The text transcript and video of John McCain’s CPAC speech will be below as it becomes available.
This is a terribly important speech for McCain to make new inroads into the conservative establishment. The rumor leading into the speech is that McCain would play a video of Ronald Reagan introducing him, although that may just be talk. Ronald Reagan is dead, after all.
An agenda for the CPAC convention is here. McCain will speak at 3pm EST on February 7th, 2007. Analysis from HotAir is here.
The speech that McCain delivers is important for a number of reasons.
First is the realism among conservatives that McCain is their Republican candidate. Now, instead of looking for reasons to vote against McCain they will be searching for reasons to support.
McCain needs to deliver those reasons loud and clear.
1) He should articulate a broad world vision of conservatism in the 21st Century, emphasizing the role of government and individual decision making in a free society.
2) McCain should emphasize his vision of America’s military role in the world as the only power which can confront the fundamentalist Islamic threat to western culture.
3) He needs to confirm his support for judicial originalists, and affirm his support for Alito and Roberts as models for supreme court justices. He had done that repeatedly on the campaign so this should be a slam dunk.
4) John McCain should explains his current support for making tax cuts permanent, vis-a-vis his opposition to the 2001 tax cuts. He needs to explain this juxtaposition in terms of a smaller federal government. He needs to confront this issue forcefully from a conservative economic perspective rather than dance around it.
5) He should reinforce his good record on the 2nd amendment.
6) McCain should state plainly that he was wrong on the amnesty bill. The people have spoken. Mentioning that Ronald Reagan favored amnesty would be a mistake. McCain should explain that he made a mistake and re-confirm that a border fence should come first. That is his new position, so admitting error will win confidence.
7) He needs to explain his support for campaign finance reform in terms of conservative principles. Quoting George Washington and James Madison on this issue would be a good plan. Explain how campaign financing restrictions promote the conservative goal of reducing the federal government’s role in our lives.
John McCain speech in front of CPAC is his most important speech before the convention. We will know soon if conservatives can begin to rally behind him or find new reasons to dismiss him as not conservative enough.
CPAC Speech transcript and video below when available.
What are your thoughts?
John McCain’s CPAC Speech (Video)
Transcript of John McCain’s Speech at CPAC - February 7th, 2008.
Thank you. Thank you for inviting me. It’s been a little while since I’ve had the honor of addressing you, and I appreciate very much your courtesy to me today. We should do this more often. I hope you will pardon my absence last year, and understand that I intended no personal insult to any of you. I was merely pre-occupied with the business of trying to escape the distinction of pre-season frontrunner for the Republican nomination, which, I’m sure some of you observed, I managed to do in fairly short order. But, now, I again have the privilege of that distinction, and this time I would prefer to hold on to it for a while.
I know I have a responsibility, if I am, as I hope to be, the Republican nominee for President, to unite the party and prepare for the great contest in November. And I am acutely aware that I cannot succeed in that endeavor, nor can our party prevail over the challenge we will face from either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama, without the support of dedicated conservatives, whose convictions, creativity and energy have been indispensible to the success our party has had over the last quarter century. Many of you have disagreed strongly with some positions I have taken in recent years. I understand that. I might not agree with it, but I respect it for the principled position it is. And it is my sincere hope that even if you believe I have occasionally erred in my reasoning as a fellow conservative, you will still allow that I have, in many ways important to all of us, maintained the record of a conservative. Further, I hope you will grant that I have defended many positions we share just as ardently as I have made my case for positions that have provoked your opposition. If not, thank you for this opportunity to make my case today.
I am proud to be a conservative, and I make that claim because I share with you that most basic of conservative principles: that liberty is a right conferred by our Creator, not by governments, and that the proper object of justice and the rule of law in our country is not to aggregate power to the state but to protect the liberty and property of its citizens. And like you, I understand, as Edmund Burke observed, that “whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither . . . is safe.”
While I have long worked to help grow a public majority of support for Republican candidates and principles, I have also always believed, like you, in the wisdom of Ronald Reagan, who warned in an address to this conference in 1975, that “a political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency or simply to swell its numbers.”
