I recently read about the “genesis�? of the mortgage crisis being attributed to a Bill Clinton HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development) appointee, Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo, the youngest ever to hold the position, had been appointed without any real solid credentials. His father being the Governor of New York and his marriage to a daughter of the late Bobby Kennedy all make the case that political cronyism were his main credentials. He led the HUD from 1997-2001 and is primarily responsible for loosening regulations which put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the subprime mortgage market without putting safeguards in place that would prevent ever increasing risk. Through him, the FHA (Federal Housing Administration) turned into a high risk mortgage lender allowing no money down and actually started giving “kickbacks�? to brokers that encouraged the sale of these high risk, unsupportable loans.

Now John McCain has endorsed Cuomo to head up the SEC and has called for the resignation of Christopher Cox. Currently, Andrew Cuomo is the attorney general for New York and is investigating Wall Street practices related to the recent market slides and has declined to comment on Senator McCain’s statements. There is no way to know how much Mr. Cuomo’s actions are linked to all the market troubles we are having now, but there does seem to be a link. With Cuomo being a Democrat and having at least arguably some responsibility for these economic woes, why is McCain endorsing this guy? Once again, McCain is a maverick. He’s going against the grain a bit here. In Cuomo’s defense, I don’t think anything he did at the HUD was ever intentionally bad. Perhaps he’s a guy that could get Democrats to listen, while still working with Republicans if he was appointed by McCain. I guess it could work. Maybe McCain sees political advantage here. Cuomo’s investigation into Wall Street would probably make McCain look good. I’m still a little baffled though.