Bill O′Reilly got hot under his well-ironed collar last night calling Alan Colmes a liar. The Fox News Channel battle royale took place during a weekly segment featuring the toadish-Liberal Colmes and his sister-in-law, Conservative Monica Crowley. Big Bill pressured Colmes to name one spending program that Barack Hussein Obama has actually cut since taking office in 2009. Instead, Colmes babbled away with the usual Democrat talking points issued by the White House about how Obama has cut $2.5 in spending for every $1 in tax increases. But, as we all know from the big Fiscal Cliff fight, the actual ratio is $1 in reduced spending increases for every $50 or so of additional tax revenue. So is it any wonder that the King of Leprechauns would lose his cool?
The one person you have to feel bad about is poor Monica Crowley, forced to sit there while O′Reilly calls out her idiot brother-in-law for lying. It was petty ugly, though not as ugly as Alan Colmes as he spewed the usual Obama lies. You have to admit that the past two weeks have been rough ones as the Obama administration have been getting caught telling many whoppers concerning the impact of the sequestration. As if horror stories of 4-hour delays at airports and thousands of pink-slipped teachers were not bad enough, the White House has now declared ending tours to the general public. Meanwhile, some 5,000 illegal immigrants are being set free in what has been described as the largest prison break orchestrated by the Federal government.
With $16.6 Trillion dollars in debt and plans to spend another $3.8 Trillion while only taking in $2.7 Trillion in revenues, Obama has succeeded in becoming the worst president in the history of the United States. Yet, thanks to his allies in the Media, and the growing percentage of federal moochers, Obama still hovers about the 50% mark for approval. The big buzz of late is how other pundits are now adopting the Limbaugh Theorem which proposes that Obama can only succeed in his agenda by causing widespread pain and suffering to the American people. O′Reilly, Brit Hume, Charles Krauthammer and others are beginning to see the light after four years of Obama.
I don′t blame Bill O′Reilly for losing his cool and accusing Alan Colmes of lying. For starters, Colmes was indeed lying about the ratio of spending cuts to tax increases. It is high-time that the lies from the Barack Obama White House are called out! But Monica Crowley better be careful, especially now that we know Eric Holder has approved drone strikes on U.S. citizens within the United States without any due process. The Fox News Channel better start thinking about getting some antiaircraft weapons mounted on their rooftop.
March 6th, 2013 at 10:13 am
I wish he’d of slapped his head and that chronic smirk off his face.
Alan is about the most irritating pundit to listen to that there is.
This morning he was trying to bullsht Martha McCallum that Barry had offered 890 billion in cuts to stop the sequester when that offer actually applied to the fiscal cliff debacle.
Then tried to tell her Barry never threatened to raise taxes last week but instead offered to close loopholes.
Its the same thing.
But, if I remember correctly, he didnt offer sht
Martha told him he wasnt making sense.
He also has a really bad habit of speaking over people at hyperlinguistic speeds.
He reminds me of that clown in the Movie “Saw”.
To be fair, I dislike Leis Weill for much the same reasons.
I really have a lot of contempt for these people who wear these persistent smirks on their faces.
March 6th, 2013 at 11:11 am
Wasn’t closing loopholes the basic premise of Romney’s plan?
Now it is “off the table”?
But for a few exceptions, loopholes are merely vehicles for the wealthy to pay less than the estimated rate.
Many wealthy people have an LLC, whether they are doing any real business or not. With that in place, the car is partially paid for, as is gas and insurance. Trips become business trips, the new computer is a “business” expense, etc., etc.
Doesn’t the term “loophole” itself describe what is essentially a flaw in the system?
Loopholes (save for a few) are simply not available to most people.
March 6th, 2013 at 11:16 am
So what manufactured crisis is coming next?
The potential government shutdown that looms over expiration of the continuing resolution — not to be confused with the last crisis over the fiscal cliff, or the just-passed sequester crisis, which is not to be confused with the debt ceiling crisis of this year or last year.
When other countries comment on our situation it is not our debt they are fixated on, but instead, the apparent bedlam of what has now become a monthly crisis.
