As Ryan wrote earlier in an excellent piece, Susan Rice has withdraw her name for consideration for Secretary of State. Immediately, the liberal media began speculating about the power of the conservative media and the lies that were spread. Let’s talk about what really happened. What does this tell us?
First, we should review the basic facts that made her promotion problematic. Following the murders of the US Ambassador to Libya and three others in Benghazi, Obama knew that he had to put someone on the Sunday talk shows. Rather than put someone on television with direct or indirect responsibility for the fiasco, why choose the UN Ambassador? Well, first Hillary Clinton refused to be interviewed. Obama at that point needed to stay on the good side of her and her husband to win re-election, and she has her reverential claque in the media (both left and right), so that was alright. I assume that General Petraeus was then asked by the administration. But he has always also been the darling of both conservatives and liberals; apparently he was also dreaming of being chosen as the 2016 Republican Presidential nominee (remember, this is prior to his affair had been revealed). So nobody has ever publicly asked Petraeus what really happened for fear of what it might do to his career. He apparently refused as well.
So then Rice went on talk shows and strictly adhered to the ridiculous talking points provided by the CIA. John McCain and a few other Republicans attacked her statements since they were obviously false. Well, people always say false things on television. One of my personal heroes, Colin Powell, made one of the goofiest speeches of all time at the UN, where he made it clear that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, which directly led to our decade long silly adventure in that nation. I understood why he did so. People sometimes do what they’re ordered to do, either that or resign. After 9-11, Powell didn’t want to resign because of the signals it would have sent, so he gave a speech based upon talking points provided him by the CIA. If he didn’t know then that he was played, he knew soon after.
But even when a few other Republicans decided to attack Rice, why was she forced to withdraw? Let’s face it…there will only be 45 Republicans in the Senate next month. The likelihood that they would stick together to defeat one black woman nominee is preposterous. She might have had a tough confirmation hearing, but would have been chosen. But when Obama refused to vehemently defend her, Rice was forced out. All through his first term, Obama was rolled, by the Democrats in Congress his first two years, by the GOP in the second two years. The man rarely if ever stands up for what he believes.
So now John Kerry will get the Secretary of State nomination, Scott Brown will be elected to the Senate, and it just became much easier for the Republicans to take over the Senate in two years.










December 14th, 2012 at 8:57 am
She was asked to withdraw because she is a distraction. Nobody walks away from their career making job voluntarily.
Take back the Senate in two years? Really a chance?
December 14th, 2012 at 9:15 am
I think that the GOP has an inherent advantage in midterms as long as a dem in in the white house. There are a lot of dem seats up in red states. As long as the reps don’t nominate awful candidates, they should net 4 or 5.
otoh, I think the dems will win a ton of senate sears in 16.
December 14th, 2012 at 12:12 pm
Shes a black woman, thats why.
I’m tossed up an this.
On one hand she looks and walks like an MMA contestant. Or shes sisters wit Juanita.
“http://www.break.com/usercontent/2007/10/ch-date-a-revolutionary-dating-service-390440
Then, shes got shares in some questionable investments.
Also, after being the sacrificial lamb the Sunday after 911 she might want to get as far away from this dysfunctional bunch of clowns ASAP and paid the reviewers to give no doubt to incompetence.
She actually “looks” more like an ass kicking neocon than Hillary.
I can see her taking out Michelle in a mud match
December 14th, 2012 at 7:49 pm
Thank you for the compliment regarding my piece!
It’ll most likely be Kerry, with the slight possibility of it being Thomas Donilon, National Security Advisor.
The only reason the Democrats have the lead in the Senate is because Obama swept in a ton of new Democrats into the Senate in 2008, all of whom would have lost had Obama not been candidate. He won’t be running in 2014, and with a very poor 2nd term for Obama, they’ll all be gone. Including my own, Senator Kay Hagan.
December 15th, 2012 at 4:23 am
John Kerry will get the job as Secretary of State. Even if it means Scott Brown returning to the Senate.
December 15th, 2012 at 5:56 am
If Kerry is appointed I’m buying stock in Heinz.
Theresas little ketchup packets will be in every MRE.
Wont be easy for Kerry since all our troops never got an education.
I’m sorry, this is frightening. The limpest dick in the world will be number two man in our national defense.
Lets buy him a swift boat for Christmas