From the Weekly Standard comes a mention of something today on MSNBC’s Morning Joe Show. The host, Chuck Todd, who was interviewing Joe Klein, author of a recently published book, A New Birth of Politics when he said this to Klein:
You’re going to like this. So, I threw the Lincoln analogy at a close aide to the president last week, and he said, ‘You know, with this Republican, with the way politics of Washington are today, there’d still be slavery. Lincoln wouldn’t have been able to navigate the polarization between the media between this–’ It was an interesting and depressing observation from this very smart White House aide.
Very smart White House aid? This is clearly one of the dumbest statements ever from a White House aid! Does this aid even know that Democrats were the ones who fought to preserve slavery? The Republican Party was formed out the remnants of the Whig Party and the radical anti-slavery elements of the Democratic Party! This is the perfect example of how Democrats refuse to let facts get in their way.
If you want a great overview of the long history of racism on the part of Democrats, just read Ann Coulter’s excellent book, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama. What are some of the facts people should know?
Let’s start with the common sense fact that it’s not possible to get any more polarized than when states begin to secede from the union. That seems logical, don’t you think?
Next is the inconvenient truth that, on top of seceding from the union and fighting the bloodiest war in US history, the Democrats’ next trick — after we finally pried the institution of slavery from the cold, dead fingers of the Confederate States of America — was to create the Jim Crow laws which denied Blacks their rights for another 70 years. When Republicans finally managed to end that era, what did Democrats do? Accuse Republicans of racism, of course!
Finally, let’s remember that after Democrats lost the War Between the States, they assassinated President Lincoln for his efforts. Clearly, when it comes to oppressing their fellow man, Democrats are willing to use “Second Amendment solutions.”
Nuff said on that stupidity!









December 3rd, 2012 at 2:02 pm
All Conservatives are prepared to do is sit around mewling about the ‘unfairness’ of it all.
Let a Conservative make one remark that can be pumped into ‘Raaaaacism’ and there are demands for him to be summarily Fired and everyone that ever knew him is squeezed for an apology.
Conservatives Must become Activists. Conservatives Must Demand retribution for the Crimes committed against us on a daily basis.
BEHEAD CHRIS MATTHEWS !
December 3rd, 2012 at 3:07 pm
Two idiots showing why white liberal males are dying off like the dinosaurs.
December 3rd, 2012 at 5:10 pm
Awlhattin O’Kaddle – “Next is the inconvenient truth that, on top of seceding from the union and fighting the bloodiest war in US history, the Democrats’ next trick — after we finally pried the institution of slavery from the cold, dead fingers of the Confederate States of America —…………..”
Do you honestly think people don’t know the history of Southern racism’s switch from the Democratic party to the Republican party in the 60’s?
The “Southern Strategy”?
Do you honestly think the KKK hierarchy/rank and file votes liberal Democrat, as apposed to Christian evangelical conservative?
Seriously. Who do you think you are kidding?…..LOL.
Stuff like this is why you clowns lose elections.
December 3rd, 2012 at 6:07 pm
MSNBC talking about polarization between the media as if it weren’t part of it, distorting the news whenever it benefits the liberals. Get real.
December 3rd, 2012 at 8:51 pm
I love when Republicans bring this up, parties have changed drastically since the 60s and prior. The civil rights movement is why the south became predominantly Republican in the first place. The North supported civil rights, the southern Democrats did not, thus they became the racist Republicans of today.
Abraham Lincoln by today’s standards would be a liberal, hippie, marxist, commie, blah blah blah.
December 3rd, 2012 at 9:36 pm
Snow Crash – I just have to wonder what these baggers are thinking. It’s such ham-handed and sophomoric propaganda.
Yeah. The 95% white, homophobic, myopic, christian only Republican party is the party of “inclusion” and freedom….lol
And the best point is….These cro-mags want to run on this for 2016.
December 3rd, 2012 at 9:43 pm
Snow Crash – “The North supported civil rights, the southern Democrats did not, thus they became the racist Republicans of today.”
Notice how the Republican states in the last few elections read like a map of the Confederacy!!
December 3rd, 2012 at 10:05 pm
Yes, Ron.
The most blatantly racist people I know are all Republicans. My parents are racist, many of their friends from church are the same, I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard them exchange racist jokes and talk crap about those who are non-white. I’ve seen it my whole life. When I was a kid I would travel with my dad all over the states, he was a salesman for tractor parts and such, so I got to meet a TON of people from all over the states. The south is amazingly racist and the worst of them were your standard right-wong fundamentalist.
Republicans are often very racist, but now it’s taboo to call them such because they pull the ‘race-card race-card’. If you call them out on their racism they pass it off as ‘the race card’… but it’s true, many Republicans only like you if you’re a white heterosexual Christian male.
