Michelle Obama and Black Separationists at Princeton
For months during the nominating process, Michelle Obama’s graduating thesis has been under lock and key at Princeton University. The university stated suspiciously that it would be available to the public after the general election. Nobody knew why until now.
The sequestering of an academic thesis was unprecedented at Princeton, a liberal university that prides itself on open access to scholarly information. Despite repeated attempts by media organizations to view the document, Obama’s alma mater would provide no explanation for hiding it.
The thesis written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn, is titled “Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community.” You can download it here.
Politico.com received a possibly redacted copy from the Obama campaign recently. The excerpts show that Obama identifies with black militancy, utterly obsessed with race in America and her own blackness. It is a fundamentally racist document, shocking when considering that this scholarship is the product of a presidential candidate’s wife at a great university.
She mourns that she will face “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.”
Obama’s thesis is full of paranoid claims and overtly racist feelings. She cannot accept the idea of a diverse student body working together in a melting pot. Others worry about her black militancy here.
“I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second.”
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but she elevates black over white in her world.
“There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost. “
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources that will elevate black over white in America?
Most alarming is her use of the terms “separationist� and “integrationist� when describing the views of black people. She clearly identifies herself with a “separationist� view of race.
“By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.�
Here is another typical passage that is uncomfortable for its poor writing, but nevertheless ominous in meaning:
“Attending Princeton has probably forced [black alumni] to compete intellectually with Whites more than with Blacks and, thus, they have probably become more familiar with Whites intellectually, but in other activities they are likely to have gained familiarity with Whites if they did not spend time with Whites in other activities besides intellectual ones. “
Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
“Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”
The conclusion of the thesis is alarming. Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni helps her understand that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. She laments that only 1/3 say they are more comfortable around black people than white people.
But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin.
“I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.”
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
That is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration. Michelle Obama’s intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern.









February 26th, 2008 at 9:09 am
Interesting comments BHR. So what you are trying to say is that Michelle married Barry because he is not black? He obviously appealed to Michelle. But then she is not really black because her thesis expressed ideas and opinions only for the purposes of getting a degree?
Wow. I hope BHR doesn’t tire itself flailing around.
February 26th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
KungPow - quit trying to reason like BlogHole - it will twist your brain in knots - which is why he has a hard time with higher level concepts - like sharing the planet with people who disagree with him.
February 27th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
That’s the first time I’ve ever heard someone suggest that college theses aren’t a matter of record or that they don’t count and don’t mean anything because they’re just written by kids trying to graduate and don’t represent their real views.
March 9th, 2008 at 6:36 am
I am a white, middle class female with a family. It is important to me that whoever becomes my president will be working to build us a stronger economy and improve our quality of lives. Notice that I said “us” and “our”. Because of statements made by Michelle Obama in interviews, and now this thesis, I worry that Obama will not be looking out for my best interests but rather those of blacks only. I find it difficult to believe that his own personal beliefs are that far distanced from those of the woman he married.
I’ll stick with Hillary, who has demonstrated over time that she is trying to help all races in both the lower and middle classes.
March 15th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
She was very disappointed that most of her fellow black Princeton students didn’t feel as seperatist and divisive as she did. This is preceisely the kind of crap most Americans are fed up with.
She was an identity politcs pro even back then and recent speeches and the church the Obamas go to prove that hasn’t changed.
I would be surprised if the campaign lets her speak again before November.
March 15th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
I would love to have a black First Family. But not a racially obsessed black first family. No thanks. He’s supposed to represent all Americans, not just African Americans.
Also, I don’t buy the part about blacks having a reason to be bitter as an excuse. Plenty, if not most, of blacks aren’t race-obsessed bigots. Like MLK, they want to unite the races, not divide them.
So far, I’ve trusted that Barak is cool about that. He seems like a reconciler. But this Michelle O is a bitter divider. I don’t want her in the White House. Hell nah.
March 16th, 2008 at 9:51 am
By some strange coincidence, Hillary also wanted to hide her past by suppressing her undergraduate thesis. See this article from May, 2007:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17388372
March 22nd, 2008 at 7:36 am
The latinos are sick of the race card used all the time,, The latinos people are sck of the BS we will not vote for this Obama cult
March 22nd, 2008 at 7:39 am
HEY HOW ABOUT OBAMAs PAST YOU HILARY BASHERS GET A LIFE AND LEAVE THIS WOMEN ALONE YOU SNIFF UP HER ASS EVERYTIME SHE MOVES
March 22nd, 2008 at 7:43 am
Will Note,
We have a very lenient policy at RP.
However, you are treading close to being banned. You can be as passionate as you like but please keep it clean.
March 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Charlie,
All opinions are welcome. Please feel free to read the rest of our stuff. I assure you that your argument is not too “sophicated” (sic) for us to understand.
