In 2010, voters decided to throw out the Democrats in the House and greatly reduce their majority in the Senate. In 2012, voters re-elected President Obama by a wide margin, and added Democrats in the House and Senate. Did the voters change their minds so drastically? Or is there some other reason for these contradictory events? Comparing the exit polls from 2012 to those from 2010 provides the answer.
What will be presented here is a table that looks at the the ages of voters in both the 2012 and 2010 elections. The comparison will be from the Wall Street Journal Exit Polls. The table will show the percentage of respondents who are from each age cohort and how they voted. Comparing these two elections is important since 2010 was a disaster for Democrats, much as the election this month was a catastrophe for the GOP.
| Comparing 2012 and 2010 Exit Polls: Age and Vote Choice | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 2012 Voter Percentage | 2012 Mitt Romney (R) | 2012 Barack Obama (D) | 2010 Voter Percentage | 2010 Republican (R) | 2010 Democratic (D) |
| 18-24 | 11% | 36% | 60% | 5% | 38% | 58% |
| 25-29 | 8% | 38% | 60% | 6% | 42% | 56% |
| 30-39 | 17% | 42% | 55% | 13% | 48% | 49% |
| 40-49 | 20% | 50% | 48% | 19% | 53% | 45% |
| 50-64 | 28% | 51% | 47% | 34% | 51% | 47% |
| 65+ | 17% | 55% | 44% | 24% | 57% | 41% |
So, it turns out that voters didn’t so much change their minds; instead, different people voted in the two elections. In 2010, less that 25% of votes were cast by people younger than 40. Two years later, these same groups made up 36% of voters. These younger voters were the biggest sources of Democratic support. People 50 and older supported Republicans in both elections. The problem for the GOP is that this group made up a much smaller share of the electorate in 2012.
There are a number of reasons that people aged 50 and older voted in the midterm election. People in this age group are more likely to think that they have more at stake in elections. They’ve paid taxes for longer, and generally have higher incomes than younger voters. It also seems that, while older voters were educated to believe that it is part of their civic duty to vote in elections, for younger people, they only have to vote every four years to satisfy this.
So, this table seems to indicate that the Republicans are in better shape in the midterm elections of 2014 than people assume. Their voters will always turn out; the Democratic ones will only vote if rock stars remind them to go to the polls.
Finally, if the GOP intends to continue their silly voter ID law obsession, which they apparently will, there is an easy solution. Remove people from the voter rolls if they don’t vote once every two years.









November 17th, 2012 at 11:34 am
It appears that older, wiser people voted for the competent leader. The old Indian tribes had this right by putting the mature guy in charge.
November 18th, 2012 at 6:29 am
So I guess this means we’ll have some ‘revenge voting’ in 2014?
November 19th, 2012 at 12:16 pm
Good post. The only thing I want to disagree with is the “wide margin” portion of your post. When you refer to the electoral count, you’re absolutely correct. That was decisive.
At the same time (and something which supports the point you’re making here), President Obama won with about 7.5 million FEWER votes than he had in 2008. His electoral count was larger, but his popular vote count was down significantly. The president got less support in just about every demographic except Asians and Latinos I believe.
And I agree that we do have a chance to make some gains in 2014. People say “no way” right now, but they said that after Democrats routed Republicans in 2008. In 2010, the route was almost completely reversed. Obamacare kicks in fully in January of 2014 and I think Republicans have an opportunity to run on reforming this big-government debacle. My two cents on this topic.
Regards,
David
November 19th, 2012 at 12:47 pm
David,
I believe that the GOP will have the chance to pick up at least 5-6 Senate seats in 14. These will be the seats that the Dems won in 08 when turnout, as you mentioned, was the greatest ever.