December 3rd, 2012 at 10:06 pm
right-wing*
December 3rd, 2012 at 10:23 pm
Snow Crash –
“many Republicans only like you if you’re a white heterosexual Christian male.”
The demographics of the Republican party bare this truth. In this country, the home of the most base of American ignorance and bigotry, is the South. The Republican base. Where they win.
Something, a reality, they (the GOP) can’t B/S their way out of.
December 4th, 2012 at 5:50 am
Just love how the Liberals try to tie the KKK with Republicans, while we all know the history shows they were mostly Democrats. And not all from the South, either! Just as the Liberals try to hide the connections between the Klan and Planned Parenthood.
As Col. Kurtz would say, “They lie and we must be merciful to those who lie…”
December 4th, 2012 at 9:21 am
“Do you honestly think people don’t know the history of Southern racism’s switch from the Democratic party to the Republican party in the 60’s?”
Thats funny.
Minorities, specifically blacks, have been voting democrat for the last 50 years, and they’re still crying about the same things they cried over 50 years ago.
Hows that workin for ya baby ?
December 4th, 2012 at 9:23 am
“As Col. Kurtz would say, “They lie and we must be merciful to those who lie…””
I beg to differ, its more like…
…”THE HORROR, THE HORROR”
December 4th, 2012 at 9:39 am
“The demographics of the Republican party bare this truth. In this country, the home of the most base of American ignorance and bigotry, is the South. The Republican base. Where they win.
Something, a reality, they (the GOP) can’t B/S their way out of.”
So, I guess when that 30% in the middle win the election for republicans they’re instantly southern ignorant bigots ?
You’re the freaking bigot bro.
Ever try listening to yourself ?
As if theres not a shtload of ignorant bigots in better developed, more populated and liberal states ?
You really are one detestable fcking piece of sht that I’d b!tchslap as quick as any white supremacist or black panther.
You morons are too freeking much.. hypocrites!
You make the poor, especially the black man, your instrument of example in your faux cries for justice and equality and then when those poor are leaning right,southerners or not members of a blue state they’re “ignorant, inbred, bigoted, uneducated” and hardly worthy of the snot nosed elite liberals who claim to champion their cause.
Your Northern populations, Chicago, South Central LA, Detroit and the South Bronx are hardly a glimmering example of your fight against racism and poverty.
Morons
December 4th, 2012 at 9:57 am
“Do you honestly think the KKK hierarchy/rank and file votes liberal Democrat, as apposed to Christian evangelical conservative?”
Hey ass hole. pay attention.
You yourself mentioned the blacks have been voting dem since the 60s. Thats right, they went from the right to the left, the party that supposedly offered them opportunity.
The KKK distanced themselves from the democratic party because they could not embrace your cause only because they thought it was actually sincere.
These hooded morons are just a wrong now by aligning with the right as they were in the 50s for aligning with the left.
The black man is either doing much better today because of your leftist efforts or hes not.
You cant have it both ways.
I was raised in Florida in the 50s n 60s, I saw my landlord, shotgun in hand, screaming “get off my land you fcking ni@@er !, chasing black tomato boys who went door to door selling tomatoes.
Anything like this today would be across the front pages of every publication in the country.
There will always be racism and idiots who are victims of it, be it the racist, or the individual discriminated against because of it.
And quite frankly, Snoew and Ron are the perfect example of two bigots jerking each other off using contrary thought as lube.
These two assclowns are cryin there eyes out over forms of racism and bigotry while at the same time associating the majority of one ideology with racism and the other as being totally objective and pure.
If it were not so sad it would be funny
December 4th, 2012 at 10:04 am
“…Minorities, specifically blacks, have been voting democrat for the last 50 years, and they’re still crying about the same things they cried over 50 years ago.
Hows that workin for ya baby ?…
Obama’s interning his second term. THAT’S how it’s working out.
December 4th, 2012 at 10:46 am
“Obama’s interning his second term. THAT’S how it’s working out.”
Thats my point, idjut. “interning” ?
Like Monica ?
A black democrat in office, put there with a 97-95% black vote.
As I said genius.
These pawns of yours have been voting for the same asshats for 50+ years and are still b!tching about the same things they were b!tching about 50+ years ago.
Obviously its not working.
Or have y’all made such great strides in your cause that the success you boast is genuine ?
Without your pawns and trumped up causes you’d be nothing, nothing.
Obama was elected because those you’ve trapped your pawns in your entitlements and they see more coming, and dont want to lose what they got.
You’ve successfully convinced everyone on the government teet that if you bend over the rich once again everything will be alright.
And spare your garbage on the south.
The cities I mentioned above are the examples of your gleaming success
December 4th, 2012 at 11:13 am
“Obama’s interning his second term. THAT’S how it’s working out.”
Dont get too far ahead of yourself buddy, the republican candidate sucked and Barry only sucked as much as he always did.
