Michelle Obama and Black Separationists at Princeton
For months during the nominating process, Michelle Obama’s graduating thesis has been under lock and key at Princeton University. The university stated suspiciously that it would be available to the public after the general election. Nobody knew why until now.
The sequestering of an academic thesis was unprecedented at Princeton, a liberal university that prides itself on open access to scholarly information. Despite repeated attempts by media organizations to view the document, Obama’s alma mater would provide no explanation for hiding it.
The thesis written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn, is titled “Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community.” You can download it here.
Politico.com received a possibly redacted copy from the Obama campaign recently. The excerpts show that Obama identifies with black militancy, utterly obsessed with race in America and her own blackness. It is a fundamentally racist document, shocking when considering that this scholarship is the product of a presidential candidate’s wife at a great university.
She mourns that she will face “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.”
Obama’s thesis is full of paranoid claims and overtly racist feelings. She cannot accept the idea of a diverse student body working together in a melting pot. Others worry about her black militancy here.
“I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second.”
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but she elevates black over white in her world.
“There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost. “
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources that will elevate black over white in America?
Most alarming is her use of the terms “separationist�? and “integrationist�? when describing the views of black people. She clearly identifies herself with a “separationist�? view of race.
“By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.�?
Here is another typical passage that is uncomfortable for its poor writing, but nevertheless ominous in meaning:
“Attending Princeton has probably forced [black alumni] to compete intellectually with Whites more than with Blacks and, thus, they have probably become more familiar with Whites intellectually, but in other activities they are likely to have gained familiarity with Whites if they did not spend time with Whites in other activities besides intellectual ones. “
Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
“Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”
The conclusion of the thesis is alarming. Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni helps her understand that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. She laments that only 1/3 say they are more comfortable around black people than white people.
But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin.
“I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.”
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
That is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration. Michelle Obama’s intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern.










October 20th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
Being a 40 year old African American, I can’t say that my views were not that different 20 years ago when I was a college student. I could, probably, go find in some of my college papers, something similar. The reality is that the 80s were a very racially tense time for us. Apartheid was still in place and the U.S. had not divested, Mandela was still in jail etc. My university was still heavily discriminating against blacks in general. My husband chose not to attend Princeton (he went to Harvard instead)because of both the lilly white faculty and lack of diversity. And almost every black person that I know, personally, that attended Princeton has commented on the rac**sm that was prevalent when they were there. Fortunately, we all have the opportunity to evolve as people. If rac**st white people can eventually produce offspring that are not rac**st, why can’t a woman (after more than 25 years, evolve in to a different mindset about different races and cultures of people? I think it is completely irresponsible to hold someone accountable to something they wrote as a younth but we can’t hold McCain accountable for his immoral actions 30+ years ago.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:05 am
I just finished reading Michelle Obama’s thesis. I am amazed that this is considered “militant rac*sm”. This label actually made me laugh out loud! I do not see it as milicious or rac*st. I am a 29 year old white woman. I don’t see this thesis as anything other than a belief system that this young black woman had as being a minority attending a prestigious school which was predominately white. We all have life experiences and at the time, Michelle was obviously feeling oppressed and wanted to search out to see if others felt the same way. If roles were reversed and I was a white in a predominately black school, I feel like I would have taken the same stance as she did. This is a free country and everyone has the right to question society while trying to make sense of it, right or wrong to anyone else. I commend her for seeking out an answer to a question that was raised within herself. This country seriously needs to move past this race issue. I am trying so hard to raise me sons to see NO color and it amazes me that the society that we are living in now seems to be taking a major step back. I am still undecide on who I would like to take the presidency but I guarantee that slander on either sides will not sway my decision one way or the other.
November 1st, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Remember that you democrats put that black woman in a white house, when you find yourself pennyless.
November 10th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Michelle Obama is the most intelligent, tough and beautiful first lady…ever!!
November 10th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Well said, kelly. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with Michelle Obama stating the obvious or making observations about her surroundings while she attended Princeton. This “melting pot” idea is a bit of a joke, really. People are expected to assimilate, but even if/when they do, it’s still made painfully obvious to them that they’ll never really be 100% included.
As for you, “angel in the south,” you might want to ease up on the bigotry. Kthanks.
November 10th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
“People are expected to assimilate, but even if/when they do, it’s still made painfully obvious to them that they’ll never really be 100% included.”
Thats why I wont reach across the aisle to work with liberals.
November 10th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Actually I would sit down and have talks with my enemy, but only with preconditions.
January 20th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Its really a sad thing she thinks.. Why have MLK day if not to celbrate us as a melting pot of unique people. I really feel sorry for her that she wantas to feel oppressed, like she’s using it to get everyone to say “poor me”. We have wonderful African American people like MLK who wanted us to unite as one people, & this woman wants us divided…. Such a shame.
January 25th, 2009 at 11:23 am
—then the tree got buds,and the flower blossomed.Most folks just have to reach in before they can reach out,we all have that capacity,regardless of our skin color.
January 25th, 2009 at 11:57 am
well the issue of race is more a shell game than anything else, trump or bad luck cards in the local gaming parlour. If you don’t want to cheat you won’t use race as decision maker. Being not a rac-est means your striving to be fair and take people at face value. But then pretty people will get most of the good stuff!
January 25th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Most of the superficial good”stuff”,they can have my share,I’d be more than happy to do without any of it.
January 25th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
well I bet someone like Goldie Hawn has lots of good stuff and none of it is superficial. Just a guess.
February 19th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
None of these things worked. My president is BLK
April 4th, 2009 at 6:17 am
This is nothing more than a twits of words and ideas of her thesis and do believe that simply because she’s black does this website publish such trash. A co-worker said “Michelle is Rac!st!” and asked where he heard this. This was his source and can see how his current ignorance can expand by reading, this! Yes, she’s going to see what she can do for the people in this country that have and are suffering the most. Has “America” forgot about the last 200 + years and it’s current rac!st undertones from companies, organizations, government, and “exclusive clubs?” When an African American walks into a room there is an immediate negative undertone among Caucasians. It’s the same feeling when a Caucasian woman walks into a room filled with African Americans. I bet she feels awkward and not in a good way. So much negativity built in the African American community; why not try to make that community strive first and foremost? If you have a problem with your home or family don’t you make that your first and foremost focus and try to repair or resolve that problem? Caucasian America can’t see it as just that right? Caucasian Americans see that as rac!st and a threat not a resolution because those particular “Americans” are in fact the rac!st persons. No one is perfect and definitely no politician and his/her spouse. I think what Michelle wants is people who never had a chance to be productive and successful in the United States a good chance to be more productive now and in their futures. Think about it… if I took you and your children and placed you in a situation where you couldn’t learn to read, not allowed to vote, denied an education, and withheld proper medical care and then 20 30 or 40 years later threw you to the streets; you probably wouldn’t make it in the World and much less the US. Now, think about an entire race for over many generations and hundreds of years; then slowly allowed to an education, to vote, medical care, and without prejudice… how long do you think it would take to fix that problem? How long do you think it would take to admit it was a problem? That would be a huge problem and I would try to fix that problem quickly. That’s what is meant by the statement quoted in this article about Mrs. Obama being a member of the “black community.”
October 29th, 2009 at 2:42 am
[...] Michelle Obama’s Princeton University thesis says her primary commitment is to the Black commu…. (This is consistent with Barack Obama’s Black Nationalism as described in “Dreams From My Father”); [...]