Obama continues to show love to Europe.
Obama’s ‘important’ speech in Berlin, Germany today was referred to as Obamafest. He got lots of great photo ops and headlines out of the whole thing. Unfortunately, he didn’t get time to stop by and see wounded American troops in Germany. You know, he was busy and all. Read about it below and see photos and a video.
(updated)
It started with the much ballyhooed trip to the war zones of Afghanistan and Iraq. Obama said he wanted to meet with troops and generals to make an assessment as to whether or not we should continue to fight our enemies or bring the troops home in defeat. He got lots of photo ops with the troops and Hamid Karzai. The spit and polished campaign spots that were played over and over again turned out to be staged and faked. Whoops. We haven’t seen those anymore.
Turns out that despite his best attempts to manipulate the media coverage and make it appear the troops loved him, they didn’t. In fact, he did not get the warm reception he has become accustomed to where ever he goes. So he moved on and didn’t show anymore coverage of that.
After his brief touch down and take off in Iraq where he met General Petraeus, we got word that he ‘agreed to disagree‘ with the General. He AGREED TO DISAGREE WITH THE GENERAL! The arrogance of that is astounding.
Then he flipped off to Israel and Palestine and said all the wrong things to all the wrong people, continuing the embarrassment of one naive gaff after the next that would get anyone else laughed out of the country. Luckily for him, the press has his back and its hardly, if ever, reported. He was heckled at Jerusalem’s Wailing Wall. It seems he put up campaign posters all over the place. Aside from his complete disrespect of the most holy of sites for Judaism, I didn’t know he was running for President of Israel.
Never mind. He got a good photo of him looking pensive and downright prayerful at the Wailing Wall that didn’t show a bit of the chaos that his presence there invoked. Best of all, he only had to stay there a few minutes and then he could leave for Europe which is a lot more fun.
The big plan was for a huge showing at the Obamafest in Berlin. He wanted to have it at Brandenburg Gate so he could invoke the images of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, but the dang Germans didn’t seem to understand that he was to give an ‘important’ speech and acted a little huffy about it. He had to settle for giving his speech at Hitler’s favorite Berlin monument the Victory Column. Best of all, his people arranged that big dog and pony show to happen immediately after a rock concert – but according to Obama’s people the old media, they were all there to see Obama.
No one mentioned that he had insulted France and England by spending so much time and money on Germany and just swinging by them as an afterthought. International politics are complicated and the simplicity with which Obama apparently sees the world doesn’t quite grasp the nuances of diplomacy.
++ Paris Left Cold by Obama Visit ++
3:30 p.m.: While Obama’s Berlin visit has caused a stir, hardly anyone is interested in his trip to Paris on Friday. There are hardly any French media reports on the eve of his visit. There is merely some grumbling about the extensive itinerary for his trip to Berlin. “A speech in Berlin, five little hours in Paris,” writes French daily Le Monde.
What about the troops? This whole thing was originally about the troops and the Global War on Terrorism, right? We kind of forgot about them once he got a cold reception from the troops on his first stops in Afghanistan and Iraq and he got caught making fake news reports about it.
Well, he apparently did learn that the troops watch Fox News during his short dash through their lives. He was able to use that to make a joke at Fox News’ expense – and insult the troops while he was at it. I’m sure he doesn’t realize he insulted them, because he doesn’t understand them at all. What he said was that the Commander and Chief makes them watch Fox News. The implication of that would be that they don’t have minds or will to do what they want. That’s the old liberal insult to American Soldiers. That they are just robotons without brains or free will. Poor, uneducated, kind of dumb guys who can’t do anything other than blow things up for ‘the man’ without giving thought to what they are doing. The concept of service to the country is so completely alien to him/them that they can’t conceive of honor, integrity, courage and duty for the sake of country.
After all, Obama made it clear, while he was in Berlin, that he’s a citizen of the world rather than of just America.
And now he ignores wounded Soldiers at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. Its seems that Obama has never been to Berlin before and wanted to tour around a bit. He extended his stay there, cutting into his time in France. If he had gone by Landstuhl and the military bases in Germany, he’d have had even less time in Berlin.
Whoops! He didn’t mean to say that. He corrected it. He refined his explanation several times. After a long meeting with some of his 300 advisers, he made a statement that he felt it was inappropriate to go by to see the troops as part of a campaign stop [note reference to campaign posters at the Wailing Wall, which apparently he didn't view as inappropriate]. But he told Berliners that he wasn’t there campaigning. Well, then he said that he had visited troops and even wounded troops in Afghanistan while he was there and felt it was intrusive for him to impose himself and his campaign on them while he was there.
Besides, he hadn’t gotten to a beer hall yet and Berlin is a GREAT city to visit and he had to get on to France to do a photo op or two before he had to head off to London to make sure he got a photo op with the King and Queen there (they do have a King and Queen, right?). There really is so little time and he’d already done what he came there to do, speak in Berlin about walls and stuff and look Presidential.
Then there the thing about the Soldiers not really being happy to see him. It was awful trying to get that ‘warm welcome by soldiers’ shot in Afghanistan. They had to do LORD ONLY KNOWS how many takes for him to make that basketball goal and a handful of soldiers meant close-in camera shots so it looks more crowded. How on earth could he get that kind of shot at a military base or a military hospital. What if they just aren’t thronging around him? It would be wasted time with no take-away great photos.
Oh hell, he’s not getting their votes anyway. He’ll write them off like he did West Virginia, Kentucky and any other state he knew he couldn’t win.
And besides, they are just American Soldiers and Obama is a citizen of the world.
7.28.2008 Update It turns out that in spite of the propaganda otherwise, the Germans weren’t as enthralled with Obama as he’d want us to believe. As if it mattered if they were …..
Here’s a fun Oktoberfest video.
Obamafest Berlin – Video









July 25th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
As a member of the United States Senate barack obama has the right liie any other citizen that would meet with General Petraeus to agree to disagree with him. Here’s the upshot you guys got your war and the peace was hacked up by the neocons. Saddam was killed and anything he knew went to Hell with him and last I checked he’s not telling a Soul. The American people love a winner but whatever this war in Iraq is it should be over and soon and if it takes a victory parade to shut you guys up once an for all then so be it. I personally congratulate you on behalf of every Progressive journalist that has ever lived on the glorious victory of the American Armed Forces over the Iraqi Army and securing a peace that can be maintained by the new democratically elected govermment of Iraq.
Have the parade in Manhattan on Labor Day Weekend and dump twenty tons of confetti on General Petraeus and give him the Medal of Honor and an Academy Award while you are at it. He deserves both.