I attended my first CPAC conference as the invited guest of Ronald Reagan, not long after I had returned from overseas, when I heard him deliver his “shining city upon a hill” speech. I was still a naval officer then, but his words inspired and helped form my own political views, just as Ronald Reagan’s defense of America’s cause in Vietnam and his evident concern for American prisoners of war in that conflict inspired and were a great comfort to those of us who, in my friend Jerry Denton’s words, had the honor of serving “our country under difficult circumstances.” I am proud, very proud, to have come to public office as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution. And if a few of my positions have raised your concern that I have forgotten my political heritage, I want to assure you that I have not, and I am as proud of that association today as I was then. My record in public office taken as a whole is the record of a mainstr eam conservative. I believe today, as I believed twenty-five years ago, in small government; fiscal discipline; low taxes; a strong defense, judges who enforce, and not make, our laws; the social values that are the true source of our strength; and, generally, the steadfast defense of our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which I have defended my entire career as God-given to the born and unborn.
Those are my beliefs, and you need not examine only my past votes and speeches to assure yourselves that they are my genuine convictions. You can take added confidence from the positions I have defended during this campaign. I campaigned in Iowa in opposition to agriculture subsidies. I campaigned in New Hampshire against big government mandated health care and for a free market solution to the problem of unavailable and unaffordable health care. I campaigned in Michigan for the tax incentives and trade policies that will create new and better jobs in that economically troubled state. I campaigned in Florida against the national catastrophic insurance fund bill that passed the House of Representatives and defended my opposition to the prescription drug benefit bill that saddled Americans with yet another hugely expensive entitlement program. I have argued to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, to reduce the corporate tax rate and abolish the AMT. I have defended my position on protecting our Second Amendment rights, including my votes against waiting periods, bans on the so-called “assault weapons,” and illegitimate lawsuits targeting gun manufacturers. I have proudly defended my twenty-four year pro-life record. Throughout this campaign, I have defended the President’s brave decision to increase troop levels in Iraq to execute a long overdue counterinsurgency that has spared us the terrible calamity of losing that war. I held these positions because I believed they were in the best interests of my party and country.”
Surely, I have held other positions that have not met with widespread agreement from conservatives. I won’t pretend otherwise nor would you permit me to forget it. On the issue of illegal immigration, a position which provoked the outspoken opposition of many conservatives, I stood my ground aware that my position would imperil my campaign. I respect your opposition for I know that the vast majority of critics to the bill based their opposition in a principled defense of the rule of law. And while I and other Republican supporters of the bill were genuine in our intention to restore control of our borders, we failed, for various and understandable reasons, to convince Americans that we were. I accept that, and have pledged that it would be among my highest priorities to secure our borders first, and only after we achieved widespread consensus that our borders are secure, would we address other aspects of the problem in a wa y that defends the rule of law and does not encourage another wave of illegal immigration.
All I ask of any American, conservative, moderate, independent, or enlightened Democrat, is to judge my record as a whole, and accept that I am not in the habit of making promises to my country that I do not intend to keep. I hope I have proven that in my life even to my critics. Then vote for or against me based on that record, my qualifications for the office, and the direction where I plainly state I intend to lead our country. If I am so fortunate as to be the Republican nominee for President, I will offer Americans, in what will be a very challenging and spirited contest, a clearly conservative approach to governing. I will make my case to voters, no matter what state they reside in, in the same way. I will not obscure my positions from voters who I fear might not share them. I will stand on my convictions, my conservative convictions, and trust in the good sense of the voters, and in my confidence that conservative pr inciples still appeal to a majority of Americans, Republicans, Independents and Reagan Democrats.
Often elections in this country are fought within the margins of small differences. This one will not be. We are arguing about hugely consequential things. Whomever the Democrats nominate, they would govern this country in a way that will, in my opinion, take this country backward to the days when government felt empowered to take from us our freedom to decide for ourselves the course and quality of our lives; to substitute the muddled judgment of large and expanding federal bureaucracies for the common sense and values of the American people; to the timidity and wishful thinking of a time when we averted our eyes from terrible threats to our security that were so plainly gathering strength abroad. It is shameful and dangerous that Senate Democrats are blocking an extension of surveillance powers that enable our intelligence and law enforcement to defend our country against radical Islamic extremists. This election is going to be about big things, not small things. And I intend to fight as hard as I can to ensure that our principles prevail over theirs.
Senator Clinton and Senator Obama want to increase the size of the federal government.
I intend to reduce it. I will not sign a bill with earmarks in it, any earmarks in it. I will fight for the line item veto, and I will not permit any expansion whatsoever of the entitlement programs that are bankrupting us. On the contrary, I intend to reform those programs so that government is no longer in that habit of making promises to Americans it does not have the means to keep.
Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will raise your taxes.
I intend to cut them. I will start by making the Bush tax cuts permanent. I will cut corporate tax rates from 35 to 25% to keep industries and jobs in this country. I will end the Alternate Minimum Tax. And I won’t let a Democratic Congress raise your taxes and choke the growth of our economy.
They will offer a big government solution to health care insurance coverage.
I intend to address the problem with free market solutions and with respect for the freedom of individuals to make important choices for themselves.
They will appoint to the federal bench judges who are intent on achieving political changes that the American people cannot be convinced to accept through the election of their representatives.
I intend to nominate judges who have proven themselves worthy of our trust that they take as their sole responsibility the enforcement of laws made by the people’s elected representatives, judges of the character and quality of Justices Roberts and Alito, judges who can be relied upon to respect the values of the people whose rights, laws and property they are sworn to defend.
Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will withdraw our forces from Iraq based on an arbitrary timetable designed for the sake of political expediency, and which recklessly ignores the profound human calamity and dire threats to our security that would ensue.
I intend to win the war, and trust in the proven judgment of our commanders there and the courage and selflessness of the Americans they have the honor to command. I share the grief over the terrible losses we have suffered in its prosecution. There is no other candidate for this office who appreciates more than I do just how awful war is. But I know that the costs in lives and treasure we would incur should we fail in Iraq will be far greater than the heartbreaking losses we have suffered to date. And I will not allow that to happen.
They won’t recognize and seriously address the threat posed by an Iran with nuclear ambitions to our ally, Israel, and the region.
I intend to make unmistakably clear to Iran we will not permit a government that espouses the destruction of the State of Israel as its fondest wish and pledges undying enmity to the United States to possess the weapons to advance their malevolent ambitions.
Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will concede to our critics that our own actions to defend against its threats are responsible for fomenting the terrible evil of radical Islamic extremism, and their resolve to combat it will be as flawed as their judgment.
I intend to defeat that threat by staying on offense and by marshaling every relevant agency of our government, and our allies, in the urgent necessity of defending the values, virtues and security of free people against those who despise all that is good about us.
These are but a few of the differences that will define this election. They are very significant differences, and I promise you, I intend to contest these issues on conservative grounds and fight as hard as I can to defend the principles and positions we share, and to keep this country safe, proud, prosperous and free.
We have had a few disagreements, and none of us will pretend that we won’t continue to have a few. But even in disagreement, especially in disagreement, I will seek the counsel of my fellow conservatives. If I am convinced my judgment is in error, I will correct it. And if I stand by my position, even after benefit of your counsel, I hope you will not lose sight of the far more numerous occasions when we are in complete accord.
I began by assuring you that we share a conception of liberty that is the bedrock of our beliefs as conservatives. As you know, I was deprived of liberty for a time in my life, and while my love of liberty is no greater than yours, you can be confident that mine is the equal of any American’s. It is a deep and unwavering love. My life experiences in service to our country inform my political judgments. They are at the core of my convictions. I am pro-life and an advocate for the Rights of Man everywhere in the world because of them, because I know that to be denied liberty is an offense to nature and nature’s Creator. I will never waver in that conviction, I promise you. I know in this country our liberty will not be seized in a political revolution or by a totalitarian government. But, rather, as Burke warned, it can be “nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts.” I am alert to that risk and will defend against it, and ta ke comfort from the knowledge that I will be encouraged in that defense by my fellow conservatives.
You have heard me say before that for all my reputation as a maverick, I have only found true happiness in serving a cause greater than my self-interest. For me, that cause has always been our country, and the ideals that have made us great. I have been her imperfect servant for many years, and I have made many mistakes. You can attest to that, but need not. For I know them well myself. But I love her deeply and I will never, never tire of the honor of serving her. I cannot do that without your counsel and support. And I am grateful, very grateful, that you have given me this opportunity to ask for it.
Thank you and God bless you.










February 7th, 2008 at 6:47 am
I think we need to understand that the conservative wing of the GOP has lost the primaries. In that context, what we can achieve is to obtain a compromise with Mac, not a Mac surrender. I think Mac has to REMIND that:
1) He always has strongly support (no timetables) in the war on terror and looking out for our interests in foreign policy;
2) He NEVER has vote for raising taxes (nor other synonims of taxes) and he has always being tough on cut SPENDING;
3) He always has support the need of a smaller State (not one that would subsidize companies in Detroit).
