Today, as we know, the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare, with one major caveat. The individual mandate was upheld on the basis that it is a tax; however, states cannot be forced to increase its Medicaid funding to pay for the throngs of individuals who will be seeking care under the increased income limits.
Thus, anyone who meets certain income eligibility levels will be required to purchase their own health insurance. Those whose income is below that level will be eligible for Medicaid if a state takes part in the program. The federal government will pick up some share of the increased Medicaid costs, but each state will be expected to cover the rest. The part of the law that was struck down mandated states that if they chose not to pick it up, they would lose all of the Medicaid funding. So now, states may retain its previous level of Medicaid funding and will not be responsible for any of these new people..
Now we get into the unintended consequences of this decision. I’d predict that states in this region (the Deep South) of the nation will never increase their own Medicaid funding if not mandated to do so. Currently, some parts of Medicaid are mandatory for states that take part in the program (all of them) and some parts are optional. So, for example, adult dental care is not part of the Medicaid package in most of the states down here. But in many other states, this is part of the program.
Also, these states have a much higher percentage of the population down here living in near poverty than in most other states. These are the people generally who will be left out of the ‘universal’ health care coverage. So, the states that are the poorest and have the highest percentage of people who need health care are the states that will not be part of the program. No matter what the rest of the country does, 25% of the population will not be part of this. Once the Medicaid mandate was struck down, any employer based program, which Obamacare is, can never be workable nationally.









June 29th, 2012 at 5:26 am
I would suggest to the poor in the Deep South that they migrate to New York, Illinois and California. Then they can get all the free health care they want.
June 29th, 2012 at 5:38 am
Ha ha ha. Ha ha ha. Good to see wingnuts twist in the wind. Ha ha ha.
The next ha ha ha will be this Nov. when Obama is reelected.
Ha ha ha.
June 29th, 2012 at 10:04 am
#2 is good example of why the Founders only let landowners vote.
June 29th, 2012 at 11:59 am
Landowners?
Considering what I read on this website, many should hope there isn’t a spelling test (or even the facility to utilize spellcheck).
June 29th, 2012 at 1:47 pm
“Landowners?
Considering what I read on this website, many should hope there isn’t a spelling test (or even the facility to utilize spellcheck).”
Typical irelevant liberal pedantic snobbery.
What in the whole fckin world does that have to do with anything ? And who knows for sure whether you actually have to use spellcheck yourself more than anyone ?
We’re here to speak as people face to face, at least I am. Face to face conversations dont include people asking how they spelled a word they used.
Focus on the substance over style,its simple.
@GOK
You obviously cant envision anything past the tip of your dick.
Your king told the entire country for years hundreds of times this healthcare would not raise your taxes one cent.
Roberts is a genius. It most definitely is a tax
By his decision he put this decision in the laps of a majority that he knew would be shooting blood out from their eyes. And a significant part of that majority includes the fair amount of moonbats with a clue.
I will however pray for you should worst become worse and psychological treatment be rationed.
June 29th, 2012 at 3:56 pm
“Typical irelevant liberal pedantic snobbery.”
Now there’s a mouthful.
Was simply waiting for that inevitable response.
June 29th, 2012 at 4:56 pm
“Was simply waiting for that inevitable response.”
Then you really need to get a life.
I have always been an excellent reader since 1st grade, with great comprehension.
But I fckin hate to read. I know exactly what most words mean, but fail to pursue their proper spelling in hopes that my message and not my grammar or spelling will give idiots opportunity to change the subject.
I’m not an idiot, and I do use spell check.
Even at 7 I knew the p was silent in Corps
Whats your kings excuse ?
June 29th, 2012 at 5:45 pm
Mick-
Buzzhead has a life. As he has previously stated–he “grossly overcharges for products”…so he is busy counting his money and kissing BillyRay’s bahonkis.
OMG I might have not spelled that last word right!!!!
Buzzer probably thinks that MLK was a Democrap and LBJ was the savior of civil rights.
ROFL
June 29th, 2012 at 8:02 pm
“Bahonkis”?
Do I wanna know ?
June 30th, 2012 at 1:09 am
The individual mandate was upheld on the basis that it is a tax;
Actually the individual mandate was upheld on the basis that the penalty for not complying with the mandate is a tax.
That’s a very different thing than saying the mandate itself is a tax. You get something very direct and specific for complying with the mandate: health insurance. It is a purchase you are making. It is not a tax going back to the general treasury. It is a purchase going to an insurance company.
However, if you decide to deliberately violate the mandate, you are subjecting yourself to a tax. THAT was the basis of the ruling.
June 30th, 2012 at 3:33 am
Mandate leads to penalty..penalty leads to tax.
50% pay taxes.
So you get a GOVERNMENT insurance card
And Moonbats think this will lead to better healthcare? OH thats right!! MORE people will be covered!!
Small business will put half of their employees on part time status hence they don’t have to pay for health benefits. Premiums at large companys will increase or turn over to the Government.
Anyway you cook it—it’s a tax on the middle/upper class and QUALITY of healthcare decreases.