I know Ms Shaw you are probably not like the rest of the paid hacks here you actually want to be a real journalist not just a button pusher for the right wing. You are probably young and idealistic so I’ll leave you with a little wisdom that cuts both ways no matter what side of the political divide you find yourself on.
If you are twenty and a conservative you may become very wealthy; if you are 40 and still a conservative you have sold your Soul.
Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!
July 25th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Boy is Fredrick the most presumptuous and incorrect mooncalf.
Brilliant post Beth. GN-P1.
July 25th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
The entire premise of this article is unfounded. As the mainstream media has reported, Obama did not visit the American military hospital in Germany because the Pentagon thought it would be viewed as a political trip. The rest of the article is just a bunch of whining over the fact that Obama can get a crowd of 200,000 while McCain is stuck stuttering in front of 200.
July 25th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Herr Schwartz – wrong, wrong and wrong. Sorry. You are just wrong.
July 25th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
AKA Strom – you are just listening to the final spin out of the Obama camp. He made a gaff – which, BTW, was consistent with his overall behavior of flipping off groups of ppl that he thinks won’t vote for him anyway. He ignored the issue at first. The troops are really VERY low on his priority list. They don’t say things that fit into his predetermined belief system.
He toured Berlin, canceled the visit to the troops and shortened his trip to France.
The Pentagon told him that he was welcome to visit Landstuhl just like any citizen would be, but could not politicize his visit. He decided not to go. What’s the point if he couldn’t take
Goebbelshis media staff?When it got more press than he anticipated he tried to blame the Pentagon and make it appear that it was he who didn’t want to politicize the visit. The problem is, if he didn’t want to politicize the event then he could have gone without taking his photogs.
He’s actually contradicting himself. He’s saying the Pentagon told him he couldn’t go. Then in the same paragraph he says he didn’t go because he didn’t want to politicize a visit to wounded soldiers. He also says that he thanked the soldiers in Afghanstan, kind of like he had already checked that dirty little job off his to-do list.
Come on. There’s a pattern in his behavior. It shouldn’t surprise anyone.
July 25th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
obama did not visit the troops because he could not bring the press
“Chief Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell confirmed to Politico that Department of Defense officials cautioned Barack Obama’s campaign that his planned visit to wounded American troops in Germany could not be political in nature and that he would be barred from bringing along campaign staff and reporters. He also said that Cindy McCain recently requested to visit sailors aboard the U.S.N.S. Comfort and was denied.
“Sen. Obama is welcome to visit Landstuhl or any military hospital in his official capacity as a United States senator,” Morrell said in a brief interview. “But there is a DOD policy which governs campaigning and electioneering at military facilities that would have to be respected if he were to visit. That distinction was relayed and made clear to campaign, and they made a decision on their own based on that guidance.”
Morrell, in a subsequent interview, added that military officials told Obama he could only visit the military facility with his Secret Service detail and Senate staff.
“We made it clear to him that campaign staff and press would not be permitted to accompany him,” Morrell said of Obama. “We relayed those ground rules. They made a choice based upon the information we relayed to them. It was their choice. We had nothing to do with it.”
July 25th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Thanks McCain. I saw the GN
July 25th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
To all you mesmerized, Obama worshiping , butt kissing anti-America people, I have a question. Almost all of you hypocritical and God-less people have stated that while you don’t support the war, you 100% support our troops. You wish them well, want better care, blah, blah …and all your other canned and meaningless rhetoric spews forth from forked tongues whenever out Troops are mentioned.
My question is how, in the name of God or whatever you and the Obamassiah would rename Him, can you cast a vote for a person that doesn’t have the empathy of a half drunk piss-ant and refused to visit our injured Troops while on his whirlwind “look at me world” tour ? Obama’s people are saying the Pentagon said they couldn’t and that is a blatant lie. Obama’s camp was informed they couldn’t bring along the press for all the photo /op-ed pieces that Obamassiah wanted, so he chose to ignore our sicked and wounded Troops. If he couldn’tget something out of that visit to benefit him, then he would just take his ball and go home. WHY do you still want to vote for this pansy ? This coward ? This brazen, it’s all about me maniac that has already hired a transition team to move him and his to the WhiteHouse before the election has even been held ? Why would you want someone that arrogant , that pompous…someone that thinks the little people ( like our soldiers) aren’t worth his time ? WHY ? If any of you utter the words “I support our troops” and I support Obama, then you are a liar.
The men and women in those hospitals beds are there because they voluntarily chose to serve this country. Their wounded and broken bodies are the result of them defending people like YOU, that run your mouths and say nothing. They suffer because people like YOU, while demanding whatever ludicrous rights you want at the moment, fail to understand that those rights come with a price and there ain’t a one of you willing to pay it.
They do not complain, nor fault people like YOU. But I sure as hell do. I happen to have first hand knowledge of what people see when they visit our troops on a daily basis. People that visit because they actually care about other humans, and are not there for some photo op. My personal opinion is if any of you,including your Obamassiah visited our injured , you would vomit for about 3 days. Oddly, none of those that are there daily do that, though. They put on their big boy/girl britches, walk in, say hello, thank you, sit and talk with strangers…because it means something to those that have sacrificed so much. Then they leave, go home and cry while they pray.
You want a person that won’t give a wounded soldier the time of day in control of our country ? You liberal IQ challenged people are a real piece of work.
God help of us if this worthless and useless coward is ever put in office.
July 25th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
According to Politico, Cindy McCain has a recent request to visit sailors aboard the USNS Comfort denied as well.
Anyone know why?
July 25th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
I’m sure it’s just me – but the same folks who constantly downplay the casualties we’re suffering in Iraq and elsewhere are the same ones attacking Obama for not visiting. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve read threads on places like FreeRepublic arguing that our casualties in Iraq are no big deal because we suffered worse losses in WWII.
July 25th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
You reporting is so biased and disengenuous. To suggest Mr. Obama “forgot” wounded solders is inflammatory and just outright a lie. He made a decision not to involve the wounded solders in the cat and mouse politicfal game fueled by an increasing frustrated Republican Party. Please try to put a little balance in your repoarting.
July 25th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Michael, you are a liar and traitor to defend this worthless politician. Our Troops aren’t even an afterthought to the Obamassiah. They mean nothing to him. He will destroy our Military ( starting of course with the injureds morale )
Who ya gonna call to defend our nation then , huh ? 1.800.t.e.r.r.o.r.i.s.t ?
This evil person has shown again and again how much disdain he has for our Military.
July 25th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
[ed - this comment was bulk mail spam placed on dozens of blogs. see comment policy.]
July 25th, 2008 at 6:03 pm
Fred, you are full of it. What does Obama ignoring our Military have to do with your anti McCain rant ? And by the way, ya should know not to trust everything you read on the internet. It’s you liberal traitors making things up and posting as fact. Rosie O’Donnell does that a lot ,too. Maybe you should join that lying crowd.