Moreover, he need to promise that
1) He will appoint judges who will not legislate from the bench; and
2) He has “evolved” (as would say Mitt) his position in inmigration and that he will veto any amnesty bill. And that he will secure the borders.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:17 am
The real question is can anyone actually believe him. Personally I think his past actions speak louder then whatever words he says today.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:41 am
Milo, he needs to do more than that, and I really don’t see him doing what it will take.
That isn’t a knock on him, but more of him being the maverick everyone talks about. The biggest problem is to truly win over the conservatvie vote, and especially CPAC, he would have to admit things that I think his own pride will not allow.
The global warming stump speech is part of the problem. He hasn’t backed off, and I don’t expect that he will. He most likely won’t mention this today. If does he will once again use Pascal’s Wager, which just isn’t going to fly. To base an argument or point on the thought that it is better to believe just because the ultimate payoff might be worth it is a joke. Not only does it show no conviction in what you are saying, but it shows that you are unwilling to take a true stand.
I don’t expect him to actually address illegal immigration. I think he will tell everyone that the border is the most important thing, and that he learned that through listening to the people. He is actually going to have to take a stand. McCain needs to say that he would not support a bill like that, and that he would not sign anything that even resembles that bill. Then he can say his #1 priority is to secure the border, and will talk about the rest after.
He will say he is for making the tax cuts permanent, but he still won’t answer the question about his class warfare talk from 2001-2004. He needs to say he was wrong. Not pretend like it was never said, and that his battle was against other provisions that went along with the tax cuts. That doesn’t fly. He needs to make a point that he either got caught up in the talk about class warfare, or simply say he was wrong. I am telling you this will go much further than just saying he is for them being made permanent. Most thinking conservatives/Republicans realize that the opportunity to make them permanent has passed. It isn’t going to happen with the Dems in control, and McCain is a big part of why we couldn’t make them permanent. He doesn’t have to say he is sorry, but he can say he was wrong. He needs to go further than just saying he was wrong by including he was wrong on the class warfare.
He needs to prove that he is a friend of small business. I am a small business owner, and he is no friend of mine. McCain has bothered me quite a bit with his commnets of late, and I truly believe that he thinks people in government are better people than people in private industry. He has basically said as much in debates and on the stump. He scares the hell out of me because he carefully words what he says, but he truly doesn’t understand what small business means to this country. McCain served his country honorably, but it bothers me a bit he has never worked in the private sector or with business. His experience has come from serving his country in both the military and in the Senate. I would be much more comfortable if he had at least run a corner store, and his talk shows that he knows very little about economy/business.
It’s hard for him to talk about smaller government when he is trying to pass McCain-Lieberman/Kennedy, etc. He just has a lot to prove, and one speech won’t cover everything he needs to address. Not only that I think that he isn’t willing to compromise on some of these things. These are his convictions at this point in his political career, and while I can honestly admire that I just don’t agree. I would have more respect for him today if he doesn’t pander. He needs to come out strong on all these issues by actually saying something of substance.
If he doesn’t address his global warming, immigration, his vote against the tax cuts, etc. than he won’t gain anything. He can’t use his lukewarm stump speech. He needs to say he was wrong or say he is right, but make sure he isn’t carefully wording things so that he can have it both ways. Plenty of people in America will buy that crap which is obvious, but some are looking for him to take real stands. The American people can take an apology and forgive, but you have to be willing to say you are wrong. And that means saying you were wrong with conviction on things such as class warfare, cap and trade, immigration, etc.
February 7th, 2008 at 9:53 am
Mike Steele, Chairman of GoPAC, stated this morning on Fox that McCain desperately needs to reinforce his conservative record in detail, and also he needs to immediately set up meetings with the conservative leaders in the party that he will need to bring his campaign to victory. Mike Steele is a good politician and knows how to work with lots of different groups. McCain should listen to him.
February 7th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
A number of sources are reporting that Romney will endorse McCain tonight (www.gorighty.com).
Does anyone know if this is true?
February 7th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
No red meat on immigration. Won’t commit to sending those here illegally home. He’s already flopped on Alito (judges)and Taxes (he was against the tax cuts before he was for them) and building a fence. However, IMO, he needed to come out and say “No Amnesty of any sort”. He didn’t do that, in fact, he brushed it aside in hopes of letting the illegals stay here after building a wall.