Oh well, regardless of who is at fault, the American public is largely placing the blame on the House GOP. Heck many people are still mad about the debt ceiling debacle last year, I can’t wait to see how they react to another one.
True, through gerrymandering, most of the House Republicans are not vulnerable unless they decide to set fire to an American flag on national TV, but it does make it more difficult for anyone else in a national election. They are “ruining the brand”.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:03 pm
“Oh well, regardless of who is at fault, the American public is largely placing the blame on the House GOP.”
Yeah well, Obamas numbers just dropped 7% as people are wising up the most phenomenal whoppers weve heard a president tell.
Seriously, this crap that the right needs to re-brand itself is just that. Crap.
The brand needs to stay as conservatism always stood.
They just need to get rid of the ass holes who wont carry or represent that brand while letting the left continue their outright prevarication.
The train wreck begins and they’re all a bunch of liberal cabooses.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:13 pm
OBAMA AND MOST DEMOCRATS GOT ELECTED THROUGH LIES. THEY KNOW MOST AMERICANS ARE CENTER SLIGHTLY TO THE RIGHT. THE LEFT HAVE TO LIE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN SUCCEED. CREATE CRISES AFTER CRISES TO WEAR THE PEOPLE DOWN TAKE POWER AND STEAL FORM PRODUCERS. COLMS CANNOT LOGICALLY DEFEND OBAMA SO HE HAS TO STICK TO HIS TALKING POINT LIES IN ORDER TO WIN THE ARGUEMENT OF THE MOMENT. COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM,AND FACISM OBTAIN POWER AND WEALTH THROUGH LIES.
March 6th, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Communism, socialism “and” facism.
Whew! That’s a lot.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:03 pm
No, by all means, stay the conservative course.
Perry, Palin, Santorum, Bachmann, etc., etc.
Continue to lose,…but with dignity.
Any truly viable candidate will never pass the GOP primary process that demands:
Evolution? Never happened.
Climate change? Simple skepticism just won’t do, it never has happened, will happen or can happen.
Abortion? Will be returned to the back alleys of New York where it belongs and additionally, there must be retribution for those that wallowed in it.
Defense? There is no such thing as enough. Despite the fact that it is becoming obvious that the next wars will be fought with laptops, we will continue to prepare are armed forces to fight World War II again. While other countries are reducing subs, destroyers and tanks, we will double down. Doesn’t matter that we have fields of tanks parked in the desert, make more (gotta keep those factories in Ohio running).
Foreign policy? Never negotiate; a military solution is not just an option, but a preference.
Taxes? Lower, lower and lower, especially on the rich so we can get back to good old fashioned “trickle down” economics.
Social programs? Eliminate them. Then those poor people will move somewhere else. Well accept in special cases, for example Michigan wants to give a tax exemption for children before they are born. Yup, a “tax cut” for the unborn, but be sure to cut them off after they enter the world. Yeah, that makes sense.
Prayer in school? Mandatory (Christian only, however, goes without saying).
Guns? Mandatory. Even though there is already a gun for every American, it is obvious that some people are walking around unarmed, that has to be fixed.
Spending? Eliminate any program that is “distasteful”. While it doesn’t solve any fiscal problems it does “send a message”.
Any contribution to Planned Parenthood? Gone.
Medicaid? Gone.
The Arts? Gone, art is for pansies.
Aid to Dependent Children? Gone, you know those people are driving Cadillacs.
Food Stamps? Gone. What I am going to work so you can shop on my dime? I don’t think so.
Department of Education? Gone, return it to the states so they can teach a local curriculum that includes people riding around on dinosaurs.
Immigration? Round them up and ship ‘em out.
Healthcare? Everyone is on their own. I mean, someone has to look out for the insurance companies. Socialized medicine? That is what emergency rooms are for.
But don’t we already pay more than any other country for substandard care? That’s only because of all of the moochers who are also impeding the access for “real” Americans.
Ok, everyone got those requirements, who is left?
Palin, Perry, Bachmann, Santorum. Hmmm…those names sound familiar.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:19 pm
That gives new meaning to putting a”cap” in your ass.