July 25th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
“ignoring our military?”
I could have sworn I just saw video of Obama in Afghanistan meeting with soliders and being wildly cheered. Maybe I imagined it?
Of course had Obama visited the troops, even without any campaign staff, there would have been a post here about how despicable Obama was in using the troops as a campaign prop.
July 25th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
bob abouie – the meeting Obama had with the troops in Afghanistan that you are referring to was staged by the Obama campaign. The old media called him out on that. Apparently, all the media that followed him over there weren’t invited and they did that show behind the scenes with campaign ppl.
http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=1764
July 25th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
Read Bob, read.
We are talking about “wounded” troops.
Also, he would of not been able to use the troops for campaigning because his entourage` and Katie Couric and gang were not to be allowed, said the pentagon
Plus, his staff gave two excuses to the media.
We didnt want it to be politicized.
When that didnt fly because he was told he could go alone.
He then said that the pentagon said he couldnt go.
Or the other way around. It doesnt matter.
Both excuses are BS
July 25th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
FYI: VoteVets.org notes that earlier this year McCain had a request to visit the Naval base in Pensacola, FL denied because the Pentagon considered it a campaign event. Now McCain claims he would never campaign at a military base.
There also appears to be some confusion of who told who what. The Pentagon has confirmed to TalkingPointsMemo.com that it denied Obama’s request to visit the airbase so long as Obama had campaign staff with him on the trip. Since the trip was paid for by his campaign, and he had campaign staff with him on the plane, he wouldn’t have been allowed to visit the base unless they made some sort of arrangement to have him land elsewhere, and obtain transportation to the base. He doesn’t have Senate staff with him on this trip.
July 25th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
“According to Politico, Cindy McCain has a recent request to visit sailors aboard the USNS Comfort denied as well.
Anyone know why?”
she is not a senator or an elected official or a member of the military so is not allowed to go on the ship without special permission … which she did not ask for and the navy did not give.
actually technically even a senator or a military officer would need special permission, but it would be unusual to deny access to a senator.
you cannot even go on the USS constitution in boston harbor unless you have permission, which in the case of the constitution you can buy for the price of a ticket during certain times of the day.
it is not a cruise ship, you cannot just jump on a navy ship when you feel like it.
July 25th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
“Since the trip was paid for by his campaign, and he had campaign staff with him on the plane, he wouldn’t have been allowed to visit the base unless they made some sort of arrangement to have him land elsewhere, and obtain transportation to the base.”
“obama: hey guys i’m sorry i have to go visit some of our wounded soldiers, but you can’t come … sorry.
campaign staff: but how will you get there?
obama: no problem, i am a senator, i get reimbursed for travel expenses like this. plus, i have a credit card and this is europe.
campaign staff: you’re right, it is a very easy thing to do. but you might be a little late to paris.
obama: i can travel quicker without the 300 staff and momumental problems of the press corps … besides what is more important the usa wounded, or a phot op in paris?”
well, i guess we know what senator obama thinks is more important
July 25th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
This is all a bunch of lies and disinformation, and not very good lies, at that. Just trash.
Look, why can’t we have some serious debate, instead of this garbage? Don’t you understand, Beth, that you lose credibility? You make it look like, you don’t really have any credible arguments in your opposition to Obama, so you resort to lies and disinformation. It will work with people with an IQ of 75 or less, maybe, but not with anyone else.
I guess your biggest problem is, you’re just not very good at it. Not like someone like, say, Rush Limbaugh. At least he can pull it off, all the disinformation and spin, but sadly, you just come off looking and sounding like an ass.
Whoever runs this site, do us a favor and stop putting up this crap. It is going to be a big, big decision in November, so why don’t we treat it like what it is, and have some serious debate?
I mean, there are a lot of people out there that are on the fence, I am sure, but this sort of thing is not going to convince anyone to vote for McCain. Sadly, it’s going to do just the opposite. Good thing for you that not many people look at it, but why should they? It’s just garbage anyway.
July 25th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Ed, you call for some serious debate on the subject.
Say its a bunch of disinformation.
You bash Beth.
And yet you yourself add nothing to the debate.
You bring no controverting evidence or points to the subject at hand.
You are guilty of exactly what yer bitchin about.
Tell us.
Did the pentagon lie ?
Did the media get it right or wrong ?
Is Obama full of it ?
Is there something we are all missing ?
You say its all disinformation.
How could you know that unless you have the real scoop ?
So….
Please share.
July 25th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
micky is right Edward. You say you want debate, but you add nothing to a debate. You just call names and accuse anyone who has opinions that don’t fit into your world view of lying.
Please, let me know where the lies are. They aren’t lies.
If you were seriously interested in the importance of this election and seriously interested in the best man/woman for the job being elected, then I’d think you’d want to know the truth rather than the spin.
If what I write is so unimportant and read by so few people that it doesn’t matter, then why are you so upset about it?
It upsets you because in your heart you know your man is being packaged and sold to the American people. Pretty pictures and long sanguine speeches don’t make a President.
July 25th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
I’m startin’ to think the best man for VP is Beth Shaw. She has a remarkable ability to clarify complex issues at a very deep level so that all can understand, whether high IQ or the disadvantaged voters who are the objects of liberal scorn.
July 25th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
it’s all lies … lies i tell you …
the bush administration would not give obama the address to the hospital
July 26th, 2008 at 12:45 am
For jo #14 and all:
And now everyone in America can see why the right wing was drooling over running against Hillary Rodham Clinton. It would have been a slam dunk of 527 commercials showing a blue dress, flashes of a dark haired woman and Kathleen Willey superimposed and floating in cigar smoke quotes over and over and over until the electorate was so nauseous that they would have voted for anyone as long as they didn’t have a D at the end of their name.
When Obama ran off that streak ten consecutive primary victories the RNC knew it had a problem. Barack Hussein Obama is a statesman and better than that he has David Axelrod as a handler. Therefore the presumptive Democratic Party candidate survived the Reverend Jeremiah Wright kerfuffle with one of the greatest speeches ever delivered in the history of American politics. He has survived his wife being bashed and vilified and accused of calling every independent white voter in the country “whitey” on a tape to be released by who would have guessed it, a right wing blogger! Funny that tape never showed up because it doesn’t exist.
Obama has survived HillBama the PUMA movement and all the other post Rovian dirty tricks and he will survive all the ones to come in the future as well. What annoys you Beth Shaw is that you are stuck with John McCain a man that you don’t consider conservative enough [gasp his immigration policy!] religious or moral enough [gasp his wife made hundreds of millions from alcohol sales and he abandoned his near crippled wife] or shiny enough [doesn't Mitt Romney look presidential now?].
