
Out of the blue and into the black
They give you this, but you pay for that
Once you’re gone, you can’t come back
When you’re out of the blue and into the black
~ Neil Young – Into The Black
Let’s be honest. In a little over one day, we’re going over the fiscal cliff. But what that means and what will happen next is anyone’s guess. How we got there is not quite so abstract.
INJUSTICE
We’re here first because of government overspending. The entitlement state began first, not with a public feeling of entitlement, but with the state’s.
This idea of people paying their “fair share” with no discussion at all of what “fair” even means is part and parcel of the problem. Many in government, including even many conservatives, believe the government is the main source of public prosperity. Certainly, good government is the main source of public order, but prosperity itself comes from an entirely different source.
The Soviet Union was a nation of the strictest order and discipline. At the same time, it had a notable lack of prosperity. The Soviet Union never managed to raise society up to once common standard. Instead, it dragged the vast majority of them into a dark depression-era existence. And when the Soviet Union finally collapsed in upon itself the way an exhausted star collapses into a black hole, it left a population morally, financially, and physically unable to drag itself from the learned dependence imposed by that now-extinct government. It left behind a nation composed largely of helpless orphans.
The clear message of history is this; government can help foster economic prosperity, and it can certainly benefit from that prosperity. At the same time, it cannot create that prosperity. The idea that government can grow and tax and control and, through all of this, somehow create a prosperous society is, at best, naive.
Government’s role is justice and public order. It can never do this perfectly, but it can seek an equilibrium that gives the society which it was created to serve the maximum opportunity to live and prosper.
When government attempts to create perfect justice or even perfect equality, what it actually creates is rampant INjustice. This should be obvious to most. You might be a firm believer in God or in the blind processes of metaphysical naturalism. In either case, it should be obvious that there’s no such thing as perfection in this universe. The very laws of the universe contradict the concept of perfection; yet some stubbornly believe such a thing is possible from the sinful/barely-evolved hands of men and women. We know what to call this kind of thinking.
ARROGANCE
We’re here as well because of the arrogance of some. It’s an arrogance that believes perfection is possible and that a few “elites” should lead the many. “We know best how to make things right,” they tell us. “You folks just let us do what we must.”
And when those well-laid plans go wrong? Well, it’s not their fault. Like a fraudulent faith healer who tells a poor unhealed follower their cancer can’t be healed because their faith is too weak, liberals point fingers and say, “it’s your fault for resisting change.”
So, while President Obama is willing to veto the Keystone Pipeline project over a possible ecological threat, he and many other liberals are willing to push legislation will, without a doubt, damage our economy.
Those who see themselves as the “elite” of our society are, at best, amateurs who believe they can perform delicate open-heart surgery after watching a Youtube video. But they don’t see or understand this. Instead, they press on, thinking in their pride and arrogance they can do all things for all people.
It’s an arrogance so extreme, coupled with a complete lack of personal insight, as to threaten our national survival. Even so, this threat could have been averted, but for one final problem.
SILENCE
Too many of us have adopted this idea of entitlement. The state used to provide a safety net for citizens. It is now busily weaving the safety net into a hammock. And too many remain silent when they well understand that it is leading us to our own economic black hole.
What must the state provide? Everything of course. Not just public order and justice, but equality. So a person who prefers not to work should have all the same benefits as someone who works 60 or 80 hours per week building a business.
American society has long been uniquely work-oriented. People in other nations scoff over how much Americans work, but for centuries hard work in America has been rewarded by prosperity. Perhaps not fabulous wealth, but most aren’t interested in this. Their American Dream is one of home, family, and community. Americans have long known, in their wisdom, that family, productive work, and economic stability is its own form of wealth. “Money can’t buy you love,” as the old saying goes; but independence and hard work, coupled with family and community, can bring mental, physical, and spiritual benefits that no other form of wealth can rival.
But now we are standing by while others try to replace that time-proven ethic with one of “state.” Those unwilling to work, unable to build family, and disconnected from any sense of community are rewarded and, thus, reinforced in activities completely counterproductive to society.
