Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, IMF, is warning Barack Obama and the United States not to make false compromises concerning the Fiscal Cliff. Appearing on CNN′s ″State of the Union″ on Sunday, Lagarde cautions that a truly balanced approach must include both revenue increases and spending cuts. That just raising taxes without any genuine spending cuts and kicking the can down the road will not be helpful. She said. ″There is still that degree of uncertainty that fuels doubt, that prevents investors, entrepreneurs, households from making decisions, because they don′t know what tomorrow will be.″ On Sunday, Obama met with Speaker of the House, John Boehner, to discuss the Fiscal Cliff. Both sides agreed not to reveal the outcome of those talks.
So far, all of the focus has been on raising tax rates on the top 2% of income earners without any real spending cuts. Obama wants to return to a top tax rate of 39.6% from the current 35%, a move which is expected to net roughly $1.1 Trillion dollars over the next ten years. The Fiscal Cliff takes place on January 1, 2013 when the Bush Tax Cuts expire, generally increasing the tax rates across the board for all income levels by about 5%. In addition to this, numerous deductions and other taxes breaks will also expire, along with the sequestration agreement from 2011 to slash $1 Trillion in spending from the Defense and federal discretionary budgets.
During the past two months, tax revenues have actually increased some $37 Billion per month, but, as is typical in the New Normal of the Age of Obama, federal spending has also increased by more than $89 Billion per month. Each day, Uncle Sam must borrow another $4.8 Billion dollars to pay its bills, which leads to another looming problem, the debt ceiling, which limits how much the government can borrow. That limit will be reached by February if spending continues at the present rate.
The IMF, which tries to coordinate the activities of the world′s central banks and national economies, has its hands full already overseeing the economic chaos in the European Union. Several nations in the EuroZone have already gone through an initial phase of severe austerity measures as countries like Greece and Spain flounder with large debts and high unemployment. About the only reason the U.S. bond market is still enjoying itself is due to the terrible state Europe is in, along with our own Federal Reserve Bank and its ′quantitative easing′ program of lending money to large banks and institutions to purchase equities.
The main problem in the United States, however, is the weakness in our economy. The rate of growth has been anemic at best. Current projections by the IMF is for the U.S. economy to grow only 2.1% in 2013. Most post-recession recoveries enjoy growth rates 3 to 4 times that rate. None of the proposals on the table by Obama, or even the Republicans, offer any plan that would double the growth rate of the economy. Add in the negative impacts of both ObamaCare and the Dodd-Frank laws and it is easy to see why the IMF is predicting 2013 to be yet another bad year for America.
Will anyone listen to Christine Lagarde of the International Monetray Fund? Will Barack Obama take her advice and put some genuine spending cuts on the table along with the revenue increases proposed by House Republicans? Or is John Boehner right after he said last week that the Fiscal Cliff talks have stalled? Is the United States headed for a major economic downturn in 2013? With just barely 3 weeks to go, there appears to be little hope that any sort of real plan will be hashed out and approved in time.









December 10th, 2012 at 7:30 am
Obama has no plans on cutting spending. Remember Cloward and Piven? Bankrupt The U.S. is Obama’s plans. All these experts can talk till they are blue in the face. They cannot comprehend that Obama wants a disaster. Obama understands economics he know the mess he is creating. He never really worked or created any wealth but he sure lives wealthy off of others.
He is a rebel.
That is what rebels do cause chaos. They are jealous of other’s success and they do not like the fruits creators enjoy. The tenth commandments states thou shall not covent thy neighbors goods. That is Obama’s problem. Many wealthy are very charitable with their income through education, hospitals and investments in future economic growth. Obama and his regime want to decide how the growth occurs and who benefits. In other words be GOD!
December 10th, 2012 at 9:13 am
I never realized that Charlie Crist was a chick.
December 10th, 2012 at 5:24 pm
The smart move, and the one that the Democrats may take, is to allow the fiscal cliff to happen.
It will most likely only last a few days and they can make an exception with the IRS regarding payroll withholding in anticipation of a forthcoming agreement.
Polls show it will be blamed on the Republicans, it increases leverage and will allow them to get a guarantee that their will not be another debt ceiling fiasco.
December 10th, 2012 at 6:06 pm
“The smart move, and the one that the Democrats may take, is to allow the fiscal cliff to happen.”
Smart for who ?
“Polls show it will be blamed on the Republicans,”
Thats so freakin hilarious its disgusting.
No one even knows what deal or lack of would lead to the jump.
” it increases leverage and will allow them to get a guarantee that their will not be another debt ceiling fiasco.”
Please, its a fiasco either way.
The dems are proposing no serious cuts other than that to the one thing our government does well, the military, pentagon. But even thats a joke as slated aid to Egypt will go thru thereby increasing instability in a region we can hardly afford to not afford.
The tax increases and caps will do little to nothing and any promised future cuts will never happen.
In the long run, at least in the next four years the party in charge will own the catastrophe they’ve created in the last 8 years and will ot win the next election.
In four years Barry has made a disaster of his “inheritance” so it only goes to logic he cant make an even worse situation better.