We need ban on high capacity caps keys.
March 6th, 2013 at 1:26 pm
Buzz, got any spare time ?
Sheesh.
You made my point by referencing Palin etc…
Conservative values speak for themselves.
What we dont need is personalities pushing them.
“Spending? Eliminate any program that is “distasteful”. While it doesn’t solve any fiscal problems it does “send a message”.”
Aww shaadup wouldja ?
After that list of whoppers your guy just dropped and trillions added to our debt n deficit you have no business invoking “message”.
March 6th, 2013 at 3:09 pm
Alan Colmes is a walking, talking, babbling, stereotypical liberal idiot, but B.O. is prolly hyper-stressed about his ratings decline.
March 6th, 2013 at 3:32 pm
Buzz @ # 2, yes indeed closing loopholes was the basic premise of Romney’s plan, the very common denominator selling point of his flawed math. I argued that point on several occasions here only to be subjected to Micky’s harassing kibitzing, Patrick’s justification that it ain’t so because he said I was a Marxist 4 times, and because Andrew said something about abortion.
March 6th, 2013 at 3:37 pm
“Wasn’t closing loopholes the basic premise of Romney’s plan?”
Yeah, liberals scoffed at loopholes.
Barry now brags about offering them.
Offered no cuts.
“But for a few exceptions, loopholes are merely vehicles for the wealthy to pay less than the estimated rate.”
Still, the wealthy are the greatest contributors of revenues.
They pay a most disproportionate amount of at least 50% of our fed taxes.
They also employ the majority of Americans whos contributions to the pot offset their exemptions.
“Any truly viable candidate will never pass the GOP primary process that demands:
Evolution? Never happened.”
You need to learn the difference between a republican and a conservative.
You wanna keep saying the right thinks the world is only 4000 years old then you yourself have discredited evolution.
Theres not much argument over the earths age and whether it was the big bang or the crash of Gods hands clapping that started it all the left has yet to give purpose and reason to creation.
“Climate change? Simple skepticism just won’t do, it never has happened, will happen or can happen.”
The top scientist at the helm got caught lying about their presentations.
Skepticism is good in any speculation.
There is no speculation that terrorism and math are existential.
Global warming, oops, excuse me, “climate change” is only existential at this point as weather.
If we could all just agree that pollution is bad and renewable energy is good without being subjected to insane environmentalist government forced mandates of consumption we’d solve all of everyones problems.
But why should that be good enough to liberal marxists who use climate change as a venue to impose socialist and forced collective actions to ensure a one state authority.
Control the energy, control the speech, let government control the money.
This is the liberal way.
“Abortion? Will be returned to the back alleys of New York where it belongs and additionally, there must be retribution for those that wallowed in it.”
Thats a pathetic defense for those who cut a human being from its mother while its heart is beating.
“Defense? There is no such thing as enough. Despite the fact that it is becoming obvious that the next wars will be fought with laptops,”
Thats just stupid.
Someone has to blow up someones laptop at some point, and btw, we are already engaged in cyber warfare costing us billions.
” we will continue to prepare are armed forces to fight World War II again. While other countries are reducing subs, destroyers and tanks, we will double down.”
Bullsht.
This is why liberals have no business in national security.
China is not making replicas of our jets and carriers for the fun of it.
N. Korea is not building nukes and testing delivery for no reason.
Iran is not building nukes to power their hookahs.
” Doesn’t matter that we have fields of tanks parked in the desert, make more (gotta keep those factories in Ohio running).”
Yeah, they’re actually being given to the Muslim brotherhood along with billions in cash.
“Foreign policy? Never negotiate; a military solution is not just an option, but a preference.”
Hows your negotiations worked so far ?
Arab Spring ?
Oh, wait ! Excuse the fck outta me, seems those drones werent such a bad idea after all, WERE THEY ?
“Taxes? Lower, lower and lower, especially on the rich so we can get back to good old fashioned “trickle down” economics.”
I better not say anything, the stock markets up.
Wait, its only up because large corporations are doing well ?
But…but…but…I thought Barry n moonbats hated those guys ?