February 7th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Brian, the illegals are going to stay here no matter what happens. There is no political will in either party to send anyone home. That’s the dose of reality. What conservatives need to get is something in return, or they risk getting nothing at all.
February 7th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Matt, our columnist MBT has reported on the Romney endorsement. Look for that article on the homepage.
February 7th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Milo, I hate to call BS on you, but McCain has not voted to do the things you claim he hasn’t done — namely, raising taxes (and synonyms thereof) — but he’s sponsored a bill that will do just precisely that.
It’s called McCain-Lieberman.
From NationalReview.com: “… he is currently sponsoring legislation that, in the name of fighting global warming, would dramatically raise the tax on all carbon-based fuels, including gasoline, home heating oil, coal, and to a lesser extent, natural gas.
According to the EPA, McCain’s energy plan will cost consumers an additional $.26 per gallon of gas by 2030, and more than $.68 per gallon by 2050. It will increase your home electricity bills by 22% in 2030 and 25% by 2050.
According to the EPA, “The present value of the cumulative reduction in real GDP for the 2012-2030 period ranges from $660 billion to $2.1 trillion…the cumulative reduction in the present value of real GDP for the 2012-2050 period ranges from about $1.6 trillion to $5.2 trillion.”
And, on top of that, not only does it cost us all more on each gallon of gas and every watt of electricity, not to mention cost the nation between $1.6 trillion and $5.2 trillion per year, but the resulting benefit is ‘virtually undetectable’.
(Source: National Review Online)
And, beyond that, he specifically avoided voting yesterday on the ‘Stimulus’ package so that he wouldn’t have to be seen as taking a stand either for or against tax rebates.
John McCain is already so wishy-washy that he makes John Kerry look principled and, as the New York Post points out, this is the most Conservative we’ll likely see him get.
Now that he’s all but locked up the nomination, we should expect him to begin his “usual leftward lurch” and return to his “lifelong positions as soft on illegal immigration, skeptical of tax cuts and favoring strong federal control over things like campaign financing.”
Perhaps the next time he’s invoking Reagan, McCain might look to Reagan’s own CPAC speech in 1975 where he stated:
“A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.
“I do not believe I have proposed anything that is contrary to what has been considered Republican principle. It is at the same time the very basis of conservatism. It is time to reassert that principle and raise it to full view. And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way.“
February 7th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Jacin - we need someone more like Reagan, “I paid for this mike, Mr. Breen!”
I love your (Reagan’s) last line!
It all points to why he was popular - “America is great” (that makes everyone feel good); “Americans make it great” (it makes everyone proud) and “Americans are going to do what they feel is right no matter what the pinhead communists say” (not a Reagan quote, but close to his sentiment!).
February 7th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
I don’t know WHAT to believe now, I never have liked McCain, I grew to seriously hate the guy over McCain-Feingold and McCain-Kennedy, I still don’t like him, I still don’t trust him and his views on the 2nd amendment are also needing to be discussed broadly as well as his weak sister approach to ILLEGAL immigration…
February 7th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
Immigration is going to kill him in the southwest, in particular and elsewhere in general. Of course, the opposition both have the same views….
February 7th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
video and transcript posted above.
Fred he has issues.
But he is pretty solid on his 2nd amendment votes although the NRA has a big problem with McCain Feingold since it would have affected their lobbying effort. His votes are solid.
February 7th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
MBT, efforts to get tough with illegals in California killed the Republican party here and we weren’t even talking about kicking them out. We lost almost the entire Hispanic vote for a generation. So no, McCain doesn’t suffer in the southwest with a humanist approach to the problem.
February 7th, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Jacin B.,
In the environment issue, the extreme right of the GOP needs to understand that things has changed. That if it is true that when Gore spoke about environment 8 years ago, there were not reason to panic. Now, we need to understand that time has come to begin to take measures to protect the planet. Now is the time to begin to panic. And the same way, there are conservatives that want that Mac accept that he was wrong in inmigration, I think that extreme conservatives need to accept that they were wrong in the environment.
February 7th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
He was trying to make it impossible to purchase a gun at gun shows.
He is a hack, and everyone knows it. By the way the media is already tearing McCain apart. This is great. It took them about 3 hours to do what many of us on this side predicted.
I hope that everyone who voted for McCain enjoys taking their medicine. I couldn’t help but laugh when the media went negative. Check out the Cafferty file on CNN. That really didn’t take long. Others are already giving it to him, but Cafferty takes the cake. Enjoy the ride.
