<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Conservatism Change? (Analysis)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rightpundits.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micky</title>
		<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937&#038;cpage=2#comment-827895</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937#comment-827895</guid>
		<description>Forbes;

&quot; NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

    Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.

    “The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”

    In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted.

    The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forbes;</p>
<p>&#8221; NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.</p>
<p>    Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.</p>
<p>    “The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”</p>
<p>    In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted.</p>
<p>    The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky</title>
		<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937&#038;cpage=2#comment-827894</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937#comment-827894</guid>
		<description>@ Arriba

my temper, sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Arriba</p>
<p>my temper, sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937&#038;cpage=2#comment-827893</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937#comment-827893</guid>
		<description>There is no name calling, I just simply pointed out that you didn&#039;t write anything about the post above.  You can only dream of being a platoon leader, I know what it was like, I was in the Marine Corps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no name calling, I just simply pointed out that you didn&#8217;t write anything about the post above.  You can only dream of being a platoon leader, I know what it was like, I was in the Marine Corps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arriba</title>
		<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937&#038;cpage=2#comment-827756</link>
		<dc:creator>Arriba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937#comment-827756</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Micky. Figure out what the magic word was that forced me to knock you out, and edit it out, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Micky. Figure out what the magic word was that forced me to knock you out, and edit it out, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937&#038;cpage=2#comment-827750</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937#comment-827750</guid>
		<description>ron, you just don&#039;t have a clue apparently of how to do any kind of real scientific analysis. So you resort to name calling.  I guess your a wanna be platoon leader too.  oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ron, you just don&#8217;t have a clue apparently of how to do any kind of real scientific analysis. So you resort to name calling.  I guess your a wanna be platoon leader too.  oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micky</title>
		<link>http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937&#038;cpage=2#comment-827748</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=8937#comment-827748</guid>
		<description>&quot;wrong, the co2 in the atmosphere traps more heat energy in its carbon-oxygen divalent covalent bonds and increases their kinetic energy thus radiating even more heat back into the biosphere some of which is absorbed terrestrially, before that energy could of escapee into space. And thats only one source. You know nothing.&quot;

Energy cannot be created.
Only moved.

Maybe we should kill all the plants giving off that nasty CO2 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;wrong, the co2 in the atmosphere traps more heat energy in its carbon-oxygen divalent covalent bonds and increases their kinetic energy thus radiating even more heat back into the biosphere some of which is absorbed terrestrially, before that energy could of escapee into space. And thats only one source. You know nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Energy cannot be created.<br />
Only moved.</p>
<p>Maybe we should kill all the plants giving off that nasty CO2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