I suggest you learn spanish asap because your nurse in the future (provided by SEIU) will have a hard time understanding you as you yell..I’m having chest pains (MI) or my head really hurts (subdural hematoma).
The very rich will continue their cashmere health coverage…CASH is KING. The very poor will continue to use the ER’s and the middle/upper class will pay for them.
I sincerely suggest that if you or a member of your family enters a hospital—Stay with them 24/7 or hire a medically trained person.SEIU nurses cannot be fired because they F*** up.
Kinda sorta like the educational system.
Welcome to BillyRay’s vision. Hope you make it.
June 30th, 2012 at 6:07 am
Yes, its a sad day when were told Government cheese ejaculated into our body’s is better than any other, and we can have all we want, but will end up waiting in line for a week just to visit “The Teenage Enema Nurse” using no petro-lube to save the planet.
June 30th, 2012 at 6:55 am
No, what I will do next is read the entire bill and discover where potential profit centers may reside.
There will be tests and equipment that allow for ridiculous profits and I will try to figure out how I can get my hand in there.
But again, people like me should not exist and I could fix half of the medical systems with three weeks and a pencil and paper.
Of course, I would also eliminate insurance companies as they serve no purpose and should not have been part of this plan.
They are like companies that sell anti-virus solutions for your computer. Did you ever think that they may also create them?
Insurance companies devise obstacles to care and then offer a solution.
June 30th, 2012 at 7:05 am
Buzzhead has a life. As he has previously stated–he “grossly overcharges for products”…
Isn’t that what a business is supposed to do?
Isn’t that capitalism?
June 30th, 2012 at 9:01 am
“They are like companies that sell anti-virus solutions for your computer. Did you ever think that they may also create them?”
Yeah, its like cars built only to last at the end of a five year warranty.
And the fckin unions know it and are instrumental in this ploy to keep people building sht cars.
If these ass holes are so worrie dabout the earth then they should build quality, not quantity.
And dont even get me started on that recycling bullsht.
It promotes more pollutants as opposed to fresh stock from iron ore and the same goes for polyethylene/rubber and plastics.
Clean aluminum is the only recycled material that makes sense.
Yeah, that was off topic but then again healtcare ala Obama might have us recycled and Soylent Green will be a reality.
A Mercedes will last you forever, but you pay up front thru the nose
June 30th, 2012 at 10:11 am
Here we go again with the liberals’ eternal obsession with form over substance (#4) who in their endless quest to correct others like a nagging wife are yet too ignorant to realize that “landowner” is the correct form. What an ignoramus, and so typical for a socialist.
June 30th, 2012 at 12:32 pm
“overcharges for products”…
Isn’t that what a business is supposed to do?
Isn’t that capitalism?”
———————————————-
Are you seriously that naive ?
Seriously !
Go get yourself some Bastiat explaining markets,read it, and then I’ll talk to you like an adult.
Good grief.
June 30th, 2012 at 12:42 pm
ME;
“Actually the individual mandate was upheld on the basis that the penalty for not complying with the mandate is a tax.”
So what ?
Sht head promised millions hundreds of times this bill would not raise taxes.
He may think hes a genius but its Roberts genius that put the decision in the laps of the people.
The 61 % of Americans that want repeal will prevail
June 30th, 2012 at 3:22 pm
This bag of taxes called “Obamacare” has been tried in many other places, and it always blows the budget to oblivion. I know, I escaped from one of those places, after suffering like 10 years of debate hearing the same lies Obama is using. In the end, the middle class suffers and dissappears.
July 1st, 2012 at 11:41 am
“Here we go again with the liberals’ eternal obsession with form over substance (#4) who in their endless quest to correct others like a nagging wife are yet too ignorant to realize that “landowner” is the correct form. What an ignoramus, and so typical for a socialist.”
I never said landowner was incorrect. I am always amazed that it doesn’t matter what I write, many of you simply see my name, decide that it must be “wrong” and then write your response.
July 1st, 2012 at 11:44 am
Buy it for a dollar and sell it for two (or three of four if the market will bear).
Isn’t that how all business’ run?
Explain to me where I am wrong (or naive).
July 1st, 2012 at 1:01 pm
“Explain to me where I am wrong (or naive).”
Alright.
In a free market it doesnt take long for people to find out that you’re gouging them,essentially taken you hostage due to a limited supply in which you exercise extreme greed that no doubt in an unstable economy of worthless dollars, chaotic or anarchist atmosphere will result in an array of disadvantages to any future endeavors attached to your name.
If your product sustains life be it nutrition or medicine you give what you can without killing or starving yourself.
Its simple.
If you want to stay or expand in business, dont go fcking people.
And get the FDA,EPA to allow individuals their own choices.
If I was terminally ill, I’d let you test anything on me so’s the public feels safe enough to purchase such a product in mass thereby volume reducing costs.
A voluntary society of private property and individualism is always superior to autocratic dictation and an over regulated society.
The French heat wave.
Hundreds died because greenies thought it would be a good idea to raise energy prices forcing people to go green/alternative.
Hopefully now you’ll understand the differences between greed, necessity,and the progression of humanity being priceless.
