As Barack Obama returns from his $7 Million dollar Hawaiian vacation, his administration is planning a full scale assault on the Second Amendment. According to the Washington Post and other sources, the gun control panel headed by Joe Biden and formed after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting will recommend a broad range of laws and restrictions that go well beyond the old 1994 ′assault weapon′ ban. The White House plans to take on the National Rifle Association and swamp it with new new rules and regulations. This from the same people in Homeland Security and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that brought us ′Fast and Furious.′
In the closing days of his reelection campaign, Obama encouraged people to vote for him out of revenge. Revenge against ′The Man′, against ′The Rich′, and against ′The Reagan Era.′ Now, add to that revenge against ′The Constitution.′ Yes, that old, silly document that stands in the way of Barack Hussein Obama and his being able to do whatever he wants.
The Washington Post reports that the Biden panel will list the following legislation to be passed: First, universal background checks for all buyers of firearms. A national database with all firearms registered. ′Strengthen′ mental health checks. Stiffer penalties for carrying guns near schools. Banning a wider range of firearms than the old 1994 law, including bans on silencers and high-capacity magazines.
This knee-jerk reaction to the Newtown shootings is typical of the Liberal-Progressive-Socialist mindset. Forget that the Bill of Rights under the U.S. Constitution says quite clearly that the right of the common citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed upon. Forget that the state of Connecticut already had stiffer gun control laws on their books than most of the nation. Forget that existing laws already require extensive background checks and paperwork for purchasing or possessing true, military-style, fully automatic weapons or unusual accessories such as silencers.
Once again, Obama is seeking revenge against America. His anti-colonial views, handed down from his father and grandfather, want nothing else but to end individual liberty and economic freedom. To put The State above The Citizen in all things, including the ability to have and protect private property. Especially the most important private property, yourself! In Obama′s America, or should I say ′Amerika′, The State would own you, not yourself.
The Liberal Media quickly dismissed any rational plan to protect the children of America, such as the suggestion by the NRA to have uniformed police at every school. About one-third of all schools already have armed guards, be they police or private security. The Media also likes to ignore the reality that nearly all of the ′mass shootings′ have taken place in so-called ′gun-free′ zones, places like schools and churches where existing laws forbid law-abiding citizens from keeping and bearing their firearms.
One has to wonder just what Obama′s panel means when they talk about strengthening mental health tests? Especially with crazy Joe Biden in charge! The same guy who was happily groping the wives and female family members of new U.S. Senators on Thursday. Suggesting that they spread their legs and get ready for a frisking. Joe Biden ought to know a thing or two about mental health considering what a lunatic he is. Will people who believe in the Constitution be considered too crazy to own a gun? How about folks who think we are taxed too much? Or that our government spends too much?
As we have seen throughout history, governments like nothing better than to expand their power. Barack Obama is no exception. The gun control issue is just one more method for him to seek revenge upon America and shred a bit more of our freedoms and liberty. He has already made it abundantly clear that he intends to raise taxes more in the near future while offering no real spending cuts to reduce the budget deficits. Obama cannot even produce a budget! I′ve lost count but it is now something like 1350-plus days since Harry Reid and the Democrat-controlled Senate have passed a budget. Yet, they seem to have plenty of time to try and pass bills that eliminate our Creator-given rights










January 6th, 2013 at 8:56 am
And the Media is going jam it down the throats of the American People.
It was Flat Out Sickening to hear Jerry Rivers ( Geraldo Rivera ) railing about it last night. ( a rerun of his 12-17-12 show). Just taking a break from his open borders crusade.
The Bimbos of FOX NEWS are pushing themselves as the official ‘Mommies’ and imploring ‘ What do they NEED gun like that for ?’. Gretchen Carlson & Monica Crowley go unchallenged by their nutless co-hosts.
This Isn’t About NEED ! Miss America 1989 Carlson doesn’t NEED 200 pair of shoes or a 10k sq ft home, but no one challenges her NEED for it. Crowley doesn’t NEED a $120k Beamer, but no one says she shouldn’t have it.
It’s About Liberty, Folks !
January 6th, 2013 at 9:51 am
I wasn’t aware that anyone had been mortally injured by a pair designer shoes.
They are more likely to be injured by Carlon’s inanity and self rightousness.
January 6th, 2013 at 10:31 am
“I wasn’t aware that anyone had been mortally injured by a pair designer shoes.
They are more likely to be injured by Carlon’s inanity and self rightousness.”
Wow, did you ever miss the point.
I’m sure plenty of your liberal cohorts wished the guy who threw his shoes at Bush had a couple hundred pair.
Your constant demonizing need to limit ones cache of ammo rings moot in the face of of the fact that simply carrying more than one stock clip for a .44 pistol can do just as much damage, just as quickly, as any AR14 with a 100 round clip.
More to the point.
Imposing more regulations on law abiding gun owners does nothing to solve the illegal gun trade and its collateral damage.
January 6th, 2013 at 10:48 am
“Your constant demonizing need to limit ones cache of ammo rings moot in the face of of the fact that simply carrying more than one stock clip for a .44 pistol can do just as much damage, just as quickly, as any AR14 with a 100 round clip.”
I think most mathematicians (as well as most children that have completed the 4th grade) would disagree with you.
Again, what is the purpose of a 100 round magazine? Oh, that’s right, protection from a tyrannical government. You do realize that most people find that rather amusing?
