A known British Mullah Mr. Anjum Chaudri describes the “Killing of Innocent” Non-Muslims civilians in the suicide bombing as “Legitimate”. He states that because Muslilms are always innocent in the eyes of God, and non-muslims are condemned in the eyes of God for turning their back on him, it is OK to rape and kill non-Muslims. He also emphatically states in his very British accent, that he cannot ever turn his back or criticize a Muslim brother. This guy is one of the most prominent muslims in Great Britain.
I really wish the majority of muslims would rise up and throw these jerks out. Allah would then be pleased.
Don’t watch this video if you easily get overcome with a feeling of putting your fist through your screen!
Anjum Chaudri Video
April 2nd, 2008 at 7:26 am
The religion of peace. This guy is clearly an uneducated moron. The problem in Islam today is that criticism among its believers is heard few and far between. I am curious as to what he thinks of Shiite vs. Sunni raping and killing and how committing such violence on anyone can still allow you to remain innocent in the eyes of your god.
He reminds me of those people centuries ago who would perform atrocities upon others because they believed people who did not look like them had no souls.
April 2nd, 2008 at 10:23 am
The scarry thing about this guy is how many Muslims around the world actually agree with him, even if only passively.
March 28th, 2009 at 8:49 am
what is he saying that’s any different from Christians that done the same for centuries? Only this time it is against the christians who have started the war against the muslims and now in no position to finish with defeat in afghanistan defeat will come to UK and rest of Europe. Islamic victory all the way.
March 28th, 2009 at 9:10 am
This guy seems like a lot trash talking politico’s at its most basic testosterone level. Ordinarily people would dismiss this “mr’s” rantings as uneducated working class anger under the guise of religion as unstable and unsuitable. But he obviously preys on displaced muslims, some homesick, finding the adjustment in the west difficult and loney, and some with various grudges, maybe even originating in their countries of orign. Surely not everyone is going to see things the way some christians do, or even want to, but this character is functioning in a very antisocial manner and may well be a dedicated provokateur to the overthrow of his host countrys government, just like he was to his country of origins government. He is advocating illegal activities and why the British put up with him is purely a political decision. Even under the guise of some religion’s cloth you have antisocial people who advocate nothing more than typical ganglike activities in the quest for power. People have to decide what religion is supposed to do for them, be a personal quest, a social sharing, or a primative mindless shield for power and glory of the sword kind that lets them get away with crimes against humanity.
July 20th, 2009 at 9:00 am
Great post!!!
Keep it up.
September 23rd, 2009 at 9:08 am
i read some similar in other blogs. but i do not think the same. sorry. maybe check better some more sources to point the thing out. community resources
September 29th, 2009 at 2:24 pm
Do you really think so? Maybe you are right but I have my doubts.