I expect in a country of 202 million white “Christians”, half of whom wouldn’t want a black president under any circumstances because he’s black, that an educated man of ideas like Barack Obama would get a hard way to go from the folks who live and breathe the Southern Strategy every day of their lives. I would suggest you look beyond what Kevin Phillips called “tribal tendencies” you know Beth the sort that makes Jesse Helms a hero to you no matter what the new media might say about him and focus on who can actually work with a Democratic Party controlled Congress that is deeper in number strength than what you have today by 25%.
For the record this all has something to do with the “every little smear campaign” being run from the RNC which is fine because the traction with new media trends toward liberal views. You guys have talk radio and the major networks sewed up for McCain where even when he looks like a fool it’s okay.
I know Beth you are going to scream back that the old media is so “librul!” Well if that were the case the story about Obama not going to visit wounded troops in Germany would not have been spearheaded by NBC’s own Andrea Mitchell and then repeated on every network broadcast locally, virtually in the country with a media market larger than 30.
What you trailer park pundits in the Confederacy fail to realize is that the old media is a corporate media that favors war for ratings ad share profit over peace for prosperity for the people.
But there are lighthouses on this terrible storm tossed ocean I do enjoy Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow. And I like your site too and how dogged and determined to get your point across in the tubes of the Internets. I think I’ll come by often to actually debate, with real facts not partisan hackery because we are like journalists and the story is what’s important not making everyone believe that “our guy is smarter” or some such crapola, with you guys and I’ll even bring a few people a lot smarter than I am.
Di lojti strixiûç!
Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!
July 26th, 2008 at 5:15 am
“Since the trip was paid for by his campaign, and he had campaign staff with him on the plane, he wouldn’t have been allowed to visit the base unless they made some sort of arrangement to have him land elsewhere, and obtain transportation to the base.”
actually the military made a special allowance to allow the plane with campaign staff to land on the base, but they could not go inside and stage pictures with the wounded soldiers … when he found that out, he decided it was not worth it and went to the gym.
July 26th, 2008 at 9:19 am
oh no…nao fred is disrespektin all r traler parks.waaaaaahhhhhh
God help us all, these liberals won’t stop til they own or kill all the po folks.
And Fred, the War of Northern aggression has been over for a bit…why continue to throw bullcrap at us ? I’m starting to get the message that if you’re Southern and have a conservative opinion,you and your hooligan friends will call for our heads.
July 26th, 2008 at 10:39 am
“And now everyone in America can see why the right wing was drooling over running against Hillary Rodham Clinton. It would have been a slam dunk of 527 commercials showing a blue dress, flashes of a dark haired woman and Kathleen Willey superimposed and floating in cigar smoke quotes over and over and over until the electorate was so nauseous that they would have voted for anyone as long as they didn’t have a D at the end of their name.”
She did plenty on her own to nauseate us without your suggested advertisements.
The commercials I believe that could of defeated her would be the ones that show her acting as if the world was her stage.Her crying bcause the boys wont treat her like Betty Boop. And maybe her having a contest with a set of nails being drawn down a chalkboard.
Maybe the cigar smoke was not such a bad idea but it should show Monica in the background smoking that cigar as a reminder that this woman forgives all the wrong people. For the wrong reasons.
“Therefore the presumptive Democratic Party candidate survived the Reverend Jeremiah Wright kerfuffle with one of the greatest speeches ever delivered in the history of American politics. He has survived his wife being bashed and vilified and accused of calling every independent white voter in the country “whiteyâ€? on a tape to be released by who would have guessed it, a right wing blogger! Funny that tape never showed up because it doesn’t exist.
Survived my a$$.
That episode tore him up and cause everyone to be just a little more cautious in their approach to this two faced liar whom disowned his own grandmother during the whole episode.
This was the one point in his candidacy where he lost more followers than over any other subject up until then.
Greatest speech ?
I thought all his speechs were the greatest ever ?
You guys really ought to stop it.
Typical libs, they want to give trophys to all the kids no matter how poor there performace is.
Oh come on now Fred.
Michelle still has plenty of problems being proud of her country with or with out the whitey tape.
” expect in a country of 202 million white “Christiansâ€?, half of whom wouldn’t want a black president under any circumstances because he’s black, that an educated man of ideas like Barack Obama would get a hard way to go from the folks who live and breathe the Southern Strategy every day of their lives. I would suggest you look beyond what Kevin Phillips called “tribal tendenciesâ€? you know Beth the sort that makes Jesse Helms a hero to you no matter what the new media might say about him and focus on who can actually work with a Democratic Party controlled Congress that is deeper in number strength than what you have today by 25%.”
Expectations will get the best of you Fred.
Now we know where the costant drill on rac*sm comes from.
A holes like you bring up to make an issue out of it as often as you can. (Jesse Helms etc…)
Try this aproach.
Obama will lose on his merits or lack of more than he will lose because he’s black.
His inexperience and arrogance are clearly more visible than his ethnicity. Which he actually portrays inaccurately. He himself makes r*ce an issue by propelling his blackness only to make for election stumps to the entitlement mentallity as he never reflects on his white side to benefit all Americans equally with diversity.
How anyone can work with the most irresponasable and useless congress we have ever had is beyond me. So if I were you I wouldnt place too many bets on that congress no matter what the scenario.
“For the record this all has something to do with the “every little smear campaignâ€? being run from the RNC which is fine because the traction with new media trends toward liberal views. You guys have talk radio and the major networks sewed up for McCain where even when he looks like a fool it’s okay.”
Delusional and incredibly ignorsnt to the facts.
Talk radio is about it.
75% of all op ed in almost every newspaper are written by liberal authors.
70% of staff members in the medias vote dem.
And all polls show that 75% of Americans on average from all polls combined believe that Obama is getting at least 75 to 80 % of the coverage.
Major networks sewed up for McCain ?
Yea, and the moon is made of cheese.
Want some fruit and Port with that ?
” know Beth you are going to scream back that the old media is so “librul!â€? Well if that were the case the story about Obama not going to visit wounded troops in Germany would not have been spearheaded by NBC’s own Andrea Mitchell and then repeated on every network broadcast locally, virtually in the country with a media market larger than 30.”
Andrea reported that people are upset about it and did not go into great lengthy detail about the pros and cons in the case just bare minimum so as to present the question as to ask whether we should be upset or not.
We are talking about liberal bias Fred.
Not claiming that all news is inandated 100% 24/7 with liberal points and views.
So you find one story and use that to try and make a point ? BFD.
“What you trailer park pundits in the Confederacy fail to realize is that the old media is a corporate media that favors war for ratings ad share profit over peace for prosperity for the people.”
Yes, its where they place that blame for the blood and catastrophy that lies the bias.