Todays majority of Progressives are everything but. And they are most certainly not the Democrats mt father knew
July 1st, 2012 at 1:15 pm
“Buy it for a dollar and sell it for two (or three of four if the market will bear).”
C’mon, you’re smarter than that.
What comes around goes around.
If you put a price on someones life there’ll be a price on yours as well.
Running a profit margin (Restaurant business) between 25 to 33.3 % is a standard.
July 1st, 2012 at 2:42 pm
That is standard in your business, just as 2% is standard in the grocery business. Most companies do exactly as I stated, if you buy it for a dollar you sell it for two.
All industries have a different percentage.
I am in the medical business and we “mark it up” as much as we can.
As I don’t believe in karma, I sleep fine at night.
I have said many times before, our medical system is flawed and people in my business should not exist.
Every medical product goes through numerous companies before it reaches the end-user and everyone gets a profit.
If we had a single payer system (LIKE EVERY OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED NATION) everyone’s cost would go down considerably.
Seniors have Medicare, the poor have Medicaid, the disabled are covered, federal employees, the military and yes Congressmen (and women) all participate in some form of government health care.
It is the middle class and American corporations that are taking it in the teeth and insist on demanding that it continue.
Amazing.
July 1st, 2012 at 2:44 pm
Also, you are saying 25 to 30%. Food cost? I have no doubt that a bottle of liquor, sold by the shot is a substantially higher profit than that.
Heck, the food is the loss leader to get people in the door.
July 1st, 2012 at 7:13 pm
“Most companies do exactly as I stated, if you buy it for a dollar you sell it for two.”
Sorry, yeah, thats the norm.
But your assertion was that you“grossly overcharges for products”.
So, you’re a part of thievery in part of no TORT reform and fictitious mark ups, or a product that cant pay for itself.
Or,equivalent to a drug dealer holding junkies hostage charging them ridiculous prices because you know they’ll do anything to make the pain go away.
Thats not capitalism.
Its pure fckin evil.
July 1st, 2012 at 8:23 pm
“I never said landowner was incorrect. I am always amazed that it doesn’t matter what I write, many of you simply see my name, decide that it must be “wrong” and then write your response.”
Yes you did. Have the courage to man up for a change or is that asking too much for a socialist to take personal responsibility? Even more alarming than your incompetence is that you would actually care how people spell words on a blog.
July 1st, 2012 at 10:16 pm
“Also, you are saying 25 to 30%. Food cost? I have no doubt that a bottle of liquor, sold by the shot is a substantially higher profit than that.”
The norm on food cost hovers around 30 %.
A liquor/cabaret license can cost hundreds of thousands to millions in certain municipalities.
Licensing and ensuring strictly food operations is far less.
I’m a pro in the field who troubleshoots and consults fresh houses.
Booze creates bar food and is often consumed before and/or after meals.
You on the other hand take advantage of sick desperate people, confessing you support and receive income from industry that you say “grossly overcharges”.
Were done, I’ve backed you up when you were treated unfairly.
I wont do it again til you get your sht straight and stop bashing sht you obviously know little about
July 1st, 2012 at 10:26 pm
Patrick…
Couple years ago some moonbat bashed my grammar while spelling grammar “gramar”.
Gawd how I wish I saved it or framed it.
Why does everyone pronounce “Catsup” “ketchup” ?
Who gives a fck ?
We got bigger problems.
Aint that right Buzzy ?
July 1st, 2012 at 10:59 pm
LOL yes it’s always a marvel how liberals value form over substance but I’m afraid that it is part of their genetic makeup. And they are too smart by half when their pinball minds don’t even know that “landowner” is historically one word, not two. And they are unable to admit error because doing so would confirm their intellectual fallibility. Too funny and too typically average.
The Framers had it right all along that only landowners got the right to vote. We dumbed down the electorate to some unfortunate unintended consequences that idiots get an equal voice in the public square.
July 1st, 2012 at 11:43 pm
Sht, we were dying by the shiploads til we owned private property.
If not, we’d be drinking tea and have really bad teeth.
Oh, English cuisine is among the nastiest
July 2nd, 2012 at 7:51 am
I never said landowner was incorrect; I was merely drawing an analogy to your only landowners should vote comment.
But then, you know that.
I am amazed at the pack mentality of this site. You really do hate people with a different opinion.
I have always stated that I think most of you would be much happier if anyone with a dissenting opinion would disappear and you could all sit around patting each other on the back saying, “You’re right”.
Especially since most of these ‘discussions” evolve into a torrent of name calling and obscenity.
July 4th, 2012 at 2:38 pm
Let’s review…
“Landowners?
Considering what I read on this website, many should hope there isn’t a spelling test (or even the facility to utilize spellcheck).”
I still do not understand your analogy — what spelling, landowners, and commenters have in common, so stop pretending. And DONT try to explain! … hate to see a proud liberal twist yourself like a pretzel trying to save literary face!
By the way, since liberals care so much about copywriting please note that it’s “spell check” rather than “spellcheck.” You can say spellchecker as a noun when talking about the tool itself, but the proper verb form is “spell check” or even “spell-check” is acceptable. How such silly spelling rules add anything to the conversation is something for only liberals to fully understand.