Since yesterday morning, when Paul Ryan was selected as the Republican Vice-Presidential nominee, President Obama’s campaign team has been spreading charges through its liberal media allies that, if Ryan wins, he will destroy Medicare. They assume that the elderly much like the rest of the demographic groups who support Obama, are ignorant of the facts and will believe that Ryan is a pure ideologue who finds compromise anathema to achieving policies. In reality, though, Paul Ryan worked together with Oregon Senator Ron Wyden, a liberal Democrat, to try to get our nation out of the Medicare quagmire which threatens to drown the federal deficit.
For years, Wyden has been concerned about the devastating effects that the exponential increases in health care costs are having on wages and upon the federal budget. In 2010, in the midst of the health care debacle in Congress, Wyden co-sponsored the Healthy Americans Act with conservative Utah Republican Bob Bennett which would have ended the employer based health insurance system which is the root cause of the problem. Although this bill enjoyed bipartisan support in the Senate, and would have easily passed in that body, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her band of henchmen killed the bill on arrival, hoping to get a single-payer system encoded into law. The end result is the hodgepodge we are left with now, an employer-based system that will keep take home wages low.
But Wyden did not give up after the Republican victory in 2010. He then went to Paul Ryan, the new head of the House Budget Committee. Ryan had previously come up with his own plan to fix the Medicare problem. The two of them came up with a system to repair Medicare, with a combination of each of their plans. Here are some of the changes Ryan made in order to compromise with Wyden, and make the bill more attractive to Democrats:
• Instead of merely providing vouchers, the support payments for seniors who opt to buy health care outside of Medicare would be increased consistent with health care inflation;
• Any private insurance carrier in the system must provide benefits at least as good as Medicare;
• Low income seniors would be eligible for subsidies to make health insurance more affordable;
• There would be a federal oversight of the policies offered by insurance carriers; and
• There would be a catastrophic benefit option.
This plan was immediately attacked by liberal interest groups as a threat to Medicare and was killed in the Senate. What the bill does show, however, that Ryan is interested in getting workable policies enacted. He is willing to work with Democrats on the Hill to get things done for the benefit of all Americans.









August 12th, 2012 at 6:06 am
If anyone is attacking Medicare, its Obama, stealing $500 Billion from it to fund his healthcare scam.
Having Ryan as the veep candidate might just end MediScare tactics once and for all. Before, few other than political junkies knew about him or listened to what he said. Now he’ll have 85 days plus a major debate to really explain his position with more eyeballs and ears in attendance. I would not write off Florida and the Senior vote just yet.
August 12th, 2012 at 7:25 am
Andy, that “stealing $500 billion” from Medicare has been debunked so many time on so many levels that it’s become the classic lie of the right. FactChecker gives it two Pinocchio’s while PolitiFact ranges from “False” to “Pants on Fire” from different perspectives. And this is not only consistent with just about every credible news source but it’s just simple math and reality. Yet here you are again, under the assumed title of a political pundit, regurgitating that very lie as if it had an iota of legitimacy. Who are you trying to sell this to? Do you believe your own lie?
Of course, I realize that dishonesty is all you have and accordingly, you’re not about to let anything like substance, reality, or common knowledge stand in your way. I understand that it’s useless to try to intelligently converse with someone of such denial.
I did however, want to point it out.
August 12th, 2012 at 10:04 am
Why shouldn’t Andy lie, if his candidate for President says the same lies every time he opens his mouth?
August 12th, 2012 at 11:49 am
No it hasn’t been debunked!
Anyone that receives Social Security will tell you how Obama stopped the COLA increases at least two years in a row
GO BACK TO YOBAMA!
August 12th, 2012 at 11:52 am
Oh forgot to mention of course that the Dumbocrats have trotted THE LIES That Republicans are out to destroy Social Security and kill off our seniors virtuall every election since FDR signed Social Security into law!
This is just a variation on that theme!
It’s old! It’s not origina and the Dumbcrats need new material!
August 12th, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Apparenty Stephanie Cutter doesn’t agree with you RJW.
Even though you called him a liar I’m sure Andy would accept your apology.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/12/Obama-campaign-calls-cutting-Medicare-achievement
August 12th, 2012 at 1:05 pm
Well hell (is it ok to say “hell” or do I need to rephrase that as “h” “e” double toothpicks? Yeah, I stole that from a MASH episode), I guess you got me. I mean, if they give an interpretation on Breitbart, it’s gotta be true, right?
For starters, based on the writing above, unless of course you want to just deny it and then, well, I guess you got me again, Andy said it was “stealing $500 Billion”. The claim that ACA cuts this from Medicare is true. What’s missing is that it increases healthcare for the elderly while cutting waste and abuse which if I’m not mistaken, is exactly the things the GOP supports. The CBO concluded this saves $700 billion over 8 years while extending the life of Medicare without cutting coverage.
Now I really wouldn’t bother to once again reiterate these facts but it pretty much shoots down your claim (which on here is no longer even a challenge as it’s akin to shooting fish in a barrel). Cutter wasn’t in disagreement with me but rather referring to it as an achievement. And in reality, these savings are something that Dems are and should be embracing, particularly at a time when the opposition, from their own admission, is to end it.
While I don’t expect it, you and Andy may apologize at any time.
August 12th, 2012 at 1:16 pm
Does Obama really think VPs have that much power? Makes me wonder who is running the country, that old geezer or the young punk?
August 12th, 2012 at 2:41 pm
“The claim that ACA cuts this from Medicare is true. What’s missing is that it increases healthcare for the elderly while cutting waste and abuse which if I’m not mistaken, is exactly the things the GOP supports. The CBO concluded this saves $700 billion over 8 years while extending the life of Medicare without cutting coverage.”
The elderly dont want it.
They want their medicare as is.
Saves 800 billion over 8 years ?
With governments record, on all entitlements,all always going 100s of times over budget every decade I have a bridge to sell you.
See here.
“1
See Congressional Budget Office, Updated Budget Projections: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022
(March 2012).
2
For more information on the insurance coverage provisions of the ACA, see Congressional
Budget Office, cost estimate for H.R. 4872, the Reconciliation Act of 2010 (March 20, 2010).
3
The budgetary effects of the ACA discussed in this report are its effects on federal revenues and
mandatory spending; they do not include federal administrative costs, which will be subject to
future appropriation action. CBO has previously estimated that the Internal Revenue Service will
need to spend between $5 billion and $10 billion over 10 years to implement the law, and that the
Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies will have to spend at least
$5 billion to $10 billion over that period. In addition, the ACA included explicit authorizations for
spending by a variety of grant and other programs; that funding is also subject to future
appropriation action.2 UPDATED ESTIMATES FOR THE COVERAGE PROVISIONS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT”
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/03-13-Coverage%20Estimates.pdf
Its less expensive to just refrain from use, pay the penalty, then jump on board when you’re sick.
Besides, the numbers are really a moot subject after Roberts decision on the mandate.
Much a do
August 12th, 2012 at 9:15 pm
Bo and Bill marched up the Hill
To save their MEDI-MONSTER
But Bo got stoned and Bill got laid,
Oh, what a failure they have they made.
August 14th, 2012 at 2:26 am
I apologize for one mistake…, Obama is actually stealing over $700 Billion from MediCare, not $500 Billion.
August 14th, 2012 at 7:26 am
Shame on you Andy! Get your facts straight about our commander in thief.