So, making money by virtue of sponsorship justifies the BS they put out just to feed the mostly liberal staff in the editing room ?
“I’ll even bring a few people a lot smarter than I am.”
We already have Bob and Ed.
July 26th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
“And Fred, the War of Northern aggression has been over for a bit…”
hey don’t blame us in massachusetts. we’ve been calling for a cut and run policy from the south for a while.
no blood for cotton! bring our boys home!
July 26th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Just to add my 2 cents:
1. Reason there were 200,000 (?) at the Berlin “rally” is because, like he did in one of his appearances in the mid-west, Obama’s appearance immediately followed a FREE rock concert with two different rock bands popular with German youth. You have to give Obama and his handlers credit for being so slick as to latch onto a FREE rock concert that would draw thousands and thousands of people (to hear the FREE music, not Obama).
Check the new services to verify the free rock concert immediately preceding Obama’s speech. Also interesting that during his speech he had the audacity to tell the world that Americans are so “stuck-Up” (my words) because they didn’t bother to learn a second language; yet during his visit to a half-dozen or so foreign speaking nations he never spoke more than a few gratituous words in a foreign language!!! Interesting isn’t it??? Two-faced???? Un-American????
2. Reason Obama didn’t visit wounded troops was because DOD (Dept of Defense) told his staff it would be inappropriate for the senator to visit wounded troops as part of a policital campaign. The DOD went on to tell Obama’s staff that he was more than welcomed to visit the wounded troops if he did not have photo ops and other trappings associated with a political campaign stop. Showing his true colors, Obama nixed the troop visit when he realized he wouldn’t gain any political advantage from such a visit.
Facts about why Obama didn’t visit wounded troops can also be checked on any of the wire services.
July 28th, 2008 at 6:52 am
Hey guys, the Disabled American Veterans just rescinded Dick Cheney’s invitation to speak after Cheney’s security team required that all attendees be locked in the room for 2 hours before his speech, and couldn’t leave until he was done speaking. Attendees include a mix of veterans, including many elderly and injured, who would be unable to use a bathroom for hours due to Cheney’s security paranoia. With Cheney’s speech scheduled for 8:30 AM, anyone wanting to attend would have had to have been in their seats at 6:30 AM.
See:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/07/27/2008-07-27_injured_vets_tell_pull_dick_cheney_invit.html
But this is OK because Cheney is a Republican, right?
July 28th, 2008 at 7:35 am
No Bob.
Well, first of all its not his fault that the meeting room doesn’t have restrooms. I mean, whos fault is that ?
Also Bob, you need to take into consideration the rest of the column which goes on to say;
“Spokeswoman Megan Mitchell said the two-hour rule is “a recommendation, not a requirement,” and “we always work to make sure the bathrooms are within the security perimeters.”
So, although up top it says that the meeting hall did not have bathrooms, Megan Mitchell says that they make sure that bathrooms are always within the perimeter.
Which means that more than likely since they “make sure” had the event gone thru there would of been restrooms. Right ?
“The vice president would never let us do anything that didn’t help facilitate the needs of our veterans,” Mitchell added.
Cheney has visited hospitalized wounded warriors and invited Walter Reed Army Medical Center patients for fly-fishing lessons around his swimming pool.
But the vice president’s rules for speaking to groups seem more stringent than those of his boss.
President Bush routinely speaks at events such as large dinners where thousands of guests freely pass back and forth through Secret Service screening portals.”
Since the event did not take place no harm really came to anyone now did it ?
You cant say that they “would be unable to use a bathroom for hours due to Cheney’s security paranoia.” when its not really his paranoia that made a meeting hall with no restrooms.
And now lets take into account that there is no doubt the NY daily news is hostile to the Bush/Cheny administration.
I think the first clue would be the very unflattering picture of Cheny they posted along with the column.
And they also dont stress the fact that this is our vice president and not Obama whom I’m sure falls under a different category and level of security.
Do we know the layout of the facility ? Does the paper ask secret service why this was planned this way ?
A lot of the time neither Bush or Cheny has a lot of say so in security measures
Really, I dont think too many want Pelosi next in line.
And this just furthers the point against Obama since the wounded he was supposed to see arent going anywhere now are they ? I’m sure their facility had restrooms and whatever they needed to make them comfortable and yet Obama never did show up or make an effort.
We also need to distinguish the difference between the wounded in a medical facility and the ambulatory wounded veteran at a meeting hall.
July 28th, 2008 at 7:57 am
Micky, I think what you are seeing is a continued pattern of disdain from Cheney toward the military. Keep in mind this is a guy who stated he had “other priorities” than military service, who used five student deferments to avoid service in Vietnam. He’s also the guy responsible for massive cuts in the military after the first gulf war. You can still read his Pentagon bio at:
http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/cheney.htm
Over Cheney’s four years as secretary of defense, encompassing budgets for fiscal years 1990-93, DoD’s total obligational authority in current dollars declined from $291.3 billion to $269.9 billion. Except for FY 1991, when the TOA budget increased by 1.7 percent, the Cheney budgets showed negative real growth: -2.9 percent in 1990, -9.8 percent in 1992, and -8.1 percent in 1993. During this same period total military personnel declined by 19.4 percent, from 2.202 million in FY 1989 to 1.776 million in FY 1993. The Army took the largest cut, from 770,000 to 572,000-25.8 percent of its strength. The Air Force declined by 22.3 percent, the Navy by 14 percent, and the Marines by 9.7 percent.
This incident is just another in a series that underscores the little regard Cheney has for America’s fighting men and women.
July 28th, 2008 at 8:40 am
Bob, you have a continued pattern of warranting bad behavior as an excuse for more bad behavior.
Even if Cheny is the militaries worst enemy it doesnt excuse Obamas behavior.
I give a sh*t about Chenys past.
We are talking about something that might happen and the we actually have the power to stop before it happens. (well, maybe not you)
We are not talking about something that is down the road and out of our hands.
And I’m not even going to bother to research your stats because as I said, it doesnt matter, Cheny and Bush are not running against Obama.
Also, half the time you guys throw these measures or bills up that didnt pass and its usually because their were other ear marks or pork attached to it that Bush or Cheny didnt want to sign off on.
For example the CHIPS bill.
All you moonbats were running around saying that Bush didnt care about kids because he vetoed the CHIP bill.
NO! He vetoed it because as it was intended for children of families that couldnt afford insurance for all of the members in that family, but there was actually 28 year olds who made 68,000.00 included on the bill and Bush felt that they were not in need of such an entitlement.
So, in a nutshell.
What you’re talking about has nothing to do with Obamas failure to do the right thing.
Really, dont you think its a little childish ?
“he did it ! so I can do it !”