January 6th, 2013 at 11:12 am
Micky, have you gone completely mental? You are actually arguing that a .44 pistol can do as much damage as an AR, just as easily?
Yeah. Right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtjDx74yrW0
January 6th, 2013 at 11:20 am
“Micky, have you gone completely mental? You are actually arguing that a .44 pistol can do as much damage as an AR, just as easily?
Yeah. Right.”
I’m crazy ? You can even understand what I’m saying
It takes two seconds to pop a fresh 16 round clip into your .44.
With a hundred round clip you’re only gaining a couple seconds which makes little difference when your prey is captive in a classroom with no exit and you’re carrying a semi automatic pistol with 5 extra 16-17 round clips.
Wise up.
January 6th, 2013 at 11:35 am
“Again, what is the purpose of a 100 round magazine? Oh, that’s right, protection from a tyrannical government. You do realize that most people find that rather amusing?”
Good then be happy and stop b!tching. You only come for entertainment, right ?
Laugh your ass off, I dont give a sht if you cant conceive rights that allow me as many quarter pounders 32 ouncers and bullets as I want.
Speed limits are no more than 65 mph and maybe 75 in some states.
Why do we need cars that go 200 mph ? 120 mph ?
Why do you want fully automatic rifles banned when its proven that previous bans did not keep criminals from getting them ?
Why do I need a shotgun that can spray 3 guys from 40 ft. ?
Why do I need fully automatic pistol with 10 clips that take a second to change ?
Answer;
According to my rights its non of your fcking business.
January 6th, 2013 at 12:54 pm
My Ruger P-85 holds 18 rnds of 115gr 9mm +1 in
a flush fitting magazine. ( 115gr means ballistics approaching those of .357 Mag. )
Ad a Double Spare Mag Holster and I’m good for 55 rnds of Hollow Point Havoc.
All Under a T-Shirt and a Pair Of Shorts.
A few more magazines in my pockets for special occasions and who needs an AR ?
SNORK RASH . . . . . BUZZBOO ?
January 6th, 2013 at 1:06 pm
Awlhat…
Buzzboo n Rash dont want to admit you have to think like a bad guy in ordere to understand.
They’re afraid that if they do show signs of actually understanding the relevancy that you and have presented they’ll lose their moonbat wings and halo.
Theres so many ways to get around owning a stock automatic weapon theres no way any law could stop you if wanted to go postal and spray the hood.
Understanding this means they’d both have to sacrifice their ignorant positions.
We all know that’ll never happen.
January 6th, 2013 at 2:48 pm
We’ve seen this movie so many times… Blame loose gun laws, disarm citizens, criminals become more brazen, blame loose gun laws, disarm citizens further, criminals get happier and bolder… rinse and repeat.
January 6th, 2013 at 3:02 pm
The people that “want” to have these weapons are exactly the people that shouldn’t have them.
Well, Awl, I, for one, feel much safer knowing you are packing.
It appears you are prepared for something. For what, I have no idea.
Well I suppose if the federal government attacks you can mow them down. I am sure they wouldn’t stand a chance.
Where do you guys live? Deadwood? Tombstone?
January 6th, 2013 at 3:03 pm
“We’ve seen this movie so many times… ”
Yup.
If we just got rid of all the cars there’d be no pollution or accidents and no high speed chases.
If we just got rid of most people or aborted them there’d be no global warming or starvation.
If we just got rid of religion there’d be no wars.
“I knew I shouldn’t have left the apartment
I knew I should’ve stayed in watching TV
If I’d looked at the moon and looked at my stars
I wouldn’t be in this mess I’m in right now
I should’ve known when my car would not get started
It should’ve clicked when indecision read its question mark
If I’d ran back for the phone but instead I let it ring
I wouldn’t be in this mess I’m in right now
Everybody hold still
Nobody gets hurt
I could’ve left all my cash and talent a credit card
I should’ve said, “Don’t wear no jewelery you’re looking fine”
If I’d ran back for the phone but instead I let it ring
I wouldn’t be in this miss I’m in right now
Everybody hold still
Nobody gets hurt
Please don’t take all of my money mister
Don’t take my money all money, money
=========
GRACE JONES
January 6th, 2013 at 3:04 pm
“Buzzboo n Rash”
Wow, that is comedy gold.
January 6th, 2013 at 3:50 pm
pay me
January 6th, 2013 at 9:59 pm
The big gun grab won’t go anywhere. Just another example of a naive president in over his head, tilting at windmills while Rome burns.
January 7th, 2013 at 6:49 am
Hey Buzz,
You ought to read more true crime stories. Plenty of men have been murdered by high heeled shoes.
January 7th, 2013 at 6:53 am
How about that gal, I think she’s in Arizona, who shot her ex nine times in the face, then cut him 27 times with a knife! Reminds me of a case here in Duh-troit back in the late ’80s where a guy killed somebody who was sleeping on a couch, shooting him multiple times then hacked away with a knife. A buddy of mine was on the jury and the killer’s excuse was “he lunged at me”, even after being shot. The killer said, “So I hads to cut’em!”
January 7th, 2013 at 8:02 am
Last night I was watching Anthony Hopkins feed Ray Liotta parts of Ray Liottas brain.
Uncapped like a monkey at a gourmet Chinese restaurant.
And then it occurred to me…
…Hollywood was making me want to buy a gun.