In addition, call it the “nail in his coffin” is the more than a trillion in additional spending/borrowing he’s asking for in the face of a proposal that does practically nothing to offset it.
The right will take the blame no matter what.
That will change in 2014 as everyone is able to see that this socialist lunatics recipes are burning Rome
December 10th, 2012 at 7:45 pm
Pew Research Poll
Four-in-ten (40%) expect that the president and congressional Republicans will reach a deal by Jan. 1 to prevent automatic tax increases and spending cuts from taking effect; 49% say they will not.
If no deal is reached, far more say congressional Republicans would be more to blame (53%) than President Obama (27%). These opinions are virtually unchanged since early November.
December 10th, 2012 at 7:50 pm
If the cliff is to be blamed on Republicans it makes sense to either force them into a position or let it happen and take advantage of the Republicans getting the blame.
They don’t want to have to renegotiate again when the debt ceiling expires so it only makes sense that part of the deal is to insist on no debt ceiling negotiation. The Democrats do not want to go through that again.
It is simply poker, when you have more chips you force the hand.
December 10th, 2012 at 9:01 pm
“They don’t want to have to renegotiate again when the debt ceiling expires so it only makes sense that part of the deal is to insist on no debt ceiling negotiation. The Democrats do not want to go through that again.
It is simply poker, when you have more chips you force the hand.”
Its not poker when the pres can threaten to issue the executive order.
Thats the elephant everyone conveniently forgets
The reason you’ll lose in the longer run is because you see it as poker, a game, better known as politics.
I already said we’d get the blame, regardless.
Your boys will suffer the loss.
What you think is an advantage today, will haunt you in 2 years.
Let the bums have whatever they want.
“More rope? Comin right atcha babe”
December 10th, 2012 at 9:14 pm
“Pew Research Poll
Four-in-ten (40%) expect that the president and congressional Republicans will reach a deal by Jan. 1 to prevent automatic tax increases and spending cuts from taking effect; 49% say they will not.
If no deal is reached, far more say congressional Republicans would be more to blame (53%) than President Obama (27%). These opinions are virtually unchanged since early November.”
Listen.
How can a poll determine blame when that poll cannot reflect how any deal, or what proposition was made ?
You have to know “the deal” before you can blame anyone. Its common freaking sense.
Jeez looo-eez whats wrong with you people ?
If no deal is reached that means someones offer was not good enough.
You need to know what that is before you can even ask the question.
If I’m asking 500 for a flat screen and you offer 50 cents then its your fault.
Capice ?
But, I digress, the right will be blamed no matter what because the proposition sucks to begin with when one scenario brings another trillion in debt and the other scenario throws an even bigger hurdle into the economy.
Its a lose lose baby !!
(until 2016)
December 11th, 2012 at 5:10 am
Oh, so what? Our bonds and credit rating get downgraded again. Maybe interest rates will finally start to rise as the we catch up with other debtor nations in our race to the bottom. Then all of that extra, deficit spending Obama has been doing will be subject to the same rates that GW Bush had to deal with. Our interest payments on the National Debt will then skyrocket overnight by a factor of 3 or 4, making it the single largest portion of the federal budget. Assuming, of course, that we have a federal budget…
December 11th, 2012 at 6:38 am
The poll was assessing blame if we did, indeed, go over the cliff.
Nothing more, or less.
December 11th, 2012 at 7:38 am
“The poll was assessing blame if we did, indeed, go over the cliff.
Nothing more, or less.”
Buzz, its bullsht.
You cant assess blame without knowing what deals constitute failure of either one side or the other.
Until the 1st we could see different propositions than what we see now.
It depends on what negotiations took place up until the 1st before you can attach blame.
Its fcking simple.
Andys right, I’m right.
Boehners already getting blame from the right, theres no way he can offer whats truly needed.
Even conciliatory offers have been laughed at by Barry. If we do not get a deal with more capitalist interests the right will hound the GOP.
If you do not get a deal with more taxes and no entitlement reform you will blame the right.
If we go over the cliff the right will be blamed regardless because of the premise that if Obamas lead is not followed by the right its because they were being obstructionists only meant to discredit the left.
Its a bullsht poll in a bullsht scenario of one side posturing to shame the other with the peoples interest being their last concern.
In the long run its the left that will take the blame from both sides because either scenario, Obamas way/going over the cliff will be bad and be owned by him.
Everythings going up for everyone, one way or the other. And your party will own that.
And you guys will own that.
You will raise taxes on the successful.
They will lay off people, or not hire at all.
Those people will go on unemployment and welfare.
That costs money.
Taxes will have go up to pay for that, but revenues will be down across the board.
The debt ceiling will rise.
We will borrow another 1.6 trillon, most likely more.
The housing market is going to crash again, the fed needs a bailout to secure the properties it insures.
Interest rates will remain low.
The market will go into further decline.
We will have to disregard any cuts to military. The growing threats and problems in the middle east will not allow it.
Promises to cut spending on entitlements and the welfare state will never happen, they never do.
Wise up for crusts sake !!