July 28th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Hey – I just noticed the photo is the German village in Disney’s EPCOT in Orlando.
What you’re talking about has nothing to do with Obamas failure to do the right thing.
Really, dont you think its a little childish ?
And claiming Obama “ignores wounded soldiers” isn’t?
Please Micky, you know better.
July 28th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
For those interested in facts rather than spin, factcheck.org has addressed this issue:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/snubbing_wounded_troops.html
July 28th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Yea.
Its not childish at all on my part.
But validating ones own bad behavior with someone else’s bad behavior is what kids do.
And unfortunately way too many adults.
That rendition of my perspective seems like it took a whole second to come up with and is about as vacant from the truth as Obamas arsenal of presidential abilities.
I do know better.
I work with alcoholics and addicts and have been recovering for 15 years myself.
I have heard every line of crap under the sun when people try to justify bad behavior.
Of course I can understand a liberal wanting to take this approach to things because after all they are of a “communal” mind set where its prudent upon them to see everyone as equal in all aspects. Even the maintaining of morals and ethics.
So if one person deserves something so does everyone else even if their actions don’t warrant it.
“he got one so I should get one to ”
“he gets to screw up so I should be allowed to also”
Nobody is claiming anything.
Its pretty much a fact seeing as how he had the opportunity and has no logical reason for not visiting them.
The pentagon said the visit would be viewed as a campaign event.
Hmm…
Campaigning in Germany ?
How many in that crowd of 200,000 could actually vote for him ?
Obama stated after that he did not want to have a trip to see our wounded perceived as a campaign event. And that it would be seen that way since the trip was campaign funded.
Its never a bad thing to visit the troops no matter who is paying for the trip. Was only that part of the trip paid for by Obamas campaign?
How does Obama explain visiting troops in the war zone and at the hospital in Afghanistan? What if he was campaigning in the US and wanted to visit with the troops at Walter Reed. Would he just sh*t can it because the campaign is footing the bill?
You cant bullsh*t a bullsh*tter Bob.
The guy made an asinine decision
BUT !
After that he was told that it would be permissible as long as the staff and cameras were not present during the visit, and what ?
There was nothing stopping him.
If he can make arrangements to speak to 200,000 Germans who don’t matter, he can do it for the troops.
You would think
Also, constantly bringing up George Bush or Dick Cheny in order to controvert arguments against Obama is also about as childish (and useless)as it gets.
My bottom line is this.
I don’t think he ignored the soldiers as much as he made some bad decisions and stepped all over himself in the process.
I’m sure he actually gives our guys more credit than this episode leaves us to believe.
Which simply brings into question what will be his decision making abilities as president ?
I think this is a reflection of that deficiency.
July 28th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
This is from your link Bob.
“The Obama campaign canceled the visit with wounded troops at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, Obama says, when he learned that the Pentagon would not allow him to bring along a retired Air Force major general who is serving as a foreign policy adviser to the campaign. Obama says that “triggered then a concern that maybe our visit was going to be perceived as political.”
Ha !
Only if he told everyone about his conversation with the pentagon !
And then he could of left the general behind
July 28th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
LOL that’s a new one. Obama’s story on this has changed at least 3 times. No wonder the troops don’t support him.
July 28th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Heres another one I got in my e mail from Faultline.
The links are dead but I’ll post them if anyone wants me to.
———————————————–
Posted: 28 Jul 2008 08:56 AM CDT
Cross-posted by Maggie at Maggie’s Notebook
Does anyone think the Pentagon issues “hints” to a Presidential candidate? In an interview with Fox News’ Bill Hemmer, Hemmer asked Obama to clarify why he did not visit a U.S. Military hospital when in Germany. Obama said the following:
There was a hint [from the Pentagon] that it might end up being perceived as a political issue, because of some blowback we’ve received…
And he says:
…we had never intended to take cameras in. Our intention was not to publicize this at all.
The Huffington Post, however, offers a direct quote with a named Pentagon spokesperson:
We told him he could visit Landstuhl (Regional Medical Center in western Germany) with his Senate staff, but not with his campaign staff,” said Army Lt. Col. Elizabeth Hibner.
How embarrassing for Senator Obama.
Then here’s a version from TMP Central, Greg Sargent speaking:
I’ve just gotten clarification from the Pentagon on what really happened with regard to Barack Obama’s canceled visit to an Army base in Germany,…
A Pentagon spokesperson confirms to me [Sargent] that because of longstanding Department of Defense regulations, Pentagon officials told Obama aides that he couldn’t visit the base with campaign staff. This left Obama with little choice but to cancel the trip, since the plan to visit with campaign aides had been in the works for weeks.
Obama the Presumptive was “left with little choice…? The campaign aides couldn’t cool their heels long enough to get Obama to the hospital?
So which is it? Did the Pentagon say:
(1) you can go with your Senate staff, but not your campaign staff and you cannot take cameras?
(2) you can’t go because it is a campaign event
(3) well, it might be perceived as political, so…
The clear answer is No. 1.
NOTE: Among The Huffington Post’s coverage, they helpfully provide a link to a Pentagon ruling (or so it would seem):
When Obama cancelled his military base visit, he was responding to a Pentagon ruling:
Click it and see where it takes you. It’s a perfect example of the fine art of deception.
Here’s another example of deception: Senator Obama speaks of “distracting” the troops.
The last thing I want to do is in anyway distract the terrific work that’s being done in terms of treating our troops by getting it fouled up by a bunch of politics, so since I had a chance to visit the folks in Walter Reed, we had a chance to visit folks in Iraq, I didn’t want it to be a distraction.
Remember this slap-in-the-face from the would-be Commander-in-Chief while standing in front of a crowd of Berliners?
Will we [America or "we" the World???] reject torture and stand for the rule of law?
Can he think those lying wounded in military hospital beds, and those wounded and bravely moving on with their lives, were not “distracted” by his indictment of them as torturers, because that’s exactly what he said, not what he hinted.
More deception: CBS News, Fox News, The AP and many more reported on Obama’s “quiet” trip to Walter Reed Hospital a few weeks ago
.
CBS News: Obama Quietly Visits Wounded War Vets
Fox News: Obama Quietly Visits Veterans at Walter Reed
The AP Obama quietly visits wounded vets at Walter Reed
You can view the video of the Hemmer-Obama interview here
July 30th, 2008 at 7:32 am
[...] die globale Bürgerschaft gemeinsam – die Neue Weltordnung, die auch Hitler wollte, wie dieses Sky News Video boshaft meint. Nun, da Berlin eine Stadt mit vielen Sünden ist, verweilte das [...]
July 30th, 2008 at 10:34 am
Congratulations to the McCain campaign, this morning they finally admitted that their ad about Obama and the troops in Germany was a lie.
