A few days ago, I wrote a piece here that explained what would be the likely result of the Supreme Court decision making the ObamaCare Medicaid expansion optional rather than mandatory. Gulf States would reject the optional funds unless they were provided with a carrot, so that states from other regions of the country would subsidize them. Politico has decided to look at this same situation today, and comes up with the same conclusion.
Politico says that the main hole card that these governors have to play is that Obama wants them to stay in the optional system, so they will be able to wheedle extra benefits from the federal government. For example, Bobby Jindal will pressure Obama so that the Medicaid funds will be sent to Louisiana as a block grant. Generally, a block grant can be spent in any way that a state would like; a categorical grant must be spent on a specific type of service. When speaking with reporters Friday, Jindal said, “I believe [the feds] can go to the states and negotiate” to convert their Medicaid dollars into unrestricted lump payments. “
Meanwhile, in Mississippi, Governor Phil Bryant said, “I would resist any expansion of Medicaid that could result in significant tax increases or dramatic cuts to education, public safety and job creation.” In Texas, a spokesman for Governor Rick Perry issued the following statement: “Gov. Perry will stand up and do what is right for Texas, based on the priorities of fiscal responsibility and the best interests of Texas taxpayers.”
Invariably, when the federal government expands its purview, this is what happens. Consider this example: With Brown v. Board of Education, it became the federal government’s responsibility that public schools in this region became racially integrated. Well 60 years later, what actually happened?
In Louisiana, for example, a number of private schools popped up in the 1960s and 1970s, as the feds tried to implement the decision. In Baton Rouge, for example, although about 2/3 of the population is white, about ¾ of public school students are not white. Many of these private schools that were set up teach a few handfuls of kids in a couple of rooms. Then, in the last decade, when No Child Left Behind was put into place, kids who failed the achievement tests for their respective grades were moved into private schools that don’t have to give the tests. Since many of these schools aren’t handicapped accessible, and since public schools must be (by federal law), many families send their handicapped kids to public schools, while their other children go to private schools. This increases the cost per pupil for the public schools, with the federal government picking up this extra funding.
What should we learn from this? Well first, maybe we should concede that Madison was smarter than all of these modern politicians put together. He understood that people in different regions would have different priorities, instead of believing in a one size fits all perspective. If people in the West, or Midwest, or the Northeast believe that something like universal health care is important, do it. Down here, it isn’t important to the voters who elect our politicians. So, if the rest of you want to pay for our services, we’ll take your money. But don’t be surprised if reality falls well short of your aspirations.










July 1st, 2012 at 4:36 am
I have to wonder if years from now, after ‘The Chaos’, if historians will view this past week’s Supreme Court decision as in the same light as Dred Scott? ObamaCare is splitting the nation apart and the worse is yet to come.
July 1st, 2012 at 7:05 am
“This increases the cost per pupil for the public schools, with the federal government picking up this extra funding.”
Making us pay twice the cost to produce idiots.
I get sick of saying it. But when the hell is anyone going to stop spending money on bullsht ?
Solve that, we solve it all.
I think Roberts knew exactly what he was doing. He put the decision on us knowing it would motive even the largest conservative couch tater to go vote
I believe he has faith in us that come November the 61 percent that dont want this mandated tax or government colonoscopies will vote the bum out.
If we all do our job, November will be most excellent
July 1st, 2012 at 8:18 pm
We’d all be better off going back to the original constitution and eliminating all the amendments. Oh sure, give black guys the vote as long as they own land. When we let the idiots vote, the current state of affairs is what should be expected.
July 2nd, 2012 at 3:36 am
Newsflash! Patrick ” McCain advocates eliminating the 2nd Amendment!
Sigh. Yeah, let’s get rid of the Bill of Rights. Require the voters to be male and land-owners.
And as for that pesky 13th amendment, well…
Oh jesus, why am i even responding to another brain embolism from that racist, retarded 60something virgin in the first place? Seriously.
July 2nd, 2012 at 3:09 pm
Me, you are banned until August 1st for violating the comment policy.
July 3rd, 2012 at 8:58 am
What on Earth is the comment policy?
It sure seems like anything goes.
July 3rd, 2012 at 9:47 am
I’m probably more guilty than anyone.
But ME never has a constructive counter argument that is always followed by unprovoked personal attack. I extended a hand to ME only to be further discounted.
MEs a miserable SOB and quite frankly a flaming idiot for personally without just cause attacking the owner/manager of this blog.
Kinda like a benevolent dictatorship with more patience than most.
I’m no one to speak, but I will.
The crowd here has shrunk significantly lately due to any number of things from liberals with no reasonable or honest comments to masochists like me who argue facts and issues while treating you like sht til you split.
I like this place. I want it to thrive(we used to win actual money)
This country’s in as much trouble as its ever been in. FACT !
And unless the “oneupmanship” and arguments concluding no solutions come to a stop we might as well exchange recipes.
The staff here are all well educated people (I miss Beth)and their posts are worthy when comments pertaining are made of the issues or opinions of ones morals/ethics.
Like I said, I’m probably the biggest offender. But we all gotta stop dumbing down our game and argue the issues with something to back our positions and assertions with links etc instead of personal attacks, slander and lies due to ideological bigotry.
You choose to argue Marxism or Republics, fine
By eliminating all grey areas in between we end up sayin the same sht everyday .
In fair fights gentlemen and women shake hands in the end
July 3rd, 2012 at 4:37 pm
The comment policy is linked on the left hand sidebar and referenced in the terms of use.