During his press conference yesterday, Barack Obama denied allegations that his White House is leaking classified information for political gain. He said that such talk is ″offensive.″ So how did the New York Times learn about the methodology used by Obama in determining his ′kill list′ for drone strikes? Or that we were behind the computer viruses used to disrupt Iran′s nuclear program? Even the operation which led to the death of Osama Bin Laden was first reported in great detail by Obama himself, not allowing our intelligence and military services any time to assess data acquired during the raid and possibly kill or capture other Al Qaeda terrorists right away. Then there is the fact that the White House has given extraordinary access to producers of movie about the raid. A film set to be released just before the November elections.
So now Eric Holder, the worst head of the Justice Department in U.S. history, has appointed two prosecutors to probe the leaks of the Obama White House. However, this move may not satisfy critics, like Congressman Mike Rogers, who are calling for an independent prosecutor to be appointed to do the investigation. Of course, there are no guarantees that any justice would come from that. All we need do is recall the investigation into the Valerie Plame-Wilson leak. The only person who actually served any time in prison was Lewis ′Scooter′ Libby, and he was not the person who did the leak. That was Richard Armitage, the then Assistant Secretary of State, who leaked the info about Plame to Washington Times columnist, Robert Novak.
No, expect no justice in this case. Barack Obama and his White House are leaking classified information, there is no doubt about it. The all-too cozy relationship between Obama and the Media is one of the great disgraces America faces today. The Media will do anything to cover up anything Obama says or does, just as they have of Obama′s past. Eric Holder is the last person to be trusted to do anything related to the cause of justice.










June 9th, 2012 at 12:00 pm
Who do you think was more corrupt? Obama or Nixon?
June 9th, 2012 at 7:24 pm
But you do not claim that the leaked info is false….
If it is not false, and it makes Obama look good, then he must BE good, no? He’s doing a good job busting the balls of our enemies. If he is doing a good job defeating our enemies, then why worry about a little leaked info? Our enemies hate us and want to destroy us anyway. So, so what? It don’t matter.
June 10th, 2012 at 4:31 am
Without a doubt, Obama is far more corrupt than Nixon. You cannot discount Nixon’s Quaker upbringing.
June 10th, 2012 at 5:29 am
Well, Klo, the leaks have apparently led to the guy who helped finger Bin Laden getting arrested by the Pakistanis and facing 30 years in prison. Nice job, Obama! Way to Go!
June 10th, 2012 at 12:26 pm
“If he is doing a good job defeating our enemies, then why worry about a little leaked info? Our enemies hate us and want to destroy us anyway. So, so what? It don’t matter.”
What enemies Kloless? I thought everybody would love us once Billy Ray handed over the White House china!!!
June 10th, 2012 at 12:28 pm
I think moderation ought be sent to moderation!!!
June 10th, 2012 at 1:06 pm
Forgot about the movie. It could be the smoking gun and his undoing.
Oh to be the janitor in the editing room!!!
June 11th, 2012 at 3:29 am
According to Obama, the moderation is “doing just fine.”