Move over Benghazi-Gate, we now have Woodward-Gate! The Washington Post lion of journalism, Bob Woodward, has gotten himself embroiled in a bitter fight with Barack Obama and his White House staff. The issue is over the looming sequestration, a series of automatic spending cuts due to begin on Friday, March 1st. For weeks, Obama has been railing over how terrible the sequester spending cuts will be in an attempt to shame House Republicans into agreeing to more tax increases. But there is just one teeny-tiny problem with Obama′s rhetoric, he is the guy who wanted sequestration in the first place! So says Bob Woodward who wrote a book on the budget battle in 2011 which led to the sequester provisions. The Woodward made the bold statement on MSNBC describing the Obama administration as ″a kind of madness I haven′t seen in a long time.″, comparing Obama to Richard Nixon. For his sins, a senior White House staffer, Gene Sperling, sent Woodward an email, threatening him that Woodward will ″regret doing this.″
Appearing on ′Morning Joe′ two days ago, Woodward was highly critical of the way Obama was using scare tactics about the spending cuts. He specifically pointed to a delay in deploying the aircraft carrier, USS Harry S. Truman to the Persian Gulf due to sequestration. Woodward said, ″Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying, ′Oh, by the way, I can′t do this because of some budget document?′ Or George W. Bush saying ′You know, I′m not going to invade Iraq because I can′t get the aircraft carriers I need?′″
Woodward accused Obama of ″moving the goal posts″ during the budget talks in order to reduce spending cuts and increase taxes. How when just as a deal for $800 Billion in budget deficit reductions seemed ready to be finalized, Obama changed his tune and demanded $1.2 Trillion instead with the extra to be made up by raising taxes. We have seen Obama do this time and time again, but his allies in the Media rarely acknowledge it and when they do, usually justify Obama′s actions as being good, social justice.
The dust-up between Barack Obama and Bob Woodward has had a positive impact. Wednesday evening during another speech, Obama backed off on his message of doom and disaster over sequestration spending cuts. Now, only 1,000 children might loose head start slots and only 2,000 college students may have to get a job to pay for their education. Spending cuts slated for the Defense Department can easily be made by trimming the fat, like the Pentagon Channel TV show, ′Grill Sargents′ or a Navy research study to see if fish can teach us about democracy. But the reality here is that the Obama administration does indeed have a form of madness with the White House crying ′Chicken Little′ while bullying any journalist who might disagree. But Bob Woodward is not your average journalist and is not taking this threat by Gene Sperling lying down.










February 28th, 2013 at 9:00 am
Woodward’s need to take his message to Sean Hannity tonight speaks volumes on his credibility. I mean, what’s next, a guest speaker on Mike Savage’s radio show?
February 28th, 2013 at 9:07 am
LOL, Ronald!
Maybe Woodward will get invited to speak at CPAC 2013, too!
February 28th, 2013 at 9:12 am
Finally a real journalist. Woodward has the balls to speak the truth about Obama. Who ever thought the Washington Post printed an article that told the truth about the dictator down the road.
February 28th, 2013 at 9:17 am
Woodwards credibility was just fine with you guys when he brought down Nixon.
Like it or not Ron, Woodward is not a right wing activist.
Tell me Ron, can you remember the last day in which we didnt hear a speech from Obama ?
Whens the last time he answered questions at a press conference ?
February 28th, 2013 at 9:21 am
“Woodward’s need to take his message to Sean Hannity tonight speaks volumes on his credibility. I mean, what’s next, a guest speaker on Mike Savage’s radio show?”
He gave the same message at MSNBC, genius.
February 28th, 2013 at 9:36 am
The “you’ll regret this” comments from the White House aide were idiotic. But you do fail to mention that when discussing the email Woodward also said that he’s sure that President Obama would be appalled by the aide’s statement as well, and that he has already received an apology from the aide.
But seriously, if there is one journalist out there who does not fear speaking truth to power it’s Woodward.
February 28th, 2013 at 9:49 am
OK, wow. Everyone go to Politico and read the actual email exchange before spouting an opinion here. I respect Woodward but he’s truly taken that so-called “theat” out of any semblance of context. These are well thought out emails between two thoughtful people. Nothing more. My guess, now that they’re public, Woodward really does regret publicizing them.
February 28th, 2013 at 10:18 am
Given that liberalism is in part a mental disorder, pot meet kettle. By definition they are both mad.
February 28th, 2013 at 10:26 am
I could care less about the threat.
Threats are issued back n forth in DC everyday in many ways.
I want the lies from this administration with the blessings of the media to stop.
But of course, I’m an idiot if I think that or any accountability will transpire out of all this
February 28th, 2013 at 12:03 pm
All we can hope is that this time the right stands their ground.
February 28th, 2013 at 4:56 pm
To hold my comments in moderation for hours or days while you cast your weak tea stones is not only typical but validates the profound cowardliness that I’ve accused you of being.
February 28th, 2013 at 4:59 pm
Wrong thread as that was meant for Logan’s diatribe. Not that there’s actually a difference.
February 28th, 2013 at 5:25 pm
Hey Ronald, you should really make inquiries before you throw accusations around.
If you’d bother to learn the filters habits you wouldnt have this problem.
March 1st, 2013 at 7:06 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ew8oj7h_M0
March 1st, 2013 at 7:42 am
What our Liberal friends are missing in this story is that the email from Sperling to Woodward begins with an apology for an angry phone call, which, according to Woodward, was about 30 minutes long. So while the emails may not be seen as a “threat”, we have no way of knowing what exactly Sperling said to Woodward over the phone.
Add to that all of the other incidents of the Obama White House bullying reporters starting in 2008 from the campaign trail and a picture emerges of nasty behavior. Obama and his gang are like teenage thugs on the loose and running wild.
March 1st, 2013 at 12:18 pm
Obamas been threatening the whole country and actually following thru before the cuts even come into play.
He tells Americans to punish other Americans.
Half his time is consumed by thinking up new methods of propaganda as threats instituted by fear mongering.
All presidents have mongered fear to a certain extent.
I’ve never seen extents to this level ever.
Hell, anyone whos followed the phony threats issued by environmentalists would realize that whatever Woodward was subjected to pales in comparison to being told the whole planet will disintegrate if you dont fall in line.
As far as the press goes. In light of Woodwardgate,I think weve all heard the stories now coming from Lanny Davis, an Obama supporter, and the many other journalists who’ve e-mailed Woodward expressing similar situations,ousting the press at the Governors meeting.
If you have no lies to keep up with and are genuine you dont need to run around trying to control every piece of info by whatever means.
Bottom line Mr. Prez, sequestration was your child.
And I’n not talking about spending cuts.