File this one under ″The Pot Calling the Kettle Black.″ Ann Coulter names names of some of the GOP hucksters and shysters whom she believes are costing Republicans elections. Appearing on Fox News with huckster Sean Hannity, shyster Coulter called out Liz Cheney, Newt Gingrich and Mark Sanford as among those who are hijacking the GOP. Likewise to consultants who worked for Linda McMahon and John Raese. Coulter said that the Republican Party needs to focus on winning elections. Mind you, this comes from the same Ann Coulter who claimed that only Mitt Romney could beat Barack Obama and says nothing bad about the GOP consultants who are out to destroy the Tea Party. Perhaps Coulter has not figured out that Republicans might start winning some elections if they demonstrate standing up for principles? By articulating the cause of Freedom? Does the shrill, shrieking Ann Coulter still have any credibility? Or has she completely sold out to the Surrender Caucus of the GOP Establishment?
I used to like Ann Coulter. Often have I said that anything Coulter says, no matter how outrageous, winds up being true within 90 days. But the 2012 GOP primary season ended my affection for her. She was pushing for Mitt Romney very early on, a choice that was obviously bad. After the election, she has attempted to regain some credibility by taking a stand against amnesty for illegal immigrants, but apparently that has not been working for her. So now, Coulter is hell bent on attacking Liz Cheney and others who seem to be more rooted in principles rather than pragmatism.
Ann Coulter, like many ′Republican′ pundits, are still puzzled by the impact of the Tea Party and 2010. They do not understand that the Tea Party gave the GOP the House for the expressed purpose of blocking Obama and the Liberal Democrats from their plans to spend America into utter bankruptcy. If the Tea Party is foolish about anything, it is probably the sad reality that our nation is already bankrupt after decades of useless, failed, Progressive entitlement programs. I might even toss in the foolish notion that Coulter and Mark Levin have that merely by ′restoring′ the Constitution, everything will get fixed. They haven′t figured out yet that it is the Constitution that allowed our government to expand and grow so large and powerful that tyranny is just around the corner, if not already here.
No, Ann Culter, like Chucky Krauthammer and others, are what I now call DINO-RINOs. RINOs from the Jurassic Era of political thought. The sort who think that having an R after their name and still being allowed to write an Op-Ed for the New York Times makes them somebody special. Somebody to be revered and respected. Someone who is electable due to their willingness to compromise and surrender.. I say N-O to that! In my world, I′d toss them in the trashbin and allow alley cats to urinate upon them daily as their purgatory for selling out the cause of Individual Liberty. That is what Ann Coulter deserves!
So what do you think about Ann Coulter naming some of the GOP hucksters and shysters? She told Sean Hannity that Newt Gingrich, Liz Cheney, Mark Sanford are the reason why the Republican Party is not winning elections. Do you agree with her? Or is it Ann Coulter, Karl Rove and Charles Krauthammer who are more responsible for promoting milk-toast candidates who fold and fall apart under the slightest pressure? Those who still think that if they compromise enough, the Liberal Media will adore them and invite them for cocktails in Georgetown?