—
McCain campaign blogger Michael Goldfarb:
“It does now seem that Barack Obama snubbed the troops for reasons other than a lack of photo-op potential,”
July 30th, 2008 at 11:02 am
What it “seems” like to some blogger is hardly relevant.
And still, he says that Obama “snubbed” the troops.
Who cares what the reason was, even though Obama has given so many by now it doesnt matter any more.
But, whats really important is that again, Bob is being deceptive.
Here is the full article in real context.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Weblogs/TWSFP/TWSFPView.asp
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
The WaPo on Landstuhl
More on the controversy over why Obama called off his visit to greet wounded troops at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany. Dan Balz and Michael D. Shear report in the Washington Post:
[Obama campaign official Robert] Gibbs said yesterday that the campaign had planned to inform the traveling media members sometime on the morning of the flight to Ramstein that Obama was intending to visit the hospital but had made no plans to take reporters, including even the small, protective press pool that now accompanies him most places.
But that’s not what Gibbs told reporters on Friday:
Q: We would have stayed on the plane, would there have been any pool report?
Gibbs: there may have been, I don’t know if we ever came to a decision on that.
Balz and Shear also report Gibbs’s initial excuse that the visit was “canceled because Obama decided it would be inappropriate to go there as part of a trip paid for by his campaign.â€? They fail to note that Obama visited troops during a campaign-funded trip to Colorodo on July 2. Clearly Obama didn’t think that was “inappropriate”, and no one criticized him for the visit.
“It does now seem that Barack Obama snubbed the troops for reasons other than a lack of photo-op potential, but the initial reports were less clear,” writes Michael Goldfarb at The McCain Report. But he explains:
In this haze of confusion, and with the press unable or unwilling to resolve the question of why Senator Obama had snubbed the troops, this campaign drew its own conclusion from the crystal clear statements of Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell:
“We made it clear to him that campaign staff and press would not be permitted to accompany him,” Morrell said of Obama. “We relayed those ground rules. They made a choice based upon the information we relayed to them. It was their choice. We had nothing to do with it.”
It was their choice–meaning Obama didn’t want to do the trip without his press, without his campaign staff, or both. Only when Obama was forced to explain the snub himself did we learn that it was the exclusion of Gration that led him to cancel the trip.
So Obama chose to cancel a visit with wounded troops because a campaign adviser, retired Major General Jonathan S. Gration, couldn’t accompany him. That’s arguably not as appalling as scrapping the visit because the photographers and press couldn’t come along. But since when is a senator unable to meet and greet some wounded soldiers without an adviser to whisper in his ear?
See bob, you’re little addition to this really makes no point different than that of Obama did snub the troops
July 30th, 2008 at 11:35 am
Who cares what the reason was, even though Obama has given so many by now it doesnt matter any more.
Using the Occam’s razor approach, the argument that makes the most sense is that Obama was afraid his visit to the troops in Germany, while on a campaign trip, would have been attacked as being politically motivated, so he canceled.
Of course folks like yourself NEVER would have attacked him if he stopped his campaign plane at an airbase and visited wounded troops on a trip paid for by his campaign, right?
Something tells me had he gone, we would have seen a blaring headline on Drudge “Obama Uses Troops As A Prop: Schedules Campaign Stop To Visit Soldiers”
Followed by “what a scum-bag” post after post.
July 30th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
“Of course folks like yourself NEVER would have attacked him if he stopped his campaign plane at an airbase and visited wounded troops on a trip paid for by his campaign, right? ”
Not true.
This already had been discussed with many pundits while Obama was visiting troops here in the US while campaigning. And it was agreed that no one would really critsize him or is going to critisize him for that.
Have you heard any critisizem about his visits to the troops here in the states ?
No. because I am making sense backed by fact.
He has visited the wounded here in the country and done so in a very discreet manner.
Which is what he should of and could of done in Germany
“Something tells me had he gone, we would have seen a blaring headline on Drudge “Obama Uses Troops As A Prop: Schedules Campaign Stop To Visit Soldiersâ€?”
Only if he took pics and used them to brag.
he could of just gone to see the wounded alone and that would be that.
It would of been to his benefit had the story surfaced if he did in the manner I mention.
All the BS in the world is not going to change the fact that he had the opportunity to do this the right way and chose not to.
July 30th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
This already had been discussed with many pundits while Obama was visiting troops here in the US while campaigning. And it was agreed that no one would really critsize him or is going to critisize him for that.
Are these the same pundits who said that Obama would rather play basketball than visit the troops and who ignored the fact that Obama regularly visits troops at Walter Reed and visited troops during his tour through Afghanistan and Iraq?
Micky, as I said, you are a lot smarter than this.
July 30th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
No, I believe the pundits who you are talking about are the one who said he would rather go to the gym for his workout while in Afghanistan.
Frankly I dont care if he went to circle jerk instead. He had opportunity.
He partook in alot of activities with active duty troops in Kuwait and Iraq. How could he not ?
Whats he supposed to do ? Go pray at a mosque ?
I googled for the exact names of US military hospitals he visited here in the states, but all you get is Obama and Afghani troops, not US wounded in US hospitals.
It doesnt matter really so I gave up.
He has visited Us wounded troops here in the US very discreetly during his campaign and you hear no one critisizing that.
As you said, he regularly visits Walter Reed, even though he is campaigning, right ?
Have you heard anyone critisize him for doing that ?
So, he has no excuse.
Actually it would be more expected than critisized if he made the visit.
Thats why all the hubbub, right ?
July 31st, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Micky, this is for you. Enjoy your crow:
—
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/brandnewday/archives/2008/07/the_new_normal.html
What the McCain campaign doesn’t want people to know, according to one GOP strategist I spoke with over the weekend, is that they had an ad script ready to go if Obama had visited the wounded troops saying that Obama was…wait for it…using wounded troops as campaign props. So, no matter which way Obama turned, McCain had an Obama bashing ad ready to launch.
Exactly as I said, had Obama gone and visited the troops, the McCain camp would have attacked him using the troops as props.
July 31st, 2008 at 1:34 pm
..which is what he was trying to do, use troops as props for shallow photography. That’s bad enough, but then he canceled it because he couldn’t take pictures which is worse. Both bad scenarios.
It’s judgment not photos that make a president. The best thing Obama could have done to support the troops was cheer on the surge and support their mission. He failed them and no amount of photography can ever make up for it.
I think that’s the big picture you are missing. At this point, the best thing Obama can do for the troops is get out of the way.
July 31st, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Eat crow ?
Eat me.
That doesnt change anything.
he had it planed already, it was supposed to be part of his campaign tour.
But since he couldnt do it his way and he really had no interest in seeing our wounded, he blew it off.
I asked you Bob.