We know as a rock-solid truth that, when you reward some actions and punish others, you get more of the one and less of the other. Unfortunately, when those of us who know this try to speak up, we’re shouted down by liberals everywhere. And with liberal media ruthlessly echoing such messages, voices of common sense are drowned out, shouted down, and silenced.
So what will happen come January 1, 2013? All over the country, businesses are sending messages to employees warning them of tax hikes. Not only will Bush-era tax rates disappear, new taxes to fund Obamacare will take effect.
Democrats think that once all the Bush-era rates go away they can reconstitute these rates for anyone making less that $250,000 a year. It’s likely they can, but in the process, damage will be done to the country. That damage is likely to be severe, with more jobs lost and the already-deep anger towards government intensifying. It’s not an inability to pass legislation which annoys most people, it’s their inability to solve problems which they themselves have created.
The idea of sequestration was the President’s idea. He could not get what he wanted, so he decided to delay the final resolution. Now we stand at the edge of a cliff built up through government incompetence. A cliff which will cause some kind of damage. We know how we got here, we just don’t know how bad the damage will be when the economy gets thrown over that cliff two days from now.









December 30th, 2012 at 1:02 pm
Invoking a Neil Young song (albeit a great one) for this purpose seems somewhat disingenuous.
Luckily, many musicians have protested when candidates they find nauseating “repurpose” their songs in a lame attempt to appear contemporary, or even worse, hip.
Heck, it happened to Gingrich twice in one week during the primaries. Of course considering one of the songs was “Eye of the Tiger” it is only natural to wonder what the intent was. Later that same week he was asked to stop using “How You Like me Now”. Somehow I doubt that Newt had much to do with that selection.
Let’s see who else was asked to stop this practice. “Bush the Better” got a quick cease and desist order when using “I Won’t Back Down”, but I can only imagine Tom Petty’s outrage when Michelle Bachmann (someone has to explain her appeal to me) used “American Girl”. I wonder if the band Garbage would have minded if she sampled “Stupid Girl” instead. Undeterred, she next chose “Walking on Sunshine”, only to have Katrina and the Waves demand she no longer utilizes that song in any form.
Bush the Better was also informed by representatives of Bobby McFerrin that he could no longer play “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” at campaign events.
The most famous episode was probably when Ronald Reagan kept blaring “Born in the USA”, much to Springsteen’s chagrin. Perhaps if he realized it was a blistering critique of America’s role in Vietnam and the plight of working-class soldiers he may have chosen a different musical interlude. Maybe candidates should be required to listen to the songs and actually read the lyrics before putting them into the “playlist”.
John McCain had his own issues and had to pay a financial settlement to Jackson Browne for using “Running on Empty” (without permission) in an ad intended to mock Obama. Heck, even Abba forbid the use of “Take a Chance on Me”, which is somewhat surprising considering they are Swedish (well, maybe because they are Swedish). John Mellencamp (wow, he is popular among GOP candidates) had a two-fer when he issued cease and desist orders for both “Our Country” and “Pink Houses”. Additionally, the Foo Fighters forbade him to use “My Hero” as did Van Halen for “Right Now”. Hmm… maybe he should be considering the music of Lee Greenwood or Barry Sandler.
You knew Palin had to show up here and sure enough she was told to stop using “Barracuda”, by Heart, after invoking it as her theme music at the 2008 GOP convention.
John Hall (of the group, Orleans) invoked a cease and desist order to “Bush the Lesser” for “Still the One”. Hall was, however, subsequently successful in his bid to be elected to Congress.
Georgie Junior seemed to be the one candidate that should have simply given up on any musical accompaniment for his campaigns. Among the many musicians that said no to him were Sting with “Brand New Day”, Petty (again) for “I Won’t Back Down” and John Mellencamp with “R.O.C.K. in the USA”.
The group Boston was noted for successfully forcing Mike Huckabee to stop playing “More Than a Feeling” at campaign rallies.