The left has successively infused race into politics at a level not seen since the 60s with the most disingenuous claims of racism being at a height since Obamas campaign began.
And the republicans thought one of the countrys largest minority voting blocks was going to vote for an extraordinarily rich white capitalist Mormon from Utah ?
This has very little to do with your delusion that Obama is somehow competent, never mind effective.
December 4th, 2012 at 11:22 am
“A black democrat in office, put there with a 97-95% black vote.”
“Blacks” are only 12% of the population, and 6% of the voting electorate.
“Normal” Whites voted 42% for Obama, Hispanic/Latinos and Asians 70%+.
December 4th, 2012 at 1:10 pm
Ron;
““Blacks” are only 12% of the population, and 6% of the voting electorate.
“Normal” Whites voted 42% for Obama, Hispanic/Latinos and Asians 70%+.”
Wow, you really are dense, arent you ?
Ron, if Romney received the black vote it would of carried him over the top.
WTF are “normal whites” ?
Once again, I’m only pointing out ehy blacks did not vote for Romney.
Your pointed data is irrelevant in the face of a welfare state, made up of entitlement minded democrats be they green,blue,or spotted who voted for “stuff” over leadership.
to be more precise, since these things never sink in with you very well.
When you have a lousy candidate like Romney, who failed to articulate his platform, the people are left with the clearer choice which was someone who has a record of giving handouts as opposed to the competition whos offerings were unclear.
If I’m redundant, I apologize, its intentional because you need constant re-introductions to whats going on.
Once idiots like you and Snow pull your heads out of your asses and realize that the elimination of all ideologies within our government,besides that which you adhere to is the single worst idea ever, as any totalitarian state on earth proves.
When you have no choice of either, or potential hybrid that could work you’re no better off than you would be any theology such as most middle eastern states or communist state or dictatorship.
To silence all dissent, be it rabid conservatives or rabid communist flys bullsht in the face of your partys cries for equality.
I myself engage in the left/right argument myself. But not by wishing all those that oppose me off into oblivion, or saying they’ll one day be irrelevant.
My argument is based on what constructive roles each partys attributes may pay into the system.
Those of you who bolster the purely socialist liberal ideology are wonderful on the social issues, making sure the smallest of individuals are not forgotten.
But, they have no business behind the register or allotting revenues when they see successful Americans as an enemy who needs to be taken down a notch.
I’ve been on both sides of the aisle in my life and not til I realized that socialism was the disease that had crept into both was I that much wiser.
Today, you can vote republican with a little more hope that you wont end up with Karl Marx than if you voted dem.
Its just that simple, and sadly the only two choices we get.
Our society is turning into junkies who wont get it til theres no dope or money. And sadly, in the process, take all their loved ones and friends down with them in the process.
If the last 50+ years have no displayed this simple analogy to you, you’re an idiot
December 4th, 2012 at 1:34 pm
“You really are one detestable fcking piece of sht that I’d b!tchslap as quick as any white supremacist or black panther.”
Code Red?
December 4th, 2012 at 2:22 pm
Buzz, the man is a bigot and a race baiting scum.
The same kind of mentality that divide this country as well as racism and cultural bigotry did in the early century.
you’re no better with your childish focus on your cherry picked bullsht.
Are you telling me you wouldnt smack down an organization that seeks genocide of any race ?
You guys are aaaaaaaaaaaaassssssssss holes.
Amber, a shining example, “shut up gramps, you old farts are clueless and out of touch, go volunteer for something”
Would she say that to Ted Kennedy who got her unqualified ass into some ivy league University ?
Or Clinton ?
WTF does ones age, race or sex have to do with corrosive socialist policies ?
Tell me !
This is what you ass holes do every time.
Instead of argue the facts you argue your opponents vocabulary, sex, age, race, education, party label, as being some pre-requisite qualifying them for the conversation/debate.
In rons most recent case, after acting as if I stood no chance in a climate change debate he chickens out by saying he wont waste his time with me for some drummed up bs …
“Mick, I’m not even going to waste time talking to the likes of you on this issue. The very idea of invoking Gore, a politician, into a scientific discussion makes this a meaningless exercise.”
“You’ve obviously never taken part in scientific study, and have no idea of methodology.”
(Then neither has Gore, it was Gores acquired science in question)
You’re a bunch of pu$$y livered morons.
Y’all deserve each other
December 4th, 2012 at 3:33 pm
buzzbee – This Mick guy is the last of a dying breed. Right wing “intellectual inbred” that is.
I don’t think he’s “evil”. He’s just DUMB, vulgar, and un-educated. Like most conseratives below the Mason-Dixon line.
December 4th, 2012 at 3:54 pm
“Tick…tick…tick…
December 4th, 2012 at 3:58 pm
“Tick…tick…tick…”
Yep. Just a matter of time….