palin?
I don’t think that I am personally so interested in the issue (Roe v Wade) that it would even make sense to me to choose a politician based on their attitude to abortion in the first place. I’m not against or for it, I just don’t care enough. Yet, this issue seems to define some very important moments in our politics, like choosing Palin for VP position.
October 3rd, 2008 at 10:56 am
Recent Daily Tracking Polling tells you all you need to know.
Obama is ahead and outside the margin of error in the Rasmussen, Gallup, Research 2000, CBS, and Diageo polls. He is up between 7-11 points..
No candidate, repeat no presidential candidate has overcome that large of a deficit this late in the campaign.
The very fact that OBAMA is still competitive (and even has a slight lead in some polls) in states like North Carolina, Virginia, and Indiana, is very, very bad news for John McCain. He should have put these states away a long time ago!!!
McCain has one last opportunity in Tuesday’s debate to change the dynamic of this race. He needs to completely overwhelm Obama next Tuesday to turn it around. A tie won’t change anything. I don’t beleive he can do it…..
The electorate is beginning to get locked in.
If the Tracking polls still consistently show Obama with a 5-7 point lead on October 11th, when all the polling from the second debate is in, then the race is over…………………..
October 3rd, 2008 at 11:14 am
I really enjoy this video where Palin praises Obama and talks about how his message of change “resonates” in her home state of Alaska.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws4Tl3vHryQ&NR=1
October 3rd, 2008 at 11:14 am
On the whole “pro-life, pro-choice” issue, I get that it’s a very charged subject for people, but we need to step back and look at it a bit more calmly, please. It is SO unfair AND irritating to read over and over that somehow ALL liberals are pro-choice, abortion-loving hussies, just because you happen to be on the opposite side of the fence. I don’t think that your personal feelings on abortion should somehow automatically link to your political leanings. It’s absurd.
And furthermore, choosing life is still a CHOICE. You can support a woman’s right to choose what she believes is right for her, while not necessarily believing abortion is morally correct. It’s called free will, and no one has the right to pass judgment on another person, their lifestyle or their personal choices if you REALLY support what the Bible has to say on the topic.
And I’m done ranting now. Back to the regularly scheduled debate.
October 3rd, 2008 at 11:22 am
Ron, “no candidate ever”? Do you have proof of that?
While it may or may not be true, this is a different election than past ones. McCain is behind right now, but I doubt this is over in any way. Also, GW is +3, Diageo is +6. You’re exaggerating. And none of those polls can truly reflect a debate that happened last night at 9 pm eastern. There will be some tightening in the next days.
The debates will not be a game-changer simply because the formatting won’t allow for any kind of big moments. It will be more like last night.
And I hate to say it, but I have to. The color of Obama’s skin will matter more and more, the closer we get to November. The polls show that as well, and it’s a problem coming from working class Democrats as much as Republicans.
October 3rd, 2008 at 11:32 am
Alicia, I did not say all liberals were pro-abortion – but a whole lot more of them are than are conservatives.
As for experience – look at the head ot the ticket. Oh yes, I forgot, McCain is experienced but a recent ad made mention of his age, ran an MD stating that most people don’t survive melanoma and that he had cancer 4 times. So which is it? Experience or not?
At least the top of the GOP ticket has experience. Most of Obama’s experience is from running for office.
October 3rd, 2008 at 12:13 pm
Why will the color of Obama’s skin matter more the closer we get to November?