February 7th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
Here is the sum total of what I got out of McCain’s speech:
McCain: We all can’t agree, as conservitives on everything…but I will listen to your arguements on those issue in which we are on different sides. I promise to give you a chance to change my mind…It won’t work, but I will give you a change to argue your point. And when you are done, I will do what I wanted anyway…I will join up with Teddy Kennedy and my other liberal friends and inact more sweeping legislation that attacks the Constitution.
Thanks John, but I think I will sit this election out. You seem to have forgotten what Bush taught you in 2000…don’t run for President without solidifying your base!
Being a POW does not entitle you to the Presidency! Real conservitives will burn this house in order to save it! Get you graham crakers and marshmellows because we are touching this house!
February 7th, 2008 at 3:41 pm
[...] McCains tal till CPAC februari 8, 2008 Posted by Sebastian Weil in Politik. trackback McCains tal till CPAC finns nu uppe här. [...]
February 7th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
I appreciate MCCain’s speech I belive him, he is a man of integrity, and he lets us know how he feels. Lincoln, once said that a man who is practible, is a man that can be trusted. He is truly a practical man. McCain, is a man for these dangerous times. We need him now! I cannot believe, that there are those that hate McCain, and this is based primarily on his practicality, regarding the undocumented, who were inticed in this country, by its insatiable apetitie for cheap labor and it’s addiction to drugs, even which wrecks havoc with even those talk show hosts, who hate him the most. When it comes time, McCain will do what is right and practical. If he were not right and the man to lead us, Why is it that so many people are using their votes to be heard. God Bless MCCIAN
February 7th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
cecimor says:
“I cannot believe, that there are those that hate McCain, and this is based primarily on his practicality…”
His “practicality???” How about his back-stabbing ways!
You entire comment is, as Rush would say, “a glittering gem of colossial ignorance!”
Me thinks you are a closet Obama supporter…
February 7th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
I am almost convinced. Not that I needed much to vote for him. Simply because the Democrats cannot be allowed to win in November.
I have always been a one issue man for the last few years. Security. Everything else can wait. The threat from terrorism cannot.
He has always been strong on National Defense so I will be proud to vote for McCain in November.
We have succeeded in preventing the amnesty bill from being passed once before. And I am sure that we can prevent it and other liberal bills from being passed again, if we only set our mind to it.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Cracked, McCain voted against background check at gunshows. His record on the 2nd amendment is clear, so you need to discover a more legitimate reason to hate him.
C-Lo, gasp. If spoiled sports like you sit out the election, you get to be responsible for a down ballot slaughter. Do you know it will take a generation to recover from a Democrat super majority in the Senate? Rush will endorse McCain so you can quote him again when that happens.
Patrick, mega dittos. McCain has all the broad conservative principles right, and he is THE man for the terror war.
February 8th, 2008 at 5:59 am
[...] han inte lyckas vinna över sina skeptiker med det här talet på CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) så vet jag inte vad som kan. Ett utmärkt [...]
February 8th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Really MCCAIN. In 2001 his bill with Lieberman proposed:
“…like so many other “crime control” bills, the McCain- Lieberman bill is gun control, pure and simple. Here are just some of the bill’s provisions which are designed to:
*Slam the door on sales at private gun shows unless the buyer submits to a registration background check.
*Force gun-owners to purchase trigger locks making their firearms useless for self-defense; and, even more troubling,
*Would encourage federal agents to arrest and convict honest gun-owners who may inadvertantly violate one of the many federal gun laws, many of which are mere technicalities but which carry severe penalties.”
Give me a freaking break. Like I have said constantly McCain in the last 8 years has done more to hard the Republican party than any other US Senator. The guy is a fraud, and people like you continue to buy the crap he spews.
February 8th, 2008 at 7:06 am
Again from the website “On the Issues”:
McCain favors outlawing cheaply made handguns called Saturday night specials, and favors mandating safety locks on certain guns. He said he is intrigued by new technology that electronically identifies a person handling a gun, allowing only the owner to fire it. McCain rallied Senate Republicans behind a Democratic measure requiring background checks at gun shows.
Read that last sentence 100 times if that is what it takes. This is why I am so upset with Republican voters is that the people who actually like and defend haven’t a clue on what he actually has done. Now it is too late, but I am a firm believer in we get what we deserve.