Cindy Lauper was recently aghast to discover that her song “True Colors” was being used in an ad by the Democratic National Committee to lambaste Mitt Romney. Miss Lauper declared herself a supporter of Mr. Obama, but objected to the use of her inspirational anthem in a negative context, adding that “Romney can discredit himself without the use of my work.” The ad was pulled shortly thereafter.
Then there was the case involving Charlie Crist. After the Republican’s failed 2010 run for U.S. Senate, the former Florida Governor was slapped with a $1 million lawsuit by Talking Heads frontman David Byrne over the use of his song “Road to Nowhere” in an online campaign video. The suit too was settled out-of-court, and Crist issued a public apology to Byrne via YouTube.
In a rare case of a musician objecting to his music being played in support of a Democratic candidate, Sam Moore of Sam & Dave sent a letter to Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, requesting a halt to the use of “Hold On, I’m Comin’,” one of the iconic Stax soul duo’s signature hits. The Obama campaign complied, and there must not have been hard feelings, as Mr. Moore performed at the Creative Coalition’s inaugural ball for the new president. In 1996, Mr. Moore had sung a version of another Sam & Dave classic, “Soul Man,” at rallies for Bob Dole’s presidential campaign, tweaking the lyrics into “Dole Man.” (Owners of the publishing rights to the original song — written, like “Hold On, I’m Comin’ ,” by Isaac Hayes and David Porter — eventually forced the Dole campaign to stop using it.)
Kid Rock (I often see him at a bar down the street and at another tavern that him and Uncle Kracker, who lives in the neighborhood, bought for a relative), however, granted the Romney campaign the right to use “Born Free” (in a rare case of someone asking permission first).
Oh well, this isn’t a new phenomenon as David Merrick forbade the use of “Hello Dolly” (I can’t imagine the context) by Barry Goldwater (he did, however, grant its use to LBJ).
As one GOP strategist remarked, if you are a Republican it is best to stick with country musicians or dead people, although even that can be slippery slope as Toby Keith, often utilized as a beacon by the right, has publicly declared he is a Democrat and a supporter of Obama. Then of course you have the Dixie Chicks, umm… oh, never mind.
December 30th, 2012 at 1:08 pm
Paul Buchheit, from DePaul University, revealed, “From 1980 to 2006 the richest 1% of America tripled their after-tax percentage of our nation’s total income, while the bottom 90% have seen their share drop over 20%.” Robert Freeman added, “Between 2002 and 2006, it was even worse: an astounding three-quarters of all the economy’s growth was captured by the top 1%.”
“Due to this, the United States already had the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world prior to the financial crisis. Since the crisis, which has hit the average worker much harder than CEOs, the gap between the top one percent and the remaining 99% of the US population has grown to a record high. The economic top one percent of the population now owns over 70% of all financial assets, an all time record.”
So remind me again how we are becoming like the Soviet Union?
December 30th, 2012 at 8:20 pm
It’s the natural conclusions of two generations of excessive spending, by all of us adopting liberal policies without the willingness to pay for them (because they aren’t worth it).
There was a small chance we might have passed a balanced budget amendment in the 1990s. I remember it lost by just a couple of votes. Too bad. Now we will all suffer a generation of hardship, and the ironic thing is that Democratic voters are going to suffer the most. It’s the lower middle class that gets taken down by liberalism as witnessed in South American and Europe recently. And the suffering will produce still more Democrat voters, which will make it impossible to get out of this mess in an orderly way.
December 31st, 2012 at 4:53 am
Buzz,
The top 1% earned roughly 17% of all income and paid 37% of federal income taxes. Is this not enough of a fair share already?
Plus, we should look at what has transpired since 1980. Thanks to the unleashing of the entrepreneurial spirit, we have gone from desktop computers with 2K worth of RAM to iPads with with Gigs of RAM. Life expectancy has increased by several years. Most products that people use on a daily basis have gone down in price with more variety and options.
You Liberals always want to connect the 1% with the robber barons of old. But you tend to forget that people like John D. Rockefeller or Andrew Carnegie probably did far more to make life better and make the nation as a whole more prosperous than any government program ever could.