It is the ultimate in irony that you misspelled the word sophisticated. If you are intent to insult us in this manner, the least you could do is spell the main word that is being used to make your point correctly.
20 years of listening to anti-American hatred from the pulpit. Obama’s first response was to deny that he had every heard these statements. That position changed in the greatest speech ever known to mankind when he admitted to hearing such hateful venom from his personal preacher and confidant. Which time was the good Senator lying to us?
This is much too easy and is similiar to taking candy from a baby but that would be an insult to the intelligence level of a baby to compare him or her to you.
Really, you will have to do much, much better than that to have us take you seriously. We are a little bit more “sophisticated” than the brain washed kiddies at Obama’s site.
Try again soon but please mind your spelling!
March 22nd, 2008 at 4:43 pm
No, your not an Obamamiac. Yea, sure and the Easter Bunny really will come tonight.
Still, I am glad that you are out there and you are certainly welcome to your opinion.
Feel free to come back often and tell us how wrong we are.
March 22nd, 2008 at 6:46 pm
ok. thanks. and, i really do not have a choice in the election. the more time mccain spends out on the road while bo and hrc beat each other up, the better he looks!
but, think what you will.
and seeing as you spent so much energy mocking our good friend ’sophicated’, please take no offense at me pointing out that the correct word is you’re, not your. it’s a very common error: we all know typos happen.
have a good weekend, and enjoy easter if that’s your thing.
March 22nd, 2008 at 7:13 pm
Easter is ok, I guess. I just thought it was funny that he was inferring that we were not sophisticated and he misspelled the word in trying to make his point.
March 29th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
[...] his children to the hatred celebrated by Wright’s congregation. It also explains his wife’s racial volatility and unexplainable shame of being [...]
April 4th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Read the entire 98 page thesis which is a thesis, not the personal position paper of the next First Lady of the United States of Funk. I just read the entire thesis. None of that crap is in there; actually the words [as a list of words] are probably there, just not in that order and/or missing the remainder of the sentence/punctuation/author of the statement.
Entire thesis is here. Release withheld by Princeton which doesn’t usually release alumni thesis to the public, but released by President Obama within a day of being asked.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8642.html
snopes.com article even debunks the contentions held in this article:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/thesis.asp
April 7th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Obama is a politician. If he has gotten far enough to run for president, sadly a lot of his personal life is going to be like other politicians. In other words, he married someone who would help him be a better politician.
It appears he married a politically minded black American female, who can easily be identified with by many other black Americans. The church is also a big political play. Obama needs to be “more black” to get the black vote. The wife and church give him enough blackness for that vote… or at least that must be his strategy. Whether he agrees with anything she said 20 years ago or today isn’t defined by their marriage … he has planned his life around being a politician, and you can bet that was a huge part of why he married her.
April 7th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
learntoplay, I give Obama the benefit of the doubt. I think he married her because he shares her views on race, the same reason that he joined a militant church.
April 7th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Or he married her because he fell in love. Hell, if Cue-ball Carvell can marry his wonderful wife anything can happen (how the hell did they ever marry any way?)
April 7th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
I don’t remember what I wrote my college thesis on. I sure don’t want it read by anyone now. I never read my wife’s college thesis. I’m sure I don’t ever want to. Frankly, I don’t care what it was about. We all held beliefs in college that we don’t hold now. In college, I considered microwaved vienna sausages and Pabst Blue Ribbon to be a good dinner. Irrelevant. Let’s move on…
April 7th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Ha, I remember my college thesis (this will show you how far I’ve come). I wrote it about the advantages of communitarianism, threw in a little Dworkin, etc. I thought it was a fine piece of publication at the time, now I consider it tripe. Liberal education my ass.
April 8th, 2008 at 6:32 am
It’s called insecurity. Grow a pair already and move on. No one cares what your color is if you have character and brains.
April 8th, 2008 at 9:48 am
BTM, ha! Dworkin? The older I get, and the more expensive college gets, the more I wonder about liberal arts education. $250,000 over 4 years and they come out reciting some completely useless philosophy? Sorry, son. Get a job, or Be All You Can Be.
April 12th, 2008 at 1:22 am
[...] title is cribbed from a Wright sermon (“The Audacity to Hope”). For Michelle, who had written that a racial “separationist” would have a better understanding of American blacks than [...]
May 6th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Bottom Line…I will vote for whichever Democratic candidate makes it to November.
A vote for McCain is the same as putting “Dubya” in for a third term. Besides, McCain probably won’t last the whole 4 years - have you seen him speak? He can hardly move about and speak up - even with a mic!!
Besides, if Obama does get elected president, the largely white Congress won’t let him get away with militant crap! Our government is still (in theory) FOR the people, BY the people! So all this black/white Obama/Clinton aruguing is useless. All you have to do is….
VOTE AGAINST MCCAIN IN NOVEMBER!!!