How much critisizem has Obama recieved for visiting wounded here in the states while campaigning ?
And so what if McCain did launch that ad ?
Does Obama not have the testicular fortitude to do whats right anyway ? No matter what anyone says ?
Face it, the guy is a schmuck.
July 31st, 2008 at 2:34 pm
Lets put this another way.
For the sake of arguement lets say that,
Obamas Muslim background is not enough to worry about.
He really was born in the US.
He really does love and care about the troops
He was never aware untill it was too late that Rev. Wright was what he is.
He is innocent of all the questionable things that are brought against him.
If all this is true, still, this man shows very poor decision making reflected in the way he has handled all of these things.
That if anything is for certain
July 31st, 2008 at 2:58 pm
How much critisizem has Obama recieved for visiting wounded here in the states while campaigning ?
Then why do you think the McCain team was ready with an ad to attack him for visiting the troops in Germany?
July 31st, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Thats Germany and McCain.
And that would be if he did use it for a photo op.
“wait for it…using wounded troops as campaign props. ”
Read the quote from your source Bob. It says if Obama used them for “PROPS”.
Now, how could Obama use them for props if he didnt take pictures of them for his campaign ?
Also, if Obama just did it discreetly without his campaign advisor and a camera crew McCain would have nothing to bitch about.
But please, just answer the question.
And I will say it again.
And so what if McCain did launch that ad ?
Does Obama not have the testicular fortitude to do whats right anyway ? No matter what anyone says ?
Why didnt Obama just go anyway ?
Also. I dont know how much credibility there is with this so called “GOP strategist”
Does he have a name ?
Face it, Obama is is a schmuck and there is no logical way for him to explain this away other than…
1) He doesnt care about the troops.
2) he makes some really poor decisions.
July 31st, 2008 at 4:20 pm
He gets up in front of 200,000 foreigners who cant vote for him and says “this is our time”.
But he doesnt find time for wounded American soldiers
July 31st, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Micky – that’s EXACTLY right.
July 31st, 2008 at 7:07 pm
All the arguments and excuses for why Obama couldn’t’ be bothered with wounded troops is just BS.
It took him a week to come up with the story he finally stuck with as to why he didn’t go by there. He wouldn’t have bothered explaining it, if it hadn’t gotten in the news.
I heard his first reaction from his own mouth. He said he’d seen wounded troops in Afghanistan and thanked them. He said it like, ‘Wasn’t that enough?’
They guy doesn’t get it. He JUST doesn’t get it. That’s the bottom line. That’s the problem. He has no respect for the military. He doesn’t value the military. He doesn’t understand the military. He believes the left’s propaganda about the military.
This is a guy that wants to send ALL our troops to Afghanistan against the advise of men on the ground and military commanders. He’s an idiot and will do nothing but get soldiers killed and put our national security in more danger than its been in throughout the history of the Republic.
July 31st, 2008 at 9:02 pm
But he doesnt find time for wounded American soldiers
You must have forgotten that he did visit wounded troops during his trip to Iraq and Afghanistan.
And again, you would have attacked him if he did go, as McCain was prepared to do.
July 31st, 2008 at 9:04 pm
If all this is true, still, this man shows very poor decision making reflected in the way he has handled all of these things.
Yes Micky, he continually shows poor decision making, which is why he came out of nowhere to defeat the Clintons, and why he currently holds an electoral college advantage of 351-187 according to The Hedgehog Report.
Yes, he’s obviously completely incompetent, keep thinking that, and then start coming up with a conspiracy theory you can blame in November.
July 31st, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Bob, your grabbing at straws.
The troops in Afganistan and Kuwait were not wounded and photos were welcome along with everyone else. He had lunch with them.
There are no hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Only traige, temporary and emergency units.
They get shipped out to germany.
And even if they did have hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan it doesnt explain away his bullsh*ting around the Germany visit.
Also, I was talking about him having time for Germans and not American wounded.
No decent guy is going to attack a senator for visiting troops unless he does it for selfish ulterior purposes.
Which reminds me, you never did answer my question.
As you said, he regularly visits Walter Reed, even though he is campaigning, right ?
Have you heard anyone critisize him for doing that ?
He beat Clinton ?
Thats what you think.
I think Clinton beat herself.
Or, if you dont think like me you could say that even a broken clock is right twice a day.
And he did not come out of nowhere. Which orafice did you pull that out of ?
I got tired of looking at him a year and a half ago.
Why dont you start coming up right now with some credible controverting claims and points ?
All you’re doing is repeating the same argument that has already been squashed once before.
He should of gone to visit without cameras and advisors and crew.
If McCain did say anything Obama plainly could of just said “hey ! I was being as low key as possible”
He could of even snuck in and not had to tell anyone until a week later !
Where theres a will, theres a way.
He did not have the will.
Period.
July 31st, 2008 at 10:48 pm
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/07/19/obama_arrives_in_afghanistan_set_to_tour_war_zone/
“}Obama played basketball with some troops and joked to those watching, “You came out here because you wanted to see me get beat by your fellow soldiers.”
“At the start of their Afghan trip, the delegation met with top military leaders and troops at Bagram Air Field, the main U.S. military base north of the capital, before going to Jalalabad Air Field in Nangarhar province.”
“Barack Obama visited Saturday with U.S. troops and Afghan officials in this war-weary nation, which is the focal point of his proposed strategy for dealing with threats to the U.S. if elected president.”
Nope, no wounded in Afghanistan.
Just basketball.
( I dont think the wounded were playin hoops)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-07-19-obama-trip_N.htm
“Earlier Sunday, Obama had breakfast with soldiers at Camp Eggers, a heavily fortified military base in the city”
“Before arriving in Afghanistan, Obama visited with U.S. troops in Kuwait. He was joined by Democratic Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska. Both have been mentioned as potential vice presidential picks”
Nope, no wounded troops in Kuwait or iraq either,
Sorry bob.
August 1st, 2008 at 5:39 am
No decent guy is going to attack a senator for visiting troops unless he does it for selfish ulterior purposes.
And since we now know that McCain’s campaign was prepared to run an ad attacking him for visiting troops in Germany during a campaign trip, in your view that makes McCain an indecent, selfish guy.
OK, I can live with that.
August 1st, 2008 at 6:28 am
Baghdad Bob, you don’t understand the simple English sentence you clipped in italics. Stop lying about Obama’s selfish ulterior purposes.
August 1st, 2008 at 8:18 am
“And since we now know that McCain’s campaign was prepared to run an ad attacking him for visiting troops in Germany during a campaign trip, in your view that makes McCain an indecent, selfish guy.”
There you go again.
Completely missing a point and continuing on as if it were never made.
Of course you have lied by taking my words out of context and repeating things I never said before, so I shouldnt be surprised