December 31st, 2012 at 9:31 am
Yeah Buzz, Fleetwood Mac letting Clinton use their work without protest told us all we needed to know about the relationship between liberals and the music biz.
I guess Clinton didnt hear about the time the McVies got popped for blow and a sht load of guns bout a 1/2 mile from my house.
” Nicks has an affair with Don Henley of The Eagles, falls offstage and checks into the Betty Ford Clinic for cocaine addiction. Then, on her release, she sinks into an even deeper and more debilitating dependency on the tranquilliser Klonopin and nearly dies all over again. John McVie has an alcohol induced seizure and is busted at his Hawaii home with four and a half grammes of pure cocaine and a collection of illegal firearms. Christine McVie has an affair with the band’s lighting director and then falls for doomed Beach Boys wild man Dennis Wilson. By her own admission, it’s taking a magnum of vintage Dora Perignon a day just for her to get by. Mick Fleetwood is busy blowing his millions on debauchery and is deep in his own brain frying self destruction, involving industrial quantities of cocaine washed down with bottles of brandy.”
Cant make this sht up.
Smooth move Clinton.
“Dont Stop Thinkin About Tomorrow” could simply refer to how they’re gonna cop more guns and another bag of dope.
December 31st, 2012 at 10:20 am
“I guess Clinton didnt hear about the time the McVies got popped for blow and a sht load of guns bout a 1/2 mile from my house.”
I would imagine that Clinton was well aware of their history, but like me, simply didn’t care.
December 31st, 2012 at 10:55 am
I also imagine he was aware and didnt care.
Which doesnt say a whole helluvalot for either of you and proves my point that one way or the other you both look kinda dumb for knowing and not caring or not just knowing anything at all.
Liberals campaigns that have tried to appeal to the cool factor has always givin me a chuckle when guys like Jayzee are done shmoozin the prez go and cut a track about puttin caps in Crack Hos asses. The feminists and anti gun freaks must love that crap. But then, maybe they’ll let it slide like most liberals do because its just art that reaches millions of kids brains.
And yeah, this supposed crap from the right that dictates Country Western music is somehow their only catalog of anthems bugs the sht out of me just as much.
These ass holes want to keep being pegged as a bunch of dipsht cowboys then they should keep using country music every chance they get.
December 31st, 2012 at 3:12 pm
I’m not as upset about the consequences of no deal as I am about these jerks being so frickin non-productive.
By now these morons are half buzzed and halfway home.
Aint nothin gettin done.
January 1st, 2013 at 3:49 pm
If I read correctly, the Senate deal has over $600B in new taxes, $12B in spending cuts, and generates over $4T new debt in the next decade. If approved, Dems won.
January 1st, 2013 at 8:42 pm
Buzz,
I can’t believe you devoted all that time to a litany of conservatives who were rebuked for using songs as part of their campaign. Guess what, this is a blog post, not a campaign. Waste of your time my friend.
January 1st, 2013 at 9:03 pm
Rivera,
The fact is, Republicans could not win this battle. The best they could have hoped for was to influence things to some extent. In that they succeeded, but of course the president got far more of what he wanted. Democrats control the White House and the Senate. They were in a far stronger bargaining position.
Republicans did well just to have some influence in the final deal.
January 1st, 2013 at 9:37 pm
Buzz,
The disparity between rich and poor is a false argument. First of all, middle class incomes did rise between 1980 and 2006, but it was in the form of benefits rather than straight salary. Especially in the form of healthcare, which employers began covering an increasing share of during that time period. Also during that time period, stock options became increasingly popular, as did vacation options, telecommuting options, etc.
The other thing the data ignores is that, during most of the Clinton and Bush presidencies, there was a wave of upward mobility that saw the middle class shrink as more of them moved into the upper income bracket. So the disparity increased because there was a smaller middle class.
The good news (if you’re a liberal) is that many of those upper income folks fell back into the middle class and even below when the housing market collapsed. Thank you Bill Clinton and so-called “affordable housing.” Now the disparity between upper and lower income levels has lessened. We can all breathe a sigh of relief.