Thank goodness we have just 90 more days of Obama-loney left. This is the term coined by Mitt Romney for the lies spoken by Barack Obama. As Romney puts it, ′Obamaloney′ is ″a dish which is simply in contradiction of the truth…″, which is probably the funniest thing Romney has said yet. Mitt was motivated after the latest Obamaloney statement, where Obama tries to compare an alleged tax plan of Mitt′s as ′Romney-Hood′, stealing from the middle class to give to the wealthy. The problem, of course, is that it is a pure fabrication. Obama refers to a study by a left-wing lobby group, the Tax Policy Center, that was co-written by a former member of Obama′s economic team, and is purely hypothetical as Romney has not given us any definitive tax plan other than making the Bush Tax Cuts permanent. So if that is all they have to go on, then Obama is also guilty of stealing from the middle class as he has gone along with extending the cuts the past three years.
This is why I am very happy that we only have 90 more days of Obamaloney to deal with. After Romney defeats Obama in the election, Obama will become irrelevant and will lose his daily access to the Media. No more daily speeches full of lies. No more of Obama in his monotone, Yogi Bear cadence boring us to death. ″If I can′t tax…, the top one percent…, I will steal…, all their picky-nick baskets.″
Even my favorite Liberal, Bob Beckel, has said many times that Obama is on television way too much. But then, what else will Obama do? He certainly is not doing any presidential work. Since April, 2011, Obama has held more than 200 campaign fundraisers. More than Bill Clinton and George W. Bush combined! Even with that Obama is still not raising the money he had hope to. Romney blew him away again for the third straight month raising more than $100 million while Obama AND the DNC only took in $75 million.
So three cheers that we only have 90 more days of Obamaloney. When Mitt Romney defeats Barack Obama this November, America will be liberated from the tyranny that is Obama, and from him simply boring us all to death with his endless stream of lies.
August 9th, 2012 at 8:34 am
(I cant resist this one )
“It reminds me of when Ross Perot would end his debate rebuttals with “and that’s why we’re going to carry all 50 states”.”
Who the hell ever spent 2 seconds listening to that idiot ?
=============================================
“Beyond that, just the simple exit of Obama will create the ‘Romney Rally’ where businesses will start investing and expanding again. ”
And the Seas will rise again !!!!!
August 9th, 2012 at 8:50 am
There was an ad in the Wall Street Journal today that stated that businesses would invest if Washington would simply do something, anything, that looked like a direction.
They said it was non-partisan and they were angry at both sides, whether it was the debt ceiling, taxation decisions, etc.
Heck, make all of Congress one six year term so that people can do the work without having to spend their time fund-raising, pandering and campaigning.
Politics should not be a career, but something resembling public service.
Eliminate all financial lobbying while we’re at it and no more PAC’s, Super PAC’s, etc.
Lobbying should be nothing more than an audience. Let me make my argument, show you a few graphs and then move on.
I don’t care who you are, if you are funding my campaign, I am essentially working for you and my decisions will probably not be objective.
Government is now for sale and I am surprised by the lack of outcry about this.
August 9th, 2012 at 8:55 am
while we’re at it we can also make the Presidency one six year term as well, for the very same reasons.
Campaigning should also have a salary cap, much like football (although it should be a hard cap).
Each candidate gets the exact same amount of money (and not from one person or group) and six months to make their case.
Their assignment their expenditures would be a good indicator of their budgetary management skills.
Baseball doesn’t have a salary cap and in most years the teams with money are at the top. I want the guy who can get a small market team to the playoffs year after year.
August 9th, 2012 at 10:31 am
“Campaigning should also have a salary cap, much like football (although it should be a hard cap).”
The only problem with that is that its unfair when the incumbent has spent four years of his term campaigning on my dime.
August 9th, 2012 at 11:05 am
“The only problem with that is that its unfair when the incumbent has spent four years of his term campaigning on my dime.”
True enough, although everyone does it and only in the first term for obvious reasons.
An incumbent also has to tout or defend his record where a challenger can employ a much more aggressive campaign (yeah, I know I am teeing it up for you guys, so bring on the rhetoric).
To continue the sports analogies, everyone loves the back-up quarterback because he is perceived as an untapped resource, rather than a known entity.
Of course, I also propose one six-year term so all of this would be irrelevant.
August 9th, 2012 at 12:55 pm
If you propose 6 year terms then I propose we make it easier to fire their asses mid term.
August 9th, 2012 at 12:57 pm
6 years of this ?
I absolutely object.
I’d rather switch our currency to Euros, or shave my balls with a chain saw
August 9th, 2012 at 4:17 pm
“To continue the sports analogies, everyone loves the back-up quarterback because he is perceived as an untapped resource, rather than a known entity.”
Then how did we get the water boy for president?
August 10th, 2012 at 6:13 am
“6 years of this ?”
You prefer the 8 you will be getting?
August 10th, 2012 at 6:37 am
Well, Buzz, if you recall, way back in 2008, John McCain was perfectly happy to comply with his own law on campaign finance which did limit how much a candidate could spend after the conventions. BUT, as you might recall, somebody else, namely Barack Hussein Obama, went back on his promise and shunned playing on an even field, cash-wise.
August 10th, 2012 at 6:39 am
Th only way I’d go along with an amendment to the Constitution to change the presidency to a six-year term is to add in a parliamentary rule allowing for a vote of ‘No Confidence’ which would require an immediate election in 90 days.