“Social programs? Eliminate them. Then those poor people will move somewhere else. Well accept in special cases, for example Michigan wants to give a tax exemption for children before they are born. Yup, a “tax cut” for the unborn, but be sure to cut them off after they enter the world. Yeah, that makes sense.”
Thats stupid.
The unborn are inheriting massive liberal debt.
“Prayer in school? Mandatory (Christian only, however, goes without saying).”
Not mandatory, stop lying.
No more mandatory than footbaths.
No one has to drop a dime if I choose to speak with my maker.
You cant “make” someone pray.
Of course unless the teacher makes them all say “Barack Hussein Obama, uhmmm uhmmm uhmmm”.
“Guns? Mandatory.”
How far up your ass are you reaching for all this concocted “mandatory” crap ?
Pretty desperate claim bro.
Dont get mad if I call you names when you act like this.
” Even though there is already a gun for every American, it is obvious that some people are walking around unarmed, that has to be fixed.”
Yeah, I cant own two guns.
What was that Barry said ?
“At some point you’ve made enough money ?”
Too bad you’re talking about sane law abiding owners and not loons and criminals.
Got any stats on criminal ownership ?
When you do, you’ll be making an honest argument.
“Spending? Eliminate any program that is “distasteful”. While it doesn’t solve any fiscal problems it does “send a message”.”
Tell ass hole to give us a budget…
…then we’ll talk.
“Any contribution to Planned Parenthood? Gone.”
Its not planed parenthood, its “the planned single life”.
But, I thought PP didnt get fed dollars for abortions ?
Its not for abortions but for mammograms ?
Well then will someone please tell me what the hell Obamacare is for ?
Shouldnt Obamacare cover abortions ax well ?
Heh heh, nothing like liberal redundancy.
Better known as “pi$$ing away money”
“Medicaid? Gone.”
But…but didnt the moonbats take billions from it for Obamacare ?
The Arts? Gone, art is for pansies.
“Aid to Dependent Children? Gone, you know those people are driving Cadillacs.”
All children are dependent.
Be honest and address waste.
Of course unless those wasters are dem voters…
“Food Stamps? Gone. What I am going to work so you can shop on my dime? I don’t think so.”
This coming from the party thats escalated food stamp distribution at a higher rate in less time than any administration in history ?
You’re funny.
“Department of Education? Gone, return it to the states so they can teach a local curriculum that includes people riding around on dinosaurs.”
DOE is a colossal unmitigated failure.
They’re just babysitters teaching liberal sht.
“Immigration? Round them up and ship ‘em out.”
No ones talking about that, cept you and far right idiots
“Healthcare? Everyone is on their own. I mean, someone has to look out for the insurance companies. Socialized medicine? That is what emergency rooms are for.”
Socialized healthcare is great.
When you figure out how to pay for it get back to me.
“But don’t we already pay more than any other country for substandard care? That’s only because of all of the moochers who are also impeding the access for “real” Americans.”
God forbid (in your case “Obama”)you actually address waste n fraud n illegals.
Ok, everyone got those requirements, who is left?
“Palin, Perry, Bachmann, Santorum. Hmmm…those names sound familiar.”
If thats all that sounds familiar to you then you cant be more than 4 years old
March 6th, 2013 at 4:04 pm
“Wasn’t closing loopholes the basic premise of Romney’s plan?”
Yeah, liberals scoffed at loopholes.
Barry now brags about offering them.
Offered no cuts.
“But for a few exceptions, loopholes are merely vehicles for the wealthy to pay less than the estimated rate.”
Still, the wealthy are the greatest contributors of revenues.
They pay a most disproportionate amount of at least 50% of our fed taxes.
They also employ the majority of Americans whos contributions to the pot offset their exemptions.
March 6th, 2013 at 4:09 pm
Brain fart, excuse me, should say..
“Wasn’t closing loopholes the basic premise of Romney’s plan?”
Barry now brags about closing them.
Offered no cuts.
=========
Hey Blobert !
You ever gonna grow a pair and actually try for once to prove me wrong ?
Or just keep acting like valley girl gaggin on a spoon ?
March 7th, 2013 at 6:27 am
I’m surprised, Buzz, that you forgot to mention how John Boehner put closing loopholes on the table during the Fiscal Cliff ‘crisis’, but Obama rejected that to get his tax rate increases.
March 7th, 2013 at 6:29 am
Hey, Ronald,
What have you got against abortion? I thought you Marxists enjoy filling trash bins with the bodies of dead fetuses?
March 7th, 2013 at 6:54 am
Rons not here Andy, he was asked to give a eulogy and be a pallbearer in Venezuela
March 7th, 2013 at 7:40 am
Andy…
Maybe you should give Robert a lesson in Marxism and make him answer me.
You know, spread himself around as evenly as he would everyone elses money ?
Its not fair that this here kibitzing rodeo clown troll not be granted fair and even distribution and access to his intellectual capital.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”
He certainly has the ability to enlighten everyone and I certainly have the need for enlightenment.
Seriously, the guys a shmuck.
Sure, we both say bad things about each other. But at least I respond to his claims and lies.
All he does is mock with no viable attempt at countering my responses.
What would we call that ?
Troll ?
Clown ?
If I’m as he says; “the rodeo clown” rescuing cowboy bloggers from the big bad Marxist bull I must be one pretty smart and agile fella.
At the risk of floating my own boat, the only reason I can come up with for his lack of dealing with me is that he’s tired of me grabbing his horns and putting his droppings back where they belong.
Ironically, a not-castrated bull is called a “micky”, the rest are “steers”.
The spellings even the same.
March 7th, 2013 at 7:59 am
Yes, Micky, I understand. Ronald/Robert and his allies all operate from the disadvantage of trying to defend Socialism. They claim the rich are not doing enough when the truth is that they are paying a higher percentage of the tax revenue now than they did during the Carter years.
In 1979, the top 20% accounted for about 56% of all federal tax revenue. Today, they cover more than 70%. Yet that still is not enough! While a few companies who are well connected with Obama get all the breaks, the vast majority of American businesses are struggling with the world’s highest corporate tax rate and the looming chaos of ObamaCare.
Funny that the peace-and-love freaks only seem to favor murderous thugs like Chavez. Or egghead, Socialist sodomites like Obama.
March 7th, 2013 at 8:36 am
Oops, yeah, I keep calling him Robert, Ronald, Bob
The only explanation I can think of is that all three of those guys pi$$ed me off at one time.
Ronald is to America what pedophiles are to children.
March 7th, 2013 at 10:47 am
I was kinda hoping his head did actually explode.
Considering how big his head is, it was certainly a possibility.
March 7th, 2013 at 11:44 am
Thats nice Buzz.
Lets do away with people who call out liars.
I’ve been watching Colmes for at least ten years now.
He’s about as honest as BTT as hes always defending himself by distraction or pointing to other bad behavior.
Hes about the dumbest and most dishonest liberal I’ve ever seen.
Bills known him for a long time. Always been a gentleman to him.
He deserved what he got as does any liar from anywhere.
No one cares anymore, they all just this kinda bullsht fly around like its some freekin reality show.
This sht is getting way out of hand
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0313/quotes.htm
March 7th, 2013 at 11:44 am
oops…
“No one cares anymore, they all just “ACCEPT” this kinda bullsht fly around like its some freekin reality show.
March 7th, 2013 at 3:55 pm
Andy, I’ve mentioned several times how you use abortion as a get-out-of-free-card when your arguments are debunked. You spew nonsense, I shoot it down, you cry abortionist, as if that exonerates you from your debunked gibberish. And again, you bring ” Marxists enjoy filling trash bins with the bodies of dead fetuses” in defense for “closing loopholes was the basic premise of Romney’s plan”. This only validates my point. From a political argumentative perspective Andy, you are a fraud.
March 8th, 2013 at 6:07 am
Sheesh, Ronald!
You apparently did not read my comment #15 here where I chided Buzz for not recalling that John Boehner offered closing loopholes during the Fiscal Cliff ‘crisis’, but it was your boy, Obama, who rejected the idea.
Now who is a fraud from a political argumentative perspective???